9. Consider: ZA26-0014, Zoning Change and Development Plan for Bear Hollow, on property described as Lots 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, Parkers Corner and Tract 2A02, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract 18 and located at 300, 500, 504, 600, and 684 Davis Boulevard, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “RE-5” Residential Estate District. Requested Zoning: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit District. SPIN Neighborhood #11. PUBLIC HEARING

[9. Consider: ZA26-0014, Zoning Change and Development Plan for Bear Hollow, on property described as Lots 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, Parkers Corner and Tract 2A02, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract 18 and located at 300, 500, 504, 600, and 684 Davis Boulevard, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “RE-5” Residential Estate District. Requested Zoning: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit District. SPIN Neighborhood #11. PUBLIC HEARING]

GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. I'LL BE PRESENTING ITEM 9, WHICH IS A ZONING CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BEAR HOLLOW.

[00:05:01]

SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BEAR HOLLOW.

REQUESTED ZONING IS RPD AND IT'S LOCATED AT 300, 500, 504, 600, 684 DAVIS BOULEVARD.

HERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTIES OUTLINED IN RED.

FUTURE LAND USE FOR THIS AREA IS MIXED-USE. IT IS OVERLAID WITH 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN TOWARDS THE WESTERN PORTION OF THOSE PROPERTIES.

CURRENT ZONING IS RE-5, WHICH IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STATE DISTRICT AND SF-1A WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

HERE'S A STREET VIEW FROM 300 DAVIS BOULEVARD LOOKING WEST ONTO THE PROPERTY.

ANOTHER STREET VIEW FROM 684 DAVIS LOOKING WEST.

ANOTHER STREET VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST AND ANOTHER STREET VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST.

HERE IS THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SHOWING 36 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.

AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS JUST OVER 14,000FT². AND THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE AROUND 30% OF OPEN SPACE ON THE SITE.

TREE CONSERVATION PLAN SHOWN HERE. THERE'S ABOUT 53% EXISTING CANOPY ON THE SITE.

THEY ARE PROPOSING TO PRESERVE JUST OVER 50% OF THAT.

AND HERE IS A TREE CONSERVATION KIND OF OUTLINE OF OUR ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STANDARD TREE CONSERVATION.

SO WITH TYPICAL ZONING, YOUR SF-1A SF-20. THIS CHART HERE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE KIND OF SHOWS YOU THE NUMBERS THAT NEED TO BE MET FOR THAT.

SINCE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING R-PUD, THERE ARE SOME OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT GO INTO THAT THAT CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BASE THEIR APPROVAL OFF OF.

HERE IS THE APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE PLAN. FENCING PLAN.

THIS IS THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN ON THE SITE AND THEIR PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN.

THEY ARE PROPOSING IT TO GO INTO A STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM WHICH OUTPUTS INTO THE FLOODPLAIN AREA.

AND THEIR PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PROPOSING TO 8" SEWER AND WATER LINES THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY.

AND HERE IS A EXHIBIT OF THEIR STORM PLAN. AND WE HAVE NOT HEARD ANY SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES AT THIS TIME.

HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IN THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE A QUICK PRESENTATION.

REAL QUICK ONE FROM ME. I GUESS THIS THIS DOES INCLUDE I GUESS THE APPLICANT IS INCLUDING ON HERE BUILD OUT OF KIND OF THE MASTER TRAILWAYS PATHWAYS THAT WE HAVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE. WE'VE HAD ON OUR PLANS FOREVER.

AND I GUESS THIS DOESN'T. YEAH OKAY. WE'LL ASK ANY QUESTIONS IF WE GET THEM LATER.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THE APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING? AS USUAL, PLEASE NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND WE'LL GET INTO IT.

GOOD EVENING. JODY BOYD, 180 STATE STREET, SUITE 225, HERE IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.

THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT. I KNOW THIS IS A VOLUNTARY POSITION. I'VE BEEN ADMONISHED TO KEEP IT BRIEF, SO I'LL DO SO. I'M PLEASED TO PRESENT BEAR HOLLOW.

IT'S THERE ON DAVIS BOULEVARD, JUST SOUTH OF THE 1709 INTERSECTION.

JUST A LITTLE OVER 20 ACRES THERE ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD.

BEAUTIFUL SITE. IT FALLS OFF, AS YOU SAW FROM THE DRAINAGE MAP.

IT FALLS OFF FROM DAVIS TO THE CREEK THERE TO THE WEST.

IT IS THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN IS MIXED-USE. WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO CHANGE THAT.

WHAT WE'RE PRESENTING TONIGHT COMPLIES WITH THE MIXED-USE.

ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T OPERATE IN A VACUUM.

AS WE LOOK AT OUR NEIGHBORS ACROSS THE STREET, WE'RE TRYING TO COMPLY AND FIT IN WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS BEST WE CAN THERE.

