[6.B. Ordinance No. 928A, 2nd Reading, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, repealing Article VII, "Curfew For Minors" of Chapter 15, "Public Safety" of the Southlake City Code. PUBLIC HEARING]

ORDINANCE NUMBER 928.

A SECOND READING, AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE.

[00:10:02]

REPEALING ARTICLE SEVEN.

CURFEW FOR MINORS OF CHAPTER 15 PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE SOUTH LAKE CITY CODE.

AND I BELIEVE CHIEF BRANDON HAS GOT A PRESENTATION OR AT LEAST A DISCUSSION.

I HAVE A VERY SHORT PRESENTATION.

CONTINUING ON OUR THEME OF BREVITY FOR THE EVENING.

BREVITY IS GOOD.

THIS IS BROUGHT ABOUT BY A HOUSE BILL, 1819, IN WHICH OUR LEGISLATURE RECENTLY OUTLAWED CITIES ABILITIES TO ENACT A JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE.

SO THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OFFICIALLY REPEALING THAT ORDINANCE, WHICH WE HAVE NOT ENFORCED SINCE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 1ST.

AND THIS WAS BROUGHT ABOUT BY STATE LAW.

CORRECT? OKAY. IT'S OVER.

COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS AT ALL ABOUT THIS? PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU CHIEF. APPRECIATE YOU SIR.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP A PUBLIC HEARING.

IF ANYBODY WISHES TO SPEAK ON TONIGHT'S REPEALING OF THIS ORDINANCE.

SEEING NONE. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL IF NO FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NEEDED, WE'LL TAKE A MOTION.

YES, MAYOR. COUNCIL. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM SIX B ORDINANCE NUMBER 928A, SECOND READING AND ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS. REPEALING ARTICLE SEVEN CURFEW FOR MINORS OF CHAPTER 15 PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE SOUTH LAKE CITY CODE, AND THIS IS SUBJECT TO OUR MEMORANDUM DATED OCTOBER 17TH, 2023.

WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

OKAY. ITEM SIX B PASSES 6 TO 0.

WITH THAT, MOVE ON TO MOVE ON TO ITEM NINE.

[9.A. SV23-0016, Sign Variances for Valera Medical Group located at 1050 E. S.H. 114, Suite 100, Southlake, Texas.]

A SVP 20 3-0016.

SIGN VARIANCES FOR VLORA MEDICAL GROUP.

DIRECTOR. KILO. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1050 EAST STATE HIGHWAY 114, AND THE MEDICAL GROUP WILL OCCUPY SUITE 100 AND THAT BUILDING.

THIS IS AN AERIAL PHOTO AND LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY.

SET THE INTERSECTION NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF CARROLL AVENUE AND EAST STATE HIGHWAY 114.

THIS IS A SITE EXHIBIT SHOWING APPROXIMATE DISTANCE OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY.

THIS IS A CURRENT SIGN THAT'S LOCATED ON THE BUILDING.

IT IS AN UPPER STORY SIGN THAT WAS APPROVED PRIOR TO THE PROVISION.

THAT REQUIRES UPPER STORY SIGNS TO COME BEFORE THE SIGN BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO APPROVAL.

OR PERMITTING. AND THIS IS PROPOSED SIGN.

THEY WOULD BE REPLACING THE NORTH COUNTRY SIGN THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED THERE.

AND ARE A NEW TENANT IN THAT BUILDING.

UH, THIS IS A DETAIL OF THAT SIGN.

AT THE LOWER LEFT HAND AREA, THERE'S A SIMILAR SIGN REPRESENTING WHAT THEIR STANDARD LOGO, COLOR AND SIGN DESIGN ARE AT THEIR OTHER LOCATIONS.

AND A LITTLE BLOW UP DETAIL OF THAT.

THIS IS A NIGHT VIEW OF THE PROPOSED SIGN.

AND THIS IS AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE SPECIFIC VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED.

FIRST OFF, IT'S AN UPPER STORY SIGN WHICH REQUIRES SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDATION.

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL.

THE PROPOSED LETTER HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM THAT'S PERMITTED BASED ON THE DISTANCE FROM THE ROADWAY.

ALSO, THE LOGO HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE IT IS PERMITTED BASED ON WHAT THE MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT IS.

IT ALSO EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA.

ALSO, THE.

THE SIGN ITSELF IS NOT CONGRUENT WITH THE TENANT'S LOCATION IN THE SPACE.

