Mar 02, 2021 City Council

GOTTA ENJOY. OK, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE REGULAR MARCH 2ND, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING

[1. Call to order]

[00:00:06]

LET'S PRAY, DEAR LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS EVENING AND WE GIVE THANKS FOR THE GOODNESS THAT YOU BRING INTO OUR LIVES EVERY DAY, THE FREEDOM WE HAVE AS AMERICANS TO WORSHIP, TO ASSEMBLE, TO BE TOGETHER, TO WORK THROUGH PROBLEMS. I PRAY THAT YOU WOULD GIVE US A GOOD PERSPECTIVE AS WE LOOK AT ISSUES TONIGHT.

I PRAY THAT YOU WOULD BE WITH EVERY VOICE THAT'S HEARD.

WE PRAY BLESSINGS UPON THE PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM AND STRENGTH TO DO YOUR WILL.

WE GIVE THANKS FOR JESUS AND IT'S IN HIS NAME.

WE PRAY. AMEN.

AMEN. THANK YOU.

JOIN US IN THE PLEDGE.

AND THE TEXAS PLEDGE:.

GREAT. THANK YOU, CHAPLAIN.

[4. Discuss all items on tonight's agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session.]

SHIVERS PARK ITEM D, RESOLUTION NUMBER 21-009 RATIFYING NEW AND EXISTING TEMPORARY REGULATIONS AND ACTIVITIES FOR SOUTHLAKE BUSINESSES DURING COVID-19.

AND THAT'S EXTENDING UNTIL JUNE THE 1ST, 2021 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXTEND THOSE AND SIMILAR REGULATIONS BEYOND JUNE THE 15TH TWENTY TWENTY ONE.

ITEM E SV TWO ZERO DASH ZERO ZERO ONE EIGHT.

THE SIGN VARIANTS FOR THE TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION, LOCATED AT 759 NORTH KIMBALL AVENUE, ITEM F RESOLUTION NUMBER TWO ZERO DASH ZERO FIVE SEVEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ZA ZERO TWO ZERO DASH ZERO ZERO SIX FOUR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR RESIDENTIAL SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM.

AND THAT'S IN CHAPEL DOWNS, ITEM G TABLING ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHT ZERO, DASH SEVEN FOUR ZERO, ALSO KNOWN AS ZA ONE EIGHT DASH ZERO ZERO SIX.

FIRST READING ZONING CHANGE IN CONCEPT PLAN FOR CREEKSIDE POINT, ITEM H TABLING ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHT ZERO DASH SEVEN EIGHT ZERO, ALSO KNOWN AS ZERO TWO ONE ZERO ZERO ZERO SEVEN. FIRST READING, ZONING CHANGE AND SITE PLAN FOR MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK.

AND THAT'LL BE PLACED ON THE APRIL 20TH, 2021 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND ITEM I RESOLUTION NUMBER TWO ONE DASH ZERO ONE ZERO, APPROVING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, TO THE LEGISLATOR IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION THAT PROHIBITS UTILITY PROVIDERS FROM SELECTIVELY TURNING OFF POWER OR NATURAL GAS TO CRITICAL PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.

I'LL NOTE ALSO ITEM FOUR F HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT 4G HAS BEEN ADMINISTRATIVELY TABLED AND AS I SAID, 4H IS TABLED TO THE FEBRUARY 25TH PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. THEN WE'LL HEAR IT ON APRIL THE 8TH.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS WE CONSIDER FOR THIS EVENING ON CONSENT? YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE CONSIDER MOVING FROM OUR REGULAR AGENDA TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. FIRST ITEM SEVEN A WHICH IS ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHTY DASH SEVEN SEVEN NINE. CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY ONE DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO FIVE.

FIRST READING ZONING CHANGE IN CONCEPT PLAN FOR THREE PROPERTY'S LOCATED ON WHITE CHAPEL BOULEVARD TO ADDRESS THE PROPERTY LINES.

ALSO, CONSIDER MOVING FROM OUR REGULAR AGENDA TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

ITEM EIGHT A RESOLUTION NUMBER TWENTY ONE, DASH ZERO ZERO SIX, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO SOME VACANCIES ON THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.

AND WE CAN DISCUSS THOSE NAMES NOW OR LATER, WHATEVER THE COUNCIL'S PREFERENCE IS.

AND THEN ALSO CONSIDER MOVING FROM OUR REGULAR AGENDA TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NINE B ORDINANCE NUMBER OR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NUMBER FORTY THREE REGARDING THE SIDEWALK AT A PROPERTY LOCATED AT ONE TWO TWO EIGHT WOODSEY COURT.

AND I WOULD SUGGEST WE MOVE THAT FROM REGULAR AGENDA TO CONSENT AGENDA AND APPROVE IT.

OK, ON ITEM EIGHT A WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION THAT IS APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND THAT'S TO FILL A VACANCY? CORRECT. I THINK WE HAVE TWO VACANCIES.

[00:05:02]

I WOULD SUGGEST WE MIGHT CONSIDER MOVING ONE OF THE OTHER ALTERNATES TO THE REGULAR PLACE FOUR AND THEN APPOINT TO THE TWO VACANT ALTERNATE POSITIONS, PERHAPS HEATHER KING, WHO'S ALTERNATE NUMBER FOUR MOVE HER TO PLACE FOUR.

AND THEN AS THE NEW ALTERNATES APPOINT BRITTON WELLS AND ALEXANDER SEXTON.

THEY RECENTLY APPLIED AND PUT ZBA AS THEIR NUMBER ONE CHOICES FOR THOSE TWO FOLKS.

OK, COUNCIL, DOES THAT WORK FOR EVERYONE? GREAT. OK, AND WE'LL PUT THAT ON CONSENT THEN.

ITEM EIGHT A AND WE WILL HAVE A MOTION ON THAT WHEN WE COME BACK.

WITH THAT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER.

[2.A. Executive Session]

AND WE'LL BE BACK AT SEVEN.

OK, THANK YOU. GO AHEAD AND CALL THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BACK IN ORDER.

IS THERE ANY ACTION NECESSARY FOLLOWING EXECUTIVE SESSION? NO, MADAM MAYOR. OK, THANK YOU.

[3. REPORTS]

I'LL TURN IT OVER TO ALISON ORTOWSKI AND SHE'S GOING TO TALK TO US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT OUR UPCOMING FOURTH ANNUAL CELEBRATE SOUTHLAKE.

BUT UNFORTUNATELY, OUR THIRD, BECAUSE WE HAD TO CANCEL BECAUSE OF COVID.

SO, YEAH.

YOU CAN GO THERE AND SEE THE DAILY LIST OF ACTIVITIES THAT WE HAVE PLANNED, STARTING WITH THE KICKOFF ON SUNDAY, MARCH 21ST, WE'LL BE PROVIDING SOME ONLINE VIDEOS WITH A SCHEDULE OF EVENTS AND KICKING OFF WITH A GET TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS PHOTO CONTEST THAT WILL BE CHALLENGING OUR NEIGHBORS TO COME TO THE NEW, I BELIEVE IN SOUTHLAKE MURAL HERE IN TOWN SQUARE. AND SUBMITTING THEIR PHOTOS FOR THAT PHOTO CONTEST WILL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK WITH CELEBRATORY VIDEOS RELATED TO CELEBRATE SOUTHLAKE.

THERE'S A DAY THAT'S GOING TO BE DEDICATED TO A TASTE OF THE SOUTHLAKE COMMUNITY, WHERE WE WILL INVITE PEOPLE TO SUBMIT RECIPES AND DO AN ONLINE RECIPE EXCHANGE.

THERE IS GOING TO BE A DAY WHERE WE HOST SOME COMMUNITY CONVERSATIONS WITH THE MAYOR'S ALLIANCE FOR UNITY AND CULTURE.

VISIT SOUTHLAKE WILL HOST A SELF GUIDED CULINARY TOUR OF SOUTHLAKE, SO FEATURING SOME RESTAURANTS ACROSS TOWN AND THEN ALSO SOME MARKETS THAT WE HAVE IN TOWN THAT ARE DEDICATED TO DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOODS WILL BE FEATURED ON VISIT SOUTHLAKE TEXAS.

AND THEN WE'LL WRAP UP THE WEEK BY HIGHLIGHTING AN ANNIVERSARY YEAR WITH SISTER CITIES AND OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH OUR SISTER CITIES ORGANIZATION AND ALSO THE BOB AND ALMEADY JONES DISPLAY THAT'S GOING TO BE ON DISPLAY AT THE BOB JONES NATURE CENTER.

THEY'RE HAVING AN OPEN HOUSE THAT WE'RE PARTNERING WITH THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ON THAT DAY. AND THEN WE'LL HAVE A WALKING TOUR OF THAT BOB AND ALMEADY JONES AND SO FOLKS THAT ARE AT HOME CAN ACTUALLY GO THROUGH THE ENTIRE DISPLAY AND EXHIBIT AND SEE EVERYTHING FOR THEMSELVES FROM HOME.

YEAH, THERE'S A VIRTUAL VIDEO THAT'S GOING TO BE PUBLISHED ALONGSIDE, AND I THINK IT'S ACTUALLY EVEN AVAILABLE ONLINE TODAY IF PEOPLE WANT TO GET A SNEAK PEEK OF IT, BUT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO DO IT FROM HOME OR COME IN PERSON.

GREAT. AND THEN WE'RE HAVING A SERIES OF FIRESIDE CHATS, WHICH I LIKE THE BEST, AND WE'RE CALLING THEM HEART TALKS.

SO YOU WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT AND THE PEOPLE THAT ARE INVOLVED IN THAT? SO WE HAVE AN ADULT GROUP, MEMBERS OF OUR MAYOR'S ALLIANCE FOR UNITY AND CULTURE.

AND THEN THERE'S ALSO GOING TO BE A YOUTH CONVERSATION.

IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE A FACILITATED CONVERSATION, VERY REMINISCENT OF A FIRESIDE CHAT JUST TO TALK ABOUT THE EXPERIENCES THEY'VE HAD BEING A RESIDENT IN SOUTHLAKE AND RELAYING HOW THEY WORK TO BUILD UNITY IN THE COMMUNITY, REALLY JUST A SNEAK PEEK INTO THEIR LIVES AS MEMBERS OF THE SOUTHLAKE COMMUNITY AND SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT THEY DEAL WITH AND ALSO SOME OF THE HIGH POINTS THAT THEY ENJOY BEING A MEMBER OF SOUTHLAKE COMMUNITY.

GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

AND I THINK COUNCIL GOT AN EMAIL TODAY FOR CELEBRATE SOUTHLAKE AND THERE'S A PIECE OF ART ON THERE THAT'S A SAVE THE DATE.

SO IF EVERYONE WILL SHARE THAT ON THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA SO WE CAN GET AS MANY PEOPLE ENGAGED

[00:10:04]

SO WE'RE REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO IT.

CELEBRATE SOUTHLAKE DOTCOM, ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED.

PERFECT. OK, NEXT ON THE AGENDA, CITY MANAGER'S REPORT.

NOTHING THIS EVENING. OK, NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS THE CONSENT.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

WE ALSO ADDED ITEM 7A, ITEM 8A, AN ITEM 9B, IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON CONSENT? YES, MAYOR, AND COUNCIL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 4A-4I, WITH RESPECT TO ITEM 4D, WE'RE APPROVING RESOLUTION NUMBER TWENTY ONE, DASH ZERO ZERO NINE, RATIFYING NEW AND EXISTING TEMPORARY REGULATIONS AND ACTIVITIES FOR SOUTHLAKE BUSINESSES DURING THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY UNTIL JUNE 1ST, 2021 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXTEND, IMPLEMENT AND ENACT THESE OR OTHER SIMILAR REGULATIONS OR ACTIVITIES BEYOND JUNE 15TH.

TWENTY TWENTY ONE. GREAT, IS THERE A SECOND?--.