RIDGEVIEW, YOU KNOW, HAVE A RANGE OF 9000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS TO 12,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

HIDDEN KNOLL, WHICH I WAS A PARTNER ON BACK IN THE MID TEENS, 10,000 TO 15,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

VERY SUCCESSFUL PROJECT. RETAIL TO THE NORTH.

THE HTEAO'S TO THE NORTH AND THE SONIC THAT'S BEEN THERE FOREVER TO THE NORTH.

AND THEN THERE'S A STORAGE PLACE THERE TO THE SOUTH.

ACTUALLY HAVE A UNIT IN THE STORAGE PLACE. I'M INTIMATELY FAMILIAR WITH THE STORAGE AREA.

ACROSS THE CREEK BROCK LANE IS KIND OF A, A LEGACY DEVELOPMENT FROM LONG AGO.

THOSE ARE HALF ACRE TO 1 ACRE LOTS. AND THEN STONY BROOK A LITTLE FURTHER WEST.

PREVIOUSLY IN IN 2024, THERE WAS A ZONING CASE TO AMEND THIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY THAT WAS ULTIMATELY DENIED.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE LEARNED AS WE REACHED OUT TO THE NEIGHBORS IS THEY REALLY DID NOT WANT THAT 4 OR 5 STORY BUILDING LOOMING OVER THEIR HOMES THERE TO THE EAST.

I THINK THAT STONY BROOK WAS KIND OF LED THE CHARGE ON THAT.

[00:10:04]

WE REACHED OUT TO THEIR HOA, TALKED TO THEM ABOUT WHAT OUR PLANS WERE.

THEY SUPPORT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES HERE. SO, YOU KNOW, JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT WE'RE NOT TRYING TO PUT A BIG OLD BUILDING OVER THERE ON TOP OF EVERYBODY. HERE'S, AS THE STAFF POINTED OUT, ALMOST 30% OPEN SPACE GROSS DENSITY HERE OF 1.7.

SO WELL BELOW THE 1.8 OR 2.0 FOR THE VARIOUS THINGS WE COULD HAVE DONE HERE.

IT IS MIXED-USE. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS A PART OF MIXED-USE.

AT CORRIDOR COMMITTEE. SOME OF YOU WILL SEE THIS PLAN.

IT LOOKS DIFFERENT THAN IT WAS AT CORRIDOR COMMITTEE.

WHAT HAPPENED IS WE GOT A CURVE BALL FROM TXDOT.

TXDOT WE THOUGHT WAS ONLY GOING TO HAVE ONE BREAK IN THE CURB HERE ACROSS FROM RIDGEVIEW COMING IN HERE.

WHEN WE GOT THE TXDOT'S PLANS THEY HAVE ANOTHER BREAK HERE.

SO OUR INITIAL ROAD COMING INTO DAVIS BOULEVARD HERE, THE SPACING WAS TOO CLOSE TO THAT BREAK.

SO WE HAD TO RECONNOITER THE PLAN A LITTLE BIT.

IT RESULTED IN A LOSS OF TWO LOTS AND THE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOT GOING UP.

I THINK WE WERE AT 13 SOMETHING BEFORE. NOW WE'RE 142.

SO I HAD TO, YOU KNOW, CHANGE THAT A LITTLE BIT FROM CORRIDOR COMMITTEE, BUT STILL ALL REALLY NICE LOTS.

ANOTHER THING FROM CORRIDOR COMMITTEE THAT I WANT TO POINT OUT HERE, THE OPEN SPACE THERE, THESE TREES, THESE ARE A BUNCH OF LIVE OAK TREES THAT GO TO AN EXISTING HOUSE.

THERE'S A DRIVEWAY THAT GOES THROUGH THERE. WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE THAT DRIVE AND LEAVE THOSE, THOSE LIVE OAK TREES THERE. THAT WAS ONE OF THE MAIN POINTS FROM THE CORRIDOR COMMITTEE THAT WE HEARD WAS, HEY, LET'S SAVE TREES. LET'S SAVE TREES. SO, YOU KNOW, IT HAPPENED THAT WHEN WE READJUSTED THE PLAN, WE CAN SAVE ALL THOSE LIVE OAK TREES THERE. MANY OF YOU KNOW, I GREW UP IN SOUTHLAKE.

MY GRANDPARENTS HAD A PLANT NURSERY HERE. I REACHED OUT TO MY MOM AND MY UNCLE, AND THEY HAVE ASSURED ME THAT MY FAMILY PLANTED THOSE LIVE OAKS BACK IN THE EARLY 90S, SO I WASN'T A PART OF IT. I WAS OFF AT COLLEGE.

BUT CERTAINLY KEEPING THE TREES IS AN IMPORTANT ASPECT TO US.