ALL SIGNS MUST BE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PORTION OF THE LEASE SPACE, AS THEY MAY FRONT ON THAT PARTICULAR BUILDING FACADE, AND ALSO THE LOGO AREA EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED AREA FOR A LOGO.

ONCE AGAIN, BASED ON WHAT THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA IS.

THESE ARE SOME OTHER SIGNS ON THE BUILDING.

ALL UPPER STORY SIGNS.

[00:15:01]

AND SOME OTHER VIEWS OF THE BUILDING.

NO SIGNAGE ON ON THESE VARIOUS VIEWS.

THIS IS A VIEW OF THE FACADE FACING NORTH CARROLL AVENUE.

AND THIS IS THE NORTH FACADE LOOKING SOUTH DIRECTION WITH CARROLL AVENUE ON THE LEFT AND STATE HIGHWAY 114IN THE FOREGROUND.

THE SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE ITEM, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT, NOTING THE APPROVAL WAS ONLY FOR THE UPPER STORY SIGN VARIANTS, AS WELL AS THE SIGN NOT BEING LOCATED CONGRUENT WITH THEIR LEASE SPACE.

THEY DENIED THE OTHER VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED REGARDING HEIGHT, LETTER HEIGHT, LOGO, HEIGHT, SIGN AREA, AND THE AND COLORS.

THE SIGN DOES NOT HAVE A NEUTRAL COLOR.

AS REQUIRED BY SIGN ORDINANCE.

THEY ALSO RECOMMENDED THE APPLICANT PROVIDE SOME OTHER OPTIONS TO THE CITY, IN PARTICULAR ONE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE AND AS WELL AS A NEUTRAL COLOR, AND THEN ANOTHER SIGN IN BETWEEN THE CONFORMING SIGN AND AS FAR AS SIZE AND AREA AND THE SIGN BEING PROPOSED.

THE APPLICANT DID PROVIDE SOME ALTERNATIVES NOT SPECIFIC TO THE SIGN WITH BLACK BACKDROPS.

CORRECT? YES.

OH. OH, MY.

ALL THREE ALTERNATIVES HAVE THE THE BLACK BACKER.

AND I THINK THEIR INTENT THERE IS TO ACCENTUATE THE SIGNS CONTRAST WITH THE STONE BACKGROUND.

AND HAVE DETAILS OF EACH ONE OF THOSE ALTERNATIVES AS THEIR COMPARATIVE.

COMPARISON WITH THE SIGN ORDINANCE.

ALTERNATIVE ONE ELIMINATES THE LOGO HEIGHT AND SIGN AREA.

VARIANTS. ALL OTHER VARIANCES REMAIN WITH THE ADDITION OF THE SIGN BACKER THAT IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER CURRENT SIGN ORDINANCE. UH, ALTERNATE TWO IS SLIGHTLY SMALLER. I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO SEE ANY OF THE ALTERNATES IF THEY CAN HAVE THAT BLACK BACKER.

DOES ANYBODY DISAGREE WITH ME ON THAT? DOES ANYBODY DISAGREE WITH THAT? OKAY. YOU CAN SKIP THE ALTERNATES.

THAT'S ATROCIOUS. THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES I HAVE PROVIDED OR OTHER EXAMPLES IN OTHER CITIES OF THEIR SIGN AND TYPICAL COLOR AND LOGO.

WITH THAT, I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

OTHERWISE, I'M HAPPY TO.

DIRECTOR, I DO HAVE A QUESTION.

WHAT IS THE LETTER HEIGHT ON THE CURRENT SIGN THAT IS THERE? IT IS NORTH IS TWO FEET IN HEIGHT AND.

TWO FEET. AND MAX.

IT IS WITHIN THE PERMITTED IT COMPLIES WITH THAT LETTER HEIGHT.

AND THERE'S NO BACKER ON THAT, CORRECT? CORRECT. OH.

THIS IS A THIS IS A.

MAYBE A QUESTION THAT YOU AREN'T PREPARED FOR, BUT YOUR DENTIST? SO YOU DO KNOW ALMOST EVERYTHING.

DO YOU KNOW IF WE'VE APPROVED ANYTHING LIKE THAT BLUE ANYWHERE ELSE IN TOWN? BECAUSE IT IS REALLY STRIKING.

SURE. UM.

