Nov 04, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission

[00:00:02]

GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

[1. Call to Order]

THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR BEING WITH US TODAY.

I THINK I'LL GO AHEAD AND START FOLLOWING THE REGULAR.

WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH THE AGENDA THIS EVENING IN THE ORDER THAT YOU SEE IT PRINTED OUT, SO NOTHING'S GETTING MOVED AROUND OR TABLED AT THE LAST MINUTE.

WE WON'T NEED EXECUTIVE SESSION THIS EVENING, SO FAR AT LEAST.

AND WITH THAT, I'LL SEE IF THERE'S ANY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE.

NO, SIR, NOT THIS EVENING.

OK, THANK YOU.

[4. Chairman Comments]

I THINK IT'S PLAYING AT KELLER FOSSIL RIDGE.

I GUESS I'M GETTING THE RIGHT RIGHT KELLER HIGH SCHOOL SO GOOD LUCK TO THEM AND GOOD LUCK TO OUR LADY DRAGON VOLLEYBALL TEAM.

THE SECOND ROUND OF THE PLAYOFFS TOMORROW OUT IN ABILENE, PLAYING MIDLAND LEGACY IF YOU CAN MAKE IT TWO AND A HALF HOURS WEST TO GO SUPPORT THEM.

SO WITH THAT, I'LL STOP THE SHAMELESS PLUGS AND GO LAUNCH INTO THE REST OF OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING. ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

ALL RIGHT, LET'S GO AHEAD, PLEASE.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND.

SECOND. OKAY, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.

AND PASSES SIX ZERO.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW WE'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE INTO OUR REGULAR AGENDA THIS EVENING.

WE'VE GOT ITEM NUMBER SIX ON OUR AGENDA, WHICH IS PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PEMBERTON.

[6. Consider: ZA21-0082, Preliminary Plat for Pemberton]

YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE, YOU KNOW, WE HEARD DENNIS TALK ABOUT HOW IT'S AND DENNIS I GUESS YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND MAYBE SKIP TO THE PUNCH LINE HERE AND RESTATE WHAT YOU SAID IN THERE IN TERMS OF IT BEING CONSISTENT WITH ALL THE PAST PRIOR APPROVALS.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

THIS PROPERTY WAS RE ZONED SF-20A WHAT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU IS THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT ACCOMPANIED THAT ZONING CHANGE AND APPROVAL, PROPOSING SIX SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, ALL OF TWENTY THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OR MORE.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT.

FULLY CONFORMING WITH THAT CONCEPT PLAN AND THE UNDERLYING ZONING.

NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM? OK, THANK YOU.

DENNIS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OK, THANK YOU. GOOD.

WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING FOR THIS ITEM.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST HANG RIGHT THERE? I GUESS. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? OK, IF WE NEED THE APPLICANT, WE'LL CALL YOU UP.

ITEM NUMBER SIX ON OUR AGENDA DOES CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS, SO GO AHEAD AND OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING NOW AND ANYBODY THAT'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD PLEASE DO.

SEEING NO ONE COME FORWARD ON ITEM NUMBER SIX, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THAT PUBLIC HEARING. GIVEN WHAT DENNIS SAID ABOUT CONFORMING TO PREVIOUS APPROVALS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION? OK, GO AHEAD.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER SIX ON OUR AGENDA ZA21-0082 SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 3RD 2021 REVISED AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED OCTOBER 29TH 2021.

WE HAVE A MOTION DO WE HAVE A SECOND.

SECOND. OKAY LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE, PLEASE. PASSES 6 0.

CONGRATULATIONS, GOOD LUCK AT CITY COUNCIL.

I'M NOT SURE WHAT DATE THAT WOULD BE TWO TUESDAYS FROM NOW HOW ABOUT THAT.

OK, WE'LL GO AND MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER SEVEN CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING CHANGE IN SITE

[7. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-643e, (ZA21 -0084), Zoning Change and Site Plan for West Elm]

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

THIS IS A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE CURRENT SP1 ZONING FOR THE PARK VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER.

THIS PARTICULAR BUILDING IS LOCATED THAT'S AFFECTED BY THE AMENDMENT IS 1001 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD, AND THIS WAS FORMERLY THE LOCATION OF FRESH MARKET.

IT'S RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND LAND USE PLAN, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, IT'S S-P-1 DETAILED SITE PLANNING DISTRICT ZONING WITH UNDERLYING C-3 DISTRICT USES.

[00:05:01]

THIS INVOLVES SOME MATERIAL APPLICATIONS TO THE BUILDING THAT WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL ZONING OF THE PROPERTY.

THIS IS A CURRENT LOOK OF THE BUILDING TODAY.

IT'S PRIMARILY A ROCK AND BRICK EXTERIOR.

THE PROPOSAL IS TO REVISE THIS, WHICH IS CURRENTLY A SINGLE TENANT BUILDING TO A TWO TENANT BUILDING, RECONFIGURE THE STOREFRONT ENTRIES.

THE PROPOSED OCCUPANT OF THE NORTH PORTION OF THIS SPACE IS THE WEST ELM, AND THEY ARE PROPOSING TO CHANGE THE FRONT FAÇADE FROM A STONE BRICK MIX TO A PLASTER EXTERIOR. IT IS A TRUE CEMENT STUCCO PLASTER APPLIED IN THE APPROPRIATE METHOD AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CORRIDOR OVERLAY AND THE CITY'S MASONRY ORDINANCE.

ADDITIONALLY, THIS PATIO AREA IS CURRENTLY CLAD IN A STONE COLUMN.

THEY'RE PROPOSING THAT THESE BE A ARCHITECTURAL STEEL COLUMN SIMILAR TO THE ARBOR STRUCTURE THAT'S CURRENTLY IN PLACE NEXT TO THE FOUNTAIN, WHICH HERE IS A PHOTO OF THAT FOUNTAIN STRUCTURE.

ADDITIONALLY, ON THE PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING, THEY ARE PROPOSING SOME COLOR CHANGES ON THE MASONRY EXTERIORS.

THIS IS THE NORTH FAÇADE FACING SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

THEY ARE PROPOSING A WHITE PAINT AND A GRAY COLORED PAINT ON THE EXISTING EXTERIORS THERE.

AND THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION AGAIN.

AND I'LL MENTION SIGNAGE IS NOT [INAUDIBLE] IT'S NOT PART OF YOUR CONSIDERATION THIS EVENING. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE CURRENT MASTER SIGN PLAN IN PARK VILLAGE WOULD COME BACK TO THE SIGN BOARD AT A LATER DATE.

THIS IS THE LOADING DOCK AREA HERE.

THEY'RE PROPOSING COLOR CHANGE IN THIS AREA HERE.

ALSO ON THE WEST ELEVATION FACING BACK AT TOWER BOULEVARD, THEY'RE PROPOSING A COLOR CHANGE ON THAT PORTION OF THE BUILDING.

THESE ARE THE PROPOSED COLOR PALETTES, WHICH AREN'T SHOWING UP AS WELL AS I'D LIKE, BUT IT'S PRIMARILY A CREAM AND WHITE TONES AND DARK GRAY TONES.

WE'VE RECEIVED NO RESPONSES FROM THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WERE PROVIDED NOTICE. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, AND OTHER THAN THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT. OK, ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS FOR STAFF? I'M SURE, DR. SPRINGER IS DISAPPOINTED WE'RE NOT GOING BE ABLE TO CONSIDER THE SIGNS TONIGHT, BUT OK, THANK YOU, DENNIS.

THAT'S RIGHT. SOMETHING TO LOOK FORWARD TO.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING FOR THIS ITEM, HOPEFULLY.

PLEASE, WHY DON'T YOU GO AHEAD AND COME ON UP FOR THIS ONE.

I THINK WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE JUST A FEW QUESTIONS.

AT LEAST I KNOW I MIGHT.

PLEASE GO AHEAD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, IF YOU COULD, AND I DON'T THINK WE NEED A FORMAL PRESENTATION, MAYBE JUST Q&A.

ARTHUR CALCATERRA QUORUM ARCHITECTS PROJECT MANAGER.

SCOTT WILSON, QUORUM ARCHITECTS PRINCIPAL.

OK, SO THE ARCHITECT'S HERE, I GUESS, OK, BECAUSE I WAS GOING TO ASK MAYBE SOME MORE LANDLORD ORIENTED QUESTIONS, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY'RE IMPERATIVE.

[00:10:02]

SO THE MATERIALS YOU'RE GOING FROM THE STONE TO JUST PLASTER AND THEN YOU'RE JUST GOING TO PAINT IT. I MEAN, THAT'S BASICALLY THE STORY.

PAINTED STUCCO WITH THREE LEVEL APPLIED STUCCO.

SO ARE YOU GOING TO TEAR THE STONE OFF AND THEN REDO IT? YES THE STONE WILL HAVE TO COME OFF. YES. PART OF THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE TENANT SPACE.

WE HAVE TO TAKE THE FRONT FAÇADE AND ACTUALLY SPLIT IT INTO A SINGLE ENTRY INTO TWO ENTRIES. AND ONCE WE DO THAT, THAT THE WHOLE FRONT FAÇADE HAS TO BE REWORKED STRUCTURALLY AND AT THAT POINT THAT THAT MATERIAL WOULD HAVE TO BE REMOVED ANYWAY.

SO THE IDEA IS TO COME BACK WITH THE NEW MATERIAL ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE AND THE EAST ELEVATION, WE'RE ACTUALLY PRESERVING THAT MATERIAL.

BUT THEN WEST ELM TO IDENTIFY THEM AS A STANDALONE TENANT WOULD HAVE THE NEW STUCCO FINISH. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. AND IS THIS THE STONE THAT'S ON THERE NOW? IS THAT LIKE A VENEER? IT IS. IT IS A THIN.

ABOUT A 1 INCH VENEER.

OK. AND WHEN YOU SAY STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR THE PERGOLA OUT THERE, I MEAN, YOU'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT TUBE STEEL.

YES, THAT'S. WE'RE GOING TO ENCAPSULATE THE EXISTING WHAT APPEARS TO BE A STEEL STRUCTURE UNDER THERE NOW. WE'LL ENCAPSULATE IT A BREAK METAL FINISH AND THEN THE WHOLE STRUCTURE WILL GET PAINTED SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU'RE SEEING THERE.

SO YOU'RE SAYING IT'S GOT STONE ON IT NOW, YOU'RE GOING TO TEAR THAT OFF.

AND IF THE UNDERLYING STRUCTURE IS ACCEPTABLE, YOU'LL JUST WRAP THAT IN SOMETHING.

WE'LL WRAP IT SO IT'S CLEAN ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

THANKS.

OK. OTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS.

OK. WELL, YOU CAN GO AND SIT BACK DOWN, I GUESS, IF IF WE NEED ANYTHING ELSE, WE'LL DEFINITELY CALL YOU BACK UP. APPRECIATE YOU FOR BEING HERE.

