8. Discuss all items on tonight's agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session.

[6.A. Resolution No. 25-020, ZA25-0021, Specific Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces, on property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Park Village, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 1035 E. Southlake Blvd. Current Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #9. PUBLIC HEARING]

CASE NUMBER ZA 25 0021. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES IN PARK VILLAGE DIRECTOR KILLOUGH.

THANK YOU. MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1035 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

IT IS IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARK VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, AND IS LOCATED RIGHT AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF ZINA RUCKER ROAD AND SOUTHLAKE OR SOUTH CAROL AVENUE, WHERE THE SPECIFIC SPACES ARE PROPOSED TO BE SET.

APPLICANTS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR ELECTRICAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SP1 DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT.

AND THE FUTURE LAND USE ON THIS IS. RETAIL COMMERCIAL.

THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SITE. PROPOSED SPACES ARE GOING TO BE LOCATED IN THIS CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT.

THIS IS A DETAIL OF HOW THAT WOULD BE RECONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE THE SPACES AND STAR SHOWS WHERE THAT CHARGING STATION GROUP WOULD BE LOCATED. IT DOES REMOVE ONE EXISTING PARKING SPACE THAT'S LOCATED IN THIS VICINITY OF THE PARKING LOT. AND GIVEN THE CHARACTER OF THE PARK VILLAGE ZONING, THEY HAD TO ACCOUNT FOR THAT SPACE ELSEWHERE.

AND LOCATED HERE, JUST NEAR THE REAL ESTATE OFFICE AND RESTAURANT LOCATED IN THIS BUILDING HERE, THERE IS A SPACE IN THAT LOCATION THAT HAS NOT BEEN STRIPED.

IT WOULD NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PAVING TO BE ADDED.

AND IT JUST REQUIRES STRIPING. AND THAT WOULD FUNCTIONALLY INCREASE THE NUMBER.

AND WE HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH OF THAT LATER ON IN THE SLIDE.

AND IT'S ACTUALLY BEING USED PERIODICALLY, EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT STRIPED TODAY.

THIS IS A STREET SHOT FROM SOUTH CAROLINA AVENUE OF WHERE THE CHARGING STATIONS WOULD BE LOCATED.

THIS IS ZINA RUCKER ROAD IN THE BACKGROUND. AND HERE'S A EXPANDED VIEW OF THE PROPOSED SPACES AND A RENDERING OF OF THE SPACES.

THIS IS NEW EQUIPMENT THAT WOULD NEED TO BE PLACED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE ELECTRIC ELECTRICITY

[00:55:07]

NEEDED TO RUN THE THE CHARGERS. AND THIS IS A RENDERING PRESENTED AT PNC.

THAT WOULD BE ALONG THE THE SIDEWALK AND EDGE OF STREET.

AND UPDATED SITE PLAN DOES ADD SOME LANDSCAPING AND THEN PROPOSES RECOMMENDATION REQUIRED THEM TO ADDRESS SOME SCREENING OF THAT EQUIPMENT THAT WOULD BE VISIBLE INTERNAL TO THE, TO THE SHOPPING CENTER AND ALSO HAD SOME VISIBILITY POTENTIAL FROM THE ADJOINING ROADWAYS.

AND SO THEY THEY'RE ADDING AN EIGHT FOOT COMPOSITE TYPE FENCING AROUND THAT.

FACILITY. THIS IS A DETAIL OF WHAT THEY WOULD ADD HERE AND WHERE THAT FENCING WOULD BE LOCATED.

THIS IS AN ELEVATION OF THE FENCING. AND I MIGHT ASK THE APPLICANT CLARITY ON THE THE FENCING TYPE.

WE LOCATED THE REFERENCE MADE TO THE TYPE OF FENCING AND IT IDENTIFIES IT AS A TREX BRAND SECLUSION TYPE COMPOSITE FENCE. THAT'S AT 50%. AND SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE ELEVATIONS, I'M NOT SURE IF THESE PARTICULAR PORTIONS OF THE SLAT ARE OPEN FOR VENTILATION OF THAT EQUIPMENT OR THAT'S, THAT'S THE APPEARANCE THAT I GET.

AND THIS WOULD BE THE COLOR OF THE FENCING PROPOSED.

THIS IS A DETAIL ON THE LANDSCAPE. AND WHERE THE NEW, NEW PARKING SPACE WOULD BE RESTRIPED AND DESIGNATED.

AND THERE IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THAT SPACE. AND IT'S ACTUALLY LIKE RIGHT HERE.

THESE ARE THE REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUP FOR THE CHARGING STATIONS.

AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSES. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION WAS TO APPROVE IT, WITH THE APPLICANT BRINGING FORTH TO THE COUNCIL WHAT THE TERM OF THE LEASE IS, WHICH THEY HAVE PROVIDED US A COPY, WHICH I THINK ARE STAFF PROVIDED YOU THIS EVENING.

IT APPEARS TO BE A TEN YEAR LEASE THAT COMMENCED IN JULY OF 2022, SO THEY'RE CLOSE TO THREE YEARS INTO THE TEN YEAR LEASE TERM AND THEY HAVE SUBSEQUENT ONE ONE YEAR AUTOMATIC EXTENSIONS UNLESS THEY RENEW AND EXTEND THE LEASE BEYOND THAT. ALSO NOTED THAT THE APP CAN AGREE TO BRING OPTIONS FORWARD WITH REGARD TO SHIELDING AND SCREENING OF THE EQUIPMENT, AND THEY PROVIDED SOME FENCING AND LANDSCAPING IN THAT REGARD, AND THEN ALSO NOTING THAT STAFF PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING HOW YOU MIGHT ADDRESS APPROVAL.

AND HISTORICALLY, LOOKING AT THAT ON ON SOME OF THE CHARGING STATIONS LIKE THIS, WE HAVE TIED THEM TO THE TERM OF THE LEASE AND SUBJECT TO ANY EXTENSIONS THAT THEY MIGHT BE GRANTED MEETING ALL THE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY MEASURES.

AND THEN IN THE CASE THAT A LEASE IS TERMINATED AND NOT CARRIED ON WITH ANOTHER ANOTHER TERM.

WE WE BELIEVE THE AREA SHOULD BE RETURNED BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE OF THE EQUIPMENT.

WITH THAT, I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, DIRECTOR KILLOUGH. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU SIR. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? COME ON DOWN, SIR.

IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. AND THEN THE PODIUM IS YOURS.

THANK YOU. MY NAME IS BRIAN POWERS. I'M WITH BLACK AND VEATCH, 45 EISENHOWER DRIVE IN PARAMUS, NEW JERSEY. WE ARE CONTRACTED BY ELECTRIFY AMERICA, WHO IS MAKING THE APPLICATION FOR FOR THIS FACILITY.

AND IN WORKING WITH YOUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT OUR ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL.

[01:00:10]

THEY ASKED US TO REDO BECAUSE OF THE ISSUE OF THE PARKING WHERE WE HAD TO COME UP WITH AN ADDITIONAL PARKING SPOT, WHICH WE WORKED WITH, THE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, WHICH HAD CHANGED FROM FROM SHOP CORP TO THE NAME ESCAPES ME RIGHT NOW.

BUT WE WORKED WORKED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP TO PROVIDE POTENTIAL OPTIONS FOR INCREASING THE OR RETURNING THE PARKING SPOT THAT WE WOULD WE WOULD BE LOSING IN THE AREA.

AND THAT WAS DUE TO US PUTTING IN AN ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SPACE, WHICH IS WIDER THAN NORMAL PARKING SPACE.

ANYTHING TO ADD TO WHAT DIRECTOR KILLOUGH PRESENTED TO US? ANY OTHER DETAILS OR ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SHARE? NO.

WE AT THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING, THEY ASKED FOR EITHER PAINTING OF THE EQUIPMENT OR SOME FENCING TO PUT AROUND IT TO BLOCK THE VIEW FROM THE PARKING AREA. WHICH WHICH WE DID. WE ADDED SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING TO MAKE THAT AS ESTHETICALLY PLEASING AS POSSIBLE.

I THINK DIRECTOR KILLOUGH BROUGHT UP THE QUESTION ON WHETHER THAT FENCING, WHETHER THERE'S SPACES IN BETWEEN FOR VENTILATION OR IF IT'S LIKE A SOLID.

LOOK, WE WE COULD DO EITHER WE SHOWED IN THE INFORMATION WE PROVIDED BACK TO THE TOWN.

THAT WOULD BE 100% COVERAGE. OKAY. BUT IN SOME AREAS THERE WE CALL 50% COVERAGE WHERE IT DOES HAVE THAT STAGGERED NATURE.

YOU KNOW, IT'S ENTIRELY UP TO THE CITY AS TO WHAT THEY WOULD PREFER.

OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU SIR. WE MIGHT HAVE SOME MORE LATER ON. ITEM SIX A REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SIX A.

I KNOW WE GOT A COMMENT CARD FROM MR. POWERS, AND I THINK WE'VE ALREADY HEARD FROM HIM, BUT WE'LL PUT THAT IN THE RECORD ON ITEM SIX.

A ALSO ON ITEM SIX, A, WE SENT OUT THE CITY SENT OUT 26 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS AND WE HAVE NO RESPONSES.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD WISH TO SPEAK REGARDING ITEM SIX A? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SIX A COUNCIL.

ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? GO AHEAD. SO JUST FOR MODIFICATION IS THIS DO WE I DRIVE A DIESEL PICKUP JUST ON PRINCIPLE SO I DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS.

DO YOU IS THIS LIKE A, LIKE BASICALLY A GAS STATION FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES? THEY PAY, PEOPLE PAY TO PARK HERE AND CHARGE THEIR CAR.

DO YOU WANT TO COME BACK UP, SIR, AND ANSWER THAT ONE? YES.

IN A SENSE, IT'S BASICALLY AN ELECTRIC GAS STATION, IF YOU WILL.

SO WHEN YOU PULL UP TO WHAT'S CALLED THE DISPENSER UNIT, WHICH THE CARS PLUG INTO, THERE'S A SCREEN THAT WOULD TAKE YOUR CREDIT CARD FOR CHARGE, WHATEVER, WHATEVER THAT THAT RATE IS TO KIND OF GIVE YOU A I GUESS A BROAD BRUSH OF WHAT THE ENTIRE INSTALLATION IS. WE REALLY THINK OF IT AS KIND OF LIKE THREE PIECES.

THE FIRST IS THE DISPENSARY UNITS WHICH THE CARS CONNECT TO.

THE SECOND IS THE POWER SUPPLY AND CONTROL UNITS, WHICH PROVIDE THE POWER AND REGULATE IT TO THE DISPENSERS.

AND THE THIRD PIECE IS WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY, A TRANSFORMER.

SO WE GET POWER INTO INTO THOSE POWER AND CONTROL UNITS.

SO DOES SOUTHLAKE GENERATE THIS GENERATES TAX REVENUE FOR SOUTHLAKE, I'M ASSUMING.

I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX.

IS I'LL HAVE TO LOOK INTO THAT. I'M NOT SURE ABOUT WHAT THE FEES APPLY TO THIS SORT OF SERVICE IN THE CITY.

OKAY. THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY ON THE FENCE FOR ME, I WOULD RATHER SEE COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE ALTERNATING BOARDS OR SOMETHING.