I HAVE SOME OTHER ITEM; I'M SORRY. CUT YOU RIGHT OFF.

WITH RESPECT TO ITEM 4E, WE'RE APPROVING CASE NUMBER SV TWENTY DASH ZERO ZERO ONE EIGHT SIGN VARIANTS AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY SIX TWENTY TWENTY ONE FOR TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION AND ALLOWING THE SIGN TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE TEN FOOT SET BACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, BUT NOTING THAT THE SIGN WILL BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY NINETEEN AND A HALF FEET BACK FROM KIMBALL AVENUE ROADWAY CURB LINE.

ALSO NOTING THAT WITH RESPECT TO ITEM FOR F RESOLUTION NUMBER TWENTY DASH ZERO FIVE SEVEN CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY, DASH ZERO ZERO SIX FOUR, THAT ITEM IS BEING WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR RESIDENTIAL SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM AT NINE TWO THREE DOVE CREEK TRAIL ALSO NOTING WE'RE TABLING ITEM FOUR G, PER THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST . ITEM 4G IS CASE NUMBER ZA EIGHTEEN DASH ZERO ZERO SIX ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT SITE PLAN FOR CREEKSIDE POINT.

ALSO NOTING WE'RE TABLING ITEM FOR H CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY ONE DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO SEVEN.

ZONING CHANGE AND SITE PLAN FOR MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK PER THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST AT THE FEBRUARY TWENTY FIFTH TWENTY TWENTY ONE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING, THAT ITEM IS SCHEDULED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE P&Z COMMISSION AT ITS APRIL 8TH TWENTY TWENTY ONE MEETING. AND IF THE P&Z COMMISSION APPROVES THAT OR MAKES A RECOMMENDATION ON THAT ITEM, THE ITEM WOULD THEN BE PLACED ON OUR APRIL 20TH, TWENTY TWENTY ONE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.

ALSO NOTING THAT WE'RE MOVING FROM OUR REGULAR AGENDA TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SEVEN A AND APPROVING ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHTY DASH SEVEN SEVEN NINE CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY ONE DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO FIVE.

FIRST READING ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE LOTS ONE AND TWO, JOEL CHIVERS NUMBER THREE FIFTY EDITION LOCATED AT TWENTY FOUR SIXTY FIVE, TWENTY FIVE, TWENTY FIVE AND TWENTY FIVE THIRTY FIVE.

NORTH WHITE CHAPEL IN SOUTH TEXAS.

THIS IS PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY LINES.

THESE VARIANCES WERE OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY SIX, TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND REVISED CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY FOURTH, TWENTY TWENTY ONE.

ALSO NOTING WE'RE MOVING FROM OUR REGULAR AGENDA TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

RESOLUTION NUMBER TWENTY ONE DASH ZERO ZERO SIX.

APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.

WE ARE APPOINTING HEATHER KING AND MOVING HER FROM ALTERNATE FOUR TO PLACE FOUR.

WE'RE ALSO APPOINTING BRITTON WELLS TO ALTERNATE NUMBER ONE AND ALEXANDER SEXTON TO ALTERNATE NUMBER FOUR.

AND ALL OF THOSE TERMS ARE RUNNING THROUGH JUNE OF TWENTY TWENTY TWO.

AND FINALLY, WE'RE MOVING FROM OUR REGULAR AGENDA TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NINE B AND WE'RE APPROVING THAT ITEM, APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE SECTION FIVE POINT SIX OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, NUMBER FOUR EIGHT THREE AS AMENDED, REQUIRING A FIVE FOOT WIDE RESIDENTIAL SIDEWALK ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE OF FOURTEEN OF THE DECKER NUMBER FOUR THREE EIGHT ADDITION LOCATED AT ONE TWO TWO EIGHT WOODSEY COURT, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY SIX TWENTY TWENTY ONE.

THAT'S IT. OK, I REALLY DID CUT YOU OFF EARLY.

I APOLOGIZE.

AND I DID WANT TO MAKE A NOTATION.

I DO HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD FROM KEVIN [INAUDIBLE] WHO WANTED TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF ITEM 9B BUT THAT ITEM IS BEING APPROVED BY BEING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO IF YOU'RE HERE THAT IS APPROVED.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

THERE WE GO, THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO.

[5. Public Forum]

WE INVITE RESIDENTS TO COME UP AND SPEAK ABOUT ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA, AMY WILL PUT THE THREE MINUTES ON AND I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF CARDS THIS EVENING.

FIRST ON THE AGENDA, I HAVE ROBIN CORNISH, IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD.

[00:15:09]

ROBIN CORNISH'S 1306 LAKEWAY DRIVE.

SO ON FEBRUARY 5TH, YOU POSTED A PUBLIC SERVICE VIDEO IN CORNISH PARK REGARDING CONTROVERSY WITH CCAP AND THE DIVIDE IN THE COMMUNITY TO USE MY HUSBAND'S LEGACY IN A PITIFUL ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS THE SERIOUS PROBLEM AND THE CITY WAS WRONG.

NEEDLESS TO SAY, MY FAMILY FOUND IT TO BE DESPICABLE.

YOUR DISRESPECT AND OFFENDED MYSELF.

AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, MY CHILDREN.

YOU USED YOUR ENTITLEMENT AND FAILED EPICALLY.

SO LET ME CORRECT YOU ON SOME THINGS.

IN 1983, I WAS GRADUATING FROM EIGHTH GRADE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAB SCHOOL.

FRANK WAS IN HIS SOPHOMORE YEAR AT MOUNT CARMEL CATHOLIC SCHOOL.

IN ADDITION, WE CAME TO SOUTHLAKE AND THEN STARTED OUR FAMILY.

EVEN MORE, YOU NEVER THOUGHT THE FRANK'S RACE TO SAY THAT YOU NEVER THOUGHT IT WOULD BE AN ISSUE WAS RIDICULOUSNESS.

PERHAPS YOU FORGOT ABOUT THE RACIAL EPITHETS AND THE TRIANGLE [INAUDIBLE] CARVED IN HIS PLAQUE. I GUESS YOU THOUGHT THE [INAUDIBLE] EDUCATION WOULD WASH THAT HATEFUL INCIDENT AWAY. TO BE CLEAR, I WILL NOT ALLOW MY HUSBAND'S LEGACY TO BE USED AS A PAWN OR A TOKEN IN AN ATTEMPT TO COVER UP AN INSIDIOUS PROBLEM OF RACISM INTOLERANCE IN THIS CITY.

IN FACT, ALL YOU'VE DONE IS PROVEN MY POINT.

THERE'S A DIRTY LITTLE SECRET THAT HAS BEEN HIDDEN FOR YEARS.

I RECENTLY SAW THE MOVIE THE UNITED STATES VS.

BILLIE HOLIDAY AND JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH.

MY HEART WAS HEAVY BECAUSE I SAID NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED.

BUT I WAS INSPIRED BY BILLIE HOLIDAY AND FRED HAMPTON'S TENACITY TO FIGHT FOR WHAT'S RIGHT. THEY FOUGHT FOR ISSUES INVOLVING HUMANITY, FLAWED AS THEY MAY HAVE BEEN, LIKE BILLIE HOLIDAY, FRED HAMPTON AND SO MANY OTHER GREAT SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS.

I WILL NOT BE BULLIED.

I WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED OR SILENCED LIKE THE TRIBAL DRUMS OF MY ANCESTORS AND THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE WHO INHABIT THIS LAND WELL BEFORE ANY OF US.

I WILL KEEP THE BEAT GOING.

I WILL STAND. I WILL SPEAK OUT AGAINST RACISM, INTOLERANCE.

I WILL STAY IN THE STRUGGLE UNTIL THERE'S EQUALITY FOR ALL.

THE CITY HAS SO MUCH POTENTIAL.

DON'T LET HATE, IGNORANCE AND INTOLERANCE BE ITS DEMISE.

GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I ALSO HAVE A COMMENT CARD FROM MAX KRUGLER.

MR. KRUGLER, IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD, PLEASE.

AND IF YOU CAN GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

I'M SORRY? YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

OH, YES, CERTAINLY.

MAX KRUGLER, 708 NETTLETON DRIVE, SOUTHLAKE.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF.

I JUST WANTED TO COME DOWN HERE AND INTRODUCE MYSELF.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DON'T ALREADY KNOW THIS ABOUT ME, I'M NOT A LARGE SCALE OR FREQUENT DEVELOPER. I'VE ONLY BUILT ONE ROAD FOR ONE CITY IN MY ENTIRE LIFE.

AND I DON'T PLAN ON BUILDING ANOTHER ROAD FOR ANOTHER CITY FOR SOME TIME TO COME.

I'M VERY PROUD, OR I GUESS I'M NOT PROUD OF THE FACT THAT I HAVEN'T DONE A LOT OF VOLUNTEER WORK FOR THIS CITY.

I DID VOLUNTEER TO SERVE MY COUNTRY FOR 20 YEARS.

I SERVED AMERICAN AIRLINES FOR 31 YEARS AFTER THAT.

I'M RETIRED NOW.

THAT'S ALL BEHIND ME FROM FOR PURPOSES OF THIS INTRODUCTION, THE IMPORTANCE OF THAT IS I'M GENERALLY AVAILABLE AND I ENCOURAGE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT ALL WHATSOEVER ABOUT THIS ISSUE THAT WE'VE BEEN QUIBBLING OVER FOR MORE THAN A YEAR NOW. PLEASE PICK UP THE PHONE AND GIVE ME A CALL.

I'LL EITHER ANSWER YOUR CALL OR I'LL RETURN YOUR CALL PROMPTLY.

THAT I PROMISE YOU.

I'M VERY PROUD TO HAVE LIVED HERE FOR THE LAST THIRTY YEARS OR SO.

I'M GRATEFUL FOR HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE RAISED MY DAUGHTERS IN THIS CITY.

I DON'T SUSPECT THAT I'M ON ANYBODY'S SHORT LIST FOR SOUTHLAKE CITIZEN OF THE YEAR.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY TO YOU FROM MY HEART BEFORE I WRAP UP THIS EVENING IS I ONLY HOPE THAT ONE DAY WHEN I DON'T LIVE HERE IN SOUTHLAKE ANYMORE, I HOPE THAT EVERYBODY WHO KNEW ME CAN LOOK BACK AND SAY, YOU KNOW, MAX KRUGLER LEFT HIS SOUTHLAKE CAMPSITE A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN IT WAS WHEN HE WHEN WE FIRST FOUND IT.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

I'LL ENCOURAGE YOU AGAIN TO CALL ME IF YOU EVER HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ISSUE THAT WE'VE BEEN KICKING AROUND FOR WAY TOO LONG NOW.

AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR ME.

GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WE APPRECIATE IT. YOU'RE WELCOME.

HAVE A GOOD EVENING. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK ABOUT AN ITEM THAT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING.

SEEING NO ONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL GO TO ITEM SIX A, I THINK.

[3. Southlake Business Spotlight - Texas Health Breeze Urgent Care]

[00:20:02]

CAN YOU TELL HIM A SHORT TIME OR IT'S LIKE, YOU KNOW, I'M LIKE I'VE ONLY FORGOT IT TWICE TONIGHT. THANK YOU, DAN.

YOU'LL JUST GET UP AND COME FORWARD.

HI, MY NAME IS JAMIE HARRAID, VICE PRESIDENT OF AMBULATORY SERVICES FOR TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES. I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTRODUCE YOU TO TEXAS HEALTH'S NEWEST VENTURE BREEZE URGENT.

BREEZE URGENT CARE IS A BRAND NEW VENTURE FOR TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES.

WE TRADITIONALLY HAVE NOT HAD A PRESENCE IN THE URGENT CARE SPACE.

WE TRADITIONALLY, IN ADDITION TO OPERATING HOSPITALS, HAD LOTS OF RESOURCES AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE IN PRIMARY CARE AND SPECIALTY CARE.