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN ON OUR AGENDA DOES CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING NOW. ANYBODY LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.

AND SEEING NO.

ONE, I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

I THINK IF I REMEMBERED RIGHT, KEN AND DENNIS, I THINK THE THREE COATS STUCCO IS NOT, I GUESS, INCONSISTENT WITH OUR ORDINANCE, BUT IT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY.

SO THAT'S PART OF THE REZONING HERE, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. THIS WAS ZONED AS AN SP-1.

SO IT'S KIND OF WHAT'S APPROVED IS TIED TO THE ZONING, THE ELEVATIONS, AND THIS IS A MODIFICATION TO THE ADOPTED AND APPROVED ELEVATIONS AS PART OF THAT INITIAL ZONING.

BUT YOU ARE CORRECT. THE PLASTER MATERIAL, AS DENNIS MENTIONED, IS COMPLIANT WITH OUR MASONRY ORDINANCE IN OUR CORRIDOR OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS IN TERMS OF AN ACCEPTED MASONRY MATERIAL. OK.

YEAH. AND THEN IN TERMS OF THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE REQUEST ON THE COLUMNS, I MEAN, I GUESS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH SOMETHING ELSE WE DID, YOU KNOW, IN THE CENTER, ON ANOTHER AREA.

AND I GUESS AT LEAST VISUALLY LOOKS APPEALING.

BUT ADMITTEDLY, IT IS KIND OF ALONG 1709.

SO I MEAN, I THINK I'M FINE WITH IT JUST GIVEN THE OCCUPANCY HISTORY IN THIS CENTER AND THAT SPACE OR LACK THEREOF AND TRYING TO HELP FACILITATE THAT.

BUT I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS.

YOU KNOW, MR. CHAIRMAN, IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO AROUND THE CORNER IN BETWEEN TAVERNA ROSSA AND SUR LA TABLE THAT WAS APPROVED RECENTLY.

AND THEN I THINK WE SAW A PICTURE IN HERE.

IT'S SIMILAR TO THE REWORK OF THE FOUNTAIN TOO.

SO I THINK IT'S PRETTY CONSISTENT AND I THINK IT LOOKS NICE AND CLEAN.

YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD POINT THAT NEW RESTAURANT THAT'S IN THERE.

YEAH, IT ESCAPES ME THE NAME OF IT.

BUT YEAH, THAT LOOKS PRETTY SHARP.

YOU KNOW, I'VE GOT A SIMILAR REACTION IN TERMS OF THE LOOK.

I THINK THAT IF YOU'RE SUBDIVIDING THAT SPACE INTO TWO TENANTS, YOU WANT TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN IDENTITY THERE.

AND I THINK THE WAY THAT IT'S PROJECTED IN EVEN THE NORTH FACING AS IT LOOKS OUT ON SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD, I THINK IS PRETTY ATTRACTIVE.

THAT AREA IS OBVIOUSLY A REWORK OR A SIGNIFICANT REWORK BECAUSE OF THE LANDSCAPING ISSUES THAT ARE THERE. SO I DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO WHAT I SEE HERE.

OK? ANY OTHER THOUGHTS COMMENTS BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION FROM OUR ESTEEMED VICE CHAIRMAN? OK.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN ON OUR AGENDA.

ZA21-0084 SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 4TH 2021 AND ALSO SUBJECT TO OUR REVISED SITE PLAN.

REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED NOVEMBER 4TH 2021.

OKAY, THANK YOU. WE HAVE MOTION.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE, PLEASE.

[00:15:01]

CONGRATULATIONS AND GOOD LUCK AT THE NEXT LEVEL.

I WAS JUST TOLD THAT THAT MEETING THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, ASSUMING YOU MAKE THE AGENDA, IS NOVEMBER 16TH.

SO GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.

AND I KNOW AT LEAST A FEW OF THE COMMISSIONERS UP HERE TO LOOK FORWARD TO THE CORRESPONDING SIGN CASE WHEN IT COMES THROUGH.

SO WITH THAT, WE'LL GO AND MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER EIGHT ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING.

[8. Consider: Ordinance No. 480-789, (ZA21-0089) Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 1049 Shady Oaks]

THIS IS ANOTHER ITEM THAT WE HEARD IN SOME DETAIL IN OUR WORK SESSION.

I BELIEVE THAT THIS ITEM IS CONSISTENT WITH OUR LAND USE PLAN AND I DON'T THINK HAS ANY NOTED VARIANCES WITH IT.

SO MAYBE DENNIS, I'LL LET YOU KIND OF MAKE A FEW BRIEF COMMENTS AND THEN WE CAN CONSIDER IT. AND CERTAINLY THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. PROPERTY IS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON THE CITY'S LAND USE PLAN, AND THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS SF-1A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CHANGE, WHICH IS MINIMUM ONE ACRE. THE PROPERTY IS JUST UNDER AN ACRE AND A HALF PROPOSED FOR SINGLE FAMILY, HOME AND CONCEPT PLAN BEFORE YOU CONFORMS WITH THE DISTRICT FOR WHICH THEY'RE PROPOSING ZONING UNDER. OKAY.

ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS FOR DENNIS.

I THINK WE'RE GOOD, THANK YOU, DENNIS.

THANK YOU.

ITEM, I GUESS.

PARDON ME, DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT HERE FOR THIS ITEM.

ANYONE WANT TO SPEAK WITH THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME, AT LEAST? EVERYBODY GOOD. OK, JUST HOLD TIGHT THERE, SIR, AND WE'LL WE'LL SEE IF WE NEED YOU.

ITEM NUMBER EIGHT ON OUR AGENDA DOES CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING NOW FOR ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.

PLEASE COME DOWN.

SEEING NO AGAIN STRIKING OUT THREE TIMES NOW I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING . ANY OTHER THOUGHTS OR COMMENTS ON THIS ONE BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

ALL RIGHT, GO AHEAD.

ALL RIGHT, MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER EIGHT ON OUR AGENDA ZA21-0089 SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 3, 2021 REVISED FURTHER SUBJECT TO PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED OCTOBER 29, 2021 AND SUBJECT TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 480-789.

OK, WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND.

SECOND. OK, LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE AND PASSES 6 0.

CONGRATULATIONS AND GOOD LUCK AT NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

THE LAST ITEM ON OUR REGULAR AGENDA FOR OUR PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TONIGHT IS

[9. Consider: Ordinance No. 1075-C, Amendments to the City of Southlake Mobility Master Plan]

AND I THINK MAYBE JUST TO FRAME THIS UP REALLY QUICKLY FOR THE COMMISSIONERS.

YOU KNOW, I THINK THIS IS MAYBE CONSIDERED, YOU KNOW, BEING IT'S AN AMENDMENT, MAYBE A REFINEMENT OR A REPRIORITIZATION OF SOME OF THE PROJECTS.

AND I THINK THE GOAL HERE THIS EVENING AND I KNOW DIRECTOR BAKER IS GOING TO MASTERFULLY LEAD US THROUGH THIS IS HAVE HAVE HIM SOME UP THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ON SOME CHANGES, TWEAKS THAT THEY'VE MADE.

AND I THINK IT'S FOR US TO KIND OF REVIEW THESE SUGGESTED CHANGES AND OFFER UP ANY OTHER COMMENTS RELATIVE TO PARTICULARLY RELATIVE TO THINGS LIKE SIDEWALKS.

AND IF THERE'S OTHER PLANS OR SEGMENTS WE THINK ARE WORTHY OF, I GUESS AT A MINIMUM ADDITIONAL STUDY OR ITEMS LIKE THAT.

SO I THINK THAT'S THE GOAL IS JUST PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF FEEDBACK THAT WE CAN HOPEFULLY AFTER THAT CRAFT A MOTION AND PASS SOMETHING ALONG COUNCIL TO CONSIDER FROM HERE.

AND AS WE ALL KNOW TO, YOU KNOW, AS A REMINDER, IT SEEMS LIKE SIDEWALKS ARE YOU KNOW, USUALLY THE NUMBER ONE ITEM ON OUR CITIZEN SURVEYS.

SO STAFF TRYING TO BE RESPONSIVE TO THAT HERE.

SO KEN, HOPEFULLY I LAID ALL THAT OUT, RIGHT.

BUT PLEASE TAKE IT FROM THERE AND RUN WITH IT.

YES, SIR. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS ITEM IS TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO OUR SOUTHLAKE MOBILITY PLAN.

WITH US THIS EVENING, WE DO HAVE THREE MEMBERS FROM OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT CAN ANSWER SOME DETAILS ON ANY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECTS.

KEVIN FERRER, BRYAN AHUMADA AND KEVIN TAYLOR ARE IN THE AUDIENCE WITH US, AND THEY CAN PROVIDE SOME INPUT, IF NEEDED, DURING THE CONSIDERATION PROCESS.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN AMENDMENT, AS THE CHAIRMAN MENTIONED, WAS TO UPDATE THE MOBILITY PLAN, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS AWARE, IS A BLUEPRINT FOR THE PROVISION OF FUNDING OF CAPITAL PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS THE CITY USES ARE

[00:20:01]

BUT AS YOU KNOW, FOR OTHER TYPES OF PLANS, WE LEAN HEAVILY ON THOSE DOCUMENTS TO ESTABLISH PRIORITIES.

THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SERVE AS A BLUEPRINT FOR THE CITY TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS, AND THE GOAL IS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THINGS GLOBALLY BEFORE WE'RE FUNDING AND PRIORITIZING PROJECTS. AND SO AS WE GET NEW INFORMATION, WE UPDATE OUR MASTER PLANS AND IN SOME ELEMENTS, EVERY FOUR TO FIVE YEARS, LIKE THE LAND USE PLAN, WE WILL COME IN AND DO A FULL REVISION THAT WE WORK WITH THE P&Z WITH AND ULTIMATELY SEND TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION.

THE SIDEWALKS, AS YOU KNOW, BASED ON OUR CITIZEN SURVEY, HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A VERY CRITICAL ELEMENT TO THE CITY'S OVERALL MOBILITY STRATEGY.

IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S DESIRED BY THE CITIZENS.

THE CITY ALLOCATES FUNDS EACH BUDGET YEAR, EACH IN THE CIP, TO CONSTRUCT THESE TYPES OF SIDEWALKS AND THE WAY IT IS STRUCTURED, IS WE HAVE A PATHWAYS MAP, WHICH IDENTIFIES ALL THE SEGMENTS UNDER A BUILD OUT SCENARIO, AND WE HAVE THESE SIDEWALKS THAT WE HAVE IDENTIFIED AS PRIORITY SECTIONS.

IN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY THOSE SIDEWALKS THAT HAVE THE BEST CHANCE TO BE BUILT BASED ON CONSTRUCTABILITY, MEANING THAT THERE'S RIGHT OF WAY THERE MAY NOT BE A LOT OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY.