SINCE ADOPTION OF THE NEUTRAL COLOR, IF WE HAVE, IT'S BEEN VERY RARE AND I CAN'T NAME IT.

I COULDN'T NAME THAT.

WE HAVE. THERE'S MAYBE BEEN JUST A FEW OCCASIONS WHERE OTHER THAN NEUTRAL COLOR HAS BEEN. PERMITTED AND THERE WERE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING IT.

SO THE LAST OKAY.

THANK YOU GEORGE KILL. AND WAS THERE DISCUSSION OF THE SIGN BOARD ABOUT THE COLOR? I MEAN, THEY ALL SENT IT THROUGH TO US SEVEN ZERO.

NO, THEY DENIED THAT VARIANCE.

RIGHT. THEY DENIED THAT PART OF THE RIGHT.

THE ONLY ELEMENTS OF THE SIGN PROPOSAL THAT THEY APPROVED WAS ITS UPPER STORY LOCATION AND NOT BEING CONGRUENT WITH THEIR LEASE SPACE ON THE BUILDING.

ALL THEY THEIR RECOMMENDATION WAS A COMPLY OR PROVIDE SOME ALTERNATES IN BETWEEN.

[00:20:06]

CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE CURRENT SIGN AND YOU MAY HAVE ALREADY ANSWERED THIS, BUT DOES THIS HAVE ANY VARIANCES? UH, IT PROBABLY HAD AN AREA VARIANCE, BUT I'M NOT.

100% CERTAIN OF THAT.

OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, GUYS? ALL RIGHT. THANKS. THANK YOU.

DIRECTOR. SURE. IS THERE A PARTICULAR SIDE YOU'D LIKE? LEAVE IT ON THAT ONE. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES, SIR. COME ON DOWN.

AND SIR, IF YOU COULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

IT'S RICKY GUZMAN, 9110 TAMPA'S LANE, DALLAS, TEXAS.

UH, ARE YOU THE THE OWNER OF THE BUSINESS, OR ARE YOU THE.

I'M THE FABRICATOR.

FABRICATOR FOR THE SIGN? YES, SIR. OKAY, OKAY.

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO DIRECTOR KILLER'S PRESENTATION? OR TALK TO MY CUSTOMER? AND HE'S REALLY.

HE WANTS TO PUSH THAT BLUE AND THE YELLOW.

THAT'S HIS. THOSE ARE HIS COLORS.

AND HE DON'T WANT TO CHANGE IT.

CHANGE ANY, DO ANY CHANGES.

OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. THANK YOU SIR. WE'LL DISCUSS IT.

WE MIGHT. WE MIGHT CALL YOU UP.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

YES, SIR. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR FOR BEING HERE.

OKAY, I ACTUALLY HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD FOR ITEM NINE A FROM SAMANTHA DUBECK.

I DON'T SEE SAMANTHA HERE.

I. I WONDER IF IT'S ACTUALLY FOR ITEM NINE B BUT.

OR I WONDER IF THAT WAS SAMANTHA WHO JUST LEFT.

ALL RIGHT, WE'LL JUST HANG TIGHT.

SO THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING BUT COUNCIL, LET'S HAVE A DISCUSSION.

I'M INCLINED TO FOLLOW SIGNBOARD ON THIS ONE.

I DON'T MIND THE UPPER STORY SIGN, BUT HONESTLY, THAT BLUE IS STRIKINGLY BAD TO ME OR OUT OF PLACE.

AND AS FAR AS THE COLORS, IT'S NOT A BAD BLUE.

IT'S JUST OUT OF PLACE.

AND AS FAR AS THE COLORS GO, I WAS DRIVING BY THE LAST TIME WE DEALT WITH COLORS THAT I CAN REMEMBER WAS THAT LEARNING EXPERIENCE.

AND AND I DROVE BY.

THEIR SIGN RECENTLY LIT UP AT NIGHT.

IT WAS REAL NICE. IT WAS NEUTRAL COLORS, BUT REMEMBER THEY ASKED FOR ALL KINDS OF THE PRIMARY COLORS.

IT WAS DIFFERENT. AND THEN LAST WEEK, OR WITHIN THE LAST WEEK, I SAW I DROVE BY ONE OF THEIR OTHER LOCATIONS AT NIGHT, AND IT WAS SO IT WAS JUST OUT OF PLACE.

IT WAS VERY IT WOULD HAVE BEEN TOTALLY, COMPLETELY OUT OF PLACE, APPROVED AS THEY PRESENTED.