BREEZE URGENT CARE IS MEANT NOT ONLY TO TAKE CARE SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTS WHEN THEY'RE SICK AND INJURED, BUT WE ARE TO SERVE AS AN ENTRY POINT AND A GATEWAY TO CONNECTIONS TO THE VARIOUS OTHER RESOURCES TEXAS HEALTH HAS TO OFFER.

ONE THAT COMES TO MIND IS RIGHT UP THE ROAD.

OUR TEXAS HEALTH SOUTHLAKE HOSPITAL, WHICH IS A GREAT PARTNER FOR US AND HAS BEEN A WONDERFUL COLLABORATIVE ENTITY TO HELP US HAVE A PLACE TO SEND THE PATIENTS WHEN THEY COME THROUGH. THE MODEL THAT WE'RE BRINGING TO DALLAS FORT WORTH IS NOT ONLY NEW TO TEXAS HEALTH, BUT WE REALLY FEEL THAT IT'S NEW TO THE MARKET.

THERE'S A COUPLE OF KEY DIFFERENTIATORS THAT WE FEEL THAT TRADITIONAL CONSUMERS OF URGENT CARE MAY FIND REFRESHING THAT HELP SOLVE SOME OF THOSE TRADITIONAL PAIN POINTS THAT PEOPLE IN THE PAST HAVE ASSOCIATED WITH AN URGENT CARE EXPERIENCE.

ONE THAT REALLY COMES TO MIND, WOULD BE A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN PRICING.

SO BREEZE URGENT CARE HAS ALL INCLUSIVE, UP FRONT, VERY TRANSPARENT PRICING SO THAT YOU WILL KNOW WHAT YOUR COSTS WILL BE BEFORE YOU EVEN WALK IN THE DOOR, WHETHER YOU'RE INSURED OR NOT. ANOTHER THING THAT WE HAVE IS JUST THE LEVEL OF EXPERIENCE THAT WE DELIVER. WE FEEL THAT OUR PATIENTS DESERVE AN ABSOLUTE RED CARPET EXPERIENCE EACH AND EVERY TIME THEY WALK INTO ONE OF OUR CLINICS.

SO INSTEAD OF WALKING INTO A BUSY WAITING ROOM FULL OF PEOPLE WHO POTENTIALLY HAVE SOME TYPE OF SICKNESS, WE HAVE VERY SMALL WAITING ROOMS BECAUSE WHENEVER YOU WALK IN, YOU'RE GOING TO GET GREETED BY A HIGHLY TRAINED CONCIERGE WHO'LL ESCORT YOU RIGHT BACK TO YOUR SUITE AND BEGINS THE PROCESS OF YOUR CARE.

THEY HANDLE ALMOST ALL ASPECTS OF YOUR ENTIRE VISIT HERE, ASIDE FROM MAYBE STEPPING ASIDE FOR A MINUTE TO ALLOW THE PROVIDER TO COME IN.

ANOTHER THING THAT STICKS OUT TO ME, OTHER THAN THE EXPERIENCE PIECE, IS WE CAN SAVE YOU A LOT OF TIME AND MONEY WITH THE PRESCRIPTION CAPABILITIES THAT WE HAVE HERE.

SO TRADITIONALLY IN URGENT CARE EXPERIENCES, YOU MAY FINISH UP YOUR VISIT IF YOU'RE PRESCRIBED MEDICATION THAT IS HOPEFULLY ELECTRONICALLY SENT TO THE PHARMACY OF YOUR CHOICE. BUT AT BREEZE URGENT CARE WE ARE ONE OF THE ONLY URGENT CARES NOT JUST IN THE MARKET, BUT IN THE STATE THAT HAVE A FULLY AUTOMATED MEDICATION KIOSK ON SITE.

SO WHEN YOU COMPLETE YOUR VISIT AND WALK OUT TO THE LOBBY, YOU CAN HAVE A QUICK VIRTUAL VISIT WITH ONE OF OUR PHARMACISTS THAT'S ON 24/7 AND THEY CAN DISPENSE YOUR MEDICATION RIGHT THERE ON SITE. AND THE BEST OF ALL IS WHEN I MENTIONED THE ALL INCLUSIVE PRICING EARLIER, THOSE MEDICATIONS ARE ALSO INCLUDED IN YOUR PRICING THAT YOU'VE ALREADY PAID, WHETHER YOU HAVE INSURANCE OR NOT.

SO, AGAIN, IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING THE TYPE OF CARE THAT WE HAVE HERE, WE CAN CONNECT YOU WITH AN ESTABLISHED RELATIONSHIP WITH YOUR PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN, SPECIALTY PHYSICIAN WITH A HOSPITAL OR CHOOSING WITHIN OUR SYSTEM.

SO IF YOU FEEL LIKE YOU NEED ANY TYPE OF URGENT CARE SERVICES, FEEL FREE TO GIVE US A CALL. VISIT US ON THE WEB AT BREEZE URGENT CARE DOT COM.

YOU CAN FIND US ON SOCIAL MEDIA OR BETTER YET, JUST STOP AND SAY HELLO.

WE'RE RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD FROM SOUTHLAKE CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL, RIGHT HERE ON THE CORNER OF DAVIS. SO IN CLOSING, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU NOT JUST TO THE CITY OFFICIALS, BUT TO THE CITY AS A WHOLE FOR WELCOMING US TO YOUR COMMUNITY.

AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO EARN YOUR BUSINESS AND YOUR TRUST AND.

AS EVERYONE SAW, THAT IS THE NEW CONCEPT OF TEXAS HEALTH BREEZE URGENT CARE, REALLY BRINGING IT TO THE 21ST CENTURY ON THEIR SERVICES.

ANY QUESTIONS? NO, I'M GLAD TO HAVE THAT HEAR IN SOUTHLAKE, THAT'S AWESOME.

YEAH, I HOPE I DON'T NEED THEM, BUT IF I DO NEED THEM.

IT'S LIKE A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD: WELCOME, BUT NOT SO MUCH.

[LAUGHTER] MY ONLY SLIGHT DISAPPOINTMENT, MADAM MAYOR, IS THEY TOOK THE SPOT OF SOUL MAN'S BARBECUE, WHICH MAKES ME A LITTLE SAD.

YEAH. DID YOU WIN THAT CONTEST?

[00:25:01]

OH, I'M SO SORRY.

IT WASN'T EVEN CLOSE. YEAH, HE ATE THE MOST.

I CAME ACROSS THAT PICTURE AND I MAY HAVE TO RESURFACE I SAW THAT PHOTO TOO; THAT WAS A FRESH FACED YOUNG COUNCIL MEMBER HUFFMAN.

YEAH, HE COULD EAT A WHOLE PLATTER.

[LAUGHTER]. ALL OF WHICH MAY LEAD TO ME COMING TO BREEZE AT SOME POINT FOR HEART ISSUES.

[LAUGHTER] THE CIRCLE OF LIFE.

WELL, THAT'S VERY NICE. AND WE APPRECIATE YOU ALL TAKING THE TIME TO DO THE VIDEO AND LOOK FORWARD TO POSTING THAT AND SHOWING THAT ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

ABSOLUTELY. OK, WHAT'S NEXT, KEN, YOU MIGHT HAVE TO TELL ME.

SEAN, YOU CAN RUN THE NEXT--I HAVE THREE MORE MEETINGS.

YOU CAN RUN THEM AND I'LL JUST SIT OVER THERE.

I'M RUNNING OUT OF STEAM, I THINK.

SO WE DO HAVE ITEM 6A.

[6.A. Ordinance No. 1161A (CP20-0002), 2nd Reading, adopting an addendum to the existing Southlake 2035 Economic Development Master Plan, an element of the Southlake 2035 Comprehensive Plan. PUBLIC HEARING]

BUT WOULD YOU LIKE A FULL PRESENTATION OR JUST KIND OF A SUMMARIZED FORM OF IT SUMMARIZED IN THREE SENTENCES.

SO MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN.

AS THE COUNCIL IS AWARE, OBVIOUSLY, THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN THAT WAS ADOPTED BACK IN 2016 HAS SERVED THE CITY REALLY WELL AND HAS KIND OF LAID OUT THE STRATEGY FOR THE CITY MOVING FORWARD WHILE THE PLAN STILL SERVES THE CITY VERY WELL.

AND WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THAT PLAN.

OBVIOUSLY, THE EVENTS OF THE LAST YEAR HAS REALLY DEMONSTRATED OUR NEED TO REALLY LOOK AT WAYS THAT WE CAN HELP RECOVER OUR LOCAL ECONOMY.

AND THAT'S IN A NUTSHELL, WHAT THE 2035 MASTER PLAN ADDENDUM DOES.

THAT BEING SAID, THIS PLAN ITSELF OR THIS ADDENDUM IS NOT MEANT TO REPLACE THE ORIGINAL TWENTY 2016 MASTER PLAN.

IT'S MEANT TO SUPPLEMENT IT.

SO ALL THE PREVIOUS STRATEGIES THAT WE HAD IN PLACE WILL STILL CONTINUE TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO THESE FOCUS AREAS THAT YOU SEE HERE ON YOUR SCREEN.

WITH THAT, OF COURSE, THERE'S ABOUT 35 RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN THE PLAN ITSELF, ALL REALLY GEARED TOWARDS AND FOCUSED ON RECOVERY WITHIN THE NEXT TWO TO THREE YEARS THAT WE HAVE HERE. SO WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN IT UP FOR ANY QUESTIONS OF COUNCIL.

GREAT. ANY QUESTIONS? NOT A QUESTION, BUT JUST A KUDOS TO YOU AND YOUR TEAM.

I THINK WE'VE MADE IT KNOWN HOW WELL THE SOUTHLAKE COMMUNITY CAME THROUGH LAST YEAR.

I MEAN, THE RESIDENTS REALLY RALLIED AROUND OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES.

AND THANKFULLY, YOU KNOW, WE WERE PROJECTING TERRIBLE DROP OFFS IN SALES TAX REVENUE, BUT WE DID BETTER THAN THE YEAR BEFORE.

AND IT REALLY WAS THE RESIDENTS WHO SHOP LOCAL SUPPORTED THE LOCAL BUSINESSES.

AND IT'S REALLY A MODEL FOR OTHER COMMUNITIES TO LOOK AT.

AND IT'S BECAUSE OF THE GREAT PLANNING WE'VE DONE OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS THAT WE ARE ABLE TO PIVOT AND MAKE, YOU KNOW, SOME DEREGULATION ADJUSTMENTS ON THE FLY.

AND, YOU KNOW, WE MADE UP THE COURT, THE ECONOMIC RELIEF COMMITTEE, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON A THURSDAY AND THE NEXT TUESDAY COUNCIL WAS ACTING ON IT.

SO YOUR TEAM REALLY LED THE WAY IN THAT REGARD.

SO THANK YOU FOR GETTING US THROUGH LAST YEAR.

AND WE'RE GRATEFUL THAT THINGS COULD HAVE BEEN SO MUCH WORSE.

AND THEY WEREN'T TOO BAD AT ALL.

THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER. YEAH.

ONE OF THE THINGS I HOPE FOR THIS YEAR IS AND IN PARTICULAR, THE CHAMBER EVENT, OCTOBER FEST, I HOPE THAT WE CAN WORK WITH ALL OF THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE HUGE FESTIVALS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE THE BEST THAT THEY CAN POSSIBLY BE THIS YEAR.

BECAUSE I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF FINANCIAL PRESSURE ON SOME OF THE GROUPS BECAUSE THEY COMPLETELY LOST THEIR BIGGEST FUNDRAISER.

SO THERE MAY BE SOME SIGNAGE AND OTHER THINGS THAT WE CAN DO AROUND THE CITY THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE CONSIDERED BEFORE.

BUT MAYBE WE CAN THINK OUTSIDE OF THE BOX ON SOME OF THOSE TO HELP DRAW PEOPLE.

SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A LOT OF PRESSURE TO MAKE A LOT OF MAKE UP, A LOT OF LOST MONEY FOR CHARITY AND FOR THE CHAMBER AND NEXT YEAR.

SO, OK, THANK YOU, DANIEL, APPRECIATE IT.

OK, KEN [LAUGHTER] HE'S LOOKING AT ME NOW. THAT'S A GOOD SIGN.

ALL GOOD? ITEM SIX B. MAYOR, YOU'LL NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 6A.

OH, OK. I'M SERIOUSLY--YEAH, WOULD ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE--NO, I'M NOT.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S WRONG WITH ME TODAY.

OK. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN?

[00:30:02]

THANK YOU. MOTION.

OH, IS THERE A MOTION? OH, MY GOD.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 6A ORDINANCE NUMBER ONE ONE SIX ONE A, CP 20 DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO TWO.

SECOND READING, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE EXISTING SOUTHLAKE TWENTY THIRTY FIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN, AN ELEMENT OF THE TWENTY THIRTY FIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY FIFTH TWENTY TWENTY ONE.

THANK YOU, IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OK, AND THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO. NEXT ON THE AGENDA, ITEM SIX B AND I'M GOING TO FOCUS.

[6.B. Resolution No. 21-005, (ZA21-0004), Specific Use Permit with Site Plan for the Dragon House on property described as Lot 1R3, Block 1 of the Gateway Plaza Phase II Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2640 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #8. PUBLIC HEARING]

PROPERTY'S LOCATED AT TWO SIX FOUR ZERO EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS RETAIL-COMMERCIAL AND THE ZONING IS SP2.

ALL THE CHANGES ARE CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE AND ZONING.

THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE.

THIS IS A MORE OBLIQUE ANGLE OF THE PROPERTY FROM 1709, LOOKING NORTH AND SOUTH, THE DRY STORAGE AREA [INAUDIBLE] BE BACK WHERE THE OLD AT THE STAKE N' SHAKE AND THE OTHER RESTAURANT DRIVE THRU AREA.

THAT'LL BE JUST IN ADDITION TO THAT BACK PORTION.

AND THEN THE PATIO AREA WOULD BE WHERE THE DRIVE THRU IS NOW EXISTING.

THIS IS THE POLLO TROPICAL, WHICH WAS THE LAST APPROVED SITE PLAN, WHICH WAS APPROVED IN 2015. IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH IT, THERE IS A DRIVE THRU AREA ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND THIS IS WHERE THE PATIO IS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE PROPOSED DRY STORAGE AREA AT THE NORTH SIDE, THE BACKSIDE NEAR WHERE THE OLD MENU SIGN IS 287 SQUARE FEET.

THAT IS THE SUP COMPONENT OF THE APPLICATION.

AND THEN IN ADDITION, A 935 SQUARE FOOT PATIO IS BEING PROPOSED ON THE WEST SIDE.

THEY ARE ADDING SOME SAFETY FEATURES, SUCH AS A CURB STOP.

SOME PAVED STONE, WHICH WILL BE ADDED AND THE PATIO, WILL BE BUILT ON THE EXISTING DRIVE THRU. IN ADDITION, THERE IS ON THE WEST SIDE SOME OF THE SIDE ENHANCEMENTS TO OPEN UP THE AREA. AND THEY'RE ALSO PROPOSING TO PAINT THE BRICK A DARKER COLOR AS SHOWN IN THE EXHIBITS IN YOUR PACKET.

THESE ARE SOME OF THE PHOTOS OF THE SITE.

AGAIN, THIS IS WHERE THE DRY STORAGE WOULD BE EXISTING, JUST AN EXTENSION, REALLY, OF THE DUMPSTER AREA. AND THEN AS YOU GO AROUND THE DRIVE THRU, THIS IS WHERE THE PROPOSED PATIO IS GOING TO BE LOCATED.

THIS IS JUST SOME RENDERINGS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING AN OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE PATIO. THERE'LL BE SOME STRING LIGHTS THAT WILL BE ADDED, A SECURITY FENCE, A DECORATIVE FENCE WILL BE ADDED TO THE PATIO AREA ALSO.

THEN YOU CAN SEE THE STORAGE AREA AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT AREA.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED WEST SIDE.

SO YOU CAN SEE SOME FACADE CHANGE, CREATING SOME MORE GLASS SAFETY BARRIERS, THE STRING LIGHTS, THIS IS THE DECORATIVE FENCE WITH A ROPE POST AND JUST THE TYPE OF LIGHTING THAT WILL BE USED.

THESE ARE SOME OF THE STORAGE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.

IT WILL MATCH THE BUILDING IN TERMS OF COLOR AND LOOK AND THERE'LL BE SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING THAT WILL BE ADDED AS PART OF THE IMPROVEMENTS SO THAT THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE. [INAUDIBLE] BE ADDING SOME GROUND COVER, SOME SHRUBS AND SOME CREPE MYRTLES . IN TERMS OF RESPONSES, THERE HAVE BEEN NO RESPONSES EITHER OPPOSED OR FOR THE APPLICATION, P&Z RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, SEVEN ZERO.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THAT SHOPPING CENTER'S COMPLETELY BUILT OUT, CORRECT? THERE ARE NO MORE PAD SITES WHERE THERE'S CURRENTLY PARKING? IT IS, YES, BUILT-OUT.

OK, COUNCIL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?

[00:35:01]

WHAT'S THE SEEDING THAT THEY'RE SUGGESTING FOR IT, DO YOU KNOW? THEY DO PARK--THEY'RE WAY OVER THE REQUIRED PARKING IN THIS PARTICULAR SUP ORDINANCE, THE PATIOS DOESN'T REQUIRE PARKING TO BE CALCULATED.

[INAUDIBLE] CAN SEE THIS HAD TO BE CALCULATED PARKING REQUIREMENT, BUT IF IT WAS, THEY WOULD STILL HAVE PLENTY OF PARKING TO MEET THE ADDITIONAL SEEDING THAT'S BEING ADDED, BUT THEY'RE SHOWING SOME TABLES AND LOOKS LIKE SOME POSSIBLE SEATING AREAS AS SHOWN IN THIS DIAGRAM. OK.

I HAVE A QUESTION I KNOW WHEN WE TALKED, I THINK YESTERDAY ABOUT THIS, YOU MENTIONED WE TALKED JUST BRIEFLY ABOUT THE THEY WOULD LIKE THE ABILITY TO RETURN TO A DRIVE THRU.

I GUESS MY QUESTION IS THIS, SHOULD THE OPERATION OF THE BUILDING CHANGE, WHAT WOULD THAT COVER AND WHAT WOULDN'T THAT COVER? WOULD THERE BE SOMETHING WHERE EVEN IF WE APPROVE THIS, THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO BRING IT BACK? WELL, THEY DID PROVIDE A NOTE, AND IT'S CALLED AN SUP NOTE.

AND REALLY, THE PATIO'S NOT EVEN ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUP.

IT WOULD BE AN ADMINISTRATOR'S DECISION AT THE TIME IF THEY WANTED TO REMOVE IT.

I WOULD TEND TO LEAN THAT IT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT OF THE ZONINGS IN PLACE THAT THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO IT ADMINISTRATIVELY, BUT IT'LL BE UP TO THE ADMINISTRATOR AT THAT TIME TO ULTIMATELY MAKE THAT DECISION.

OK. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THAT COLOR THAT [INAUDIBLE] IS THAT BLACK? OR GREY? YES, IT'S KIND OF A CHARCOAL.

AND THIS IS A PROPOSED EXTERIOR COLOR.

YEAH, IT'S WHITE RIGHT NOW.

SO FAR, SO ALL OF THIS IS BEING, ARE WE LOOKING AT THE COLOR, TOO, AND ARE THEY ADDING, ARE THEY CHANGING THE AWNINGS? AND IT LOOKS LIKE A WHOLE OVERHAUL.

YES, IT'S THE PATIO.

THE SAFETY FEATURES SOME GLASS IMPROVEMENT STORE FRONT IMPROVEMENT.

THE ONLY THING I DIDN'T MENTION IS THAT THEY ARE SELLING SOME SIGNAGE HERE.

AND AS PART OF THE REVIEW AND MAYBE COUNCIL MEMBER, IF YOU DO MAKE A MOTION THAT IF YOU CAN POINT OUT NO SIGNAGE IS BEING APPROVED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION.

DOES THAT INCLUDE SIGNAGE ON THE NEW AWNINGS? WE'D HAVE TO EVALUATE IT.

THERE IS A CONDITIONAL SIGN PLAN FOR THIS, BUT NONE OF THE ACTION HERE WOULD APPROVE ANY SIGNS THAT ARE SHOWN.

RIGHT, I JUST WANTED CLARIFICATION.

I MEAN, IT LOOKS VERY NICE.

IT'S OBVIOUSLY A NICE UPGRADE.

SO BUT WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS WHAT WE ARE APPROVING TONIGHT, AND WHAT WE ARE NOT APPROVING TONIGHT.

OK, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ANYBODY HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THIS AT ALL? OK, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? SEEING NO ONE WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE A MOTION? YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM SIX B, RESOLUTION NUMBER TWENTY ONE, DASH ONE ZERO ZERO FIVE. CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY ONE, DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO FOUR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WITH SITE PLAN FOR THE DRAGON HOUSE LOCATED AT TWENTY SIX FORTY SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY SIXTH TWENTY TWENTY AND SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER FIVE DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY FOURTH TWENTY TWENTY ONE.

NOTING APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN AND EXHIBITS AS PRESENTED THIS EVENING AND ALSO NOTING THAT NO NEW SIGNAGE HAS BEEN APPROVED WITH THIS APPLICATION IN MOTION.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OK, THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO.

GREAT. NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 6C.

[6.C. Ordinance No. 480-777, (ZA20-0068), 2nd Reading, Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 1029 Shady Oaks Drive on property described as Tract 8A2, Thomas M. Hood Survey Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 1029 Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #7. PUBLIC HEARING]

THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE REQUEST IS APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FROM AG TO SF1A FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE ON A LOT THAT IS ONE POINT FIVE ACRES.

PROPERTY'S LOCATED AT ONE ZERO TWO NINE SHADY OAKS DRIVE PROPERTY'S LOCATED JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE DURHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL ON SHADY OAKS.

IT'S THE SECOND LOT TO THE NORTH.

ONCE YOU GET PAST THE SCHOOL, IT DOES HAVE AG ZONING AND WHEN YOU PULL A PERMIT YOU HAVE TO PLAT AND ZONE THE LOT.

AND THIS IS THE EXERCISE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS GOING THROUGH.

[00:40:03]

THIS IS THE PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED TO P&Z, THE ISSUES, NOT REALLY ISSUES, BUT P&Z'S RECOMMENDATIONS WERE TO HAVE THE FENCE 10 FEET OFF THE ROADWAY AND THE GATE, 25 FEET, DO A WROUGHT IRON FENCE.

THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED PER THE P&Z MOTION AND INCORPORATED THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE CONCEPT PLAN.

THE PURPOSE OF P&Z'S RECOMMENDATIONS WAS JUST TO ENSURE THAT IF ANYBODY THOSE DELIVERY TYPE TRUCK OR ANYBODY PULLING INTO THE DRIVE COULD HAVE THE MANEUVERABILITY TO TURN AROUND AND NOT HAVE TO STACK UP ON SHADY OAKS.

THE TREE PRESERVATION REQUIRES 60 PERCENT.

THEY'RE PROPOSING SIXTY EIGHT POINT THREE PERCENT TO BE PRESERVED.

THIS IS THE PRE SITE PLAN DRAINAGE, SHADY OAKS TO YOUR LEFT AND POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE. AN EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALK WILL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT JUST A COUPLE OF VIEWS. PHOTOS OF THE SITE AS RECENT PHOTOS EXIST FROM VARIOUS ANGLES.