THERE'S NOT BRIDGE CROSSINGS, MAYBE NOT MUCH DISRUPTION TO THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT IN TERMS OF TREES.

WE WE DID AN EVALUATION WITH OUR CONSULTANT AND LOOKED AT THE PRIORITY SEGMENTS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED ON THE MAP AND SCORED THOSE.

AND WE ARE GOING TO REEVALUATE OUR PRIORITY LIST TO MOVE THOSE SIDEWALK PROJECTS THAT WE THINK WE CAN GET BUILT IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS AS A PRIORITY BECAUSE WE WANT TO PROVIDE SIDEWALKS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND WOULD LIKE TO TACKLE THOSE PROJECTS WE THINK WE CAN GET DONE.

AND ANY TIME WE GO THROUGH AN EASEMENT OR THE CITY HAS NEVER DONE A COMBINATION TO DO A SIDEWALK. BUT AS YOU KNOW, THE CITY JUST CAN'T GO ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.

AND SO WE NEED THE SPACE TO CONSTRUCT SOME OF THESE SIDEWALKS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE MOBILITY MAP OR THE PATHWAYS MAP.

ALSO, AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT, WE'RE LOOKING TO DO A PATHWAYS MAP AMENDMENT.

YOU MAY REMEMBER A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO WE TALKED ABOUT A POSSIBLE REALIGNMENT OF THE PATHWAY WITH THE ZENA RUCKER PROJECT, THE OFFICE PROJECT.

AND SO WE'LL BE PRESENTING THAT HERE THIS EVENING.

ALSO UP ON WHITE CHAPEL, WHERE THE BRIDGE PROJECT IS, WE'RE LOOKING TO GET SOME GRANT FUNDING TO ELEVATE THAT STRUCTURE, TO MOVE IT OUT OF THE FLOODWAY.

THAT'S THE FLOODING THAT OCCURS WHEN, PARTICULARLY WHEN LAKE GRAPEVINE BACKS UP AND THEN IT CUTS OFF OUR NORTHERN PART OF THE CITY, TO BOB JONES PARK AND EAST BOB JONES VIA WHITE CHAPEL. AND SO THAT'S A MAJOR ROAD PROJECT THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE UNDERTAKING NEXT FEW YEARS AND THERE MAY BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOME SIDEWALKS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THAT.

AND THEN THERE'S A COUPLE OF ROAD PROJECTS THAT WE WANT TO LIST IN THERE BECAUSE AS I MENTIONED, IN ORDER TO GET ON THE CIP, THEY NEED TO BE IN SOME OF THESE POLICY DOCUMENTS AND WOULD LIKE TO AMEND THE PLAN TO ALLOW THOSE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUNDING IN THE FUTURE. JUST QUICKLY, BECAUSE A SIDEWALK SYSTEM IS NOT LISTED BY AS A PRIORITY SEGMENT ON THE PRIORITY MAP OR PATHWAYS MAP.

THERE'S A NUMBER OF WAYS THAT'S SOUTHLAKE PROVIDES SIDEWALKS IN THE CITY.

AS MENTIONED, SIDEWALKS ARE BUILT AS PART OF THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM.

THAT'S ONE WAY THE CITY ALLOCATES FUNDS EACH YEAR FOR THAT.

WHEN WE DO ROADWAY PROJECTS, WHITE CHAPEL BOULEVARDS AS AN EXAMPLE, WHEN WE DO THESE ROAD WIDENING PROJECTS, WE PROVIDE SIDEWALKS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THOSE PROJECTS.

AND SO WHEN THE WHITE CHAPEL PROJECTS, SIDEWALKS WILL BE ULTIMATELY CONSTRUCTED FROM 114 DOWN TO EMERALD AS PART OF THAT PROJECT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD.

VILLAGE CENTER IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE.

THE RECENT PROJECT, WHERE YOU SEE SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD.

BRUMLOW AVENUE IS ANOTHER MAJOR ROAD PROJECTS GOING TO COME UP IN THE NEXT THREE OR FOUR YEARS.

THAT'LL INCLUDE SIDEWALKS INTO OUR FIRST DEDICATED BIKE LANE FACILITY ON THAT ROADWAY.

OUR ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS MODIFIED THEM REALLY 2004 TO REQUIRE THAT SIDEWALKS BE BUILT WITH ALL NEW COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

WHEN A LOT OF THE SUBDIVISIONS WERE CONSTRUCTED IN 1990 TO ABOUT 2004 SIDEWALKS WEREN'T

[00:25:07]

SO WE HAVE A NUMBER OF SUBDIVISIONS IN THE CITY THAT DON'T HAVE SIDEWALKS IN THEM.

BUT SINCE 2004, RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ANY NEW RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DOES REQUIRE SIDEWALKS TO BE BUILT ALONG THE PUBLIC ROADWAY.

AND SO WE'VE ADDED QUITE A BIT OF LINEAR FEET TO OUR SIDEWALK SYSTEM BECAUSE THAT ORDINANCE CHANGE NOW GOING ON, IT'S, I GUESS, 16TH OR 17TH YEAR.

WHEN WE BUILD OUR PARKS, WE CONSTRUCT PATHWAYS NOT ONLY TO CONNECT TO THE SURROUNDING SYSTEM WHO ARE AVAILABLE, BUT INTERNALLY.

THE CITY HAS ALSO TAKEN ON SOME INFILL GAP PROJECTS AND THEN WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHING FUND PROJECT OR PROGRAM IN PLACE WHERE IF A NEIGHBORHOOD DOES COME TO THE CITY AND THEY OBTAIN THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS [INAUDIBLE] RIGHT OF WAY FOR SIDEWALK PROJECT, THE CITY WILL MATCH.

THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE A 50 50 MATCH ON THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THAT SIDEWALK.

AND SO THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITY IF A SUBDIVISION OR A NEIGHBORHOOD IS TRULY INTERESTED IN PROVIDING SIDEWALKS IN THE FUTURE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT PROGRAM.

IN TERMS OF OUR VALUATION THIS WAS A CRITERIA THAT WAS LOOKED AT, AND WE USE THIS AS A BASIS TO RANK THE SIDEWALKS THE PRIORITY SYSTEM SIDEWALKS ONE, TWO OR THREE, BUT THAT INCLUDE CONNECTIVITY TO OTHER SIDEWALK SYSTEMS LOCATION NEAR PARK OR SCHOOL AVAILABLE RIGHT OF WAY OR EASEMENTS.

TREE REMOVAL, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.

AND AS YOU GET THOSE LAST FIVE BULLETS, YOU KNOW ANY OF THOSE TAKE PLACE, THOSE INCREASE THE COST OF THE PROJECT.

SO THIS IS OUR RECOMMENDED TIER ONE PROJECTS ON THIS MAP, AND I'LL QUICKLY GO OVER THOSE.

THOSE INCLUDE THE UNION CHURCH ON THE NORTH SIDE TO FILL IN THE GAPS THAT WILL PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY FROM THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS SUCH AS SIENA AND CHESAPEAKE TO THE CHESAPEAKE PARK, WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE CITY.

THE SILICON AREA THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF PEOPLE WALKING DURING THE DAYTIME.

AND THEN, OF COURSE, IF YOU GO TO A DRAGONS FOOTBALL GAME ANY TIME OF THE YEAR, A NUMBER OF PEOPLE PARK IN THAT INDUSTRIAL FLEX OFFICE AREA AND WALK TO THE STADIUM.

THIS WOULD PROVIDE A CONNECTION DOWN TO EXCHANGE, AND YOU COULD CROSS TO GET ON THE STADIUM SIDE AND CREATE A LITTLE SAFER ENVIRONMENT FOR THE LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT WALK DURING ON GAME DAYS.

AND NOLAN DRIVE ALSO IS ANOTHER EASY PROJECT THAT CAN BE COMPLETED BECAUSE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE FLAT TERRAIN WITH THE MINIMAL DISTURBANCE TO THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT OR TOPOGRAPHY. THE SOUTH WHITECHAPEL BOULEVARD PROJECT YOU MAY HAVE SEEN WHEN THE BRIDGE OPENED UP TO BEAR CREEK THAT WAS A TXDOT PROJECT TO IMPROVE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY THAT BRIDGE HAS OPENED UP, AND YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED THE EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALK ON THE COLLEYVILLE SIDE, A VERY NICE SIDEWALK THAT LEADS ESSENTIALLY INTO THEIR TOWN CENTER AND EVENTUALLY ONTO THE COTTON BELT.

THE CITY DOES HAVE THE AVAILABLE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG SOUTH WHITE CHAPEL, AND THEN YOU HAVE THE TIMARRON KIND OF OPEN SPACE THAT'S ADJACENT TO THAT.

THAT PROJECT SCORED HIGH AS A CONNECTION TO JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE CONTINENTAL ROUNDABOUT. THERE IS A SIDEWALK SEGMENT IN THE TIMARRON OFFICE AND THAT WOULD GET A CONNECTION TO THE CONTINENTAL SIDEWALK SYSTEM THAT WOULD GET YOU ALL THE WAY BACK UP TO CROOKED IN THAT AREA. SO THAT WOULD BE A CRITICAL LINK AND ALSO ALLOW CONNECTION TO THE SOUTH AND INTO COLLEYVILLE AND THEN ALL THE WAY DOWN, ESSENTIALLY TO THE TOWN CENTER IN COLLEYVILLE. SO IT WOULD BE A CRITICAL CONNECTION POINT AND THAT IS RANKED HIGH IN TERMS OF A PRIORITY.

DAVIS BOULEVARD.

THIS IS ON SUNSET.

AGAIN, THERE'S AN ADEQUATE RIGHT OF WAY IN THE TXDOT RIGHT OF WAY TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE THAT CONNECTION.

AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SEE ON THOSE PHOTOS THAT THAT SIDEWALK SYSTEM JUST ENDS, THAT WOULD PROVIDE SOME CONNECTION BACK TO THE SOUTH, BUT ALSO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY INTO

[00:30:01]

THE SUNRISE RANCH IS IN CLARIDEN RANCH, AND FOR SOME REASON WHEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK SYSTEM WAS PUT IN, THEY DID NOT COMPLETE THIS CONNECTION INTO THE CLIFFS PARK, SIDEWALK OR PATHWAY SYSTEM.

AND ONE OF THE PARK PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS WAS TO GO AHEAD AND COMPLETE THAT CONNECTION.

YOU CAN SEE WHERE PEOPLE ARE WALKING.

IT'S ONE OF THOSE WHERE THE GRASS IS WORN BECAUSE PEOPLE JUST OBVIOUSLY JUST GO AHEAD AND WALK AND GET INTO THE PARK AND WALK.

AND SO THAT'S ONE OF THOSE NO BRAINERS.

WE NEED TO DO THAT. AND BECAUSE OF THE PARK PLAN, IT'S ON CITY PROPERTY, A VERY EASY SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO COMPLETE.