HERE'S A SUMMARY. OUR RANGE LOT RANGE SIZES FROM 11,241 TO 18,558.

HERE'S THE NEIGHBORS I POINTED OUT BEFORE. YOU'LL SEE OUR SLOT LIMIT IN OUR LOT RANGE IS WELL ABOVE THE NEIGHBORS TO THE EAST OF US, RIDGEVIEW AND HIDDEN KNOLL. AND THEN OF COURSE, THE LEGACY STUFF TO THE WEST AND BROCK LANE BEING A LITTLE BIGGER, A LITTLE FURTHER TO THE WEST. WE REALLY FEEL LIKE OUR PLAN FITS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT'S A GOOD USE OF THIS SPACE.

DRAINAGE. WE UNDERSTAND DRAINAGE IS A HUGE ISSUE.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE DONE SOME PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDIES BECAUSE WE'RE BY THE CREEK.

THE THEORY IS THAT IF YOU'RE BY THE DRAINAGE AREA, YOU DON'T DO DETENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT YOUR WATER TO CLEAR OUT AS FAST AS IT CAN, SO THAT FOLKS THAT ARE UPSTREAM, THAT ARE DETAINING HAVE ROOM IN THE CREEK WHENEVER THEIR DETENTION PONDS START TO, TO DRAIN OUT INTO THE DRAINAGE BASIN. SO WE DON'T BELIEVE WE NEED A DETENTION ON THIS PROPERTY.

WE'LL DO A FULL BLOWN STUDY IF WE'RE SUCCESSFUL IN OUR ZONING REQUEST.

BUT JUST WANT TO BE SURE WE MENTION THAT THIS IS THE PREDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE.

YOU SEE, IT ALL COMES FROM DAVIS BOULEVARD, FLOWS TO THE WEST OF THE CREEK ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CREEK.

IT COMES FROM TO THE EAST AS WELL. HERE'S OUR POST.

DEVELOPED DRAINAGE. YOU KNOW, I COULD, I COULD DRONE ON ABOUT CFS, BUT I WON'T.

BUT WE BELIEVE THIS IS GOING TO BE A REALLY GOOD SITE.

HERE'S OUR MASTER PLAN. YOU KNOW, WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT IT.

I FIRST TALKED WITH MR. KELLER IN 2014 ABOUT HIS PROPERTY WHEN WE WERE DEVELOPING ACROSS THE STREET AT HIDDEN KNOLL.

SO I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THIS LANDOWNER FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW.

WE FEEL LIKE THIS WILL BE A GREAT ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.

OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THANKS FOR THE CONTEXT. YOU KNOW, SOMEBODY I KNOW A FEW OF US SAW IT AT CORRIDOR COMMITTEE AND SO APPRECIATE.

I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT KIND OF THE BREAKS ALONG DAVIS AND, YOU KNOW, CONFIRMING WHERE THOSE WOULD BE IMPACTING YOUR SITE PLAN.

AND IT'S GOOD TO SEE. THE LOT COUNT GO DOWN, I KNOW THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS TALKED ABOUT AS WELL AS THE TREES.

SO I THINK THAT THAT'S ALL HELPFUL. I GUESS ANY QUESTIONS? I'VE GOT A FEW, BUT I'LL DEFER IF THERE'S ANY OTHERS.

ONE OF THEM I WAS GOING TO ASK. DO YOU HAVE ANY RENDERINGS OR IDEA DESCRIPTION OF KIND OF WHAT, WHAT IT'LL LOOK LIKE ALONG DAVIS I GUESS. YEAH, LET ME GO HERE.

WE'VE GOT. SO THIS IS OUR FENCE PLAN RIGHT HERE.

SO IN THAT OPEN SPACE WHERE THE LIVE OAK TREES ARE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE KEEPING THAT SPACE, WE'RE GOING TO KEEP THAT TRAIL.

YOU KNOW, IT'S OUR DRIVEWAY NOW, BUT IT'S A CONCRETE IN GOOD SHAPE. SO WE'RE GOING TO KEEP THAT AS KIND OF A TRAIL THAT COMES THROUGH HERE. THE GREEN HERE INDICATES A WROUGHT IRON FENCE. SO WE'LL HAVE 6 FOOT WROUGHT IRON FENCE THERE.

NOW ACROSS THE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY THERE. OTHERWISE THE RED FENCE, THERE IS A 6 FOOT MASONRY FENCE THAT COMES AROUND AND WE'RE GOING TO BEND IT BACK TO KIND OF BLOCK OFF THIS RETAIL TO THE NORTH. NOW ON THE SOUTH, THERE'S AN EXISTING MASONRY FENCE THERE TO THE STORAGE FACILITY.

WE'RE JUST GOING TO MAINTAIN THAT, THAT FENCE THERE AS IT EXISTS TODAY.