ONE RESPONSE, THE NEIGHBOR TO THE SOUTH, MR. [INAUDIBLE], IS IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION.

P&Z RECOMMENDED 7-0 RECOMMENDING THE SETBACK FENCE 10 FEET AND ANY GATES BE 25 FEET BACK AND THAT THE FENCING MATERIAL BE WROUGHT IRON.

AND AGAIN, THE APPLICANT MODIFIED THE CONCEPT PLAN TO REFLECT P&Z'S RECOMMENDATION.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? LOOKS PRETTY GOOD. DOES ANYONE NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? OK, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? IS THERE A MOTION? YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 6C ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHTY DASH SEVEN SEVEN SEVEN.

CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO SIX EIGHT.

SECOND READING ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR TEN TWENTY NINE SHADY OAKS DRIVE, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 24TH.

TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER THREE DATED FEBRUARY 9TH.

TWENTY TWENTY ONE. NOTING THAT THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO MODIFY THE FENCING AND THE GATE ALONG SHADY OAKS DRIVE PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. AND THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO.

NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER 6D.

[6.D. Ordinance No. 480-778, (ZA20-0070), 2nd Reading, Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 1395 E. Dove Rd. on property described as Tract 4A3, Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 1395 E. Dove Rd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested: Zoning: "SF-30" Single Family Residential District SPIN Neighborhood #3. PUBLIC HEARING]

THIS REQUEST IS APPROVAL OF ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FROM AG TO S.F.

30 PURPOSE TO BUILD A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME AT THIS LOCATION, PROPERTY'S ONE THREE NINE FIVE EAST DAVE RODE LAND USE PLAN IS LOW DENSITY AND IT'S BEING ZONED FROM AG TO SF30 REASON THAT IS AN SF 30 REQUEST IS THAT THE EXISTING TRACT IS UNDER ONE ACRE IN SIZE, BUT WILL NOT BE ANY FURTHER ANY ADDITIONAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS TRACK.

AND WHERE YOU HAVE ONE HOME NOW, YOU'LL HAVE ONE HOME IN THE FUTURE.

SO WILL NOT ADD HOMES IF THE ZONING IS APPROVED.

THIS IS A AREA OF THE SITE.

THERE IS AN EXISTING BARN THAT IS ON THE BACK, THE SITE THAT WILL THE OWNER PLANS TO KEEP THAT. IT WILL BE ESSENTIALLY BECOME NONCONFORMING BUT THE BARN IS PLANNED TO REMAIN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE.

THERE IS A DRIVEWAY VARIANCE THAT'S BEING REQUESTED, BUT BECAUSE OF THE LOT WITH THE DRIVEWAYS AND THE GENERAL EXACT LOCATION THAT IT IS TODAY.

AND SO BECAUSE OF THE TWO DRIVEWAYS BOTH TO THE EAST AND WEST, THERE'S 100 FOOT SPACING REQUIREMENT THAT IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MEET THAT GIVEN THE DISTANCE EXISTING BETWEEN THE TWO ADJACENT DRIVEWAYS.

SO THERE IS A DRIVEWAY VARIANCE REQUEST, BUT IT'S TO ALLOW THE DRIVEWAY WHERE IT IS TODAY. THIS IS THE STREET VIEW OF THE EXISTING HOME.

THERE WILL BE A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADDED.

THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO THAT.

ALSO, BACK IN 2005, THE ZBA DID ALLOW A VARIANCE TO THE SET BACKS OF SHOWING THE CONCEPT

[00:45:03]

SO THE CONCEPT PLAN IS SUBJECT TO THE ZBA MOTION.

THAT'S WHY THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS ARE LESS THAN THE NORMAL SF30 REQUIREMENTS.

THEY ALSO DID ALLOW THE SEPTIC SYSTEM TO BE LOCATED ON ONE ACRE LOT THAT'S LESS THAN ONE ACRE. AND THAT WAS DONE IN 2005.

THE APPLICANT DID ADDRESS THE P&Z'S CONCERNS IN TERMS OF THE SETTING THE FENCE BACK, BEING WROUGHT IRON IN THE GATE 25 FEET BACK.

AND P&Z ALSO DID ASK THAT THEY SHOW THE CIRCULAR DRIVE ON THE CONCEPT PLAN, VERY SIMILAR TO THE ADJACENT HOUSE THAT WAS BUILT RECENTLY.

AND THEY DID HEAR THAT.

AGAIN, THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS FOR THE SPACING ALONG DOVE ROAD.

THIS IS JUST EXHIBIT SLIDE SHOWING THAT THE APPLICANT HAS RESPONDED TO ALL THE PANSY'S RECOMMENDATION AS REFLECTED ON THE CONCEPT PLAN.

WE DID RECEIVE ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR AND THEN ONE UNDECIDED, BUT THERE WASN'T ANYTHING ARTICULATED IN RESPONSE OTHER THAN CIRCLING THE BOX.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

GREAT, THANK YOU, KEN.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS AT ALL? OK, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NO ONE WE'LL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING? IS THERE A MOTION? YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM SIX D ORDINANCE NUMBER FORTY SEVEN SEVEN EIGHT, CASE NUMBER ZA TWENTY DASH ZERO ZERO SEVEN ZERO. SECOND READING ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR ONE THREE NINE FIVE EAST DOVE ROAD, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY FIVE TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER THREE DATED FEBRUARY 9TH.

TWENTY TWENTY ONE. GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE NUMBER SIX THREE FOUR REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTER LINE TO CENTER LINE DRIVEWAY SPACING OF ONE HUNDRED FEET FOR RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS ON ARTERIALS.

A VARIANCE APPROVED TO ALLOW THE EXISTING SPACING TO THE EAST AND WEST ALONG EAST DOVE ROAD, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY EIGHTY FIVE FEET TO THE WEST AND APPROXIMATELY NINETY EIGHT FEET TO THE EAST THAT EXISTS WITH THE CURRENT DRIVEWAY TODAY.

ALSO NOTING THE VARIANCE S TO ALLOW THE TEN FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACKS AS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE SEPTIC SYSTEM ON A LOT LESS THAN ONE ACRE WERE APPROVED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ON MAY TWENTY SIX, TWENTY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE UNDER CASE NUMBER ZBA FOUR FIVE NINE.

ALSO NOTING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT THE LOT CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LOW DENSITY LAND-USE PLAN DESIGNATION, SINCE THE EXISTING TRACT IS NOT BEING FURTHER SUBDIVIDED AND ONLY ONE HOME CAN BE BUILT ON THIS LOT.

ALSO NOTING THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MODIFIED THE CONCEPT PLAN PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS. GREAT, IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OK, THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO. NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER NINE A.

[9.A. ZA19-0027, Plat Revision for Lots 3R3R1 and 3R3R2, Block 1, Steward Addition on property described as Lot 3R3, Block 1, Steward Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 551 E. Dove Rd., (addressed as 551 and 561 E. Dove Rd. by Tarrant Appraisal District) Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #3.]

PROPERTY'S AT 551 EAST DOVE.

JUST AS A REMINDER TO THE COUNCIL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 212 ZERO ZERO NINETY THREE, THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, THE APPLICANT DID FILE A RESPONSE TO THE CITY COUNCIL'S OCTOBER 15, 2019 AND FEBRUARY FOURTH TWENTY TWENTY DISAPPROVALS OF THE PLAT REVISION IS SEEKING TO APPROVE OR DIVIDE ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.

COUNCIL MUST APPROVE, DISAPPROVE OR APPROVE OF CONDITIONS NO LATER THAN FIFTEEN DAY FOLLOWING THE FILING OF THE RESPONSE.

THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

IT'S LOCATED ALONG A ROADWAY EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION.

AGAIN, THE PROPOSAL IS TO SUBDIVIDE THIS EXISTING TWO POINT TWO ACRE LOT AND CREATE AN ADDITIONAL BUILDABLE LOT TO THE SOUTH OF THE EXISTING HOME, THE PROPERTY LAND USE DESIGNATION IS LOW DENSITY.

THE PROPOSED PLAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGNATED LAND USE PLAN DISTRICT FOR THIS AREA,

[00:50:02]

SO NO REZONING WOULD BE REQUIRED.

WE'VE GONE THROUGH HISTORY IN OUR PREVIOUS MEETINGS, BUT THESE ARE AVAILABLE IF WE NEED TO DISCUSS ANY PREVIOUS PLATS FOR THE STEWARD ADDITION.

THIS IS THE PLAT THAT YOU SAW ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, THAT THE PLAT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR.

BUT THERE WAS A A TURNAROUND THAT WAS SHOWN ON THE NORTH DRIVE OF THE LOT AT THAT TIME.

AND I HAVE ANOTHER EXHIBIT IN THE PRESENTATION THAT SHOWS THAT CLOSER IN JUST FOR REFERENCE. AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED PLAT REVISION THAT YOU ARE CONSIDERING THIS EVENING.

THERE ARE TWO VARIANCES THAT ARE LISTED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.

ONE IS THE VARIANCE TO THE LOT FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT.

THE PROPERTY DOES NOT FRONT ON A PUBLIC STREET THAT IS ONE VARIANCE AND THEN THERE IS A SIDEWALK VARIANCE ALSO AS PART OF THE REQUEST, BECAUSE THIS APPLICATION HAS RECEIVED A WRITTEN PROTEST FROM OWNERS THAT CONSIST OF AT LEAST 20 PERCENT OF THE AREA THAT SURROUNDS THE LOT WITHIN TWO HUNDRED FEET.

IT IS REQUIRED A SUPER MAJORITY VOTE BY THE GOVERNING BODY, WHICH IS THE CITY COUNCIL. IN THIS CASE, THE WAY THE LAW READS IS THAT THREE FOURTHS OF THE MEMBERS PRESENT, WHICH YOU HAVE SIX THIS EVENING, SO YOU WOULD NEED YOU NEED FIVE AFFIRMATIVE VOTES, JUST A COUPLE STREET VIEWS.

THIS IS THE EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE PROPERTIES.

A COUPLE OF VIEWS OF DOVE.

THIS IS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, BUT THERE IS A HISTORY ON THIS P&Z AND THEN YOUR LAST MOTION WAS A FIVE TWO, BUT FAILED DUE TO A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE THERE.

AT THE PREVIOUS ONE, THERE WAS IN THE NARRATIVE THERE, THE ABILITY TO, THE APPLICANT DID INDICATE THAT THEY HAVE WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER ON DOVE ABOUT CREATING A PAD SITE FOR THE MAILBOXES AND TRASH CANS.

AND THEN THERE WAS AN OFFER FOR A SEWER EASEMENT.

IN YOUR PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY, THERE IS A COMMENT IF YOU DO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE YOU CAN JUST ADDRESS THE PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY; IT DOES HAVE A COMMENT ABOUT FIND A 15 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD BE IN THIS THIS GENERAL AREA. I DID ALSO INCLUDE AN EXHIBIT WHICH IS IN YOUR PACKET SHOWING THE RESPONSES IN FAVOR AND THOSE THAT ARE IN OPPOSITION IN THEIR LOCATION.

ALSO, ONE OF THE PREVIOUS CONSIDERATIONS, THERE WAS A TURN AROUND DEDICATION THAT WAS DISCUSSED TO JUST REFRESH COUNCIL'S MEMORY THAT AT ONE POINT THAT WAS DISCUSSED AS A POSSIBILITY WITH THE PLAT.

SO THIS IS THE PREVIOUS PLANT REVISION THAT SHOWED THAT TURNAROUND AREA ON THAT NORTH DRIVE.

THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.

YOU WERE HANDED TWO OPPOSITION FORMS AT YOUR PLACE THIS EVENING THAT WAS HANDED OUT BY STAFF. SO I'D LIKE TO JUST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE HAVE THOSE, THANK YOU. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DIRECTOR BAKER, I THINK WE'VE SEEN THIS A COUPLE OF TIMES, BUT I THINK THE FIRST TIME WE SAW IT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WAS BROUGHT UP WAS THE PANHANDLE LOT OR FLAG POLE LOT.