BYRON NELSON, AGAIN, ONE OF THOSE SMALL GAPS, BUT IMPORTANT GAPS.

YOU KNOW, BYRON NELSON, THE SIDEWALKS ARE LONG BYRON NELSON ALL THE WAY DOWN TO CONTINENTAL AND THEN THE SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

WHILE THERE ARE A FEW GAPS ON THAT 1709 SYSTEM, THAT SIDEWALK SYSTEM BASICALLY RUNS EAST FROM GRAPEVINE ALL THE WAY WEST TO KELLER, ABOUT SIX MILES OF SIDEWALK.

THAT'S A PROJECT THAT THE CITY RECEIVED A GRANT ON ABOUT 10, 12 YEARS AGO TO HAVE THOSE SIDEWALKS INSTALLED WHEN THE LANE WIDENING TOOK PLACE ON 1709 A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO.

AND SO THAT WOULD ALLOW CONNECTIVITY INTO THE PARKWOOD PROPERTY.

YOU GOT ROCKENBAUGH AND THEN, OF COURSE, INTO THE TIMARRON NEIGHBORHOOD.

ALONG 114 THERE ARE SOME GAPS.

AGAIN, THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE TOPOGRAPHY.

THIS IS A PROJECT THAT SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE COMPLETED FAIRLY SOON.

THIS WOULD PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY FROM ESSENTIALLY THE GRAPEVINE IF YOU COULD SEE THE SIDEWALK TO THE EAST ALL THE WAY, ALMOST TO CARROLL.

THERE WILL BE A GAP ON THE CHESAPEAKE PIECE.

THAT'S THE PIECE THAT HAS THE HEAVILY TREE'D JUST TO THE EAST OF GATEWAY CHURCH ALL THE WAY UP TO CARROLL, EXCEPT FOR THE HARD CORNER.

BUT THAT WOULD COMPLETE A LARGE SEGMENT ALONG 114 AND THAT WOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE GATEWAY CHURCH SIDEWALK PROPERTY.

IN YOUR PACKET WE'VE ALSO PROVIDED THE TIER TWO TIER THREE PROJECTS.

I WON'T GO THROUGH THOSE THIS EVENING, BUT THOSE ARE AVAILABLE.

WE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THOSE PROJECTS.

WE ALSO WANTED TO GET OUR INPUT FROM OUR CITIZENS, AND WE DID GET A NUMBER OF COMMENTS WHICH AT YOUR PLACE THIS EVENING, THERE IS A SPREADSHEET THAT WAS PREPARED BY STAFF THAT SUMMARIZES THE PROJECTS THAT WERE REQUESTED TO BE ADDED TO THE PRIORITY LIST.

AND WE WOULD LIKE TO GO THROUGH THOSE AND GET ANY COMMENTS OR FEEDBACK FROM CITY COUNCIL.

IF THERE'S ANY PUBLIC HERE THIS EVENING, THAT'D LIKE TO SPEAK WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY LIKE TO GET SOME FEEDBACK FROM THAT.

BUT YOU RECEIVED A NUMBER OF COMMENTS REGARDING A SIDEWALK SYSTEM ALONG RANDOL MILL.

AND THIS IS A CONNECTION THAT WOULD GO NORTH TO WESTLAKE AND UP IN THE WESTLAKE NEIGHBORHOODS.

THERE'S A PRETTY EXTENSIVE SIDEWALK SYSTEM WHICH IS BEING UTILIZED AND PROVIDE A CONNECTION FROM THE RESIDENTS IN THIS GENERAL AREA.

THE STAFF LOOKED AT IT AND DID A ROUGH COST ESTIMATE AND THIS SECTION HERE IS ABOUT 2400 LINEAR FEET, ABOUT A $650,000 COST.

THE CHALLENGES WOULD BE EASEMENTS WOULD NEED TO BE OBTAINED.

IT IS A BAR DITCH. THERE MAY BE SOME TREE REMOVAL.

AND THEN IF YOU CAN SEE DOVE HERE, THE CITY LIMITS DO NOT GO ALL THE WAY TO DOVE.

AND SO THE CITY WOULD HAVE TO EITHER HAVE WESTLAKE OR THIS PROPERTY OWNER AGREE TO AN EASEMENT TO MAKE THAT CONNECTION.

IT COMES INTO THAT THREE WAY TRIANGLE, AND WE WOULD NEED TO PROBABLY CREATE SOME TYPE OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSING INTO LOOK AT THAT TO GET THEM TO THE SIDEWALK SYSTEM INTO THE WEST LAKE SYSTEM.

HERE'S A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE AREA AND THIS SHOWS WHERE THE ARROW IS, THE GENERAL CONNECTION POINT AND YOU CAN SEE THE SIDEWALK SYSTEM INTO THE THE WESTLAKE AREA.

[00:35:05]

IS IT EASIEST TO I GUESS IT MIGHT BE EASIER TO JUST LET YOU PRESENT THE HANDFUL I GUESS THAT YOU HAVE AND THEN WE PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON EACH ONE JUST SO WE HAVE THE CONTEXT OF THE DIFFERENT ONES RATHER THAN. I MEAN, IS THE COMMISSION OK WITH THAT RATHER THAN JUST ONE BY ONE? SO WE HAVE THAT, OK? BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU GUYS KNEW WE CAN CIRCLE BACK ON EACH ONE AND JUST GET SOME QUICK COMMENTS.

ALSO, A LOT OF COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED ON EAST DOVE ROAD.

THIS SEGMENT IS HEAVILY USED BY BICYCLISTS, BUT WE DO SEE A NUMBER OF RUNNERS AND WALKERS ALONG DOVE.

THERE IS A PORTION THAT DOES HAVE SIDEWALKS WHERE THE ROUNDABOUT IS TO THE EAST AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, JUST TO THE NORTH OF DOVE IN THIS LOCATION.

THE CITY LOOKED AT THE SECTION ABOUT 4000 LINEAR FEET.

IT'S A $1.2 MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT.

WHAT'S DRIVING THE COST IS THE EASEMENTS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED BAR DITCH.

THERE WOULD BE TREE REMOVAL, DRAINAGE CHALLENGES AND UTILITY RELOCATIONS.

BUT AGAIN, THIS HAS BEEN A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY THE NEIGHBORS AND SOME OF THESE PROJECTS ALONG DOVE AND RANDOL MILL AND PARTICULARLY THE DOVE PROJECT, YOU KNOW, MAYBE GRANT ELIGIBLE BECAUSE IF YOU COULD GET THAT CONNECTION ACROSS THE YATES GROCERY STORE AND INTO GRAPEVINE, THAT GETS YOU TO THE HORSESHOE TRAIL IN GRAPEVINE PARK.

SO IF YOU KEEP GOING EAST, THAT GETS YOU INTO ABOUT A FOUR MILE LOOP SYSTEM AROUND THE LAKE AREA. SO AND THEN ALSO GRAPEVINE HAS SIDEWALKS ALL ALONG DOVE LOOP UNTIL YOU HIT BACK WHAT THEY CALL DOVE STREET, WHICH RUNS NORTH SOUTH.

AND SO THAT WOULD CREATE ANOTHER, MUCH LIKE THE COLLEYVILLE SITUATION, WOULD CREATE A MAJOR CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CITIES AND BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF A SIDEWALK SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE.

ANOTHER ONE WAS THE EAST HIGHLAND STREET.

THIS SIDEWALK SEGMENT DOES PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY TO THE MIDDLE SCHOOL.

THE CITY HAS BEEN LOOKING AT THIS AS PART OF A UTILITY PROJECT SEWER PROJECT, AND IF RIGHT OF WAY COULD BE OBTAINED, POSSIBLY COULD BE BUILT AS PART OF THAT SEWER PROJECT IN THE AREA AND WOULD BE A CONNECTION FROM KIMBALL TO THE SCHOOL PROPERTY ALONG EAST HIGHLAND. AND ALSO THAT WOULD GET BACK TO KIMBALL, WHICH GETS TO THE DOVE KIMBALL INTERSECTION WOULD GET YOU TO LAKE GRAPEVINE.

SO THAT WOULD BE THERE ARE SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF KIMBALL CURRENTLY.

THIS IS THE NORTH PEYTONVILLE PROJECT.

THE ESTIMATED COST ON THIS ONE IS ABOUT THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS, IT'S ABOUT FORTY SEVEN HUNDRED LINEAR FEET.

AGAIN, ANY PROJECTS ALONG PEYTONVILLE THE RANDOL MILL.

IT WILL REQUIRE SOME TREE REMOVAL AND SOME ADDRESSING SOME DRAINAGE WITH THE BAR DITCHES.

THE REQUEST FROM THE CITIZEN WAS THAT THIS BE COMPLETED IN 22 OR 23.

THIS IS THE SOUTH PEYTONVILLE, SO HERE'S THE HIGH SCHOOL.

THIS WOULD COMPLETE A LINK TO THE SOUTH AND YOU WOULD HAVE TO CROSS, BUT GETS YOU DOWN TO CONTINENTAL INTO THAT SIDEWALK SYSTEM.

THERE ARE SOME EXISTING SIDEWALKS THAT LEAD INTO THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO THAT GENERAL AREA. THE SOUTH WHITE CHAPEL PROJECT, THIS IS WHERE THE LARGE HOMES ARE, THE FEED STORE BARBECUE, THAT AREA FROM 1709 TO CONTINENTAL.

WE DID RECEIVE SOME COMMENTS FOR THAT SIDEWALKS SEGMENT.

THIS IS NOT ON CURRENTLY ON OUR PRIORITY LIST, BUT COULD BE ADDED AS A LOWER TIER.

WE HAVE NOT DONE A COST ANALYSIS ON THIS, BUT COULD BE A SEGMENT THAT WE COULD DEFINITELY

[00:40:05]

AND SO THOSE ARE THE SIDEWALK SEGMENTS.

SO BEFORE I MOVE ON TO THE MAP AMENDMENTS, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO DISCUSS THAT CHAIRMAN OR IF YOU'D LIKE. YEAH, I MEAN, I GUESS JUST COMMISSIONERS.

I MEAN, I GUESS AN DENNIS, I THINK THE RIGHT WAY TO CATEGORIZE THESE PROJECTS ARE THESE ARE NOT THE TIER ONE PROJECTS THAT YOU PRESENTED EARLIER THAT WOULD BE DONE FAIRLY QUICKLY. I MEAN, THESE ARE, I GUESS, AROUND TIER THREE.

I MEAN, EXCLUDING MAYBE THE ONE ON THE SCREEN, BUT THESE ARE TIER THREE PROJECTS THAT I THINK YOU'RE LOOKING FOR FEEDBACK IN TERMS OF IF WE WOULD RECOMMEND POTENTIALLY.