SOMETHING THAT LOOKS NICE. NOT JUST A FLAT BOARD, BUT BECAUSE I GET YOU WANT VENTILATION BACK THERE, BUT I'D RATHER THOSE THINGS BE COMPLETELY COVERED FROM CAROL ALL THE TIME. YEAH.

NO, THE VENTILATION IS OKAY. OUR ORIGINAL CONCERN WITH PUTTING FENCING THERE WAS, DO WE HAVE ENOUGH CLEARANCE AROUND THE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE THAT THEY COULD GET THE OR YOU COULD HAVE ACCESS SAFELY, AS WELL AS PROVIDING ANY COOLING FROM FROM FRESH AIR AROUND THERE.

SO REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT'S A FULL 100% COVERAGE, WHICH WE HAD PROPOSED, WHICH SEEMS TO BE THE MOST, MOST REQUESTED, THAT WHEN WE RUN INTO THESE ISSUES OR A 50% COVERAGE, WHICHEVER YOUR PREFERENCE IS.

YEAH. SO TO BE CLEAR. SO THESE SPACES EXIST ALREADY? AM I CORRECT? AND BASICALLY, THEY'RE VACANT SPACES AT THE CENTER NOW.

SO WE WOULD BE I UNDERSTAND THAT WE WOULD BE MEETING OUR PARKING REQUIREMENTS, BUT FOR SOMEONE WHO GOES THERE QUITE A LOT.

IN FACT, I'M SURPRISED THE PICTURE OF THE CAR THAT UNSTRIPED SPOT WASN'T MY WIFE'S.

[01:05:04]

SO THE. BUT FOR SOMEBODY WHO GOES THERE A LOT, PARKING IS A DISASTER THERE.

SO WE WOULD BE TAKING AWAY FOR SPOTS AND RESERVING THEM ONLY FOR EVS THAT WOULD PAY TO PARK THERE.

AM I CORRECT ON THAT? THE FOLKS I WORK WITH, A FEW OF THEM HAVE ELECTRIC VEHICLES, AND THEY SAY THAT THERE'S A AN APP ON THEIR CELL PHONE THAT LETS THEM KNOW WHEN IT'S CHARGED, AND THEN THEY WOULD GET CHARGED IF THEY SIT THERE IN, IN TIME, IN EXCESS. NEEDED, NEEDED TO CHARGE.

SO SO THEY'RE NOT, YOU KNOW, A PARKING STAY TYPE.

PARKING SPOT, IF YOU WILL. I HAVEN'T BEEN TO THE THE PROPERTY MUCH JUST TWO TIMES THAT I'VE BEEN DOWN HERE, AND THAT AREA OF THE PARKING LOT WHERE WE'RE PLACING THAT WAS EMPTY BOTH TIMES THAT I WAS THERE, BUT I WASN'T THERE ON A ON A WEEKEND, WHICH MAY BE, YOU KNOW, HIGHER TRAFFIC FOR, FOR THE RETAIL AND AND RESTAURANTS THAT ARE THERE.

WHO MONITORS LIKE IT SAYS EV CHARGING ONLY. WHAT'S THE CONSEQUENCE FOR SOMEONE PARKING THERE? NON EV VEHICLE THERE. IS IT TOWED OR IS IT THAT THAT WOULD.

YEAH THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER FOR YOU.

I THINK SO LIKELY THE RETAIL CENTER WOULD YOU KNOW, BE BEST TO ANSWER THAT OR LOCAL PARKING ORDINANCES WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. OKAY. SO DON'T PARK YOUR TRUCK THERE, RANDY.

THAT MEANS I CAN'T PARK MY TRUCK THERE. YOU MAY.

YOU MAY GET A NOTE FROM AN EV VEHICLE PERSON.

IF YOU PARK THERE, I'LL PARK ON TOP OF IT NEXT TIME.

DENNIS, IS IS IF THOSE SPOTS ARE TAKEN FOR EVS, DO WE HAVE IT COVERED IN PARKING? EXCLUDING THOSE. WHEN YOU TAKE THOSE OUT, ADD THAT OTHER SPACE.

ARE WE COVERED IN THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF PARKING FOR THAT CENTER FOR STANDARD PARKING SPACES? I WOULD SAY NO, BUT IT'S STILL TECHNICALLY MEETS THE OVERALL PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY NUMBERS, GIVEN THAT THEY HAVE REPLACED ONE SPACE THAT'S BEING TAKEN OFF IN THIS AREA TO ANOTHER CONVENTIONAL SPACE ELSEWHERE.

SO IT'S MUCH LIKE ACCESSIBLE PARKING, IN A WAY, AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING STILL COUNTS TOWARDS THE OVERALL PARKING TOTAL, IF THAT. IF I'VE CORRECTLY ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION.

THE SNP ALLOWS FOR SOMEONE TO COME IN AND TAKE UP AS MUCH AS 10% OF THEIR OVERALL PARKING, AND THEY'RE WELL BELOW THAT WITH WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WHAT I HEARD WHAT I HEARD HIM SAY WAS THAT AFTER IT'S DONE CHARGING, IT BEGINS TO CHARGE YOU FOR PARKING THERE. SO THEORETICALLY, IF YOU'RE AN EV DRIVER, YOU COULD JUST PAY TO PARK THERE AT THE PARKING LOT'S FULL.

RIGHT. ESSENTIALLY, I WOULD ASSUME SO, YES. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW HOW HOW THE RATES ARE CHARGED, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S, YOU KNOW, ECONOMICAL FOR SOMEBODY TO DO THAT OR I THINK YOU'D HAVE TO HAVE THE APP.

YEAH. RIGHT. IF YOU JUST PARKED THERE. WELL, I THINK HE SAID CREDIT CARD UP AT THE, AT THE MACHINE.

SO APP OR A MACHINE. THAT'S KIND OF WHEN I ASKED THE QUESTION I THINK THAT IT'S ALL IRRELEVANT BASICALLY.

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO TELL YOU THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING. SO IF YOU PARK THERE, YOU PARK THERE. IF THEY'RE CHARGING, THEY'RE CHARGING. SO I THINK WE'RE GOOD. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IT'S BEEN MY EXPERIENCE IN THAT PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT.

NOBODY PARKS IN THAT CORNER. DO Y'ALL PARK THERE? I MEAN, IN THAT CORNER. OH, YEAH. I'VE BEEN THERE.

WOW. MOST PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO WALK THAT FAR, BUT THAT'S INTERESTING.

OKAY. JUST YOU, HON. CHUCK AND RANDY'S TRUCK.

I MEAN, IT'S I MEAN, THERE ARE TIMES ALL I'M ALL.

I'M JUST SIMPLY SAYING IS THAT THAT PARTICULAR PARKING LOT AREA IS ENORMOUSLY PACKED.

I THINK THESE SPOTS WOULD BE GREAT. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THEM, LIKE AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION FURTHER AWAY FROM THE RESTAURANTS, BUT I DO FREQUENT THAT PLACE, THAT AREA, GLORIA'S AND TAVERNA ROSSA AT LEAST TWICE A WEEK.

SO SOMETIMES BOTH OF THOSE TWICE A WEEK. AND I'M JUST SAYING THAT PARKING OVER THERE IS REALLY, REALLY DIFFICULT. SO IT'D BE. BUT. ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU SIR, I THINK WE'RE GOOD.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? COUNCIL? BEFORE I CALL FOR A MOTION FROM DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM TALLEY, I JUST HAD A QUESTION. SO IS EVERYBODY IN AGREEMENT THAT WE WANT THE SCREENING?

[01:10:04]

WHAT AM I CALLING THIS? THE SCREENING FENCE AROUND THE THE EQUIPMENT.

100%. 100%? I THINK SO.

DOES THAT WORK, DENNIS? OKAY. IN THE. YOU MAY ALREADY HAVE THIS IN YOUR NOTES, BUT THE RESTORATION CLAUSE AT THE END OF THE LEASE.

ON THE THE MOTION NOTES IT SAYS IT'LL INCLUDES ANY EXTENSIONS OR OPTION PERIODS.

SO DOES THAT COVER IT? JUST THAT AT THE END OF THOSE THAT THEY HAVE TO RESTORE IT TO ITS PREVIOUS CONDITION.

IF THEY DON'T, AT THE END OF IT, THEY HAVE TO JUST DON'T EXTEND OR THEY TERMINATE BEYOND OPTIONS, EXTENSIONS, ALL THAT. YEAH.

OKAY. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. OKAY. MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE.

ITEM SIX, A RESOLUTION. NUMBER 25. DASH ZERO ZERO 25, DASH 020 ZA 25, DASH 0021.

SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE PARK VILLAGE, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 1035 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

CURRENT ZONING SP ONE. DETAILED SITE PLAN. DISTRICT.

SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 13TH, 2025.

SPECIFIC USE PERMIT STAFF REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED MAY 2ND, 2025.

NOTING WE ARE APPROVING THIS ITEM AND NOTING THAT THE SP WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT CONCURRENTLY WITH THE TENANT'S CHARGER LEASE, INCLUDING ANY EXTENSIONS OR OPTION PERIODS, AND INCLUDING THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS SHALL ADHERE TO THE FIRE MARSHALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND UPON ANY TERMINATION OF LEASE, ALL CHARGING EQUIPMENT WILL BE REMOVED AND THE PARKING SPACES AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE RETURNED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION.

ALSO NOTING THAT THE SCREENING FENCE AROUND THE EQUIPMENT WILL BE AT 100%.

WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.

CAST YOUR VOTES. THAT MOTION CARRIES 5 TO 1. ITEM SIX A IS APPROVED. GOOD LUCK. THANK YOU. NEXT UP IS ITEM SIX B.

[6.B. Ordinance Nos. 480-832 and 480-833, ZA25-0018, 2nd Reading, Zoning Change, Development Plan and Site Plan for Liberty Commons, on property described as Tracts 3D and 3C02, WR Eaves Survey Abstract No. 500, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1963 W. Southlake Blvd., and 200 S. Peytonville Ave. Current Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District and "O-1" Office District. Requested Zoning: "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #10. PUBLIC HEARING]

ORDINANCE NUMBER 480 832 AND 480 833. CASE NUMBER IS E 25 0018.

SECOND READING. ZONING CHANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN FOR LIBERTY COMMONS DIRECTOR KILLOUGH.

THANK YOU. MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1963 WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD AND 200 SOUTH PATTONVILLE AVENUE.

IT'S A REQUEST TO CHANGE ZONING ON A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY FROM SP ONE DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO SP ONE DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AND A PORTION OF ANOTHER PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY BEING CHANGED FROM RESIDENTIAL FROM OH ONE AND SP ONE TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.

THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE PROPERTY ALONG THE SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD FRONTAGE IS RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.

THE OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE STREET SECTION OF THIS IS IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS OFFICE COMMERCIAL.

AND AS MENTIONED, THE ZONING ON THE PROPERTY IS INCLUSIVE OF SP1 AS IT EXISTS TODAY, AND O1 AND PROPOSED ZONING IS SP1 AND RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR PUD.

THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY.