AND THEN IT WAS AMENDED, I THINK, FOR THE LAST TIME WE SAW IT.

BUT, YOU KNOW, IN MY OPINION, IT STILL FUNCTIONED AS A FLAG POLE OR PANHANDLE.

LOT, IS THERE ANOTHER WAY WE COULD MAKE IT SUCH THAT THERE'S NO DANGER OF SETTING PRECEDENT FOR OTHER PROPERTY'S, PERHAPS MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A CUL DE SAC.

I KNOW IT'S A PRIVATE STREET.

WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO MAKE IT A PUBLIC STREET, BUT IS THERE A WAY TO MAKE IT LOOK AND

[00:55:01]

BECAUSE OF THE MODIFICATIONS.

YOU ARE CORRECT. COUNCIL MEMBER, THERE WAS ONE ITERATION, I BELIEVE, BACK IN THE OCTOBER TIME PERIOD THAT THE CENTER LOT DID HAVE AN EXTENSION OF A LAKE AND IT WAS DEEMED A PANHANDLE BY THE STAFF.

AND THE VARIANCE SUBSEQUENTLY WAS REDESIGNED TO BE MORE RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE.

TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT THE TURNAROUND WHICH WAS SHOWN HERE ON THE NORTHERN DRIVE TO REFLECT A MORE TRADITIONAL CUL DE SAC, THAT BULB WOULD BE MOVED TO, I GUESS, THE SOUTH DRIVE OR TO THE SOUTH.

AND THAT COULD BE A DISCUSSION YOU COULD HAVE WITH THE APPLICANT AND GIVE IT, I GUESS, MORE OF A STREET LOOK, IF THAT'S YOUR QUESTION.

THANK YOU. QUESTION.

YES, DIRECTOR BAKER, JUST TO BE CLEAR, I MEAN, THE REALLY VARIANCES CREATED BY THE FACT THAT THIS NEITHER OF THESE TWO LOTS FRONT DOVE ROAD IN THIS CASE, CORRECT? YES, SIR. THAT'S CORRECT. AND BUT THE YOU KNOW, THE DRIVEWAY, THE 12 FOOT DRIVEWAY RUNNING DOWN THE EAST SIDE, THAT IS A PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT, IS THAT RIGHT? RIGHT. IT'S A ROADWAY ACCESS EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE WESTERN LOTS.

AND THIS PLAT ESSENTIALLY EXTENDS A ROADWAY UTILITY EASEMENT TO THE SOUTH INTO THAT PROPOSED SECOND LOT.

SO IT'S EXTENSION OF THAT EASEMENT FURTHER SOUTH.

RIGHT. BUT TO BE CLEAR, IF THE DRIVE, THE ROADWAY ACCESS EASEMENT WERE A PUBLIC STREET, WE WOULDN'T EVEN BE HAVING THIS CONVERSATION.

THERE WOULD BE NO VARIANCE APPLICABLE.

CORRECT? RIGHT, IF IT WAS A PUBLIC STREET, THEN THE ONLY VARIANCE WOULD BE THE SIDEWALK VARIANCE. RIGHT. AND SO THAT IS JUST IN PLAY DEPENDING ON WHAT ACTION YOU DO, BUT THAT'S WHY IT'S LISTED. SO OBVIOUSLY THE APPLICANTS DID NOT CREATE THE SITUATION WITH A ROADWAY ACCESS EASEMENT OR THE WIDTH BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 12 FEET WIDE, CORRECT? YES, THAT'S CORRECT. AND I BELIEVE DIRECTOR COHAN AND HIS TEAM AND MAYBE YOU AS WELL, LOOKED AT THE POSSIBILITY OF TRYING TO CREATE MAYBE A PUBLIC ROADWAY OUT OF THIS, BUT IT WAS NOT FEASIBLE, CORRECT? YEAH, IT'D BE VERY COSTLY, PLUS, HE HAD TO GO IN AND ACQUIRE THE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG THOSE EXISTING TRACTS WOULD BE YOU'D HAVE TO ACQUIRE IT WOULD BE HAVE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, WOULD BE PROBABLY A TIMELY AND EXPENSIVE ENDEAVOR.

AND 50 FEET MINIMUM, RIGHT? THAT'S OUR STANDARD.

STANDARD IS 50 FEET AND THEN 31 FEET BACK A CURB TO BACK A CURB.

BUT YOU GUYS LOOKED AT IT, LOOKED AT THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVING THAT TO A PUBLIC ROADWAY? WE DID, JUST RUN SOME NUMBERS AND IT WAS JUST--.

WE CAN'T AFFORD IT. YEAH.

DIRECTOR BAKER, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THIS PARTICULAR AREA, ALL THESE LOTS ALONE THAT EASEMENT ARE FAIRLY UNIQUE WITHIN SOUTHLAKE? I MEAN, THIS IS A PRETTY UNIQUE SITUATION.

I MEAN, OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD, CAN YOU THINK OF OTHERS THAT ARE LIKE THIS.

THE SIMILAR ONES YOU COULD MAYBE LOOK AT MARANATHA AND MAYBE [INAUDIBLE] MAYBE SOMEWHAT ANALOGOUS--. BUT BY AND LARGE, THOUGH, IT'S UNUSUAL.

YEAH, THEY'RE FEW AND FAR BETWEEN.

YEAH. OK, THANK YOU.

OK, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL OPEN PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THEN IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT AFTER THAT, I'LL CALL THE APPLICANT UP.

OK, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

WE DID RECEIVE COUNCIL RECEIVED A COUPLE OF NOTIFICATIONS FROM RESIDENTS WANTING TO WEIGH IN ON THIS. AND I DO HAVE ONE PUBLIC COMMENT CARD FROM MS. HEITMAN. IF YOU'RE HERE, MA'AM, IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD.

AND IF YOU'LL PLEASE GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND WE'LL HAVE YOU USE THE MICROPHONE RIGHT OVER HERE, IF THAT'S OK.

YEAH, WELL, WE'RE TRY TO BE CAREFUL BECAUSE OF COVID.

SO DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANT TO SHOW? KEN CAN PUT THAT UP FOR YOU.

WE'RE JUST TRYING TO PROTECT STAFF.

THANK YOU FOR BEING UNDERSTANDING.

YEAH, WE'LL GO AND PUT THAT UP FOR YOU.

GREAT, THANK YOU.

SURE, YES, IF YOU'RE COMFORTABLE.

SURE. THANK YOU. I LIVE AT 475 EAST DOVE ROAD.

[01:00:06]

AS THIS WAS SUBDIVIDED BEFORE, IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING IN 1999 THAT IT WOULD NOT BE SUBDIVIDED AGAIN, THE TWO ACRE LOT WAS APPROVED IN 1999 BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THE HOMEOWNER WANTED, AND HE HAD HORSES AND WHATEVER ON THAT PROPERTY.

TO ME, IT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD BE AN ADVANTAGE TO HAVE THAT.

BUT I UNDERSTAND THEY WANT TO SELL IT, I GUESS, AND MAKE A PROFIT FROM THAT.

BUT TO DO THAT, THEY HAVE TO CROSS MY PROPERTY TO GET TO THEIR LAND, WHICH THEY HAVE ACCESS TO RIGHT NOW.

BUT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO EXTEND THE ROAD EASEMENT ANOTHER I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY FEET TO GO ACROSS INTO THE SECOND ACRE, THE FIVE LOTS [INAUDIBLE] NOW, MY CONCERN IS MOSTLY, AGAIN, WITH THE IT'S THE 12 FOOT DRIVEWAY THAT THE HOME OWNERS AT THE TIME PUT IN.

CURRENTLY THAT WE HAVE ONLY EIGHT DRIVERS ON FIVE LOTS, BUT POTENTIALLY THERE COULD BE EASILY BETWEEN, YOU KNOW, 18 TO 20 GOING IN AND OUT EVERY DAY.

IF YOU HAD, YOU KNOW, THREE OR FOUR PER HOUSEHOLD AT THE TIME THAT THIS WAS APPROVED, THERE WASN'T ANY OTHER TRAFFIC REALLY ON THE ROAD OTHER THAN THE OWNERS.

NOW, IN ADDITION, THERE'S AMAZON, FEDEX, UPS, YARD PEOPLE, POOL PEOPLE, DELIVERY PEOPLE, PEST CONTROL PEOPLE, YOU NAME IT.

AND THEN LATELY THERE'S BEEN A NATIONAL TREND, WHICH I LEARNED FROM COMING TO YOUR COUNCIL MEETINGS OF A MULTIGENERATIONAL FAMILIES UNDER ONE ROOF, WHICH COULD MEAN THAT THERE WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, GRANDPARENTS, PARENTS, CHILDREN, ALL THERE, WHICH COULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE EVEN THE ONE POTENTIAL LOT ADDITION THERE.

I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO PLEASE PROTECT ME AND MY NEIGHBORS AND MY PROPERTY FROM UNWANTED BURDENS OF THE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT WOULD CROSS MY PROPERTY.

IT GOES THROUGH MY PROPERTY FOR ABOUT 200 FEET.

ALSO THAT THE DRIVE THAT WAS PUT IN WHEN THIS WAS ALL BUILT OUT IS CONCRETE, BUT IT WASN'T. WE THOUGHT IT WAS ALL BUILT OUT AND IT WASN'T MEANT TO HANDLE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION BECAUSE WE ASSUMED THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE.

THERE'S STILL AN ISSUE FROM MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT DOESN'T GO TO THE ROAD AND THAT ONE STAFF REPORT STATED IT'LL BE WORKED OUT AMONG THE OWNERS.

THE ONES WHO GAIN THE MOST ARE THE OWNERS OF THIS, IF IT'S SUBDIVIDED AND IT LEAVES THE REST OF US TO JUST KIND OF TRY TO WORK IT OUT.

SO THE FIRST PICTURE YOU HAVE IS MY CAR ON THE DRIVEWAY, AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU CAN'T PASS REALLY ANYBODY WITHOUT GETTING OFF TO THE SIDE.

THE OTHER ONE IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PEOPLE COME UP LOOKING FOR ESTES PARK OR WHATEVER, POTENTIALLY. OR IT COULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE HOMEOWNERS, BUT THE TWO VEHICLES WERE LOOKING FOR WHATEVER. AND OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE OFF IN THE DITCH RIGHT NOW ON THAT RIGHT SIDE, AS YOU SEE THAT I HAVE RUTS PROBABLY OVER SIX INCHES DEEP THAT JUST CAME FROM A RECENT INCIDENT AFTER THE SNOW.

ANYWAY, SO IT IS A CONTINUED CONCERN OF MINE.

AND I DO BELIEVE THAT IT WILL AFFECT ME ON A DAILY BASIS IF YOU GO FORWARD WITH THIS PROPOSAL. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF STAFF? I'D LIKE TO HEAR A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT DIRECTOR COHAN HAS TO SAY ABOUT YOUR IDEA ABOUT THE CUL DE SAC.

DIRECTOR COHAN? YES.

OK. YES, SIR, PLEASE.

DID YOU CATCH THAT, ROB? YES? DID YOU CATCH COUNCIL MEMBER MCCASKILL'S QUESTION ABOUT A CUL DE SAC? YES, SIR, ABOUT THE FEASIBILITY OF INSTALLING, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY IT COULD ALWAYS BE INSTALLED. YES, SIR. YOU KNOW, THERE'S OBVIOUSLY MORE THAN THAT.

WE'D HAVE TO LOOK AT DRAINAGE AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THAT WITH THE RADIUS AND TO MAKE SURE IT CAN SUPPORT THE EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

BUT THAT'S DEFINITELY SOMETHING WE COULD LOOK AT.