I THINK SOME OF THE OPTIONS ARE EITHER TRYING TO PUSH THEM UP TIER WISE OR MAYBE, YOU KNOW, MAKE MORE EFFORTS TO FIND, YOU KNOW, PARTIAL GRANT DOLLARS TO HELP MOVE THOSE ALONG AND OR MAYBE BEGIN TO DO JUST SOME INITIAL MOCKUPS ON WHAT THINGS MIGHT LOOK LIKE.

IS THAT THAT FAIR? YES, SIR. I MEAN, GENERALLY, THESE HAVE COME INTO TIER THREE, BUT IF YOU SEE A SEGMENT YOU THINK NEEDS TO BE MOVED UP A HIGHER PRIORITY BASED ON THE CITIZENS COMMENT, WE CAN DEFINITELY TAKE A LOOK AT THAT.

I DO THINK LIKE THE DOVE PROJECT, WHICH IS A MUCH DESIRED PROJECT THAT WE COULD LOOK AT SOME, MAYBE SOME GRANT FUNDING OR MAYBE SOME DESIGN, JUST SO THAT EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS WHAT THAT SIDEWALK SYSTEM MAY LOOK LIKE AND HOW IT MAY OR MAY NOT IMPACT THE ENVIRONMENT.

I MEAN, IF YOU LOOK AT THE SIDEWALK SEGMENT AROUND THE ROUNDABOUT THAT WAS DONE VERY NICELY AND HAS REALLY MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

AND WHETHER IF THAT'S POSSIBLE AS YOU HEAD TO THE EAST, IT MAY BE, BUT WE JUST NEED TO STUDY AND LOOK AT IT. AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT THAT MAY OR MAY NOT LOOK LIKE BEFORE MOVING FORWARD.

BUT THE TWO PROJECTS THAT RECEIVED THE MOST INPUT WERE THE RANDOL MILL AND THE DOVE PROJECT SEGMENT. AND MAYBE IF YOU GO BACK ALL THE WAY TO THE MAYBE IT'S BACK TO THE RANDOL MILL ONE FIRST. WE'LL JUST MAYBE SEE IF ANYBODY HAS ANY COMMENTS REAL QUICK, JUST ONE AT A TIME ON EACH OF THESE, I GUESS STARTING WITH THIS ONE, WHICH I THINK WE, YOU KNOW, MAYBE TO FRAME IT CORRECTLY, YOU SAID WE GOT A LOT OF CITIZEN FEEDBACK.

HOWEVER, I GUESS STAFF, YOU KNOW, HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT JUST USAGE AND POPULATION DENSITY AND THEN I GUESS COST AND AS WELL AS JUST FEASIBILITY RELATIVE TO THE POTENTIAL OF WESTLAKE TO COOPERATE WITH THIS OR LACK THEREOF, I GUESS.

YEAH, I THINK THOSE WOULD BE SOME QUESTIONS WE WOULD NEED TO EXPLORE IS WHETHER WESTLAKE WOULD ALLOW THE CONNECTION TO THE NORTH AND THEN THE DOVE AND THIS LOCATION IS IN THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE.

AND, YOU KNOW, IN ORDER TO ALLOW CROSSING OF THAT AT THAT THREE LANE INTERSECTION AND WHAT POSSIBILITIES THIS ONE IS STAFF, I GUESS SEEING IF CITY OF WESTLAKE HAS A FORMAL RESPONSE TO THAT.

SURE, WE CAN HAVE. WELL, I MEAN, LET'S GET IT ON THE RECORD, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER IT IS, I GUESS OTHER COMMENTS, THOUGHTS ON THIS ONE? WELL, I PERSONALLY THINK THE RANDOL MILL IS A PRETTY IMPORTANT ONE TO GET DONE.

THAT'S A VERY DANGEROUS ROAD BECAUSE IT GOES DOWNHILL.

TODAY, YOU KNOW, I HAD TO, YOU KNOW, GET OVER IN THE OTHER LANE FOR TWO PEOPLE WALKING TWO DOGS. AND OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, THEY WERE ALL TAKING AN ENTIRE LANE, YOU KNOW, SO YOU KNOW, I'D REALLY HATE SOMEBODY TO GET TAKEN OUT.

WELL, MAYBE STAFF, I GUESS.

COULD THAT BE ONE WHERE I COULDN'T REMEMBER IF YOU CITED A DOLLAR AMOUNT OR NOT, BUT MAYBE JUST. I THINK IT WAS LIKE SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND? YEAH, MAYBE JUST REFINEMENT OF A COST AND OR A MOCKUP ON THAT ONE OF JUST WHAT IT WOULD.

HOW MANY TREES WOULD BE TAKEN OUT.

I GUESS.

THE OTHER THING ABOUT THAT, TOO, IS THAT AREA THAT IS PART OF QUAIL HOLLOW THAT'S SHOWN THERE SORT OF THE LIGHTLY SHADED AREA TO THE WEST THAT'S SUPPOSEDLY GOING TO BE A PARK.

IT WAS PART OF THAT WHOLE BUILDING PROJECT THEY WERE DOING THERE AND THEY GAVE THAT TO WESTLAKE. SO HAVING ACCESS TO THAT WHENEVER THEY FINALLY DECIDE TO OPEN IT UP TO THE PUBLIC WOULD BE A PLUS TOO.

ASSUMING THEY OPEN IT UP TO SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTS.

YEAH. HOPEFULLY SO, BUT YEAH.

OK, WE'LL SEE WHAT PUBLIC MEANS.

YEAH. ANY OTHER COMMENTS, THOUGHTS ON THIS ONE? YOU KNOW, I KIND OF LOOK AT AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THE BREAKDOWN HERE BECAUSE AS A GUY WHO LIKES TO RIDE A BIKE AROUND THIS AREA AND I'LL GO UP RANDOL MILL AND THAT IS A TOUGH AREA TO RIDE A BIKE ON.

IT'S TOUGH TO GO DOWN DOVE THE CONNECTIVITY INTO COLLEYVILLE AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO I'M KIND OF LOOKING AT IT MORE ON A MACRO LEVEL.

[00:45:01]

BUT I THINK RANDOL MILL IS ONE I THINK DOVE WHEN YOU GO DOWN THERE.

BUT AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD SOME, I GUESS, CHALLENGES IN TRYING TO GET SOME COOPERATION, SOME TIME WITH NEIGHBORING CITIES THAT I WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THAT AS WELL TO SEE HOW RECEPTIVE THEY WOULD BE TO ALLOW CONNECTION INTO WHAT IS A VERY EXTENSIVE.

AND ONE OF THE REASONS I WRITE UP RANDOL MILL IN THOSE OTHER AREAS IS GOING INTO WESTLAKE AND OUT TO THE SCHWAB CAMPUS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

YOU'VE GOT YOU'VE GOT GREAT MOBILITY OUT IN THERE THAT I THINK ANYTHING WE CAN DO TO GIVE US ACCESS TO GIVE CITIZENS ACCESS INTO THAT IS GOING TO BE AN ABSOLUTE PLUS.

SO I THINK THE PRIORITY IS ON SOMETHING LIKE THIS ARE PRETTY DOGGONE HIGH TO ME.

OKAY. SO I HEAR GET THAT INFORMATION AND MAYBE AS IT GOES, IF IT IS MOVED TO COUNCIL, HAVE THEM PRESENT THAT INFORMATION AND HAVE THEM DETERMINED ON THE YEAH, I MEAN, I THINK MAYBE WE'LL CLUSTER A FEW OF THESE TOGETHER BECAUSE I KNOW WHEN WE GET TO MAKE SOME SIMILAR COMMENTS ON THE DOVE ROAD ONE.

I MEAN, I THINK BIGGER PICTURE, YOU KNOW, AS WE ALL KNOW, I THINK IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'VE KIND OF DONE THE LOW HANGING FRUIT HERE, AND THERE'S JUST SOME KEY SEGMENTS THAT ARE NOT EASY LIKE THIS ONE AND DOVE THAT WOULD CONNECT A LOT OF AREAS OF THE CITY.

AND THAT'S PROBABLY ONE OF THE REASONS WE KEEP GETTING CONSISTENT FEEDBACK IS TRYING TO FINISH OUT THESE LAST PARTS.

SO YEAH, I THINK AT LEAST TRYING TO GET MORE INFORMATION AND COST FEASIBILITY, WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE. I MEAN, I KNOW WE'LL YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALWAYS TRADE OFFS.

I MEAN, YOU'RE GOING TO LOSE A FEW TREES, BUT IF YOU CAN INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY AND ENJOYMENT. THAT'S A POSITIVE.

SO YEAH, I THINK LET'S GROUP THIS ONE.

AND THEN MAYBE KEN IF YOU GO THROUGH THEM AGAIN, I'D PROBABLY GROUP THIS ONE THERE AS WELL, INCLUDING THE COMMENT YOU MADE ABOUT, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO FIND IF THERE'S, YOU KNOW, GRANT MONEY AVAILABLE.

I MEAN, THIS ONE TO ME IS JUST HUGE BECAUSE YOU KNOW GRAPEVINE HAS AN EXTENSIVE TRAIL SYSTEM JUST TO THE EAST OF THIS, AND WE KNOW JUST TO THE WEST OF WHERE THIS STOPS.

WE'VE BUILT OUT A LOT OF CONNECTIVITY, SO I KNOW THIS IS PROBABLY THE MOST COSTLY ONE, BUT I BET IT COULD ALSO BE THE MOST BENEFICIAL.

SO I'D LUMP THIS ONE, MAYBE IN WITH PEYTONVILLE OR SORRY, RANDOL MILL.

AND THEN I GUESS IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE, WOULD YOU LIKE TO KEEP IT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO MOVE THIS ONE TO PRIORITY ONE WITH THE CAVEAT OF SEEKING MAYBE GRANT FUNDING OR.

YEAH, I GUESS YOU THINK IT'S GRANT FUNDING IS MORE FEASIBLE WITH THIS ONE? I THINK IT MAY HAVE SOME MERITS BECAUSE OF THE CONNECTIVITY, BUT WE WOULD PROBABLY EXPLORE ANY, YOU KNOW, ALL SIDEWALKS.

YEAH, NO. I THINK THAT WOULD BE FINE.

I AGREE. KEN REAL QUICK ON THE DOVE ONE YOU DESCRIBED THE PEYTONVILLE ONE AS HAVING A BIKE SORT OF LANE AND THEN WALKING LANE WILL DOVE AS WELL BECAUSE OF ALL THIS BIKE TRAFFIC HERE. DOVE WILL NOT BRUMLOW.

RIGHT NOW, BRUMLOW IS THE ONLY FUTURE ROADWAY THAT WILL HAVE A DEDICATED BIKE LANE.

THE WAY THE MOBILITY PLAN IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN, THAT IS THE ONLY ROAD RIGHT NOW THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED FOR A DEDICATED BIKE LANE.

DOVE WILL NOT.

DOVE IS TRAVELED HEAVILY BY BICYCLES.

YEAH, OK. AND HOW BIG ARE THE SIDEWALKS? PROBABLY IN THIS SECTION, WE'D PROBABLY BE LOOKING PROBABLY MORE OF A FIVE FOOT.