SO I DO THINK THE COLOR THING IS A IS AN IMPORTANT LINE TO DRAW.

SO I'M NOT INCLINED TO GRANT THAT VARIANCE.

BUT. I'M OPEN TO DISCUSSION, YOU GUYS.

AND I TYPICALLY WANT TO DISAGREE BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF COLORS FOR A BRAND.

BUT I CERTAINLY SEE YOUR POINT ABOUT HOW THAT GETS OUT OF WHACK IF WE START GETTING TOO LENIENT WITH IT.

YOU KNOW, THE THING THAT THREW ME OFF WITH THIS IS THE THE TOTAL SIGN AREA SET OF 4188.

THEY'RE ASKING FOR 8423.

THAT'S I DON'T THINK I'VE EVER SEEN THAT LARGER DIFFERENTIAL.

IT'S REALLY BIG. IT'S REALLY BIG.

YEAH, I AGREE, I, I MOST OF THE TIME STRUGGLE WITH NOT ALLOWING A BUSINESS TO EMBRACE THEIR BRAND WHEN IT COMES TO COLORS AND LOGOS AND STUFF.

HOWEVER, THIS IS STRIKING.

IT ALSO SEEMS TOO BIG FOR ME AS WELL.

I'M OKAY WITH SECOND STORY.

THAT MAKES SENSE IN THAT LOCATION, BUT I THINK IT'S TOO BIG AND I'M NOT A FAN OF THE COLORS.

I AGREE, I THINK THE SIGN BOARD GOT IT RIGHT.

I DON'T LIKE THE THE BLACK SIGN BACKER AND THE BLUE LETTERS.

SO I MEAN MAYBE IF THEY FOR THE LOGO MAYBE.

BUT LOGO IS PART OF THE THE NAME.

BUT I DON'T KNOW. IT'S JUST TOO MUCH.

AND THE THE ONES WITH THE BLACK BACKING WAS THAT THE ALTERNATES? THEY WERE ASKED TO PROVIDE BETWEEN SIGNBOARD AND HERE.

IS THAT RIGHT? YEAH.

YES. YEAH, I THINK SO.

THAT. YEAH, IT ALMOST DOESN'T EVEN FEEL LIKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT THAT ONE TO HAVE.

WELL, I THINK SIGNBOARD ASKED THEM TO BRING SOMETHING THAT WAS COMPLIANT, AND I DON'T THINK THAT MAKES IT COMPLIANT.

IN FACT, I THINK THAT ADDS A VARIANCE.

THAT'S WHAT I WAS SAYING. YEAH. IT DIDN'T.

I DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND.

SO. OKAY.

WITH JUST BASICALLY APPROVING WHAT THE SIGN BOARD DID AS FAR AS WHAT THEY APPROVED AND WHAT THEY DENIED.

I AM COUNCIL MEMBER, I'M KIND OF WITH COUNCIL MEMBER.

I MEAN, I STRUGGLE WITH NOT ALLOWING THEM THEIR BRANDING.

THAT'S TOUGH.

AND I'M NOT REALLY THAT OFFENDED BY THE BLUE.

BUT AGAIN, THEY'RE ASKING FOR A LOT, SO I'M INCLINED TO GO WITH WHAT THE SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDED.

[00:25:01]

OKAY. WELL.

THE CITY SECRETARY WENT OUTSIDE TO TRY TO TRACK DOWN SAMANTHA, IN CASE SHE ACTUALLY DID WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS ONE.

YEAH, AND JUST MY COMMENT.

IF THE APPLICANT HAD COME WITH MAYBE WHITE LETTERS AND KEPT THE GOLD, I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE INCLINED TO SAY OKAY, OR VICE VERSA. KEPT THE BLUE AND WENT NEUTRAL IN THE BACK OR SOMETHING.

I THINK IT'S JUST TOO STRIKING HOW IT IS, JUST TO BE HONEST WITH YOU.

MAYBE IF IT WAS SMALLER.

YEAH. OKAY, LET'S FOLLOW A SIGNBOARD.

IS THERE A MOTION? YES.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NINE, A CASE NUMBER SB 20 3-0016.

SIGN VARIANCES FOR VLORA MEDICAL GROUP LOCATED AT 1050 EAST STATE HIGHWAY 114, SUITE 100, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.

SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 20TH OCTOBER 10TH, 2023.