SO I GUESS IT WOULD BE UP TO THE APPLICANT OR WHOEVER BUYS THAT OTHER LOT TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO GIVE UP THE LAND TO PUT IN A FULL CITY APPROVED CUL DE SAC, RIGHT?

[01:05:05]

WELL, IS IT GOING TO BE A REQUIREMENT OR IS IT GOING TO BE UP TO THEM? I THINK IT'D BE A CONDITION OF THEM DEVELOPING, GETTING THE APPROVAL FOR SEPARATING THESE LOTS INTO TWO LOTS OF BUILDING ON THE VACANT LOT.

I MEAN, THEY DON'T HAVE TO THEY DON'T HAVE TO ACT ON IT, BUT IT WOULD BE PART OF THE APPROVAL IF THEY WANTED TO MOVE FORWARD.

WE'RE NOT FORCING THEM TO BUILD THE CUL DE SAC IF THEY IF THEY CHOOSE NOT-- RIGHT. IF THEY DON'T BUILD ON THE PROPERTY.

RIGHT. ALL WE'RE DOING TONIGHT IS SUBDIVIDING THE PROPERTY POTENTIALLY.

SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A FULL CUL DE SAC AT THE END.

SO THESE CARS, THEY GET BLOCKED OUT IN THE STREET, COULD COME DOWN TO THE END AND TURN AROUND JUST LIKE ANY OF OUR OTHER ONE IN ONE OUT NEIGHBORHOODS? YES, MA'AM. I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT THE THOUGHT IS.

SO THAT'S A FULL SIZED CUL DE SAC THAT YOU CAN TURN AROUND IN? YES, MA'AM, THAT IS CORRECT.

BUT IS THERE AN OPTION? BECAUSE I REMEMBER ONE DISCUSSION WHERE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT LIKE A HALF MOON THAT WAS KIND OF IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY, ONE OF THE PRESENTATIONS.

IS THAT CORRECT? I BELIEVE THERE WAS, YES, SIR.

I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, IS THERE A WORKAROUND TO THAT? IS IT FEASIBLE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY VEHICLES TO TURN AROUND WITHOUT IT BEING A FULL? I HAVE TO DEFAULT TO THE FIRE CHIEF ON THAT ONE, SIR, HONESTLY--.

THAT JUST HAPPENS TO BE HERE.

[LAUGHTER] I DON'T WANT TO ANSWER.

OK.

HOW ARE YOU? GOOD THANK YOU.

COULD YOU REPEAT YOUR QUESTION? I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE-- IS IT FEASIBLE TO HAVE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT OR VEHICLES TO TURN AROUND WITHOUT IT BEING A FULL CIRCLE, SAY, AT THIS END? COULD WE DO LIKE, IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE LIKE A HALF MOON OR-- IT'S ACTUALLY DESIGNED THE WAY IT IS TODAY, WE ACTUALLY WENT AND CHECKED IT AND WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH THE WAY IT'S CURRENTLY DESIGNED.

SO ANYTHING IN ADDITION TO THAT IS FINE.

BUT WE ACTUALLY THE WAY IT'S DESIGNED IN THE GATE, THEN ORIGINALLY WE CAN TURN OUR APPARATUS AROUND. WE WENT AND CHECKED IT THE LAST TIME THIS WAS ON THE AGENDA.

WE'RE FINE WITHOUT THE CUL DE SAC OR WITH IT EITHER.

WHATEVER YOU GUYS DECIDE WITH THE WAY IT CURRENTLY IS DESIGNED, WE HAVE NO ISSUES TURNING THAT APPARATUS AROUND. SO THE CUL DE SAC IS MORE AN ISSUE OF GETTING AROUND THE FACT THAT WE DON'T ALLOW FLAG LOTS AND WE DON'T ALLOW THE STUB OUTS LIKE THAT.

SO, OK YES, IT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE OUR ABILITY EITHER WAY.

IT'S DESIGNED WITH IT, WHEN THEY PUT THAT IN, WE WORKED WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND WE HAD THE ACCESS CODES TO THE GATES SO WE CAN TURN OUR APPARATUS AROUND.

OK, THANK YOU.

PERFECT. SO EVEN TODAY AS IT IS, YOU HAVE NO PROBLEM SERVICING THE HOMES THAT ARE THERE FOR FIRE? NO, MA'AM, NO ISSUE. OK.

DIRECTOR COHAN, JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, IF JUST SOME, LIKE A RANDOM NEIGHBORHOOD WAS BEING PROPOSED ON A PLOT OF LAND AND IT WAS JUST A ONE IN ONE OUT, IS THAT HAMMERHEAD TURN AROUND AN OPTION? I MEAN, INSTEAD OF A CUL DE SAC, COULD A DEVELOPER HAVE THIS HAMMERHEAD THEY CERTAINLY COULD DO THAT.

YES, SIR. AS LONG AS OUR CURRENT ORDINANCE MEETS WITH CLEARANCE.

AND IF THERE'S ANY DRAINAGE OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT HAS TO BE ADDRESSED, THAT IS CERTAINLY A POSSIBILITY. YES, SIR.

THERE IS SOME FLEXIBILITY. IT WOULD LOOK WEIRD, BUT YOU COULD DO IT.

YES, SIR. OK.

OK, YOU WOULD PUT THAT AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THE ROAD? YEAH, I GUESS.

IS THERE ANY ISSUE WITH PUTTING IT IN THE MIDDLE, PUTTING THE HAMMERHEAD IN THE MIDDLE, AND I ONLY BRING THAT UP BECAUSE IN ONE OF THE PRESENTATIONS WE SAW, I THINK THAT WAS AT LEAST THE TOPIC WAS AT LEAST BROACHED OF HAVING THE HAMMERHEAD KIND OF BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES.

NO, FOR US, IT WOULDN'T AS LONG AS IT MEET CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS, THEN, I THINK WE WOULD BE FINE. AND THE BIG DRIVER IS MAKE SURE THAT FIRE HAS NO PROBLEMS WITH IT ACCESSING THEIR APPARATUS. OK.

BUT WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT AND WORK WITH THE APPLICANTS TO MAKE SURE IT MEETS THE REST OF OUR REQUIREMENTS, RADIUS AND VISIBILITY, SIGHTLINES AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

YES, SIR. THANK YOU.

[01:10:01]

SO THIS WOULD, YOU KNOW, HELP THE TRAFFIC SITUATION, IF THAT'S, BUT AGAIN, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL WHEN AN APPLICANT CAME FORWARD TO ACTUALLY BUILD ON THAT PROPERTY.

RIGHT. WE WOULDN'T REQUIRE IT UNTIL PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR THE BUILDING PERMITS BEING PULLED. THAT'D BE A CONDITION OF THE-- YEAH, IF THIS DOES PASS, I JUST DON'T WANT TO LEAVE A MESS FOR SOMEONE IN THE FUTURE.

THAT SAYS, WELL, WHY DID YOU APPROVE THIS, BUT YOU DIDN'T MAKE ANY ARRANGEMENTS? SO THAT WOULD BE IN STAFF NOTES, BUT NO ONE WOULD BE TIED TO IT UNTIL BLOCK ONE LOT THREE R THREE R TWO.

UNTIL SOMEONE CAME FORWARD WITH A PLAN FOR THAT.

YES, MA'AM. NO IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE REQUIRED UNTIL SUCH TIME A BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT IS PULLED AND ISSUED ON THAT SOUTHERN LOT AND UTILITY EASEMENT, THAT UTILITY EASEMENT ISSUE WOULD HAVE TO BE CLEARED UP BEFORE THAT TOO? YEAH, THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO GET WATER TO, YOU KNOW, HAVE TO MEET ALL FIRE REQUIREMENTS IN TERMS OF WATER SUPPRESSION AND GET WATER TO THE HOUSE.

RIGHT. OK.

OK, COUNCIL, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? JUST AGAIN, FOR DIRECTOR BAKER.

SO IT WOULD BE A NOTE IF WE'RE GOING TO DO A MOTION TO APPROVE, IT WOULD BE A NOTE, WHATEVER WE COME UP WITH, WHETHER IT'S SOME SORT OF HAMMERHEAD OR CUL DE SAC OR WHATEVER, WE'RE NOT REQUIRING IT NOW.

IT'S JUST GOING TO BE NOTED THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED AS PART OF A SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION.

AND NO IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME UNTIL A SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION COMES THROUGH TO BUILD ON WHAT THREE R THREE R TWO SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT? YES, SIR. YOU CAN STATE IN YOUR MOTION THAT THE CITY WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY IMPROVEMENTS UNTIL THE TIME THAT A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ON, LOT THREE R THREE R TWO ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS.

AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE OTHER ITEMS THAT WERE DISCUSSED, THE PAD FOR THE TRASH AND THE MAILBOXES OR THE PAD FOR THE--I GUESS THAT WAS FOR BOTH.

YOU COULD MAKE A NOTE TO THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER TO PROVIDE THAT PAD SITE.

THE ONLY STIPULATION IS THAT ANYTHING BUILT UP THERE WOULD NEED TO GET THE APPROVAL FROM PUBLIC WORKS, IN TERMS OF THE PROPER SIZE IN THE CULVERTS.

AND THEN IF ANY ENCROACHMENT IS NEEDED BECAUSE THE RIGHT OF WAY ISSUES, OK, BUT THAT DOESN'T BECOME THE PROBLEM OF THE PERSON WHO PURCHASES THREE R THREE R TWO THAT GOES WITH WHAT WE VOTE ON TONIGHT IF IT PASSES, NOT UNLESS, YOU KNOW, TYING IT TO A PLAT ACTION WOULD IF YOU KEEP IT JUST NOTED THAT THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO THAT.

RIGHT. AND THAT NOTING THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.

OK, SO DIRECTOR BAKER, SO RECOGNIZING TO MY EARLIER POINT, THIS IS AN EXTREMELY UNUSUAL SITUATION, VERY UNIQUE, YOU KNOW, PROPERTIES HERE, BUT ALSO WANTING TO BE SENSITIVE TO NOT SETTING A PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER IDEAS FOLKS COME UP WITH AS A RESULT OF THIS.

DOES THE HAMMERHEAD VERSUS THE CUL DE SAC, DO THEY ACCOMPLISH THE SAME THING OR IS A HAMMERHEAD GOING TO BE EASIER FOR SOMEBODY DOWN THE ROAD TO GO, "WELL, THEY DID IT OVER HERE AND I CAN JUST POP A HAMMERHEAD IN HERE" VERSUS THE CUL DE SAC LOOKS VERY MUCH LIKE WHAT OUR DESIGN STANDARDS ARE, THAT YOU HAVE A CUL DE SAC STREET.

THE MAIN INTENT OF THE HAMMERHEAD IS TO MAKE SURE THAT A PORTION OF THAT DRIVEWAYS BUILT TO SUPPORT A PUMPER TRUCK--.

FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. RIGHT.

AND SO THOSE WILL SERVE THAT PURPOSE TO ALLOW THOSE THAT TRUCK TO COME IN AND TURN AROUND, BACK OUT, TURN AROUND AND GO BACK OUT TO THE CUL DE SAC.

YOU KNOW, IF YOU DO A HALF OR TURN AROUND TOWARD THE END, THAT WOULD BE MORE MAYBE TRAFFIC RELATED TO THE.

OR SOMEBODY COULD GO DOWN AND DO IT, KIND OF LIKE WOODSEY COURT, I GUESS, AN EXAMPLE

[01:15:06]

IT'S NOT A FULL CUL DE SAC, BUT YOU CAN TURN YOUR CAR AROUND AND YOU CAN GO BACK OUT TO CONTINENTAL. SO THE THE HAMMERHEAD THAT'S SHOWN ON THE PLAT HERE WOULD SERVE TO ENSURE THAT A FIRE TRUCK WOULDN'T HAVE TO BACK OUT, YOU KNOW, THE HALF CUL DE SAC OR THE TURN AROUND WOULD ALLOW FOR IT TO BE MORE USED BY DELIVERIES OR MAYBE PEOPLE THAT CAME INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BY MISTAKE OR--.