[00:15:04]

WE'VE GOT LANDSCAPE PLAN HERE. WE'LL FULLY LANDSCAPE ALONG THAT MASONRY WALL.

THERE'LL BE SOME SETBACKS AND SOME DEPTH TO THAT AS WELL.

WALLS HAVE SOMETHING WITH SOME ARTICULATION IN OUT, UP, DOWN LANDSCAPE, YOU KNOW, BREAKS.

AND YEAH, WE DON'T WANT THE TO VISUALIZE KIND OF HOW THAT CAN LOOK ALONG DAVIS.

I THINK THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE HELPFUL. YEAH, WE'D BE HAPPY TO DO THAT.

AND YOU KNOW, WE DON'T WANT THE BRICK CANYON.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE SEEN THAT IN OTHER OTHER COMMUNITIES. YOU KNOW, THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR HERE. WE'RE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING WITH SOME DEPTH AND SOME TEXTURE TO IT. OKAY. NOW APPRECIATE YOU BEING RESPONSIVE TO SOME OF THE FEEDBACK WE GOT AT CORRIDOR.

AND, YOU KNOW, WE'VE SAT UP HERE AND SEEN A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT, I CAN'T REMEMBER HOW MANY DIFFERENT PROPOSALS FOR THIS.

AND THIS IS SO FAR THE LEAST INTENSE. IN TERMS OF IT BEING MIXED-USE LAND USE.

SO THIS IS LESS INTENSE THAN WHAT WE'VE SEEN.

AND I'M ASSUMING FROM A DRAINAGE PERSPECTIVE, PROBABLY HAS LESS IMPERVIOUS COVER THAN, THAN WHAT WOULD POSSIBLY BE CONTEMPLATED UNDER A MIXED-USE DESIGNATION. SO PROBABLY THE BEST ONE WE'VE SEEN SO FAR.

SO I GUESS WE'LL SEE HOW THE REST OF THIS GOES.

AND I'M GLAD YOU INCORPORATED THE TRAILS ON THE WEST SIDE, AND THAT'S SOMETHING THE CITY HAS BEEN TRYING TO.

YEAH YOU BET. ALSO, THANK YOU FOR POINTING THAT OUT COMMISSIONER.

WE'RE GOING TO PUT SOME TRAILS, SOME BENCHES ALONG THAT TRAIL AS WELL. SO IT'S NOT JUST GOING TO BE CONCRETE OUT THERE. YOU CAN HAVE A PLACE, YOU CAN COME SIT UNDER THE TREE CANOPY, RELAX, AND IT'LL TRANSITION FROM NORTH ALL THE WAY TO SOUTH WITH 3 PEEKABOO'S COMING OFF THE INTERNAL STREETS FOR OUR FOLKS TO WALK OUT THERE. AND THEN OF COURSE, OTHER NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA CAN ACCESS THAT AS WELL.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY? ONE OTHER ONE. WHEN THE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CAME THROUGH, I KNOW THAT THEY HAD RENDERINGS FROM THE OTHER SIDE IN THAT NEW NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S GONE IN THAT KIND OF SHOWED THE 5 STORY BUILDINGS AND HOW OFFENSIVE IT WAS.

IT MIGHT BE WORTH IT TRYING TO DO SOME ON THIS, SHOWING IT, YOU KNOW, COMING IN FROM THAT WAY, KIND OF LIKE YOU'RE DOING ALONG THE DAVIS SIDE, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

YES, SIR. WEST TO EAST THE VIEWPOINT. WEST TO EAST.

RIGHT. YEAH. AND IF I REMEMBER THAT DISCUSSION TOO.

THIS SITE, LIKE YOU SAID, KIND OF TAILS DOWN TO THE WEST.

SO HOPEFULLY. IT DOES OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR NOW? ALL RIGHT.

WE'LL CALL YOU BACK UP IF WE NEED YOU. THANK YOU.

WE MAY NEED YOU. WE'LL SEE. [LAUGHTER]. OKAY.

ITEM NUMBER 9 ON OUR AGENDA DOES CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.

IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.

AS I TALKED ABOUT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COME FORWARD.

SEEING NO ONE, I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

MAYBE JUST IN TERMS OF DELIBERATION AND I GUESS I ALREADY SAID IT. I MEAN, I, THIS, THIS IS THE BEST VERSION WE'VE SEEN OF A HANDFUL OVER TEN YEARS ON THIS SITE SO FAR. LESS INTENSE. NICE TO SEE THE TRAIL GET DONE.

I MEAN, IT'S KIND OF A TRICKY SITE BETWEEN A 6 LANE ROAD AND COMMERCIAL USES AND SO IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S ONE ON THE RIGHT PATH.