THIS IS THE SOUTH PATTONVILLE FRONTAGE. AND THIS IS THE COMPOSITE PLAN SHOWING THE NONRESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROPERTY PROPOSED FOR SP1, DETAILED SITE PLAN, DISTRICT ZONING AND THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS A DETAIL OF THE PUD PORTION INCLUDES 14 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, ALL IN EXCESS OF 20,000FT². AND INCLUDES THE PROPOSED FENCING ALONG THE PERIMETER AS WELL.

[01:15:04]

AND A DETAIL OF THE NONRESIDENTIAL PORTION. LOT FIVE PROPOSED FOR THE 3400 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING WITH DRIVE THRU. THIS IS BEING REQUESTED FOR JUST HORIZONTAL APPROVAL ON THE GROUND. THEY WOULD NEED TO RETURN TO CITY COUNCIL WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR FINAL ELEVATIONS.

BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET, THE APPLICANT INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD COME, COME BACK WITH THAT AREA WHEN? WHEN IT WAS MORE TENANT SPECIFIC, SINCE THAT WOULD DICTATE SOME OF THE DESIGN OF THE EXTERIOR.

THIS SITE DATA SUMMARY OF THE NON RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT.

AND THIS IS THE TREE CONSERVATION PRESENTED AT THE AT THE FIRST READING OF THIS ITEM.

THE EXISTING TREE COVERS APPROXIMATELY 6% AND PROPOSED PRESERVATION WAS APPROXIMATELY 13%.

THIS IS A REVISED PRESERVATION PLAN. THE APPLICANTS INDICATED PRESERVATION OF THESE TREES HERE AND THAT HAS INCREASED THE OVERALL PERCENTAGE OF PRESERVATION FROM THE ROUGHLY 13 TO JUST UNDER 44%.

AND THIS IS THE FIRST READING LANDSCAPE PLAN.

AND THIS IS A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT INDICATES SOME OF THE TREES THAT WERE ABLE TO BE PRESERVED.

AND THEN THE TREES IN THE IN THE PURPLISH COLOR ARE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE BEING ADDED TO THAT PLAN. AND THIS IS FIRST READING PRESERVATION PLAN.

IT HAD JUST UNDER 20% COVERAGE AND PROPOSED JUST OVER 38% OF PRESERVATION OF THAT. THE REVISED PLAN INDICATES APPROXIMATELY 43% PRESERVATION.

AND LANDSCAPE PLAN BEING PROPOSED, AND THIS REVISED PLAN AND ADDITIONAL MATERIAL THAT'S BEEN ADDED IS REPRESENTED FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN, AS REPRESENTED IN THE PURPLE COLOR.

THIS IS THE OVERALL DRAINAGE AREA MAP AND PLAN.

WATER WOULD BE DETAINED IN THIS DETENTION RETENTION POND.

THESE ARE RENDERINGS PROPOSED. THE OFFICE COMPONENT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS PROVIDED ELEVATIONS FOR THOSE.

SO UNLESS THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO ANY OF THOSE, THOSE WOULD POTENTIALLY COME FORWARD TO STAFF UNDER A BUILDING PERMIT. THE FINAL ELEVATIONS OF THE RETAIL COMPONENT HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED, AND THEY, THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RETURN TO COUNCIL FOR ELEVATION APPROVAL.

FOLLOWING A RECOMMENDATION, OF COURSE. THESE ARE THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE ELEVATIONS.

AND WE HAVE RECEIVED TWO RESPONSES OUTSIDE OF THE 300 FOOT NOTIFICATION AREA IN OPPOSITION AND I THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOME ADDITIONAL RESPONSES COUNCILS RECEIVED THAT WE WE DON'T HAVE SPECIFIC RECORD OF AS OF YET.

THIS ITEM WAS APPROVED AT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, SIX ZERO, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT.

AT THE FIRST READING OF CITY COUNCIL, IT WAS APPROVED RESTRICTING THE RESIDENTIAL FROM HAVING ANY FRONT LOADED GARAGES AND NOTING THE APPLICANT WOULD RETURN AND ADDRESS TREE PRESERVATION.

ALSO NOTING THAT IF APPROVED, A NO U-TURN SIGN WOULD BE INSTALLED.

THAT THE CITY WOULD INSTALL A NO U-TURN SIGN AT THE SOUTH PATTONVILLE TURN LANE THAT WOULD REFLECT THE HOURS OF THE SCHOOL ZONE.

[01:20:09]

AND THEN THE SP ONE ZONING DISTRICT WAS LIKEWISE APPROVED AS IT WAS WAS PRESENTED.

AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THE APPLICANT HAS A PRESENTATION.

THEY CAN WALK THROUGH SOME OF THE CHANGES AND ITEMS I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS WITH COUNCIL.

THANK YOU. DIRECTOR KILLOUGH, ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE ONE WHERE IT SHOWS THE RETAIL IN THE FRONT AND THE RESIDENTIAL IN THE BACK? I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY SLIDES BACK IT WAS, BUT THAT I THINK THAT THAT IS THE ONE.

SORRY. THAT ONE. THAT ONE. SO CAN YOU VERIFY FOR ME HOW MANY POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE RETAIL PORTION OF IT? THERE IS ONE AT SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD HERE.

A COMMON DRIVE AT SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD HERE THAT'S SHARED WITH THE RETAIL STORE.

PHARMACY AT THE CORNER. THERE IS A ACCESS POINT THROUGH COMMON ACCESS DRIVE IN THE PLAYERS CIRCLE HERE ON THE WEST. AND THEN THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL ALL COMMON ACCESS THROUGH DRIVE ON PATTONVILLE THAT ALSO SERVES THE RETAIL STORE AND PHARMACY. THANK YOU.

AND THEN ONE OTHER QUESTION ON THAT SLIDE IN THE THE DETENTION RETENTION POND IS THAT PART OF THE OPEN SPACE CONSIDER IS THAT CALCULATION IS PART OF THE OPEN SPACE. AND THEY THEY HAVE INDICATED THAT IT IS COMPLIANT WITH THE PERCENTAGE PERMITTED, THE 25% PERMITTED FOR A DETENTION AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN AN OPEN SPACE.

THANK YOU. YES, DENNIS, REAL QUICK QUESTION. EARLIER IN THIS PRESENTATION, YOU MENTIONED THAT RETAIL PAD SITE AND THAT IT WOULD COME BACK LATER FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW. SO ARE YOU SAYING JUST FOR EDIFICATION OF EVERYBODY? ARE YOU SAYING THAT IT MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE A DRIVE THROUGH, AND IT COULD BE OFFICE OR IT WILL BE A DRIVE THROUGH RETAIL.

JUST THE SPECIFICS OF IT AS THEY ARE PROPOSING IT.

WITHOUT A ZONING CHANGE, IT WOULD BE A RETAIL STORE WITH DRIVE THRU, A RETAIL RESTAURANT SLASH TEA ROOM.

OKAY, THE LIST OF USES A THEY PROVIDED IN THAT SP ONE.

YEAH. IF IT'S DEVIATES FROM THAT. IN ORDER TO TO CHANGE THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO IN ADDITION TO JUST THE SITE PLAN, THEY WOULD NEED TO GO THROUGH A ZONING AMENDMENT TO, TO CHANGE THAT FROM, FROM WHAT'S REPRESENTED ON THE PLAN TODAY.

OKAY. THANK YOU. DENNIS, CAN YOU LIST FOR ME AGAIN ON THAT PARTICULAR PAD WHAT USES WOULD BE ALLOWED HERE AND THEN WHERE THAT WOULD END? SURE. I BELIEVE THEY HAVE SPECIFICALLY LISTED THAT IT WOULD FOLLOW C-1, BUT WOULD BE RETAIL RESTAURANT CAFE WITH DRIVE THRU.

AND I'M NOT SPEAKING VERBATIM FROM WHAT'S WHAT'S IN THERE, BUT IT'S PRIMARILY INTENDED FOR FOOD SERVICE.

IT COULD ALSO BE BEVERAGE SERVICE. THE WAY IT IS SITUATED.

SO IT COULD BE A COFFEE. DRIVE THRU RESTAURANT WITH BEVERAGE SERVICE ASSOCIATED.

WHAT ABOUT A CAR WASH? NO, SIR. NO, NOT NOT NOT NO.

THAT WOULD REQUIRE A ZONING CHANGE. AND DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT CONSIDERATIONS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR DENNIS AT THIS POINT? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. THE APPLICANT HERE.

AND I KNOW YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION, BUT I THINK WE CAN JUST JUMP AHEAD TO WHAT HAS CHANGED FROM FIRST READING TILL TONIGHT.

SOME OF US HAVE SEEN THIS THIS PROPERTY APPLICATIONS ON THIS PROPERTY MANY, MANY TIMES.

AND MAYBE OUR NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS WOULD LIKE TO GO BACK AND SEE WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE WITH 30 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, BUT I'D RATHER JUST SKIP AHEAD TO WHERE WE'RE AT NOW.

I AGREE, MAYOR. ALL RIGHT. MY NAME IS CURTIS YOUNG WITH THE SAGE GROUP, 1130 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE HERE IN SOUTHLAKE.

AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ADDRESS I'VE GOT THE REST OF THE PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY DETAILED QUESTIONS, BUT I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ADDRESS WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT LAST TIME, AND I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE COMMENTS.

JUST TO REPEAT, HERE'S OUR PLAN. DENNIS GAVE HIS VERY THOROUGH PRESENTATION ON ALL THIS, SO I WON'T GO INTO ALL OF THIS,

[01:25:01]

BUT THERE WERE TWO THINGS THAT WE DISCUSSED TWO WEEKS AGO AT FIRST READING.

ONE WAS THE TREES. AND WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE EXISTING TREES THERE AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

AND YOU KNOW, THAT'S A THAT'S A VERY GOOD COMMENT.

I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT, THAT WE ALWAYS LIKE TO LOOK OUT FOR EXCUSES TO SAVE TREES WHERE WE CAN.

I THINK OUR TRACK RECORD IS IS PRETTY EXTENSIVE ON THAT HERE IN SOUTHLAKE ANYWHERE FROM, YOU KNOW, ESTES PARK TO JOHNSON PLACE TO, TO SHADY OAKS TO, YOU KNOW, EVEN CRESCENT HEIGHTS, WHEN WE FIND A COLLECTION OF QUALITY TREES THAT THAT WE CAN SAVE IN A DESIRABLE AREA, WE WE TRY TO DO THAT.

THIS SITE WAS DIFFERENT, THOUGH, BECAUSE IT WAS PRETTY MUCH DUG UP AS A TREE FARM AND, AND HAD A LOT OF UNEVEN GROUND AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

SO WE PRETTY MUCH CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY, IT WOULD NEED A LOT OF GRADING AND THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER TO START OFF, START OVER, AND PLANT HIGH QUALITY TREES WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO GROW.

SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT'S OUR APPROACH ON THIS, HOWEVER, BECAUSE WE'RE NOT MEETING THE STANDARDS ON THAT WHAT WE'VE WHAT WE'VE TRIED TO DO ON THIS IN BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL AREA HERE IS TO SAY WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO PLANT ADDITIONAL TREES, FOUR INCH CALIBER TREES, ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT THE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE WOULD NORMALLY REQUIRE US TO DO.