NOTING THAT WE'RE FOLLOWING THE SIGN BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION AND THEIR APPROVAL OF THE UPPER STOREY SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST, AND ALSO APPROVING ONLY THE BUILDING SIGN BEING LOCATED ON THE NEIGHBORING UPPER STORY LEASE TENANT SPACE, BUT DENYING ALL OTHER VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO LETTER HEIGHT, LOGO HEIGHT, SIGN AREA AND COLORS.

AND WE'RE NOT APPROVING ANY BLACK SIGN, BACKER OR BLUE LETTERING.

WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

OKAY. ITEM NINE EIGHT PASSES SIX ZERO.

JUST MOVING ON TO ITEM NINE B SB 20 3-0017 SIGN VARIANCES FOR PIZZA HUT DIRECTOR KILO.

[9.B. SV23-0017, Sign Variances for Pizza Hut located at 100 W. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, Southlake, Texas.]

THANK YOU AGAIN. MAYOR.

CITY COUNCIL.

THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 100 WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD AND SUITE 100.

THIS IS A SUN TREE RETAIL CENTER.

INCLUDES A TOM THUMB GROCERY STORE.

THIS AERIAL SHOWING LOCATION.

AND DISTANCE FROM SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

THIS IS A CURRENT EXISTING PHOTO OF THE PIZZA RESTAURANT.

AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE.

THEY PROPOSE REMOVING THE RED AWNING AND REPLACING THAT WITH A RED METAL PANEL.

WHICH IS ONE OF THE NEW BRANDING ELEMENTS OF THE PIZZA HUT.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED ATTACHED SIGN.

AND NIGHT ILLUMINATION VIEW OF THAT.

AND THIS IS DETAIL OF THE VARIANCES RELATED TO THAT SIGN.

IT EXCEEDS THE SIGN AREA.

ALSO THE LOGO AREA AND ALSO THE PERMITTED SIGN AREA.

ALL OTHER ELEMENTS OF THAT SIGN ARE CONFORMING.

AND THE RED METAL PANEL IS NOT A DEFINED SIGN TYPE.

IN SOME CASES, IF THIS WERE NOT A BRANDING ELEMENT OR SOMETHING BRINGING ATTENTION TO THE BUILDING, IT WOULD BE HANDLED UNDER A SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND DEALT WITH AS A COLOR VARIANCE.

THEY ARE REQUESTING THAT THIS ELEMENT BE ALLOWED TO BE APPLIED TO THE BUILDING FACADE.

THIS IS SOME OTHER SIGNAGE IN THE CENTER.

AND THIS IS AN ALTERNATIVE PROVIDED FOLLOWING SIGNBOARDS.

RECOMMENDATION. THEY APPROVED THIS ITEM SEVEN ZERO, NOTING THE APPROVAL OF THE SIGN AREA AND THE LOGO AREA, VARIANCES THAT WERE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT, AND REMOVING THE EXISTING AWNING AND PLACING THE NEW SIGN ON THE LOWER PORTION OF THE BUILDING WHERE THE STUCCO IS.

AND FOLLOWING THAT RECOMMENDATION, THIS IS AN ALTERNATIVE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED.

ALL OTHER VARIANCES WOULD STILL APPLY TO THAT PARTICULAR SIGN.

THE APPLICANT WAS OKAY WITH THAT ALTERNATE DIRECTOR.

I WOULD LET THEM SPEAK TO IT.

THEY MAY WANT TO ADDRESS THE PANEL WITH THE COMMISSION, BUT OKAY.

[00:30:05]

FOLLOWING SIGN BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION, THEY DID PROVIDE THIS.

AND ONCE AGAIN THE AREA AND SIZE VARIANCES WOULD STILL APPLY TO THIS THIS SIGN.

OTHER ALL OTHER ELEMENTS WOULD BE CONFORMING.

OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? CAN I SEE THE ORIGINAL AGAIN? SURE. WELL.

THEY DIDN'T WANT TO KEEP THAT.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

DENNIS, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YOU GUYS WANT TO COME ON DOWN? I JUST WANT TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

BOTH OF YOU, PLEASE.

MIKE PREZIOSO, 8017 SITKA STREET, FORT WORTH, TEXAS.

LARRY MARSHALL, 1300 SHADY OAKS DRIVE, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.

ALL RIGHT, TAKE IT AWAY.

ANYTHING TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION? WELL, YOU KNOW, UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO.