I'M SURE COUNCIL MIGHT HAVE THEIR FEEDBACK TOO, SO I'D BE READY, BUT BUT SEEMS LIKE IT'S ON A GOOD ENOUGH PATH TO CONSIDER PASSING ALONG TO THEM. SO THE CHANGE TO THE ENTRANCES TO LINE UP WITH THE ENTRANCES THAT ARE ON DAVIS BOULEVARD IS MIGHT HAVE BEEN UNFORTUNATE BECAUSE YOU LOST A LOT OR TWO, BUT IT'S, IT MAKES FOR A MUCH BETTER DEVELOPMENT.

IT SHOULD MAKE FOR BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW. SO IT'S AN IMPROVEMENT FROM THAT STANDPOINT.

SO I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT HAPPEN ACTUALLY. YEAH, I'D SECOND THAT.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION? WE SURE YOU DON'T WANT GATES ON THIS. [LAUGHTER].

YES. YOU SURE? I'M. BE SURE. YEAH. I'M JOKING.

DON'T [LAUGHTER]. DON'T DO THAT. YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOT DOWN ALREADY. ALL RIGHT, MR. CHAIRMAN. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 9 ON OUR AGENDA.

ZA26-0014, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED APRIL 17TH, 2026 AND ALSO SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY #2 DATED MARCH 6TH, 2026, AND NOTING THE APPLICANT'S AGREEMENT TO BRING RENDERINGS LOOKING FROM EAST TO WEST AND ALSO FROM WEST TO EAST ALONG DAVIS BOULEVARD.

ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.

[00:20:01]

ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD AND VOTE, PLEASE. AND PASSES 5-0.

CONGRATULATIONS. GOOD LUCK. NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, WHICH DENNIS WOULD TELL ME WOULD BE ASSUMING YOU MAKE IT.

HOW'S THAT WORK AGAIN DENNIS? IS IT THE 5TH TUESDAY? MAY. THIS WILL BE MAY 19TH. MAY 19TH. OKAY, SO IT'LL BE TUESDAY, MAY 19TH.

GIVEN THE TIMING WE NEED NOW, THANKS TO THE STATE AND THEIR NOTICE PERIOD.

SO CONGRATULATIONS. GOOD LUCK. THE NEXT PHASE OF THE PROCESS.

WITH THAT, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 10 ON OUR AGENDA, WHICH IS CONSIDERATION OF ZA26-0015 ZONING CHANGE AND SITE PLAN FOR 1275 AND 1285 SHADY

[10. Consider: ZA26-0015, Zoning Change and Site Plan for 1275 and 1285 Shady Oaks Drive, on property described as Lots 2B2AR and 2B1, Block 1, Burnett Acres Addition and located at 1275 and 1285 Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “SF-2” Single Family Residential District. Requested Zoning: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “SF-2” Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #5. PUBLIC HEARING ]

OAKS DRIVE. GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSION.

I WILL BE PRESENTING ITEM 10 ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR 1275 AND 1285 SHADY OAKS DRIVE.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN.

THE CURRENT ZONING IS SF-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND SF-1A, AND THE REQUESTED ZONING IS SF-1A AND SF-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED ON 1275 AND 1285 SHADY OAKS DRIVE. THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED OFF SHADY OAKS DRIVE.

THE FUTURE LAND USE IS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.

THE CURRENT ZONING IS SF-1A FOR LOT FOR THE TRACT.

SORRY FOR 1285 AND SF-2 FOR 1275. THIS IS A STREET VIEW FROM 1275 SHADY OAKS LOOKING EAST.

JUST TO NOTE, THERE'S NOT ANY DEVELOPMENT BEING DONE, BUT THERE HAS BEEN A DEMOLITION PERMIT.

SO THIS IS WHAT THE PROPERTY LOOKS LIKE RIGHT NOW.

AND THE DEMOLITION WAS FOR THE EXISTING HOUSES.

THIS IS A STREET VIEW FROM SHADY OAKS LOOKING NORTH.

THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE. NOTING THAT THE 1285 IS THE SF-1A 5.3 ACRE, 38 ACRES, AND 1275 IS 4 ACRES. THIS IS THE PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN.

THEY'LL HAVE A SF-2 FOR 8.377 ACRES AND THEN SF-1A LOT OF 1 ACRE.

THIS IS THEIR FENCING DIAGRAM. THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN.

AND THERE IS ONE RESPONSE WRITTEN IN FAVOR WITHIN 300 OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS.

AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND THE APPLICANT HAS A PRESENTATION. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS WE'LL FOLLOW UP BACK UP WITH YOU. DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING? GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

MY NAME IS CURTIS YOUNG WITH SAGE GROUP. HERE TO PRESENT THIS AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

IT'S OVER 9 ACRES OF PROPERTY ON SHADY OAKS. AS SANDY SAID.

THE BULK OF IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF-1A SOUTHERN PART IS ZONED SF-2.

YOU CAN SEE IT'S KIND OF THE ONLY SF-2 IN THE AREA, BUT WHAT WE WANT TO DO HERE IS KIND OF THIS END UP BEING A KIND OF A FAMILY COMPOUND.