WHAT HAVE YOU THAT SO YOU CAN SEE AROUND THE DETENTION AREA HERE WHERE A LOT OF THE OPEN SPACE IS WHERE THERE'S GAPS IN THE EXISTING TREES. IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARDER TO SEE THE GREEN TREES HERE, BUT THOSE ARE THE TREES THAT EXISTING TREES THAT WE'RE SAVING.

BUT I MADE THE NEW ONES. WE'RE PLANTING PURPLE.

SO THEY WOULD THEY WOULD SHOW UP A LITTLE BIT MORE.

AND YOU CAN SEE WE'VE ADDED WHERE THERE'S GAPS BETWEEN US AND OUR NEIGHBORS, BOTH ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.

SO AND THEN EVEN A LONGER ENTRY HERE WHERE WE ARE SAVING A LOT OF TREES, AND THIS IS WHERE SOME OF THE BEST ONES ARE.

WE'RE WE'RE ADDING SOME TREES IN THE MEDIANS HERE AND ON, ON THE SIDE WHERE THERE'S SOME GAPS BETWEEN THE EXISTING TREES.

SO I THINK THE END RESULT WILL BE VERY NICELY LANDSCAPED WITH QUALITY TREES.

AND THERE WON'T BE ANY OPEN AREAS WITHOUT, WITHOUT SOME, SOME TREES IN THEM.

SO THIS IS ADDITIONAL 41 FOUR INCH CALIBER TREES WE'RE SHOWING HERE ON THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION.

AND IN THE COMMERCIAL PORTION. I WENT OUT THERE AND LOOKED IN DETAIL.

SINCE WE'RE NOT HAVING TO PUT A WALL IN BETWEEN THIS COFFEE SHOP AND THIS AREA HERE, I RETHOUGHT SOME OF THE TREES THAT WE COULD SAVE THERE, AND I THINK WE CAN SAVE THOSE TREES. THOSE ARE ACTUALLY FAIRLY LARGE TREES.

SO THAT ACCOUNTS FOR A LOT OF THE DIFFERENCE IN THE COMMERCIAL AREA, HOW WE WE WERE ABLE TO UP THE SAVINGS OF THE TREES THERE A LITTLE BIT.

BUT TO THAT EXTENT. WE'RE ALSO PROPOSING TO ADD IN AREAS WHERE WE'RE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE, LIKE THE BUFFER YARD ALONG THE FRONT HERE OR WHATEVER, BECAUSE WE HAVE STACKING DISTANCE THAT OUR ENTRY HERE, THAT FREES UP SOME SOME OPEN SPACE HERE WHERE WE CAN ADD SOME TREES AND ALSO YOU KNOW, BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS AND IN OTHER AREAS WHERE WE HAVE SOME ROOM AROUND THE PERIMETER. SO WE'RE SHOWING AN ADDITIONAL 19 FOUR INCH CALIBER TREES IN THE COMMERCIAL AREA THERE.

SO I THINK THAT IS AN HONEST ATTEMPT TO TRY TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE AND, AND ADD TREES TO THAT.

THE OTHER THING THAT WAS DISCUSSED, AND I BELIEVE COUNCIL MEMBER SHARLI YOU ASKED ABOUT IT, THE FRONT LOADING GARAGES, AND I BELIEVE YOUR QUESTION WAS, WOULD WE BE WILLING TO ELIMINATE GARAGES THAT ARE ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE? TO ME, THAT MEANT A GARAGE DOOR THAT'S RIGHT ON THE FRONT SETBACK LINE AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

AND I AGREED THAT WE COULD DO THAT. HOWEVER, HOMES OF THIS SIZE AND THIS QUALITY ARE GOING TO WANT THREE CAR GARAGES.

THE TYPICAL WAY THOSE ARE DONE IS THERE'S KIND OF A DRIVEWAY COURT BEHIND THE FRONT THERE WHERE YOU GO IN AND YOU HAVE A SIDE FACING GARAGE THAT'S A TWO CAR GARAGE.

AND THEN OFTENTIMES BEHIND THAT YOU HAVE A SINGLE PHASE GARAGE THAT DOES, IN FACT FACE THE STREET, BUT IT'S WAY BACK THERE. AND SO IT'S NOT WHAT WHAT WE WOULD CALL A FRONT LOADING LOADING GARAGE, BUT THAT IS A FAIRLY TYPICAL ON HOMES OF THIS SIZE AND ON THESE SIZE LOTS THING.

AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT SITUATION OR A SITUATION WHERE YOU HAVE A PORTE COCHERE AND THEN A,

[01:30:03]

THEN A BANK OF GARAGE DOORS BEHIND THAT, THAT'S PRETTY MUCH SCREENED BY THE ROOF OR, YOU KNOW, THE THING THAT THAT THOSE ARE ALLOWED BECAUSE I THINK THOSE ARE QUALITY ANSWERS TO GETTING A THREE CAR GARAGE.

AND I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT ONE POINT AND MAKE SURE WE WERE ON THE SAME PAGE ON THAT.

SO, WELL, I GUESS, CURTIS, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO EXPAND ON THAT BECAUSE THOSE ARE TYPICALLY IN THE FRONT OF A HOUSE.

SO WELL, THEY'RE OFTEN ON THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE, AND THOSE ARE THE ONES I'M TALKING ABOUT.

OKAY. ON THE SIDE WHERE YOU WOULD DRIVE THROUGH THEM AND THEN THE GARAGES WOULD, WOULD BE BACK THERE.

RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. LET'S TAKE A MOMENT TO TALK ABOUT THE DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT.

I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR SOME COMMENTS DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANY UPDATES ON WHAT THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE? WHO MIGHT BE THE TENANT OR THE BUSINESS IN THERE? WHAT CAN YOU SHARE, IF ANYTHING, AS FAR AS UPDATES ON WHAT'S CONTEMPLATED THERE? WE DO NOT HAVE A TENANT ON THIS YET. AND AS YOU KNOW, IF IT'S A IF IT'S A WHATABURGER, IT'S GOING TO LOOK ONE WAY.

IF IT'S A IF IT'S A CHICKEN EXPRESS, IT'S GOING TO LOOK ANOTHER WAY.

IF IT'S A YOU KNOW. RAISING CANE'S IT'S GOING TO LOOK ANOTHER WAY.

SO IT SEEMED TO US THAT RATHER THAN SAYING IT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE THIS, BUT NOT KNOWING WHAT THE TENANT WAS, IT WOULD BE BETTER TO BRING BACK THE ARCHITECTURE AND THE DETAILS WHEN WHEN THERE'S AN ACTUAL TENANT THERE.

SO THAT'S THAT'S OUR APPROACH HERE. OKAY. BUT YES, IT WOULD, IT WOULD, IT WOULD BE SOME KIND OF A RESTAURANT WITH OR WITHOUT A DRIVE THROUGH.

BUT A DRIVE THROUGH IS ALLOWED. IT WOULD NOT BE A CAR WASH.

IT WOULD. YOU KNOW, IF WE PROPOSE SUCH A THING, WE'D HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR THAT.

OR ANYTHING THAT'S THAT'S RADICALLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE'VE ASKED FOR HERE.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? GO AHEAD. I DIDN'T THINK ABOUT THIS UNTIL I WAS LOOKING AT THIS EARLIER.

CURTIS. SO ON THE ON THE EAST SIDE OF WHERE YOU WOULD COME IN AS ONE OPTION TO THE DRIVE THROUGH.

IT LOOKS LIKE I MEAN, IF THIS BLACK LINE IS THE PROPERTY LINE, IT LOOKS LIKE IT EXTENDS OVER A LITTLE BIT ONTO THE CURRENT DRIVE THAT'S THERE.

SO HOW IS THAT GOING TO WORK? LIKE I MEAN, IS IT ARE YOU GOING TO IMPROVE THAT DRIVE OR IS IT GOING TO STAY THE WAY IT IS NOW? WELL, THE PROPERTY LINE IS IN THE CENTER OF THE DRIVE.

THAT IS OFTENTIMES HOW IT WORKS IN COMMERCIAL CENTERS WHERE YOU HAVE TWO DIFFERENT SITES.

AND SO THE DRIVEWAY ALREADY EXISTS A LITTLE BIT ONTO OUR PROPERTY.

AND IF IT EVER NEEDS IMPROVEMENT, THEN I GUESS THERE WOULD BE A MECHANISM TO DO THAT.

CURTIS, REAL QUICK QUESTION AS IT RELATES TO INGRESS EGRESS FOR THAT DRIVE THROUGH, OBVIOUSLY THE IMPLICATION IS THAT ON A DRIVE THROUGH HIGHER TRAFFIC VOLUME, CIRCULATION, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE PULLING INTO IT, YOU GO THROUGH THE CIRCULATION AND YOU'RE HEADED WESTBOUND ON 1709. HOW DOES THAT HOW DO YOU FORESEE THAT WORKING? BECAUSE WHEN I LOOK AT IT, I THINK, GOLLY, IT'S GOING TO BE HARD, HARD TO LOSE THOSE OFFICE BUILDINGS, RIGHT? BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THEM MEANDER THROUGH AND GO OUT TO PLAYERS CIRCLE AND OUT.

WELL, IF YOU WERE IF YOU WERE COMING FROM THE EAST, SAY YOU'RE COMING FROM HERE OUT OF HERE AND YOU WANT TO GO TO THAT.

PROBABLY THE EASIEST WAY TO DO WOULD BE TO TURN LEFT ON PATTONVILLE AND THEN TURN IN THE WALGREENS THERE AND AND GO BEHIND THE WALGREENS.

AND YOU'RE RIGHT THERE TO THAT. AND IF YOU WANTED TO CONTINUE WEST AFTER THAT I GUESS YOU COULD GO.

YOU COULD USE ONE OF THE ENTRIES DIRECTLY ON A SATELLITE BOULEVARD TO MAKE A U-TURN.

OR AS WE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE, GO TO PLAYER CIRCLE AND TRY TO MAKE A LEFT THERE OR GO THROUGH THE, THE HOBBY LOBBY SHOPPING CENTER OVER THERE TO, TO TO DAVIS OR FIND YOUR WAY BACK TO PATTONVILLE, I GUESS. YEAH. OKAY. WELL, OR THEY WOULD COME THROUGH THE WALGREENS OVER TO PATTONVILLE AND THEN GO TRY TO MAKE THE U-TURN AT THE SCHOOL. RIGHT. BECAUSE THAT'S ANOTHER OPTION THAT IF I WERE THERE AND I WANTED TO GO AND I GOT MY BURGER OR WHATEVER IT IS, AND I WANTED TO GO WESTBOUND ON SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD FROM THERE ISN'T THE EASIEST WAY TO CUT THROUGH WALGREENS AND THEN DO A U-TURN AT THE SCHOOL.

WELL, YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO U-TURN BECAUSE THERE'S A MEDIAN BREAK THERE. THE THE EXIT DRIVE.

YOU CAN SEE HERE WITH MORE CLARITY THE EXIT DRIVE ONTO PATTONVILLE FROM THE WALGREENS.

OH, YES. I'M SORRY. YOU CAN TURN LEFT. I'M SORRY.

YOU'RE CORRECT. YEP. THANKS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR ANYTHING ELSE FROM THE APPLICANT? NO THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. ITEM SIX B IS A SECOND READING AND REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING.