ORIGINALLY, WE CAME WITH THE RED AWNING.

THAT'S REALLY KIND OF THE BRANDING FOR.

YOU JUST GET A LITTLE CLOSER TO THE MIC.

THAT'S REALLY THE BRANDING FOR PIZZA HUT.

YOU CAN SEE THAT, YOU KNOW, IN ALL THEIR STORES.

YOU CAN EVEN THINK BACK TO.

PIZZA HUT YEARS PAST WITH THE RED THE RED ROOFS.

AND SO.

WE WE DID PRESENT WHAT THE SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDED AS WELL.

WE JUST ASKED THAT YOU GUYS CONSIDER THIS AS WELL.

SO YOU MAY HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION.

OKAY. I'VE LIVED IN SOUTHLAKE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS NOW ON SHADY OAKS, WHICH IS RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM THIS LOCATION ON THE SIDE OF BICENTENNIAL PARK.

AND I THINK I'VE OWNED THIS STORE.

I DID. BY THE WAY, THAT SIGN WAS THERE WHEN I BOUGHT IT.

SO JUST TO BE CLEAR ON THE ON THE RECORD AND I WANTED TO UPDATE IT.

SO NOW IS AN OPPORTUNITY OBVIOUSLY TO UPDATE IT, MAKE IT LOOK A LOT BETTER AND IT'S FADED AND ROTTEN OUT.

BUT I KNEW THERE'D BE A VARIANCE REQUIRED TO GET GET IT IN THERE.

SO BUT THE RED BAND THAT YOU SEE ON THAT DEPICTED IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS A BRAND STANDARDS, WHAT THEY CALL IT A PIZZA HUT.

THEY LIKE TO GET THAT WHEREVER THEY CAN, KNOWING THAT NOT EVERYWHERE YOU'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET IT.

BUT IF WE DON'T SHOW IT AND WE DON'T ASK, WE DON'T HAVE A CHANCE.

SO UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, I LIVE IN SOUTHLAKE.

I DON'T SEE A WHOLE LOT OF THIS GOING ON.

BUT LIKE I SAID, IF YOU DON'T SHOW IT, YOU DON'T GET A CHANCE, I UNDERSTAND.

A GRAPEVINE LOCATION.

OUR ROANOKE LOCATION.

THOSE ARE THE TWO THAT I HAVE THAT ARE NEIGHBORS.

THEY ALL HAVE THIS RED BAND ON IT.

THE ROANOKE STORE IS A LOT BIGGER, BUT THE THE ONE IN GRAPEVINE IS A SMALLER STORE.

IT HAS THAT RED BAND. IT'S PROBABLY ABOUT PROBABLY ABOUT THREE FEET TALL.

AND THIS ONE LOOKS LIKE IT'S ABOUT 20FT WIDE.

GOTCHA. IT HELPS IDENTIFY PIZZA HUT.

SO THAT'S THE REASON FOR THE REQUEST? SURE. MAKES SENSE.

ALL TRANSPARENCY.

THANK YOU FOR THAT. ABSOLUTELY.

QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

OKAY, YOU GUYS CAN HAVE A SEAT.

WE'LL TALK AND WE MIGHT HAVE QUESTIONS FOR YOU.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY. COUNCIL. SO I THINK THE QUESTION REALLY BOILS DOWN TO WHERE WE ARE ON THE RED PANEL, THE BAND.

WHAT'S YOUR THOUGHT? I MAYBE THE OUTLIER HERE.

I LIKE THE I LIKE THE BRAND NAME ABOVE THE AWNING.

AND THAT YOU'RE IN FAVOR OF THE AWNING, THE RED BAND.

I DON'T IT DIDN'T GIVE ME INDIGESTION.

I MEAN, IT SEEMS WEIRD TO PUT ANOTHER COLOR THERE, AND THEN EVEN WEIRDER TO PUT PIZZA HUT ON TOP OF IT.

SO I WOULD ABSOLUTELY BE IN FAVOR OF WHAT WE HAVE HERE.

I'M IN FAVOR OF THE ALTERNATE PROPOSAL THAT CAME OUT OF THE SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDATION WITHOUT THE RED ALUMINUM.

I'M IN FAVOR OF THAT AS WELL.

DENNIS, CAN YOU MOVE IT TO THAT OTHER OPTION REAL QUICK? IT JUST IT JUST IT MATCHES UP WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT'S IN THAT CENTER.