WE KIND OF WANT TO SWITCH IT AND PUT A 1 ACRE LOT IN THE SOUTH SIDE, WITH THE REMAINDER OVER 8 ACRES OF BEING SF-2, AS WAS SUGGESTED IN THE CORRIDOR MEETING THAT, YOU KNOW, TO, TO MOVE IT AROUND LIKE THIS, WE COULD OFFER TO INCREASE THE SF-2. SO THAT'S WHAT THIS PLAN REPRESENTS.

THE LIGHTER YELLOW IS ALL PROPOSED TO BE SF-2.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE 1 ACRE LOT WHICH IS PROPOSED TO BE SF-1A.

AND EVEN THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING AROUND IT.

TREE CONSERVATION PLAN. THERE'S A CREEK GOING THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF IT. IT ALSO MAKES SENSE THAT THE 1 ACRE LOT GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE CREEK.

IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO EXTEND THAT LOT OVER THE CREEK.

SO WE ONLY HAVE TO HAVE ONE CREEK CROSSING TO REACH THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY.

AND JUST A CONCEPT TO KIND OF GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT'S PLANNED HERE, A LARGE HOUSE ALONG SHADY OAKS IN THE UPPER LEFT THERE WITH A BRIDGE ACROSS THE CREEK BEHIND IT AND THEN, YOU KNOW, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE AND PONDS AND THOSE KINDS OF THINGS IN THE LARGE BACK AREA. AND THEN A, ON THE 1 ACRE LOT, A ADDITIONAL HOUSE BUILT THERE FOR FAMILY MEMBERS ON, ON THAT LOT. SO IT WOULD, IT WOULD ALL BE WITHIN THE FAMILY, SAME, SAME FAMILY COMPOUND IF YOU WILL.

[00:25:07]

SO IT'S A PRETTY SIMPLE REQUEST HERE, BUT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. NOW LOOKS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

SAME NUMBER OF HOUSES CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE.

OKAY. RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. NO THANK YOU. WE'LL CALL YOU BACK UP.

OKAY. IF WE NEED YOU. ITEM NUMBER 10 ON OUR AGENDA DOES CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THAT PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYBODY LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND COMMENT ON THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME? AND SEEING NO ONE. I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION? ALL RIGHT. MR. CHAIRMAN. I MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE ITEM TEN ON THE AGENDA.

ZA26-0015. SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED APRIL 17TH, 2026 AND ALSO SUBJECT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY #2 DATED APRIL 2ND, 2026.

WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND ALL RIGHT, LET'S GO AND VOTE, PLEASE. AND PASSES 5-0.

CONGRATULATIONS. GOOD LUCK. THE NEXT STEP OF THE PROCESS ON MAY 19TH.

WITH THAT, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 11.

[11. Consider: ZA26-0022, Zoning Change and Development Plan for Breeze Way at Carroll, on property described as Tract 1A05, J. W. Hale Survey Abstract No. 803 and Lots 2, 25, and 26, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition and located at 940 S. Carroll Ave. and Current Zoning: “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District, “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District, and “CS” Community Service District. Requested Zoning: “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #9. PUBLIC HEARING ]

ZONING CHANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BREEZE WAY AT CARROLL.

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING AGAIN. I'LL BE PRESENTING ITEM 11.

SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 940 SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE AND 1000-1040 BREEZE WAY.

HERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY. FUTURE LAND USE IS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND THERE ARE COUPLE ZONING DISTRICTS LOCATED WITHIN THESE PROPERTIES. THE SOUTHERN TWO LOTS ARE SF-20A THE BIG LOT THERE IS CS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT.

AND THAT EASTERN PORTION LOT IS PART OF THE RPUD AND THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

HERE'S A STREET VIEW FROM SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE LOOKING SOUTHWEST ONTO THE PROPERTIES.

ANOTHER STREET VIEW FROM BREEZE WAY LOOKING NORTHWEST.

AND ANOTHER STREET VIEW FROM BREEZE WAY LOOKING WEST.

HERE IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOWING 6 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.

AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS JUST UNDER 25,000FT². GROSS DENSITY IS 1.73.

THEIR PROPOSED ZONING IS TO CHANGE ALL THESE LOTS TO SF-20A.

TREE CONSERVATION PLAN. SO THERE'S JUST UNDER 20% OF EXISTING CANOPY ON THE SITE.

THEY ARE PRESERVING OR PROPOSING TO PRESERVE 45% OF THAT, WHICH MEANS THEY WILL BE ASKING FOR A VARIANCE TO THE TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE NUMBER 585-E, WHICH REQUIRES 70% OF THE EXISTING TREE CANOPY TO BE PRESERVED.