WHICH DOESN'T THAT HELP RESOLVE ONE OF THE ISSUES ON THAT STREET RIGHT NOW? A LITTLE BIT, I WOULD THINK.

I MEAN, THAT'S THE THING IS WHAT YOU KNOW, ARE YOU FIXING ANYTHING WHEN YOU DO THIS? I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND THE APPLICANT'S GETTING A LOT TO SELL, BUT ARE YOU FIXING ANYTHING WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE EXISTING ISSUES THAT ARE ALREADY THERE? SO A HAMMERHEAD DOESN'T REALLY FIX ANYTHING BECAUSE IN FACT, YOU CAN PUT A GATE IN FRONT OF A HAMMERHEAD; IT'S ON YOUR PROPERTY.

RIGHT, AND ARE WE TRYING TO IN SOME WAYS, YOU KNOW, CONFORM TO OUR PLANNING STANDARDS TOO.

THAT'S A VERY LEGITIMATE POINT.

YEAH. SO, YEAH, THE ONE THE ONE ISSUE WAS THE FIRE, THE OTHER ISSUE IS FIXING AN EXISTING ISSUE. YEAH, I WILL JUST SAY, IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT A HALF CUL DE SAC FROM EMERGENCY RESPONSE, WE WOULD PREFER HAMMERHEAD, A HALF CUL DE SAC, REALLY DOESN'T DO US ANY GOOD.

WE CAN'T TURN AROUND IN THAT, AND A HAMMERHEAD, WE CAN TURN AROUND IN.

IT TAKES A, YOU KNOW, DOUBLE WHAT THAT IS TO TURN A FIRE TRUCK AROUND.

A HAMMERHEAD, WE CAN PULL UP BACK OUT AND TURN AROUND.

YOU CAN'T DO THAT WITH A HALF CUL DE SAC.

SO FROM AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE STANDPOINT, WE WOULD PREFER IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT WHICH ONE YOU WOULD PREFER, WE WOULD PREFER THE HAMMERHEAD FOR THAT REASON.

WHAT ABOUT A FULL CUL DE SAC UP TO THE CITY STANDARDS? IF YOU HAD A CUL DE SAC, THAT'S A DIFFERENT STORY.

BUT A HALF CUL DE SAC IS VERY DIFFICULT BECAUSE WE COULD NOT TURN AROUND IN THAT.

WE WOULD STILL HAVE TO BACK OUT AND FIND A PLACE TO TURN AROUND USING WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE. WHICH IS WHAT YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW? YES, MA'AM. THAT'S WHAT I WAS SAYING.

SO FROM THAT STANDPOINT, BUT ON A HAMMERHEAD, WE COULD ACTUALLY USE THAT TO TURN AROUND.

SO IF YOU SPLIT IT BETWEEN THE TWO LOTS, IT WOULD GIVE US ANOTHER ACCESS POINT TO TURN AROUND. YEAH, BUT THE ISSUE FOR US IS WHAT ARE WE FIXING? I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY WE DON'T WANT ANYONE TO HAVE A FIRE THERE, BUT WE ALSO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH TRAFFIC ON THAT ROAD.

SO AND ANOTHER HOUSE WILL ADD TRAFFIC REGARDLESS WHETHER IT'S A UPS TRUCK OR AMAZON OR DOOR DASH OR WHATEVER ELSE.

SO, YEAH.

OK, WELL, I MEAN, IF IT'S APPROVED, IT DOESN'T LESSEN TRAFFIC, IT ACTUALLY INCREASES TRAFFIC TO A SMALL DEGREE, BUT IT MAKES IT FLOW BETTER.

YOU KNOW, YOU CAN GO DOWN AND TURN AROUND AND VERSUS-- RIGHT, IT DOESN'T CUT TRAFFIC IT JUST ALLOWS THE TRAFFIC TO GET BACK OUT EASILY.

RIGHT. OK, SO WHAT'S THE PULSE OF COUNCIL? DO YOU WANT A HAMMERHEAD? DO YOU WANT A CUL DE SAC? WHAT DO YOU WANT? WHAT DO YOU WANT? I GUESS I WOULD JUST WONDER OR HAVE SOME CONCERN ABOUT THE COST OF A FULL CUL DE SAC VERSUS THE RENDERING WE SAW FROM A PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETING.

AND I GUESS BASED ON THAT, NOT KNOWING THAT I WOULD PREFER A HAMMERHEAD, BECAUSE I WOULD GUESS THAT ANY OF THESE FOLKS THAT HAVE THIS HAMMERHEAD TYPE OF DRIVEWAY ALREADY HAVE DELIVERY PEOPLE PULLING IN AND BACKING OUT AND TURNING AROUND ALREADY.

SO I DON'T KNOW.

I'M JUST NOT SURE WHAT TO MAKE OF A FULL CUL DE SAC WITHOUT SEEING IT RENDERED, I GUESS.

WELL, I THINK TO MAYOR HILL'S POINT WE'RE TRYING, YOU KNOW, THE FULL DE SAC SOLVES THAT ISSUE OF PEOPLE HAVING TO BACK OUT AND TURN AROUND.

THAT WAY, THEY CAN JUST GO DOWN TO THE NEW CUL DE SAC AND TURN AROUND THERE IF THAT'S WHAT WE APPROVE. AND I THINK FOR ME, THAT'S THE BEST OPTION AS FAR AS STAYING AS FAR AWAY FROM A FLAGPOLE OR PANHANDLE, LOOK.

WELL, YEAH, AND I THINK TO YOUR EARLIER POINT, I CAN'T IMAGINE US EVER APPROVING A ONE IN ONE OUT NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A HAMMER AT THE END, EVEN IF IT'S TECHNICALLY, YOU KNOW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR ORDINANCES.

NO ONE'S EVER BROUGHT US ONE FOR A REASON.

RIGHT. RIGHT.

I'M WITH YOU, SEAN.

I PREFER THE FULL CUL DE SAC IF WE'RE GOING TO DO IT.

YOU KNOW, AND IT'S NOT UNUSUAL.

I KNOW MY MOM AND DAD LIVE IN [INAUDIBLE], AND THEY WERE REQUIRED TO PUT IN A FULL CUL DE SAC SO THE FIRE TRUCK COULD TURN AROUND BECAUSE THEY WERE AT THE END OF A VERY LONG COUNTRY ROAD THAT'S PROBABLY AS NARROW AS THIS ONE.

SO, I MEAN, IT DOES HAPPEN.

I KNOW IT COSTS MONEY, BUT THERE'S ALSO, YOU KNOW.

SO, HOW DOES THAT RENDERING LOOK THEN? DOES IT ONLY IMPACT SINCE THIS IS A PRIVATE ROAD, WOULD THE FULL CUL DE SAC THEN JUST GO

[01:20:03]

I GUESS, PUBLIC WORKS COULD TAKE A LOOK AT IT.

BUT I THINK IT WOULD PROBABLY BE LOCATED IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF LOT THREE R THREE R TWO CONCEIVABLY.

BE A FULL CUL DE SAC IN THAT TOP RIGHT CORNER.

AND SO IF THEY'RE HAPPY, YOU'RE OK WITH THAT, THEN THEY KNOW ABOUT IT AND KNOW ABOUT THE EXPENSE, THEN SO BE IT.

RIGHT. OK. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? THIS IS A SUPER MAJORITY, SO I THINK WHAT WE CAN DO IS GO AHEAD AND DO A MOTION AND SEE WHERE IT COMES OUT AND IF IT, AND WE'LL SEE WHERE IT COMES OUT.

SO.

AND I SEE YOUR POINT, TOO, KATHY.

SO I LIKE THE HAMMERHEAD, HOWEVER, TO RANDY'S POINT, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU SOLVE ANYTHING WITH THE HAMMERHEAD BECAUSE IT'S YOU KNOW, THE FIRE CHIEF WAS SAYING YOU DON'T NEED IT, BUT I DON'T, HAVING SAID HERE, YOU KNOW, FOR YEARS ON THE ZBA, I DON'T LIKE THE IDEA OF SETTING A PRECEDENT AND HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT LATER THAT WE, YOU KNOW, WE FIX ONE THING AND CAUSE EVEN MORE PROBLEMS. I THINK THAT KIND OF MAKES IT MORE PALATABLE.

I THINK THAT'S VERY FAIR.

YEAH, TO YOUR POINT, I THINK, YOU KNOW, YEAH, IT'S GOING TO EAT INTO THAT LOT, BUT I MEAN, I THINK THAT'S THE BETTER COURSE.

IT'S BETTER THAN LOT. YEAH.

I MEAN, THEY'RE KIND OF PAINTED INTO A CORNER, YOU KNOW, ON THIS, NOT BY ANY RESULT OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS. THEY'RE JUST SORT OF PAINTED INTO A CORNER.

BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I KNOW THIS AREA.

I'VE WALKED IT. I'VE BEEN BACK THERE.

IT'S EXTREMELY UNIQUE.

AND IF THERE WERE AN AREA THAT IT MAKES SENSE TO DO IT, I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THAT.

BUT I DON'T WANT TO SACRIFICE OUR STANDARDS AND BE BATTLING THAT FOR YEARS TO COME.

AS TO POINTING TO THAT AND GOING, WELL, YOU DID IT HERE, SO YOU SHOULD DO IT FOR ME.

THAT'S TO ME WHY A CUL DE SAC MAY NOT BE IDEAL TO WHOEVER BUYS THAT OR, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER, BUT STILL IT'S NOT A DEAL BREAKER FOR THEM.

YOU CAN PUT A BEAUTIFUL HOME THERE WITH A CUL DE SAC.

AND IT'S BETTER FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO BE ABLE TO GO AND CONTINUE, YOU KNOW, MOVE STRAIGHT INSTEAD OF BACKING UP AND ALL THAT.

SO THAT'S WHERE I'M AT. OK, WELL, YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND GIVE A SHOT AT A AT A MOTION AND WE'LL JUST SEE IF IT PASSES OR NOT BASED ON SUPER MAJORITY.

YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NINE, A CASE NUMBER, ZA 19 DASH ZERO ZERO TWO SEVEN.

PLAT REVISION FOR LOTS THREE R THREE R ONE AND THREE R THREE TWO BLOCK ONE STEWARD ADDITION A PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT THREE R THREE BLOCK ONE.

STEWARD EDITION LOCATED AT FIVE FIVE ONE EAST DOVE ROAD ADDRESSED AS FIVE FIVE ONE AND FIVE SIX ONE EAST DOVE ROAD BY THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY FOURTH TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER FIVE DATED FEBRUARY TWENTY FOURTH TWENTY TWENTY ONE.

GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUESTS FIRST AS THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHT THREE AS AMENDED SECTIONS EIGHT POINT ZERO ONE A AND FIVE POINT ZERO FOUR WHICH REQUIRE THAT EVERY LOT SHALL FRONT ON A PUBLIC STREET.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO THIS REQUIREMENT AND WE'RE APPROVING IT.

NUMBER TWO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR EIGHT THREE.

SECTION FIVE POINT ZERO SIX REQUIRES MINIMUM FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS ALONG BOTH SIDES OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS.

NO SIDEWALKS ARE PROPOSED.

ALSO NOTING THAT ANY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG DOVE ROAD TO ADDRESS THE MAILBOX AND TRASH CAN ISSUE MUST RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ALSO NOTING A CONDITION AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION AND MOTION OF CONSTRUCTION OF A FULL NOT HALF CUL DE SAC AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THE ROAD IN THE DIMENSIONS, MATERIALS AND QUALITY AS APPROVED BY OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

BUT NO IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED UNTIL AN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND A BUILDING PERMIT IS MADE ON LOT THREE R THREE R TWO.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OK, AND THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO, AND THAT'S THE END OF IT.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.