WE DO HAVE SOME COLOR THERE.

SO OBVIOUSLY THE THE RED PIZZA HUT HAT.

YEAH. I MEAN I, I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE MARKETING AND, AND SO FORTH, BUT THAT'S A REALLY IDENTIFIABLE SIGN.

YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU GO INTO A SHOPPING CENTER, IF YOU DO A QUICK SCAN, YOU'RE GOING TO PICK THAT PIZZA HUT SIGN UP RIGHT THERE TOO.

AND I THINK IT'S JUST A LOT CLEANER LOOKING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.

IT LOOKS GOOD. IT'S A HUGE IMPROVEMENT.

HUGE IMPROVEMENT. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. NO. NO MORE DISCUSSION.

THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL TAKE A MOTION.

YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NINE, B CASE NUMBER SB 20 3-0017.

SIGN VARIANCES FOR PIZZA HUT, LOCATED AT 100 WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.

[00:35:04]

SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 10TH, 2023.

NOTING THAT WE'RE THE APPLICANT IS REPLACING THEIR EXISTING SIGN WITH A NEW SIGN THAT REQUIRES VARIANCES FOR THE SIGN AND LOGO AREA, AND THAT WE'RE APPROVING THE APPLICANT'S ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL RECOMMENDED BY THE SIGN BOARD, WITH THE ATTACHED SIGN CENTERED WITH THE STUCCO FACADE AREA AS PRESENTED, AND ALLOWING A MAXIMUM SIGN AREA OF 28.8FT² AND A MAXIMUM LOGO AREA OF 7.47FT², AND THAT THE APPLICANT WILL BE REMOVING THE EXISTING AWNING, AND ALSO NOTING THAT WE'RE NOT APPROVING THE RED FLUSH MOUNTED ALUMINUM PANEL.

WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

OKAY. AND ITEM NINE B PASSES 5 TO 1.

THANK YOU GUYS VERY MUCH.

WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR FINAL ITEM ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, WHICH IS APPROVE A VENDOR MEMBER AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF SYNTHETIC TURF BALL FIELD FENCING

[9.C. Approve a vendor/member agreement for the purchase and installation of synthetic turf, ballfield fencing and amenities at Bicentennial Park and Bob Jones Park with GeoSurfaces for an amount not to exceed $11,600,000 and the reallocation of $11,600,000 of approved SPDC Capital Improvements Program (CIP) funds from the Southlake Sports Complex (SSC) project to this project to allow funding.]

AND AMENITIES AT BICENTENNIAL PARK AND BOB JONES PARK WITH GEO SERVICES.

DIRECTOR COHEN.

GOOD EVENING, MR. MAYOR. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.

SO I'LL BE PRESENTING ITEM NINE C THIS EVENING.

AND SO THE REQUESTED ACTION IS BASICALLY APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH GEO SERVICES LLC.

AND THE INTENT AND FOCUS OF THE PROJECT IS TO REPLACE EXISTING TURF WITH SYNTHETIC TURF.

AS WELL AS INSTALL SOME AMENITIES SUCH AS FENCING AND SOME OTHER ITEMS THAT WE WILL TALK A LITTLE BIT FURTHER ABOUT IN THE FINANCIAL SLIDE.

THIS MOTION ALSO INCLUDES THE AUTHORIZATION TO REALLOCATE THE MONIES FROM THE APPROVED SOUTHLAKE SPORTS COMPLEX PROJECT TO THIS PROJECT.

SO A LITTLE BACKGROUND FOR HOW WE GOT HERE.

SO IN THE SUMMER WORKSHOP WE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THEY IDENTIFIED THE NEED TO REPLACE THE GRASS GRASS TURF WITH SYNTHETIC TURF. AND SO WE CHOSE THIS METHOD AND AVENUE AS THE MOST EXPEDITIOUS ROUTE TO CARRY FORWARD WITH THAT DIRECTION.

AND SO THE END USERS WERE CONSULTED, AS WELL AS THE MAINTAINERS ON WHICH FIELDS SHOULD BE CHOSEN FOR THIS PROJECT.

AND SO SEVERAL FIELDS WERE CHOSEN FOR BICENTENNIAL PARK, AS YOU SEE ON THE SLIDE, AS WELL AS BOB JONES PARK THERE, THE SOFTBALL FIELDS, AS WELL AS THE MULTI YEAR MULTIPURPOSE USE FIELDS.