I MEAN, WE WOULD TRY TO MAKE THEM AS WIDE AS POSSIBLE, BUT GIVING THE EASEMENTS AND THE CONSTRAINTS AND WHAT WILL MOST LIKELY HAPPEN IS IT WILL BE ALMOST A MEANDERING TYPE OF SIDEWALK TO GET AROUND TREES TO TRY NOT TO DISRUPT AS MUCH AS THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AS WE CAN. AND IF WE CAN MANAGE THOSE AROUND AND BUILD THEM, THAT'S USUALLY THE APPROACH THAT OUR ENGINEERING STAFF TAKES IN DESIGNING FACILITIES.

BUT IF WE CAN GET A, YOU KNOW, AN EIGHT FOOT WORKS, OBVIOUSLY ON SOUTH WHITE CHAPEL, I THINK WE WANT TO TRY TO MATCH THE COLLEYVILLE, BUT WE DO HAVE THE RIGHT WAY.

AND IF WE PROBABLY COULD MAYBE GET AN EASEMENT FROM TIMARRON TO GET UP INTO THAT OPEN SPACE, TOO, THAT WOULD BE THE PREFERENCE THAT MATCH THAT EIGHT FOOT ALONG WHITE CHAPEL.

BUT WE'D GO EIGHT FOOT IF WE CAN BUT WE'LL JUST HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SITUATION, SPEAKERS] LOTS OF PLACES, PROBABLY HAVE FIVE FOOT.

OK, BECAUSE I BET YOU THIS DOVE ONE WILL GET PRETTY CROWDED.

WELL, NO, I THINK THAT SOUNDS GOOD KEN ON THIS ONE.

AND I GUESS ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS ONE FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? I'M GUESSING THIS ONE PROBABLY BE LOWER COST, BUT I GUESS THERE WILL BE SOME TREE REMOVAL TO CONTEMPLATE.

[00:50:01]

AND AGAIN, WITH A UTILITY PROJECT GOING IN, WE MAY BE ABLE TO GET A PORTION OF THAT BUILT OR MAYBE EVEN ALL OF IT.

AND SO RIGHT NOW, THE STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED THAT KEEP AS A PRIORITY THREE.

BUT THERE MAY BE OPPORTUNITY IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS TO GO AHEAD AND BUILD THAT.

IF WE HAVE THE RIGHT OF WAY, IF WE CAN GET OK, NEXT ONE PEYTONVILLE.

I THINK PEYTONVILLE IS IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS RANDOL MILL.

IT'S THE NORTH SOUTH THAT YOU'VE GOT TO GET SOMEWHERE TO CONNECT TO SOME OF THESE TRAILS.

SO TO ME, THIS IS I WOULD PUT THIS ONE PERSONALLY [INAUDIBLE] A HIGHER PRIORITY THAN I WOULD PUT DOVE. BUT THAT'S PROBABLY BECAUSE OF THE WAY THAT I HAPPEN TO GO WHEN I RIDE MY BIKE SOMEWHERE, BUT I THINK THIS ONE IS A PRIORITY AS FAR AS I CAN SEE.

YEAH, I WAS GOING TO PROBABLY SAY IT SEEMS FAIRLY SIMILAR TO RANDOL MILL IN TERMS OF THE SAME KIND OF NORTH SOUTH CONNECTIVITY ON ONE OF OUR MORE MAJOR, YOU KNOW, TWO LANE ARTERIALS. MAYBE, I GUESS THE SAME THOUGHT, JUST MORE OF A COST REFINEMENT AND A VISUALIZATION OF KIND OF WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE TRYING TO PUSH THROUGH SOME OF THESE TREES AND TOPOGRAPHY.

DOES THAT SOUND GOOD TO EVERYBODY? YEAH. THIS AGAIN IS ANOTHER ONE THAT I TRAVEL QUITE A BIT AS WELL.

YOU KNOW BY VEHICLE.

NOT BY ON FOOT OR BIKE.

BUT IT'S YEAH, THERE'S NOT A LOT OF ROOM FOR PEDESTRIANS OR BICYCLES ON THIS THING.

IT'S KIND OF ANOTHER ONE. AT LEAST IT'S SOMEWHAT STRAIGHT.

IT'S NOT QUITE AS BAD AS RANDOL MILL UP AND DOWN.

YEAH, IT'S OK. WHAT WAS THE NEXT ONE? AND SOUTH PEYTONVILLE.

OH, YES.

LITTLE BIT LIKE THE HIGH ONE GOING SO.

OK. IS THAT IT? I THINK. OH, THERE WAS THE WHITE CHAPEL ONE, I THINK, BUT I THINK I MEAN, I KIND OF AGREE WITH YOU THERE JUST IN TERMS OF WE CAN'T DO EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE.

THE OTHER ONE'S SEEMED LIKE THEY MIGHT BE A LITTLE HIGHER PRIORITY FOR NOW UNLESS OTHERS DISAGREED. OK, I THINK WE AGREE WITH THAT.

OK. WE'RE ALSO RECOMMENDING A COUPLE OF MAP AMENDMENTS.

THE ONE ON THE LEFT IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIDEWALK SEGMENT ALONG WHITE CHAPEL.

AS THE COMMISSION KNOWS, AS YOU TRAVEL ACROSS THE KIRKWOOD BRANCH THAT BRIDGE HAS BEEN FLOODED THROUGHOUT THE YEARS OR WHEN THE LAKE BACKS UP, IT SERVES THE STORAGE AND THE WATER WILL GET OVER THE BRIDGE.

AND THAT HAS CREATED ISSUES FOR ACCESS AND ALSO HAS OTHER ISSUES, YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND CONVENIENCE, GETTING ACCESS TO BOB JONES PARK, ET CETERA, BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY BASICALLY DOWN T.W.

KING TO ACCESS THE AREA TO THE NORTH.

AND SO THE CITY HAS MADE IT A HIGH PRIORITY TO SEEK FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT.

IT'S PROBABLY A THREE TO $4 MILLION PROJECT WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE AND HOPES TO GET SOME TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUNDING DOLLARS TO CONSTRUCT THIS FACILITY.

BUT AS THIS WAS GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS, THE COG AND THE DENTON COUNTY ARE VERY INTERESTED IN MAKING SURE WE HAVE A SIDEWALK CONNECTION OR SIDEWALK AS PART OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE THERE'S LIMITED RIGHT OF WAY.

THE CURRENT PLAN HAD A FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES, BUT THE CITY CAN'T GO IN AND GET RIGHT OF WAY BECAUSE THIS CORP PROPERTY THROUGH THERE AND THE CORP THE FEDS ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION.

SO WE LOOKED AT IT.

AND BECAUSE OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SYSTEM, THE LESS DISRUPTION ON THE WEST SIDE VERSUS THE EAST SIDE AND THE ABILITY TO SHIFT THE ROAD SLIGHTLY TO GET AN 8 FOOT SIDEWALK IN ON THE WEST SIDE, WE WOULD LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND AMEND OUR PLAN TO SHOW THAT.

AND BECAUSE OF THE SIDEWALKS THAT ARE ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF KIRKWOOD HOLLOW AND AS YOU GET UP INTO CLARIDEN RANCH AREA, IF THIS SEGMENT WAS CONSTRUCTED, IT WOULD PROVIDE

[00:55:04]

AND SO IT'D BE A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT SEGMENT THROUGH THE WHITE CHAPEL.

AND YOU WOULD HAVE CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK SYSTEM BETWEEN THOSE FOUR PARKS.

AND THE NICE THING IS THAT IT MAY BE THROUGH TRANSPORTATION DOLLARS AND NOT NECESSARILY CITY DOLLARS, BUT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE GO AHEAD AND AMEND OUR MAP TO SHOW THAT IN ORDER TO HELP WITH THE FUNDING PROCESS.

THE ONE ON THE RIGHT IS WE HAD A DISCUSSION AT YOUR LAST P&Z MEETING.

YOU MAY RECALL AS PART OF THE THE ZENA RUCKER OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, THE CONCRETE THERE.

THE PATHWAYS PLAN CURRENTLY SHOWS THE CONNECTION ALONG REALLY THE JUST TO THE WEST OF MATTHEW'S COURT.

THERE WAS A FOUR FOOT SIDEWALK THAT WAS BUILT AND WENT TO NOWHERE.

AND THE POINT THAT WAS BROUGHT UP WAS THAT THE WAY IT WAS SHOWN IN THE PLAN, IT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH ROCKENBAUGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND THEN THROUGH THE TIMARRON OPEN SPACE. THE APPLICANT INDICATED THAT DISCUSSIONS WITH TIMARRON THAT THEY WEREN'T REALLY INTERESTED IN OPENING UP THAT AREA TO THE PUBLIC AND THEN HAVING A PUBLIC PATHWAY ON SCHOOL PROPERTY MAY BE SOME CONCERN TO THE CISD AT SOME POINT.

AND AS DISCUSSED AT THAT MEETING, WHEN STAFF WAS LAYING THIS OUT 10, 12 YEARS AGO, THE THOUGHT THE CRITICAL THOUGHT WAS TO GET CONNECTION FROM CARROLL.

AND THEN WHAT WAS THE FUTURE OF WINDING CREEK SUBDIVISION BACK TO RUCKER ROAD SO YOU COULD EASILY WALK TO ROCKENBAUGH ELEMENTARY.

YOU GOT THE PARKWOOD CITY PROPERTY JUST TO THE WEST OF ROCKENBAUGH.

AND IT WAS MORE CRITICAL TO GET FROM POINT A TO POINT B AND GIVEN SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES WITH THE WOODED AREA ON SCHOOL PROPERTY AND TIMARRON PROPERTY STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE GENERALLY JUST SHOW AN ALIGNMENT THAT WHEN, THE IF AND WHEN THE RUCKER PROPERTY DOES EVER DEVELOP THAT THAT TRAIL BE INCORPORATED INTO THAT SUBDIVISION.

SO IT INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD OF CONSTRUCT ABILITY AND HAVING A BUILT AS PART OF A FUTURE SUBDIVISION AND WOULD STILL ACHIEVE THE CITY'S GOAL OF MAKING SURE THE CONNECTION POINTS ARE ACHIEVED AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE TO INCREASE WALKABILITY TO THE SCHOOL AND CITY PROPERTY AND EVENTUALLY THE 1709 SYSTEM AND TO THE SHOPPING CENTER.

SO THERE'S A NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CONNECTION POINTS WITH THAT SEGMENT.

AND SO THIS IS WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE ON THE MAP.