SO I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM SIX B.

WE HAVE SOME COMMENT CARDS WHICH WE'LL GO THROUGH FIRST AND THEN SOME ONLINE SUBMITTALS.

[01:35:02]

COMMENT CARDS AGAIN IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK. YOU COME ON DOWN.

YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. THE LIGHT WILL TURN GREEN TO START AT 2 MINUTES OR 1 MINUTE LEFT.

IT'LL BE YELLOW RED TO STOP. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE YOUR MIND.

IF YOU WANTED TO SPEAK AND CHANGE YOUR MIND, OR DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK AND CHANGE YOUR MIND, THAT'S QUITE ALL RIGHT. SO THE FIRST INDICATED SPEAKER SANJAY VORA BETHENA AT 1921 BIG BEND COVE HERE IN SOUTHLAKE.

WE'LL SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO ITEM SIX B. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. I WANT TO START OFF BY EXPRESSING MY STRONG CONCERNS ABOUT THE RIGHT TURN ONLY EXIT ON PATTONVILLE BECAUSE OF THE FORCE YOU TURN, IT'S GOING TO IMPOSE ON THE NEIGHBORING SUBDIVISION, THE SOUTHLAKE WOODS.

RIGHT. AND THIS IS GOING TO ADVERSELY ALSO IMPACT THE SCHOOL TRAFFIC.

I THINK THIS IS A VERY BAD IDEA AND A HUGE PROBLEM FOR THE RESIDENTS OF SOUTHLAKE WOODS.

SECONDLY, THE CURRENT ZONING IS SP1 AND OH ONE.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LAND AS C3, C2, SP1, AND O1.

RIGHT. YOU KNOW, IF THE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ARE BEING PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE, WE SHOULD ALIGN THEM WITH THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.

BUT THE PROPOSAL IS DEVIATING FROM THAT AND ENTERTAINING OUR PUD DESIGNATION.

CLEARLY, THIS DOESN'T FOLLOW THE TEMPLATE FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE.

AND WE ALSO HAVE A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROTECTED TREES BEING REMOVED, AS NOTED BY KEITH MARTIN, THE LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR, IN HIS REVIEW. THEN YOU KNOW, PER THE DEVELOPER'S DETAILED PLANS, SITE DETAILED SITE PLAN LOT FIVE ON THE COMMERCIAL PROPOSAL IS SUBJECT TO C1 ZONING DISTRICT UNDER THAT ORDINANCE.

PERMITTED USES INCLUDE SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS, PROVIDED THAT THE SALE OF FOOD AND BEVERAGES IS LIMITED TO ON SITE DINING.

TAKEOUT RESTAURANTS AND RESTAURANTS WITH DRIVE THROUGH SERVICE ARE NOT ALLOWED.

RIGHT. BUT YOU KNOW, THE DRIVE THROUGH PART OF THIS PLAN IS CLEARLY NOT ALIGNED WITH OUR ORDINANCE.

AND SO I DON'T THINK THAT SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED.

THERE ARE ALSO EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE BEING MADE IN THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROPOSAL, AS EVIDENT FROM THE FIGURES IN THE DEVELOPER'S RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THESE EXCEPTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED, SINCE THE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT IS THE STANDARD OF QUALITY THAT SOUTHLAKE IS KNOWN FOR.

SO I WOULD LIKE TO URGE ALL OF YOU TO TAKE THESE ISSUES AND CONCERNS INTO ACCOUNT AS YOU VOTE ON THIS PROPOSAL.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. NEXT UP IS HILARY RAMBLER AT 602 STONEBRIDGE DRIVE.

WE'LL SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO 60.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

FIRST, I WANTED TO SHARE THAT AFTER BEING VERY INVOLVED IN THIS CAROL CROSSING AND NOW LIBERTY COMMONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRESSION, I HAVE A NEWFOUND APPRECIATION FOR THOSE WHO HAVE GONE BEFORE US AND OUR CITY.

THESE ARE LEADERS WHO DREAMED, SET THE BAR HIGH, CREATED STANDARDS THROUGH OUR ORDINANCES, AND MAPPED OUT WHAT A BEAUTIFUL QUALITY CITY LOOKS LIKE THAT CAN BE ENJOYED BY GENERATIONS TO COME.

SO I'M SO APPRECIATIVE. THEY CREATED OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN WITH THOUGHTFUL DESIGNATIONS FOR WHAT FITS BEST IN UNIQUE SPACES.

THEY CREATED OUR CITY TREE ORDINANCE, WHICH HAS LED TO OUR TREE CITY USA RECOGNITION FOR 25 YEARS, AND THEY'VE SET PRECEDENTS IN PLACE SUCH AS THE C1 C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WHICH HAS.

SANJAY MENTIONED, IT SAYS SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS, PROVIDED THAT THE.

IT PERMITS SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS PROVIDED THAT THE SALE OF FOOD AND BEVERAGES IS LIMITED TO ON SITE DINING.

TAKEOUT RESTAURANTS AND RESTAURANTS WITH DRIVE THROUGH SERVICE ARE PROHIBITED.

THAT'S UNDER THE C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. I'M SO GRATEFUL FOR THESE HIGH STANDARDS.

WHEN WE LOOK AT LIBERTY COMMONS BECAUSE OF THE EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED WHETHER IT'S ELIMINATING TREES OUTSIDE OF THE GUIDELINES OF OUR CITY WITH THE 70% OR ADDING A DRIVE THROUGH TO THE COMMERCIAL SPACE, WHICH I JUST EXPLAINED IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, OR DECREASING THE RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS AND INCREASING THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE UNDER THE THE RPD WHICH I HAD PREVIOUSLY EMAILED THOSE NUMBERS TO YOU GUYS, THE DIFFERENTIALS. ACCORDING TO THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN THIS AREA IS ZONED AGAINST C3, C2, SP1 AND O2. IT'S NOT DESIGNATED RPD, SO I ASKED THIS QUESTION IN PLANNING AND ZONING A FEW WEEKS AGO,

[01:40:01]

AND I ASK IT AGAIN TONIGHT. WHY ARE WE DEVIATING FROM OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN? I THINK IT'S AN IMPORTANT QUESTION. MY FRIEND MELISSA AND I TALKED WITH SEVERAL NEIGHBORS WHO DIRECTLY WHO DIRECTLY ABUT THIS LAND AND ARE OPPOSED TO ASPECTS OF THIS PROPOSAL.

I HAVE THEIR SIGNATURES HERE. I WOULD LIKE TO.

I WOULD HAVE REALLY LIKED TO SEE US SPEND MEETING IN A JUST TO ENGAGE THE RESIDENTS IN CONVERSATION.

I REALIZE THIS HAS GONE THROUGH BEFORE, BUT IT IS NEW.

AND I THINK WITH ALL THE ELEVATED DISCUSSION, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HELPFUL.

TALKED WITH ONE NEIGHBOR ON PATTON VILLE. SHE'S VERY CONCERNED WANDA WITH HER FRONT YARD, WHICH IS USED AS A U-TURN SPACE.

AND I CAN SEE WITH THIS SITUATION GETTING WORSE WITH THE FORCE.

RIGHT. U-TURN WITH THE FORCE. RIGHT TURN OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THE NO U-TURN SIGN IS ONLY GOING TO ENCOURAGE THOSE THOSE U-TURNS TO HAPPEN SOUTH ON PATTONVILLE, WHICH IS IN ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS.

I'M IN SOUTHLAKE WOODS AND I FORGOT TO SAY I'M HILLARY RAVELER, 602 STONEBRIDGE DRIVE.

I'M SORRY. SO I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT THIS ENTRANCE AND EXIT ON PATTONVILLE WITH ONLY 14 HOMES IS UNNECESSARY.

AND I THINK THAT'S ALL MY TIME. THANK YOU. IF YOU HAVE A LIST OF SOME OTHER NAMES THAT HAVE SIGNED UP, IF YOU WANT TO PROVIDE THOSE TO US, THAT'D BE GREAT.

MAYBE TAKE IT OVER TO THERE TO ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER BRANDON, AND WE'LL GET THAT RIGHT INTO THE RECORD.

THANK YOU. NEXT UP IS MELISSA PARROTT AT ONE 901 WHITE OAK CLEARING HERE IN SOUTHLAKE.

WE'LL SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO ITEM SIX. BE RIGHT WITH YOU.

GOOD EVENING. I'M MELISSA PARROTT. I LIVE AT 1901 WHITE OAK CLEARING.

THANK YOU, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND WELCOME TO OUR NEW MEMBERS.

I'M HERE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE LIBERTY COMMONS DEVELOPMENT.

I'M PLEASED THAT THE NUMBER OF HOUSES HAS BEEN LOWERED TO 14 AND THAT THAT IS NOW COST EFFECTIVE.

THAT IS A HUGE IMPROVEMENT FROM WHEN IT WAS CAROL CROSSING.

THROUGHOUT THE PAST FEW MONTHS, I HAVE LEARNED SO MUCH DOING TONS OF RESEARCH.

ONE THING I LEARNED IS THAT SOUTHLAKE HAS BEEN A TREE CITY USA FOR 27 CONSECUTIVE YEARS.

THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO WORKED HARD TO ACHIEVE THIS.

I'M SURE IT INVOLVED A LOT OF WORK. HOW DOES THIS CONTINUE THOUGH? IF WE'RE GOING TO LET SUCH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF TREES BE CUT DOWN WITH SO MANY OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS.

I APPRECIATE THE ATTEMPT AT GETTING THE TREES UP TO THE 40 ISH PERCENTAGE RANGE.

HOWEVER, THAT IN MY MIND, IS NOWHERE CLOSE TO THE 70% THAT I THINK ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SAVED.

EVERY TREE THAT IS LOST IMPACTS CARBON SEQUESTRATION, AIR QUALITY, ECOLOGICAL BALANCE, SOIL HEALTH, AND WATER QUALITY. THESE DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD NOT BE PASSED IF THEY ARE GOING TO REMOVE SUCH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF TREES.

THIS DOES NOT HELP KEEP SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAKE AND IN MY OPINION, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN UGLY TREE.

THE PART OF LIBERTY COMMONS THAT IS OF THE MOST CONCERN TO ME IS THE RESTAURANT, WITH THE DRIVE THRU LOCATED SO CLOSE TO CARROLL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

I'M SURE IT'S A GREAT BUSINESS PLAN. WHO WOULDN'T WANT TO PUT A DRIVE THRU THERE AND OWN IT? HOWEVER, IN MY OPINION IT'S A TRAFFIC CAUSING NIGHTMARE.

IF YOU NEED A VISUAL ON THIS, JUST THINK OF THE CHICK FIL A AT KIMBALL AND SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

THAT IS PROBABLY THE DRIVE THRU THAT IS CLOSEST TO ANY OF OUR SCHOOLS IN OUR SCHOOL DISTRICT.

AND IF YOU HAVEN'T WITNESSED THE TRAFFIC THAT CREATES, THEN CONSIDER YOURSELF LUCKY.

I HAVE A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING HOW ONE CAN VOTE ON AND APPROVE THIS TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT WITHOUT ACTUALLY KNOWING WHAT IS GOING TO GO THERE.