HERE IS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. GRADING PLAN.

AND IT SHOWS A DETENTION AREA OVER HERE, WHICH IS WHERE THEY WILL BE HOLDING SOME OF THEIR WATER. THAT LOTS 3, 04, 5 AND 6 PRODUCE. HERE'S A DRAINAGE PLAN. UTILITY PLAN CALLS FOR AN 8" SEWER LINE AND WATER LINE. AND AS OF THIS EVENING, WE HAD NOT HEARD OF ANY SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES.

HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND THERE IS A APPLICANT PRESENTATION.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND ASK THE APPLICANT TO COME BACK UP FOR A 3RD TIME HERE EFFECTIVELY. MAKING A GOOD LIVING TONIGHT. HELLO AGAIN CURTIS YOUNG WITH THE SAGE GROUP.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS. YOU KNOW, THIS THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT'S, FOR THE MOST PART, SURROUNDED BY OUR RPUDS OF SMALLER LOTS THAN WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING HERE.

THERE ARE A COUPLE LARGER LOTS JUST TO THE NORTH STATE HOMES ON CARROLL.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT, IT'S THE VERSAILLES AND TIMARRON ARE SMALLER DEVELOPMENTS.

EVEN THE SCHOOL IS ZONED RPUD, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE HOPING TO CHANGE.

WE'RE WORKING WITH THEM TO PERHAPS REZONE THE SCHOOL AND SEPARATE IT FROM THE VERSAILLES RPUD.

AND AS A PART OF THAT PROCESS THEY HOPE TO HAVE SOME EXCESS LAND THAT THEY'RE NOT USING ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DRAINAGE THERE.

THAT IS NOT A PART OF WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TONIGHT.

BUT JUST TO GIVE YOU A PREVIEW OF WHAT MAY BE COMING ON, ON THAT.

[00:30:01]

AND IT WOULD BE OF SIMILAR LOTS OF WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING HERE.

AGAIN, THE TIMARRON LOTS ARE BASICALLY SOUTH OF CONTINENTAL 11,000FT² TO 13,000FT².

12,000FT² TO 14,000FT² TO OUR WEST AND THE VERSAILLES LOTS ACROSS CARROLL ARE 15,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS AND UP.

THIS IS OUR PROPOSAL. IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE SHOWED AND GOT A GOOD RESPONSE TO THE CORRIDOR COMMITTEE.

THE ONE DIFFERENCE IS THIS TURNAROUND TO THE CORRIDOR COMMITTEE WAS HERE, AND THEN THIS WENT TO HERE AND THE REQUEST WAS MADE TO. SO IT DIDN'T SEEM LIKE A FLAG LOT IN BACK THAT WE MOVE IT BACK TO HERE, THE TURNAROUND. WE ALSO MADE THIS THE LARGEST LOT.

SO THEY'RE ALL OVER 2000. BUT THIS ONE IS, IS YOU KNOW, 3/4 OF AN ACRE IN SIZE WHERE WE'RE ADJACENT TO THESE RESIDENTIAL HERE. WE'RE PROPOSING A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT IN THAT LOCATION.

THESE LOTS ARE ALREADY BASICALLY ZONED SF-20A, SO WE'RE JUST RECONFIGURING THEM A LITTLE BIT TO ACCOMMODATE THE PRIVATE ROAD IN HERE.

THE PRIVATE ROAD IS AN APPROVED TURNAROUND IN THERE AND I MET WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL ON THAT AND HE'S PERFECTLY FINE WITH THIS. HIS ONLY REQUEST WAS THAT WE, INSTEAD OF MAKING THAT 24FT WIDE, WE MAKE IT 31FT BACK-TO-BACK. SO IT'S THE SAME SIZE AS A, A NORMAL STREET.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO HERE. OTHER THAN THAT YOU KNOW, LOT 6 WILL GET ITS ACCESS OFF OF THE PRIVATE ROAD, SO THERE WON'T BE ANY OTHER DRIVEWAYS GOING OUT TO CARROLL OR CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION, THE DRIVEWAY INTO THE OLD CHURCH PROPERTY IS RIGHT HERE, VERY CLOSE TO THE CORNER.

AND THAT'S KIND OF AN UNSAFE DRIVEWAY LOCATION.

AND SO THAT WILL GO AWAY. I THINK THAT WILL BE A BIG IMPROVEMENT.

BUT ANYWAY, OTHER THAN THAT, I THINK IT'S, IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD TRYING TO SAVE THE TREES WHERE WE CAN.

AND OF COURSE THERE'LL BE LANDSCAPING AND STANDARDS FOR ALL THIS.

BUT ANYWAY, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BE HAPPY TO ADDRESS THEM.