IF APPROVED, THIS IS MORE JUST A KIND OF A PUBLIC INFORMATION ITEM THAT CITY DOES HAVE A WEBSITE WHERE YOU CAN TRACK SIDEWALK PROJECTS AND UPDATES AND WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE BUILT AND PLANNED AND WHAT THE LONG TERM PLAN IS FOR THE CITY WITH ON THE WEBSITE ON THE TOP OF THE SLIDE THERE. A COUPLE OF ROAD PROJECTS, AS MENTIONED WHEN WE FUND ROAD PROJECTS IN OUR CIP, THEY NEED TO BE ALIGNED WITH OUR OVERALL GOALS.

AND SO IF A ROAD PROJECT SHOWS UP IN OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, IT SHOULD BE IN OUR MOBILITY PLAN AS A FUTURE PROJECT.

AND THERE ARE TWO PROJECTS WE WANT TO LOOK AT.

ONE IS THE SHADY OAKS HIGHLAND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PART OF THE MOBILITY PLAN IT'S CURRENTLY WAS IDENTIFIED AS AN INTERSECTION NEEDED TO BE LOOKED AT DURING THE AM PEAK TIME.

IT'S FUNCTIONING AT A LEVEL SERVICE F AND THE PM PEAK TIME IT'S A LEVEL SERVICE E.

E IS OVER 40 SECOND DELAYS AT THOSE INTERSECTION.

F IS CLOSER TO A MINUTE AND THE THE INTERSECTIONS ARE NOT ARE FUNCTIONING AT A VERY LOW LEVEL. AND OF COURSE, A LOT OF THAT IS CAUSED BY THE SCHOOL TRAFFIC.

AND I THINK THE PATTERNS ARE GENERALLY WHEN YOU DROP OFF A KID THAT YOU TRY TO GET 114 EITHER GOING DOWN HIGHLAND OR SHADY OAKS TO HIT DOVE AND GET ONTO ONE 14.

BUT THAT'S CAUSING A LOT OF THAT DELAY AT THAT INTERSECTION AT THOSE PEAK TIMES.

AND SO THE WAY THE RECOMMENDATION WAS PRESENTED TO ON THURSDAY WAS TO, YOU KNOW, EVALUATE THOSE INTERSECTIONS AND IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS.

YOU HAVE BEEN HANDED OUT SOME INFORMATION FROM THE COUNTRY MANOR SUBDIVISION.

OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MET RECENTLY AND WENT OVER A COUPLE OF OPTIONS, WHICH INCLUDE A ROUNDABOUT, A MINI ROUNDABOUT AND SOME RIGHT HAND TURN LANES TO IMPROVE THAT.

AND THE SUBDIVISION IS PRETTY ADAMANT THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO SEE ANY IMPROVEMENTS AT

[01:00:05]

AND SO POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION IS, YOU KNOW, AS THAT GOES THROUGH THE POLICY PROCESS, YOU KNOW, IF IT'S DETERMINED NECESSARY TO MAKE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE CONTINUE TO EVALUATE THAT WE MAKE THIS A PRIORITY TIER TWO, WHICH IS AT LEAST MORE THAN THREE YEARS OUT, BUT I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COMMISSION WAS AWARE OF THAT INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED TO OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TODAY.

AND YOU HAD THAT INFORMATION.

THE OTHER ROAD PROJECT IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH TXDOT THAT WE LOOK AT SOME RAMP REVERSALS AND THEN POSSIBLY ADDITIONAL LANES ON 114.

THE P&Z IS PROBABLY FAMILIAR WITH THE FRONTAGE ROAD PROJECT THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDERWAY ON THE 114 CORRIDOR, AND THIS WOULD KIND OF WORK THE SAME WAY WITH THE CITY WOULD MAYBE PARTICIPATE IN SOME DESIGN MONEY, BUT THIS WOULD ULTIMATELY BE A TXDOT PROJECT LONG TERM PROJECT. BUT WHAT THAT WOULD DO IS CREATE MORE EFFICIENT ACCESS TO PROPERTIES.

SO FOR INSTANCE, WHEN YOU COME OFF THE IF YOU'RE HEADED EASTBOUND ONTO CARROLL, YOU GET OFF RIGHT THERE BEFORE THE 711.

SO YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE THE CARROLL BRIDGE INTERSECTION AND THEN YOU'RE DEALING WITH THE U-TURN TRAFFIC ON THE BRIDGE AND THEN A LOT OF WEAVING IS TAKING PLACE.

THESE RAMP REVERSALS WOULD BASICALLY FLIP WHERE YOU GET ON, YOU GET OFF AND THEN VICE VERSA. AND THAT BY DOING THAT, IT OPENS UP SOME OF THAT PROPERTY MAKES IT MORE ACCESSIBLE, BUT ALSO ADDRESSES SOME OF THAT WEAVING AND SAFETY ISSUES AS A RESULT OF THAT. AND FOR INSTANCE, LIKE WHITE CHAPEL, WHEN YOU HAVE TO EXIT WAY TO THE WEST TO GET TO THAT WHITE CHAPEL INTERSECTION.

AND SO LOOKING IN THAT THIS IS ONLY A RECOMMEND A STUDY.

MORE OF STUDY WOULD NEED TO BE DONE ON THAT.

AND SO, YOU KNOW, THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO LOOK AT IT.

OF COURSE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT WOULD BE VERY CRITICAL AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS PROVIDED THEIR INPUT ON THIS PROJECT.

AND SO THAT WOULD BE ONE PROPOSAL.

AND THEN THE RAMP REVERSAL LOOK AND STUDY THAT FURTHER TO SEE IF IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THE POINT THAT THE RETURN ON THE COST WOULD HELP THESE PROPERTIES AND ADDRESS SOME OF THAT WEAVING AND ALSO PROVIDE BETTER ACCESS TO THE PROPERTIES ALONG 114.

AND THEN LOOK AT MAYBE AN ADDITIONAL LANE ON 114 AS THOSE TRAFFIC VOLUMES INCREASE.

SO THOSE ARE THE PROPOSALS.

YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE P&Z MEETING, IF YOU DO MOVE IT FORWARD, IT WOULD BE NOVEMBER 16TH WOULD BE A CITY COUNCIL FIRST READING AND THEN DECEMBER 7TH.

SO THERE WOULD BE MORE OPPORTUNITIES, IF THE PUBLIC IS WATCHING OR WANTS TO PROVIDE INPUT. WE DO HAVE A WEBSITE ON OUR MOBILITY PLAN PAGE AND A FORM THAT IF CITIZENS WANT TO PROVIDE ANY INPUT THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS, BUT THERE'S STILL A ANOTHER SIX WEEKS AND IF IT STAYS ON SCHEDULE BEFORE COUNCIL WOULD MAKE A A FINAL DECISION ON THIS.

THANKS, KEN. I GUESS, COMMISSIONERS.

DID ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER THOUGHTS ON THE LAST TWO ITEMS THAT KEN WENT THROUGH IN TERMS OF THE FREEWAY RAMPS, WHICH THAT PROJECT TO ME LOOKED REALLY INTERESTING TO STUDY IN TERMS OF MAYBE BETTER ORIENTING THEM FROM BOTH A SAFETY POINT OF VIEW AND MAKING SOME OF THE FREEWAY FRONTAGE WE HAVE.

IT'S REALLY VALUABLE FOR THE CITY, A LITTLE BIT MORE ACCESSIBLE.

I GUESS THERE'S THAT ONE, I THINK, WHICH LOOKED REALLY INTERESTING.

AND THEN I GUESS THERE WAS THE OTHER ONE THAT RECEIVED, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF RESIDENT FEEDBACK, I GUESS. KEN IS THERE IS THERE ANY WAY YOU COULD SUMMARIZE THAT FEEDBACK? I KNOW YOU GAVE IT TO US AND I FLIPPED THROUGH IT.

BUT I MEAN, IS IT RELATED TO THE STRUGGLES THAT THEY'RE HAVING THERE? I MEAN, IS IT? YEAH, I DON'T KNOW, KEVIN, IF YOU MAYBE WANT TO SUMMARIZE.

CONSTRUCTION AT TIME CONSTRUCTION THAT IT IMPACTS THEIR DAILY ACTIVITIES AND ULTIMATELY THEY DON'T WANT ANY IMPROVEMENTS RIGHT TURN LANE OR MINI ROUNDABOUT OR ROUNDABOUTS.

I GUESS THEY DON'T WANT TO HAVE.

I GUESS THE CONSTRUCTION TIME PERIOD WOULD BE NOT DESIRABLE, WHICH I'M ASSUMING WOULD BE DONE IN THE SUMMERTIME RELATIVE TO THE SCHOOL.

IF THERE IS ANYTHING CONTEMPLATED. YEAH, WE WOULD AIM FOR Q THREE, Q FOUR WHEN IT'S

[01:05:03]

AND I GUESS I MEAN, IS IT LANDSCAPING OR JUST THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR.

PART OF IT IS FOR THE ROUNDABOUT OPTION AT LEAST THEY FELT LIKE THERE WOULD BE THE ONLY NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WOULD HAVE A ROUNDABOUT AS AN ENTRANCE FEATURE, WHICH THEY DIDN'T PREFER. AND I THINK MAJORITY OF THE CONCERN WAS REALLY CONSTRUCTIVELY, AND THEY FELT LIKE THAT TAX MONEY COULD BE UTILIZED AT A DIFFERENT PROJECT SINCE THEY FELT LIKE THE TIMING OF THE WAITING PERIOD ON SHADY OAKS.

I THINK THEY DID A ROUGH ESTIMATE ON THE TIMING, ON HOW LONG IT TAKES FROM THE SCHOOL TO THE INTERSECTION. I BELIEVE THEY TIMED IT FOR ROUGHLY SEVEN MINUTES, AND THEY BELIEVE THAT THAT'S NOT JUSTIFIABLE FOR IMPROVING THE INTERSECTION.

OKAY. AND THEIR POINT OF VIEW.

I APPRECIATE IT, I GUESS, COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THAT ONE IN TERMS OF WHAT. WHAT WERE THE TWO POINTS NOW FOR THE SEVEN MINUTES FROM THE INTERSECTION WHERE THE ROUNDABOUT WOULD BE TO WHERE.

OH OK.

ELEMENTARY. IS IT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

DURHAM YEAH. SO SEVEN MINUTES TO GO TWO BLOCKS IS NOT LONG ENOUGH FOR THEM.

OK. YEAH.

I MEAN, I GUESS I WOULD HOPE THAT THERE CAN CONTINUE TO BE A DIALOG.

I THINK THAT'S WHAT STAFF IS PROPOSING AND HOPEFULLY MAYBE THERE'S SOMETHING THAT THAT COULD BE AN IMPROVEMENT ON WHAT'S THERE TODAY, ALBEIT, YOU KNOW, BALANCING THAT WITH NEIGHBOR CONCERNS.

RIGHT. BUT BY LISTENING THE MOBILITY PLAN DOESN'T MEAN IT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, BUT IT PROVIDES THAT FRAMEWORK IF THE CITY DOES CHOOSE TO MOVE FORWARD.