I DON'T LIKE HOW VAGUE IT IS I FEEL FOR YOU GUYS HAVING TO VOTE ON SOMETHING WITHOUT REALLY HAVING ALL THE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS, IN MY OPINION. IT'S SORT OF LIKE WRITING A BLANK CHECK, BUT INSTEAD OF DOLLARS, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HUMAN LIVES.

I STRONGLY FEEL A DRIVE THROUGH AT 1709 PATTON VILLE WILL ATTRACT A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES, ESPECIALLY DURING PEAK HOURS, WHICH WILL ONLY COMPOUND EXISTING TRAFFIC.

NOT TO MENTION THE PEDESTRIANS TRYING TO CROSS THIS INTERSECTION.

INTERSECTION, MOST OF THOSE PEDESTRIANS BEING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS.

I AGAIN, I THINK THIS NEEDS SPECIAL CONSIDERATION.

I SAID THAT A MILLION TIMES WHEN IT WAS CAROL CROSSING.

THIS IS DIRECTLY BY CAROL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

THE SENIOR HIGH IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE. I REALLY THINK WE NEED TO THINK LONG AND HARD ABOUT THIS DRIVE THROUGH.

I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK REGARDING ITEM SIX B? I ALSO HAVE SOME COMMENT CARDS FOR NON-SPEAKERS AND I'LL GET TO THOSE IN JUST A MOMENT. BUT ANY OTHER SPEAKERS TONIGHT?

[01:45:04]

ALL RIGHT. CONTINUING ON WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING, I'LL READ INTO THE RECORD THE NAMES THAT WERE JUST PROVIDED TO US ON A LIST OF NEIGHBORS.

HILARY RAMBLER, 602 STONEBRIDGE DRIVE. MELISSA PARROTT, ONE 901 WHITE OAK CLEARING.

CRAIG I CAN'T READ THE HANDWRITING, BUT AT 407 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY.

LARRY AND JEANNIE OCCURRED AT TWO 60 SOUTH PATTONVILLE AND WANDA AND LAMAR MAY AT 280 SOUTH PATTONVILLE.

YOU'RE IN SOUTHLAKE PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS FOR NON SPEAKERS.

AGAIN, IF ANYONE CHANGES THEIR MIND AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK JACKIE BAUMAN AT 1106 VERSAILLES, WHICH IS DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO SIX B.

ROSEANNE DILLER, SWAGGER AT 605 STONEBRIDGE DRIVE.

DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK AT RECORD, BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO ITEM SIX.

B PATTY JAEGER DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, AND SHE'S AT 1402 ROSA COURT DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO SIX B. ANISA VALENCIA AT 1413 NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO SIX B. RENE ENRIQUEZ AT 1401 PARK PLACE, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO SIX B LAURIE SIEGEL AT 903 MEADOW LANE HERE IN SOUTHLAKE, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO 60. RACHEL SIEGEL AT 903 MEADOW LANE, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO 60 AND PAUL SIEGEL AT 903 MEADOW LANE DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT RECORDS OPPOSITION TO SIX BE.

ALSO SOME. LET'S SEE. WE SENT OUT 34 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS.

AND LET'S SEE.

LOOKS LIKE THERE WERE NO RESPONSES TO THAT INITIAL PASS, BUT WE ALSO HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL COMMENT CARDS.

PUBLIC FORUM PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS THAT WERE SUBMITTED.

MELISSA PARROTT ONE 901 WHITE OAK CLEARING HERE IN SOUTHLAKE.

AS OPPOSED TO THIS ITEM THAT MAY BE FROM THE PNC MEETING, BUT IT'S IN OUR PACKET.

ALSO HILLARY AT 602 STONEBRIDGE DRIVE. OPPOSED TO THIS ITEM, THAT WAS AGAIN AT THE P AND Z COMMISSION MEETING.

HILLARY AT 602 STONEBRIDGE DRIVE. AGAIN, THIS IS FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

PROBABLY FILLED OUT THAT NIGHT. EMAIL FROM HILLARY DATED MAY 19TH, 2025 WITH QUESTIONS REGARDING LIBERTY COMMONS THAT HAVE BEEN, I THINK, STATED HERE TONIGHT. THEN AN EMAIL DATED MAY 20TH FROM LOU ANN MONTGOMERY. NO ADDRESS GIVEN.

REGARDING THE OPPOSED TO THE DRIVE THROUGH ACROSS FROM CARROLL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD IN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 60? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 60. COUNCIL.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR DIRECTOR KILLOUGH OR THE APPLICANT? GO AHEAD. WELL, I JUST WANT TO. HOWEVER THIS GOES, I WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN THE MOTION REGARDING A.

CURTIS MENTIONED THOSE SINGLE FRONT FACING GARAGES, BUT THEY'LL BE SET BACK.

SO I AM INTERESTED IN ALLOWING THOSE AS LONG AS THEY'RE SET BACK.

SO DO I NEED DO WE NEED TO? I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU GUYS FEEL ABOUT THAT, BUT I DON'T WANT IT TO TURN INTO SOMETHING WHERE ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY'RE ON THE FRONT. SO.

YEAH, I THINK IF THEY'RE IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE FACING THE STREET, THEY NEED TO BE SET BACK FROM BEHIND THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE.

OKAY, MAYBE DIRECTOR KILO CAN GIVE US SOME BETTER LANGUAGE IF THAT'S AN OPTION.

YEAH, I KNOW THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, SHADY OAKS, NEIGHBORHOOD SHADY OAKS, THAT'S ACTUALLY FAIRLY COMMON. WHERE THE SIDEWAYS AND THEN FURTHER BACK. RIGHT? RIGHT. IS THERE JUST A TERM I CAN USE OR. YEAH.

AND YOU'RE REFERRING TO ONLY THE SINGLE CAR THIRD CAR STORAGE? CORRECT. I THINK IF YOU THEY'RE TYPICALLY GOING IF THEY'RE FACING THE STREET, THEY'RE GOING TO BE BASICALLY L-SHAPE OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE TWO CAR GARAGE. AND SO I THINK IF YOU SAY THEY'RE SET BACK.

BEHIND THE TWO CAR SIDE ENTRY GARAGE. SO SO WE'RE NOTING WE WE ARE ALLOWING A

[01:50:03]

SETBACK FRONT FACING A SINGLE CAR GARAGE SUCH THAT IT'S SET BACK BEHIND THE SIDE.

ENTRY TWO CAR GARAGE. OKAY. AND I THINK ALSO DID HE MAY HAVE MENTIONED LIKE PORTICO CHAISE AND IF A GARAGE IS BEHIND THE PORTICO.

AND I THINK THIS WOULD COVER THAT SCENARIO AS WELL.

SO IS THAT GOOD? IS USUALLY THE NUMBER WE USE A MINIMUM OF 20FT FURTHER BACK FOR THE SECOND PART.

WELL, YEAH. I THINK IF YOU DO WHAT YOU SAID IS FINE.

YES, MA'AM. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. FIRST OF ALL, I'D LIKE TO COMPLIMENT THE DEVELOPER FOR REDUCING THE NUMBER OF HOUSES. I'M VERY HAPPY ABOUT THAT. I HAVE A MAJOR CONCERN WITH THE DRIVE THROUGH.

ALWAYS HAVE. AND IT'S ONLY INCREASED GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF ACCESSES, THE NUMBER OF DRIVEWAYS THAT ACCESS THE COMMERCIAL.

AND A COUPLE THOUGHTS. FIRST OF ALL, IF THAT'S A VERY POPULAR PLACE WITH LANDSCAPERS, I COULD SEE THEM PARKING THEIR VEHICLES BEHIND THE FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS THERE, WHICH WOULD PUT THEM NEXT TO THE RESIDENTIAL.

THAT'S ONE THOUGHT I HAVE. AND ONE CONCERN I HAVE.

THE OTHER IS THE PEDESTRIAN ISSUE WITH IF IT'S A POPULAR PLACE LIKE WHATABURGER.

YOU KNOW, THE KIDS ARE GOING TO BE WALKING ACROSS THE STREET.

THAT'S GOING TO BE A HAZARD. AND THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE IS HOW MANY DRIVE THRU RESTAURANTS DO WE HAVE IN SOUTHLAKE THAT ARE THIS CLOSE TO RESIDENTIAL? I KIND OF DID A AND IT WAS NOT EXHAUSTIVE, BUT I TRIED TO THINK OF EVERY DRIVE THROUGH.

WE HAVE EVERY DRIVE THROUGH WE HAVE DOES NOT BACK UP TO RESIDENTIAL.

AND I KNOW IT'S NOT EXACTLY BY RESIDENTIAL, BUT THE WAY THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO COME THROUGH THERE AT THE BACK, IT COULD BE COMING RIGHT THROUGH THE TRAFFIC FOR IT.

AND SO I JUST THINK THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE FOR A DRIVE THROUGH.

TO ME, THE, THE THE CHALLENGE IS IT'S JUST A, IT'S JUST A, A FLOW WITHIN THE SITE PLAN.

THE RETAIL THERE. QUITE FRANKLY, I JUST THINK THE DEVELOPERS NOT THINKING THROUGH THIS CORRECTLY BECAUSE YOU'RE YOU'RE IMPACTING NEGATIVELY THE LEASING OF THE REST OF THAT OFFICE IF YOU DO A DRIVE THROUGH HERE.

BECAUSE IF THEY'RE GOING WESTBOUND, THEY'RE GOING TO BE QUEUING THROUGHOUT, MEANDERING AROUND THIS, THESE OFFICE BUILDINGS TO GET TO PLAYERS COURT TO GO WEST AND OR THEY'RE GOING TO BE STACKING BEHIND THE CVS TO THEN GET ON PATTONVILLE AND GO NORTH. SO I JUST DON'T FEEL LIKE IT FITS VERY WELL.

I FEEL LIKE IT LIMITS THE LEASING AND THEN IT MAKES THE PROJECT STRUGGLE.

AND THEN WE HAVE VACANT BUILDINGS SITTING ON ON 1709.

I JUST I STRUGGLE WITH THAT. SO IF I, IF I CAN SO I CAN, I CAN GET PAST THE ENTRANCE EXIT OFF OF PATTONVILLE BASED ON THE SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF PROPERTIES.

I AM SOMEBODY WHO USED TO LIVE IN SOUTHLAKE WOODS.

WE LEARNED REAL QUICK NOT TO GO ON CONTINENTAL AT CERTAIN TIMES, NOT TO GO ON PATTONVILLE AT CERTAIN TIMES.

SO I CAN, I CAN SEE WITH ONLY 14 HOUSES THAT ACTUALLY POTENTIALLY WORKING OUT BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD GO OUT THE OTHER THE OTHER ENTRANCE, THE TREE THING IS ONE, THE OTHER WOULD BE THE DRIVE THROUGH.

WE'RE NOT QUITE THERE ON THE TREE NUMBERS. AND AGAIN, THAT COULD BE POTENTIALLY SOLVED EITHER WITH REFORESTATION CONTRIBUTIONS OR WITH WITH, AS WE SAW ON ANOTHER PROPERTY. SIMILARLY, WHERE THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO REQUIRE THE OWNERS TO PUT IN SEVERAL TREES ON EACH PROPERTY TOO, AND MAYBE WE COULD MAKE THAT UP, YOU KNOW, AND GET BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT I DON'T THINK I KNOW IT'S ONLY A 40 SOMETHING PERCENT, BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S ACTUALLY THAT FAR REALLY, TO 70. IT SOUNDS LIKE IT IS, BUT I DON'T THINK IT REALLY IS.