AND MAYBE THERE IS A SOLUTION THAT'S ACCEPTABLE MORE ACCEPTABLE TO THE NEIGHBORS IN THE FUTURE, BUT IT JUST KEEPS THE OPTION OF IT BECOMING A PROJECT IN THE FUTURE.

OK. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY COMMIT IF IT BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE OR DESIGNED TO START, IT WOULD HAVE TO BECOME IT WOULD BE A CIP PROJECT.

IT WOULD HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.

SO YOU GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS.

OKAY. NO, I THINK THAT THAT MAKES SENSE TO ME.

I GUESS I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANY OTHER FEEDBACK ON THAT.

OK. WELL, I THINK IT DEFINITELY NEEDS TO STAY ON THERE, AS YOU KNOW, MOVING FORWARD BECAUSE IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT GOING TO GET ANY BETTER, I DON'T THINK OVER TIME.

YEAH, I THINK A NUMBER OF US HAVE LIVED THROUGH THAT WITH KIDS AT DURHAM AND I THINK OBVIOUSLY THE OFFSHOOT OF THAT IS THAT IT TEMPTS YOU INTO GOING DIFFERENT WAYS, INCLUDING MAYBE THROUGH THE SHADY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THAT'S NOT GOOD FOR SAFETY, EITHER.

YOU WANT THESE ROADS TO DO WHAT THEY'RE CONSTRUCTED TO DO, WHICH IS TO MOVE PEOPLE ALONG.

SO, YEAH, HOPEFULLY THERE'S SOME KIND OF PROGRESS THAT CAN BE MADE THERE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS JUST BROADLY ON THE ENTIRE PLAN? DID YOU HOPEFULLY, I GUESS, DIRECTOR BAKER, GET WHAT YOU NEED FROM US IN TERMS OF SOME FEEDBACK ON A FEW OF THOSE THINGS? YES, SIR. AND JUST A REMINDER THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS.

YES. YEAH, I'VE GOT A COMMENT CARD HERE.

SO WE'LL TAKE SOME ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK INTO ACCOUNT.

THANK YOU, STAFF. I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF WORK ON YOUR PART AND I KNOW YOU'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CITIZEN CONCERNS, SO I VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THAT.

AS DIRECTOR BAKER REMINDED ME, ITEM NUMBER NINE ON OUR AGENDA DOES REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING THIS EVENING. SO I'M GOING TO OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING RIGHT NOW, AND I DO HAVE A COMMENT CARD FROM ED AGNEW AT 1001 MEADOW COURT, WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM PLEASE GO AHEAD AND COME UP, SIR.

WE WON'T TURN ON THE THREE MINUTE LIGHT FOR YOU THIS EVENING.

WE'LL HAVE FAITH THAT YOU'LL.

I'LL KEEP IT BE CONCISE IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE GO AHEAD.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, IF YOU DON'T MIND.

YES SIR, I'M ED AGNEW 1001 MEADOW COURT I LIVE IN CHIMNEY HILLS SUBDIVISION.

THANK YOU. BEEN A 30 YEAR RESIDENT OF THE AREA.

THE ONE THING I WANTED TO POINT OUT, I THINK THE 2030 PLAN HAS BEEN EXCELLENT FOR OUR COMMUNITY. THE SIDEWALKS I RIDE MY BICYCLE ALSO.

I'VE PROBABLY BEEN ON EVERY ONE OF THEM TWICE AND THEY'RE BEAUTIFUL FOR OUR COMMUNITY, SO IT'S BEEN A GREAT INVESTMENT.

BUT I REALLY HAVE A PASSION ABOUT ONE THAT'S IN THERE THAT IT'S PROJECT NUMBER THREE OR FOUR ON PAGE SEVENTY TWO THAT WAS MENTIONED EARLIER, AND THAT'S THE SOUTH PEYTONVILLE FROM ELK'S LANE TO BOARD WALK LANE.

AND THAT HAS BEEN A SECTION THAT HAS BEEN, I GUESS, INCOMPLETE NOW FOR SUCH A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. IT JUST DOESN'T FEEL LIKE IT'S EVER GOING TO GET DONE.

AND SO MY POINT TONIGHT, I WANT TO GO ON RECORD TONIGHT BECAUSE OF MY EXPERIENCES LIVING IN THAT COMMUNITY GOING DOWN PEYTONVILLE.

IT'S A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR FOR KIDS COMING OUT OF MY NEIGHBORHOODS OR THOSE BY ME GOING TO CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL.

[01:10:01]

SO I WANT TO GO ON RECORD ON THAT.

BUT THE IMPORTANT THING I WANT TO MAKE IS THAT WHEN PEOPLE WALK DOWN THAT AREA, THE UNIMPROVED SHOULDERS, THE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS THAT GO OFF.

IT'S NOT STABLE AND PEOPLE CAN SLIP AND FALL IN THE ROAD AND I'VE EXPERIENCED THAT MYSELF AND I KNOW OTHERS, PARTICULARLY THE KIDS AND THEN MOST IMPORTANTLY, BEING POORLY LIGHTED.

IT ADDS ADDITIONAL RISK TO ALL OF US RIGHT THERE.

SO I WOULD IMPLORE THIS GROUP RIGHT HERE TO RECONSIDER THAT FROM A PRIORITY THREE, WHICH IS EIGHT YEARS OUT, WHICH WAS IN THE AMENDMENT TO A PRIORITY ONE, WHICH IS ONE TO THREE.

AND LET'S WORK WITH THOSE NEIGHBORS AND SEE IF WE CAN'T GET SOME COMMON GROUND TO GET SOMETHING IN THERE FOR THESE KIDS AND THE REST OF OUR COMMUNITY TO WALK THERE AND I'LL STOP THERE. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.

OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

PUBLIC HEARING DOES REMAIN OPEN.

DOES ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO COME FORWARD AND COMMENT BEFORE I CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? OK, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND MAYBE WITH THAT COMMENT, I GUESS, DIRECTOR BAKER.

I MEAN, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT MAYBE SIMILAR TO THE OTHER ITEMS WE TALKED ABOUT IN TERMS OF MAYBE BETTER REFINING THE COST AND JUST VISIBILITY OR RENDERINGS OF WHAT IT MIGHT LOOK LIKE THAT WITH THAT INFORMATION, MAYBE THE THOUGHT CAN BE TO CONSIDER MOVING IT UP TO A TIER ONE OR TWO BASED ON WHAT THAT INFORMATION IS.

AND IT DOES MEET A LOT OF THE IMPORTANT CRITERIA IN TERMS OF THE PARTICULARLY THE CONNECTIVITY TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, SO [INAUDIBLE] THE P&Z CAN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL THAT IT BE LOOKED AT TO BE MOVED UP.

I THINK THAT'S APPROPRIATE.

I MEAN, MAYBE WE CAN PROBABLY APPLY THAT SAME CRITERIA TO THE HIGHLAND ONE AS WELL, BECAUSE I MEAN, IT HAS THE SAME EXACT CRITERIA.

IT'S NOT QUITE AS BIG SCHOOL CONNECTIVITY.

SAME ISSUE. SO I DID CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, I THINK, RIGHT? OK, GOOD. I GUESS, MR. VICE CHAIRMAN, I'M NOT SURE.

AND MAYBE DIRECTOR BAKER, I'M NOT SURE THE BEST WAY TO SUM UP SOME OF THE VERBAL FEEDBACK WE HAD IN TERMS OF A MOTION.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY GUIDANCE FOR OUR VICE CHAIR.

I MEAN, I GUESS OR ANY NOTES OR DENNIS? YEAH. YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THAT.

I MEAN, I THINK THE HIGHLAND AND THE ONE WE JUST LOOKED AT.

SORRY, I'M BLANKING ON IT.

PEYTONVILLE SOUTH PEYTONVILLE, I GUESS WITH THE ADDITIONAL DILIGENCE, CONSIDER MOVING UP TO A TIER ONE OR TWO.

THERE WAS DOVE NORTH PEYTONVILLE AND RANDOL MILL.

AND I THINK WE WANTED THE SAME DILIGENCE WITH AS WELL.

CONSIDERING MOVING UP TO TIER ONE OR TWO WITH DOVE BEING THE ONE THAT MAY BE MOVING UP TO A ONE WITH SUBJECT TO ABILITY TO LOCATE GRANT MONEY, I GUESS.

IS THAT. RIGHT? I THINK WHAT I HEARD WOULD BE EAST OF AND THE RANDOL MILL LOOK AT MOVING THOSE UP AS A HIGHER PRIORITY.

AND BECAUSE OF THE COST, AT LEAST GET A DESIGN DONE AND PURSUE GRANT MONEY BECAUSE THE HIGH COST WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE.

AND IF THAT'S ACHIEVED AND MAYBE MOVE THOSE PROJECTS FORWARD AND THEN TO THE HIGHLAND IN THE SOUTH PEYTONVILLE MOVE THOSE UP BECAUSE OF THE CONNECTIVITY TO THE EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITIES. DOES THAT SOUND GOOD TO EVERYBODY? I THINK YOU'VE GOT THAT. OK? ALL RIGHT.

WELL, NOW I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY'S PATIENCE WORKING THROUGH THIS ONE.

I THINK THIS IS AN IMPORTANT ONE, GIVEN THE CITIZEN SURVEY FEEDBACK WE GET.

SO HOPEFULLY WE CAN MOVE THE BALL FORWARD ON SOME OF THESE SO.

UNLESS THERE'S ANY OTHER DELIBERATION, WE CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

ALL RIGHT, MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER NINE ON OUR AGENDA ORDINANCE NUMBER 1075-C WHICH ARE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS TO STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL.

FIRST, WITH RESPECT TO THE SOUTH PEYTONVILLE NUMBER 304 AND THE HIGHLAND SECTIONS THAT STAFF GO AHEAD AND REFINE THE COST.

CONSIDERING THE CONNECTIVITY OF THE SCHOOLS AND EVALUATE MOVING THOSE UP THROUGH A TIER ONE OR A TIER TWO WITH RESPECT TO RANDOL MILL.

TALK TO THE CITY OF WESTLAKE ABOUT CONNECTIVITY AND CONSIDER MOVING THAT UP IN PRIORITY

[01:15:05]

DID I MISS ANYTHING. THAT IS JUST AN OUTSTANDING MOTION.

PERFECT. THAT CAN BE ONE OF THE BEST MOTIONS I THINK I'VE EVER HEARD IN HERE.

WELL, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

I APPRECIATE THAT.

I'LL AMEND MY MOTION TO INCLUDE THAT.

THAT'S OUTSTANDING AMENDMENT ACCEPTED AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED.

WE HAVE A MOTION, FINELY CRAFTED MOTION.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.

ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE, PLEASE.

THANK YOU, CITY STAFF.

APPRECIATE THAT, AND I'M ASSUMING THAT WILL BE ON THE NOVEMBER 16TH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA LIKELY. YES, SIR.

OK, THANK YOU.

AND WITH THAT, WE ARE ADJOURNING OUR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.