IF THAT WAS REQUIRED SOMEHOW, AND I THINK THAT THERE'S ROOM WITH 20,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

SO BUT ON THE I GUESS MY QUESTION IS FOR WELL, FOR DENNIS OR FOR COUNCIL.

ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO ANSWER. CAN CAN WE NOT PUT A RESTRICTION ON THAT PROPERTY THAT IT HAS TO ONLY BE SIT DOWN.

RIGHT. THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK. AM I CORRECT ON THAT? THEY WOULD PROBABLY GO TO THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THAT ONE. AS FAR AS RESTRICTIONS ON USES, WHICH I THINK, YOU KNOW, IT'S A ZONING CHANGE. SO I'LL JUST LET THE CITY ATTORNEY WEIGH IN.

SO I THINK IF THE DEVELOPER OR THE THE PROPOSAL HERE IS TO SIT DOWN IS THE DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT.

SO IF THE COUNCIL IS NOT LIKING THAT PROPOSAL, THEN IT WOULD BE A CONVERSATION WITH THE DEVELOPER ON WHETHER OR NOT HE IS COMFORTABLE

[01:55:06]

WITH GOING WITH SOMETHING LESS INTENSIVE THERE.

YEAH. I MEAN WE COULD APPROVE RETAIL JUST NOT DRIVE THROUGH, RIGHT? YEAH. SO WE CAN SAY THAT WE APPROVE IT AS A RETAIL SIT DOWN RESTAURANT, BUT NOT APPROVE DRIVE THRU, RIGHT? SO SIT DOWN ONLY. BUT THE DEVELOPER HAS THE OPTION TO DECLINE THAT.

I THINK THIS IS WHAT THE DEVELOPER WANTS. SO IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THAT, I THINK YOU HAVE TO ASK HIM IF HE WANTS THAT.

NOT JUST AND NOT JUST THAT. EXACTLY. SO THAT'S WHY I THOUGHT WE WE WOULD NEED TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION WITH THE APPLICANT.

MR. YOUNG, WHY DON'T YOU COME ON UP AND ADDRESS THAT ISSUE ON THE THE RESTAURANT, THE SIT DOWN VERSUS DRIVE THROUGH DISCUSSION? YEAH. WE'RE SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, TYPICAL C-1 USES THERE PLUS A RESTAURANT.

AND WE'RE ASKING FOR THE THE DRIVE THRU. IF THAT BECOMES AN ISSUE WITH YOU WE CAN REMOVE THAT.

YOU KNOW, I'D RATHER GET THIS PASSED AND MOVED ON THAN, THAN TO WORRY ABOUT A DRIVE THRU.

WE DON'T HAVE A DRIVE THRU TENANT NOW. WE'VE HAD INTEREST FROM THAT.

BUT YOU KNOW WE CAN GO THE OTHER DIRECTION TOO, YOU KNOW, IN THAT, IN THAT REGARD, IF YOU FEEL THAT THE DRIVE THROUGH IS INAPPROPRIATE HERE, THEN LET'S REMOVE THE DRIVE THROUGH PORTION FROM THAT.

ALL RIGHT. SEE HOW EASY THAT WAS? AFTER ALL THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THERE'S A DRIVE THROUGH RIGHT ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY FROM THAT THOUGH. BUT IT'S STILL A CVS. I MEAN THAT YOU TALK ABOUT A DRIVE THROUGH THAT STACKS.

I MEAN, GO PICK UP A PRESCRIPTION THERE. I MEAN, I JUST THINK IT'S A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT VOLUME BEAST.

I THINK THAT'S A BAD COMPARISON. BUT THAT'S WHY I THINK ABOUT CHICK FIL A BEING HERE.

YEAH. OR OR IF IT IS, THEN THE PEOPLE CUTTING ALONG THROUGH THE ALLEYWAY ALONG THE FOUR HOUSES THAT ARE BACK THERE AS WELL.

AND I WOULD HAVE I MEAN, I THINK THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL PIECE FOR ME IS IF THOSE WERE EXISTING HOMES THAT YOU'RE, THAT YOU'RE SUBJECTING THOSE THOSE RESIDENTS TO, IT'S DIFFERENT THAN A PLAN LIKE THIS WHERE THE PEOPLE BUYING THESE RESIDENCES KNOW WHAT'S THERE. SO I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S A BIG DIFFERENCE TO ME THOUGH.

ALL RIGHT, I THINK WE'RE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR DIRECTOR KILLOUGH OR THE APPLICANT? AND I THINK WE NEED TO TALK TO.

GO AHEAD. WELL, I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO ADDRESS THE TREES THAT COUNCIL MEMBER TAGGART BROUGHT UP.

RIGHT. MR. YOUNG, DID YOU WANT TO COME BACK AND ADDRESS THAT? AS FAR AS I KNOW, I THINK YOU WERE HERE. WE HAD ANOTHER CASE WHERE WE ADDED SOME MORE TREES.

MAYBE TAKE US BACK THROUGH THE THE TREE NUMBERS AGAIN.

IF YOU HAVE A SLIDE ON THAT AND SHOW US THE LATEST AND GREATEST VERSION.

YEAH, I THINK YOU'RE PROBABLY ON THE RESIDENTIAL.

MR.. COUNCIL MEMBER TAGGART. OR WHICH WHICH AREA WERE YOU? FOCUS ON THE COMMERCIAL. IT WAS ON THE ARPA ITSELF, THE RESIDENTIAL PART.

SO IF YOU COULD FOCUS ON THAT AND KIND OF GO THROUGH THE COUNT.

I MEAN, IF YOU GO TO THE NEW TREE CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL, WE'RE SAVING ROUGHLY 43.25% FOR THE PERCENTAGE OF CANOPY ON THERE, I THERE.

I BELIEVE WE'RE A LITTLE BIT OVER 20%. I BELIEVE THAT THE REQUIREMENT IS 60%.

THE 41 TREES, YOU KNOW, THE 43.25% IS BEING ACHIEVED BY SAVING 112 TREES. SO IF WE ADD 41 TO THAT, I'LL BET WE'RE AWFULLY CLOSE TO THE 60% NUMBER.

BUT ADDITIONALLY, WE CAN PUT A REQUIREMENT ON EVERY HOMEOWNER TO PLAN AT LEAST TWO TREES IN THEIR FRONT YARD.

THREE TREES, IF THEY'RE A CORNER LOT, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

THAT'S SOMETHING WE WOULD DO ANYWAY. SO YOU KNOW THESE ARE GOING TO BE NICE HOMES, WELL LANDSCAPED.

AND WE HAVE NO ISSUE AT ALL REQUIRING THEM TO HAVE A CERTAIN NUMBER OF TREES BECAUSE WE LOVE TREES, TOO. SO ON 14 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, THAT'S AT LEAST 28 NEW TREES.

SOME MORE ON THE CORNERS, RIGHT? SO WE'RE TRYING TO DO THE MATH IN MY HEAD AS FAR AS HOW WE GET TO IF WE'RE GETTING PRETTY CLOSE TO 60%.

YEAH, FIVE LOOKS LIKE FIVE MORE. SO FIVE ADDITIONAL ON TOP OF THAT.

SO. RIGHT. BECAUSE YOU GOT FIVE CORNERS. YEAH.

SO I THINK WE'RE PROBABLY RIGHT AT 60 TRYING TO DO THE MATH IN MY HEAD.

AND THAT'S THAT'S DANGEROUS ATTORNEYS DOING MATH.

YEAH. NO, NO. WELL THE 41 ADDITIONAL TREES WERE PLANTED IN THE OPEN SPACES PLUS, SAY, 30.

THAT'S 71 TREES. THAT IS YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY MORE THAN HALF OF THE 112 THAT'S GETTING US TO 43%.

SO, YOU KNOW, MORE THAN HALF OF 43% IS WOULD CERTAINLY GET US BEYOND 60.

OKAY. I THINK SO. ARE YOU ARE WE OKAY WITH THAT?

[02:00:06]

WITH THE TWO, EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT HAS TO HAVE TWO TO NEW TREES AND CORNER LOTS THAT HAVE TO HAVE THREE.

OKAY, CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THAT WORKS? LIKE IF I GO BUY THAT HOUSE. SO HOW HOW DO HOW AM I MADE TO PLANT THOSE TREES? IF I BUY THAT LOT AND YOU OR DENNIS OR ANYBODY OR THE ATTORNEY.

WELL, WE'LL PUT IT IN THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, THE DESIGN GUIDELINES THAT WE'LL HAVE ON THIS.

BUT IF IT'S A CONDITIONAL ZONING FROM THE CITY.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I JUST WANT TO THAT YOU INCLUDED IN THE IN THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL THAT THAT WAY IT'S ADDED TO THE ORDINANCE ITSELF.

AND WHEN WE DO HOUSE PLAN REVIEWS, WE'LL EVALUATE EACH ONE OF THOSE HOMES ACCORDING TO THOSE ZONING REGULATIONS.

IF IT REQUIRES TWO ADDITIONAL TREES AT A CERTAIN MINIMUM CALIPER SIZE AND PLANT TYPE, WHICH YOU MAY MAY BE DEFER TO CURTIS AS THE PLANT SELECTION THEY WOULD LIKE.

WE WOULD ENSURE THAT. WHEN WILL WE SEE THAT? LIKE WHEN YOU COME THROUGH THE SITE PLAN OR PUTTING IT IN THE KNOW, PUT IT IN THE MOTION. IT WOULD, IT WOULD JUST BE WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION.

BUT BY PUTTING IT IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR THE ZONING APPROVAL THAT YOU MAKE, IT IS NOW ENFORCEABLE UNDER THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

THANK YOU. YEAH. GO AHEAD. IT'LL BE BUILT INTO THE ZONING AND WE'RE DOING THE SITE PLAN.

SO IT'S ALL GOING TO BE BAKED IN AND IT'LL BE ENFORCED BY THE CITY.

SO DENNIS NOTING THAT EACH HOME WILL BE REQUIRED TO PLANT TWO TREES AND THREE TREES FOR CORNER LOTS.

IS THAT GOOD ENOUGH? YES, MA'AM. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

ANYTHING ELSE FOR DIRECTOR KILLOUGH OR THE APPLICANT OR ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? YEAH. I HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION. YEAH. SO, SIMILAR TO ANOTHER PROPERTY.

I JUST JUST FOR MY OWN CLARIFICATION HERE, THE THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE SOUTH OF THAT ACCESS TO PATTONVILLE.

DO THOSE THEN HAVE ANY RESTRICTIONS, RESTRICTIONS ON THEM BASED ON THE OUTPUT GOING IN HERE? THEY MAY. AS FAR AS RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY. YEAH.

LIKE ON THE WHAT IS IT SHADY OAKS, THAT PROPERTY.

RIGHT. AGAIN, WE'LL DEFER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THIS, BUT I'M NOT SURE WE CAN START SAYING WHAT RIGHTS OR LIMITATIONS ARE ON PROPERTIES THAT AREN'T IN FRONT OF US. I MEAN, WE'LL DEAL WITH THOSE IN DUE COURSE WHEN THEY COME, IF THEY EVER COME, YOU KNOW, WHO KNOWS IF THEY'LL DEVELOP IN THE NEXT YEAR OR TEN YEARS.

BUT I'LL GO TO THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THAT ONE.

YEAH. THAT'S CORRECT. WE WE'RE ONLY LOOKING AT THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY AND ANY PROPERTY, ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.

WE'LL HAVE TO JUST AS YOU'VE DONE WITH THIS CASE IN IN LOOKING AT HOW IT IMPACTS THE NEIGHBORS, ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, YOU WILL DO THE SAME. OKAY.

CAN I CONFIRM THAT WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY COMMENT CARDS OR YEAS AND NAYS FROM ANY.

HAVE WE HEARD ANYTHING FROM THESE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THAT ADJACENT SIDE AT ALL? NO, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ANY RESPONSES FROM, FROM THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS.

AND THAT INCLUDES ALL GOING BACK TO JANUARY FOR CAROL CROSSING AS WELL.

YES, SIR. YES. NOT FROM THE PAINESVILLE PROPERTIES? YES, THAT IS CORRECT. WHAT? DIDN'T WE HEAR ONE TONIGHT? I BELIEVE THE LADY'S NAME IS WANDA, WHO IS COMPLAINING ABOUT THE U-TURNS, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF.

IS IT ON ONE OF THOSE PROPERTIES IN THOSE TWO LADIES OUT THERE? WOULD ONE OF THOSE WOULD PROBABLY KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT, OR I'LL PULL THOSE BACK UP THE.

WANDA AND LAMAR MAY AT 280 SOUTH PATTONVILLE, AND THEN LARRY AND JEANNIE ECKARD AT 260 SOUTH PATTONVILLE. THEY SIGNED THIS I GUESS, PETITION OPPOSED TO LIBERTY COMMONS.

DENNIS, DO WE KNOW WHERE 260 AND 280 ARE THOSE? YEAH, AND WE HAVE NOT SEEN THAT PETITION. I WAS UNAWARE OF WHO WAS ASSOCIATED, BUT YES, THOSE TWO NAMES, I DO BELIEVE, RESIDE AT THE TWO LOTS AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF THIS WHERE THE DETENTION POND IS. AND I CAN VERIFY THAT ON OUR NOTICE MAP.

YEAH. THE ADDRESSES ARE 260 AND 280 SOUTH PATTONVILLE.

[02:05:04]

LET ME SEE THOSE LONG SENTENCES. I'M NOT SURE IF THOSE ARE THE ADDRESSES, BECAUSE ON THIS IT SHOWS TWO 60 SOUTH PATTONVILLE IS A HALF ACRE LOT AND 280. SOUTH PATTONVILLE IS ANOTHER HALF ACRE LOT, SO I'M NOT SURE WHERE THEY WOULD BE.

YES. YES, SIR. THEY THEY ARE THE IT'S THE TWO RIGHT ABOVE RESIDENTIAL.

THEY ARE THE TWO RESIDENTIAL HOMES THAT ARE LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE DETENTION POND.

OKAY. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR DIRECTOR KILLOUGH? CAN WE SUM UP THE U-TURN AGAIN? WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN THERE OR WHAT WE WHAT WE SUGGEST TO HAPPEN THERE? WHAT WOULD BE THE. I THINK WE HAD THAT ON THE FIRST READING MOTION. BUT IF YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND RECAP WHAT WE SAID ON FIRST READING AND SEE IF WE NEED TO TWEAK THAT FOR SECOND, NOTING, IF APPROVED, THE CITY WILL INSTALL A NO U-TURN SIGN LOCATED ON SOUTH HILL AVENUE IN THE HOURS OF THE SIGN WILL BE CONCURRENT WITH SCHOOL ZONE HOURS.

ALL RIGHT. I THINK THE OTHER THING JUST THINKING AHEAD ON MOTIONS THE OPTION OF AS DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT LIMITING OR NOT APPROVING THE DRIVE THROUGH COMPONENT OF THE RESTAURANT AT THIS TIME.

EVERYONE'S OKAY WITH THAT. WE'LL DEAL WITH THAT LATER IF IT EVER GETS TO THAT, SINCE THEY DON'T HAVE A TENANT YET. WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT.

SAY THAT AGAIN. WHAT DID YOU SAY? SORRY, WE'RE NOT APPROVING A DRIVE THROUGH.

USE. AT THIS POINT IN THIS ZONING, THEY CAN ALWAYS COME BACK LATER ON AND REOPEN IT.

BUT GIVEN THE REPRESENTATION THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A TENANT AND THEY WERE AGREEABLE TO TAKING THAT OUT, FOR NOW, WE DON'T HAVE TO PUT IT IN. AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT HAD SOME THERE WAS SOME HEARTBURN ABOUT THAT AT THIS POINT ON THE DRIVE THROUGH PART.

IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE, ANY OTHER LEGAL WORDS WE NEED TO USE.

I GUESS MY QUESTION ABOUT THAT IS IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE CLOSING IT NOW, BUT IT COULD BE OPEN LATER.

I'M NOT PUTTING THAT BACK PIECE IN THE MOTION. I'M JUST PUTTING NOTING WE ARE NOT APPROVING ONE RETAIL RESTAURANT BUILDING, RIGHT? I MEAN, ANYONE CAN CAN COME BACK AND TRY TO REOPEN THEIR ZONING. I'M NOT SAYING THAT WILL GO IN THE MOTION, BUT TECHNICALLY THEY COULD.

OKAY. BUT BUT YOUR MOTION IS IT SHOULD BE A RESTAURANT EXCLUDING DRIVE THROUGH.

WE'RE APPROVING A RESTAURANT, JUST NOT A DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT. ISN'T THAT WHAT I SAID? YEAH, WELL, SHE SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS EXCLUDING THE RESTAURANT PORTION COMPLETELY.

JUST THE DRIVE THROUGH. JUST THE DRIVE THROUGH PORTION OF IT. YEAH. OKAY. BUT, YEAH, IF THEY WANT TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR A DRIVE THROUGH AGAIN, THEY CAN. YEAH. WE CAN'T STOP THAT FROM A NEW APPLICATION. RIGHT.

YOU THINK YOU HAVE WHAT YOU NEED FOR A MOTION? OR DO YOU WANT TO TAKE A PRACTICE RUN AT IT BEFORE WE DO IT FOR REAL? I'LL JUST GO. YOU CAN CORRECT ME AS I GO. I FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THAT WILL HAPPEN IF NEEDED.

OKAY. MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE.

ITEM SIX B ORDINANCE NUMBERS 480 832 AND 480 833 ZA 25 0018.

SECOND READING ZONING CHANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN FOR LIBERTY COMMONS ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TRACKS THREE D AND THREE CO TWO W SURVEY SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 500, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 1963 WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD AND 200 SOUTH AVENUE.

CURRENT ZONING SP ONE DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT AND OH ONE OFFICE DISTRICT REQUESTED ZONING RPD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SP ONE DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 13TH, 2025 AND THE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER FOUR DATED APRIL 29TH, 2025. NOTING, WE ARE APPROVING THE ZONING CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING FOR 14 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 10.72 ACRES AS PRESENTED FOR ORDINANCE NUMBER 480832, NOTING THE FOLLOWING.

NOTING THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO NO FRONT LOADING GARAGES AND THE APPLICANT WILL OKAY NO FRONT LOADING GARAGES, AND NOTING THAT A SINGLE CAR GARAGE WILL BE PERMITTED THAT IS SET BACK BEHIND TWO CAR GARAGES.

NOT SURE IF THAT'S THE BEST WAY TO WORD THAT NOTING.

IF APPROVED, THE CITY WILL INSTALL A NO U-TURN SIGN LOCATED ON SOUTH AVENUE, AND THE HOURS OF THE SIGN WILL BE CONCURRENT WITH SCHOOL ZONE HOURS.

NOTING WE ARE APPROVING ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR 8833, A ZONING CHANGE AND SITE PLAN FOR SP1, DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT ZONING FOR OFFICE RETAIL AS PRESENTED FOR FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS ON APPROXIMATELY 4.4 ACRES AS PRESENTED, NOTING WE ARE NOT APPROVING A DRIVE THRU RETAIL RESTAURANT BUILDING, NOTING THAT ALSO NOTING THAT EACH HOME WILL BE REQUIRED TO PLANT TWO TREES AND CORNER LOTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO PLANT THREE TREES. I THINK YOU GOT IT.

THAT'S A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.

CAST YOUR VOTES. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.

[02:10:05]

AND ITEM SIX B IS APPROVED. THANKS, EVERYONE FOR YOUR WORK ON THAT ONE.

NEXT UP IS ITEM SEVEN, A ORDINANCE NUMBER FOUR 8826 A CASE NUMBER Z 25 0026.

[7.A. Ordinance No. 480-826a, ZA25-0026, Zoning Change and Concept/Site plan for Dakota's Southlake on property described as Lot 1R1R2, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus Addition and located at 1901 W. Kirkwood Blvd. Current zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District.]

FIRST READING ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN AND SITE PLAN FOR DAKOTAS.

THANK YOU. MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL. THIS IS A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE CURRENT SB TWO GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT ZONING FOR THE DAKOTA STEAKHOUSE RESTAURANT AND EVENT CENTER, LOCATED AT 1901 WEST KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD.

THIS IS AT THE INTERSECTION OF WESTBOUND STATE HIGHWAY 114 FRONTAGE ROAD AND WEST KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD.

THIS IS AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PROPERTY.

THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE PROPERTY, AS I MENTIONED, IS SP2.

GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT AND INCLUDES CURRENTLY A RESTAURANT WITH EVENT CENTER AND SPECIALTY RETAIL.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS ZONING CHANGE IS TO AMEND THE ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDINGS AND REFINE THE CURRENTLY APPROVED SITE PLAN, AND INCLUDE A PHASE ONE SITE PLAN WITH THIS CONSIDERATION.

THE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE PROPERTY IS MIXED USE ON THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND ON THE OPTIONAL LAND USE OVERLAY. IT INCLUDES A RESTAURANT AND SPECIALTY RETAIL OVERLAY, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THAT IS, IT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE RESTAURANTS AS WELL AS UNIQUE RETAIL USES WITHIN THIS OPTIONAL OVERLAY. THIS IS CURRENTLY APPROVED. CONCEPT PLAN.

THE EVENT CENTER WAS LOCATED CLOSER TO THE FRONTAGE OF WEST KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD AND THE RESTAURANT MORE TOWARDS THE REAR AND FRONTAGE OF 114. THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDED TWO DRIVEWAYS ACCESSING KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD AND REQUIRED STACKING DEPTH VARIANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE.

THIS IS A REVISED CONCEPT PLAN PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

IT ADDS A DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO THE FRONTAGE ROAD WHICH TEXDOT HAS MADE PROVISIONS FOR.

AND THE REQUEST A VARIANCE FROM THE STACKING DEPTH FOR THAT PARTICULAR DRIVEWAY.