NO I'M GLAD YOU HIT ON THE, I KNOW SOME OF THE THINGS WE HIT ON AT CORRIDOR WAS TALKING TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, SO I'M GLAD YOU GOT THAT DONE. I REMEMBER WE TALKED ABOUT LOT 6 AND MAKING SURE THAT THAT DID NOT HAVE ACCESS ALONG.

RIGHT. SO CLOSE TO CARROLL. SO IT KIND OF IMPROVED AN EXISTING SITUATION.

SO I THINK THAT'S GOOD. MAYBE JUST TALK ABOUT THE TREE PRESERVATION ITEM THAT STAFF HIT ON.

I GUESS THE PERCENTAGE, THERE'S A KIND OF A REQUEST FOR RELIEF.

I'M ASSUMING THAT'S BASED ON JUST WELL, THERE'S A PERCENTAGE REQUEST.

JUST THE PURE NUMBER OF TREES IS NOT. WELL A LARGE NUMBER. IS THAT. IS THAT FAIR? YEAH. IT'S JUST THERE AREN'T THAT MANY TREES THERE.

AND, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF THE LARGEST ONES ARE HERE WHERE WE HAVE WE BASICALLY HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE THAN TO PUT THE ROAD THERE.

TO PUT THE ROAD OVER HERE WOULD HAVE BEEN BRINGING IT OUT TO CARROLL, WHICH IS NOT AS GOOD A CHOICE.

SO YOU KNOW, BASICALLY WE'RE, WE'RE AGREEING ALL THE TREES THAT ARE IN THE FRONT YARDS AND REAR YARDS WE'RE AGREEING TO SAVE.

BUT IT'S TOUGH SOMETIMES TO SAVE 70% OF THE TREES ON A SITE.

OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH. I WAS WANTING TO KNOW WHAT'S THE ACCESS FOR LOT 1 GOING TO BE? WHERE'S THE DRIVE FOR THAT GOING TO BE? IT'LL, IT'LL BE OFF OF BREEZE WAY JUST LIKE IT IS NOW.

AND I'M ASSUMING MAYBE ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THAT SITE VERSUS NORTHERN JUST TO GIVE IT MORE STACKING OR MORE DRIVEWAY SPACING? I GUESS. PERHAPS THERE'S SOME TREES THAT WE'RE TRYING TO SAVE SO, BUT. YEAH THESE PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE ON THAT SARAH PARK ON LOTS 1 AND 2 ARE NOT COMPLAINING ABOUT THE DENSITY SINCE HOW THEY GET TWO LOTS NOW IN THEIR BACK.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR HIM, KNOWS THOSE FOLKS AND HAS TALKED TO THEM.

SO I THINK THEY'RE GOOD. OKAY. IT'S HELPFUL WHEN THOSE CONVERSATIONS HAPPEN BEFORE THIS STEP.

YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT FOR NOW.

ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. CALL YOU BACK UP IF WE NEED YOU.

[00:35:04]

ITEM NUMBER 11 ON OUR AGENDA DOES CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THAT PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND COMMENT. COME UP HERE.

COME ON UP AND FEEL FREE TO COME ON UP TO THE.

YOU CAN COME, YOU CAN COME KIND OF ONE AT A TIME AND, AND JUST GET YOUR THREE MINUTES AND THEN THE NEXT PERSON CAN COME UP AND YOU CAN JUST COME RIGHT UP. THERE'LL BE A MICROPHONE. AND THERE'S A FEW OF US THAT ARE HERE THAT ARE LIVING ON THE BACK END OF THIS ON TIMARRON.

SO LONGFORD CIRCLE WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT DRAINAGE.

THIS IS HIGHER. OKAY. WOULD YOU MIND REAL QUICK. JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS ON RECORD. BETSY HINES, 1100 LONGFORD CIRCLE. PERFECT. OKAY. YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND LAUNCH INTO.

SO ANYWAY WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT DRAINAGE. THIS PROPERTY IS HIGHER THAN OURS, AND A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT IS NOT GOING TO PREVENT MASS FLOODING INTO OUR PROPERTIES.

WE'VE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH IT. WITH A NEIGHBOR DIRECTLY BEHIND US.

WE HAD 4FT OF WATER COMING THROUGH OUR FENCE YEARS AGO.

SO OUR CONCERN HERE, WE'RE A LITTLE BIT NORTH OF THAT, BUT I DON'T WANT THEM DRAINING IT LIKE TOWARDS US. IT NEEDS TO GO OUT TO THE STREET.

IT CANNOT BE COMING TO THE BACK END. SO I'D LIKE THEM TO ADDRESS THAT.

OKAY. WE'LL TALK TO THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU.

OKAY. DOES ANYONE ELSE WANT TO COME FORWARD? YEAH.

COME ON UP. AND JUST NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, AND THEN WE'LL START THE THREE MINUTE LIGHT.

ALL GOOD. HEY, MY NAME IS JOHN GEERTSEMA. ADDRESS IS 809 LONGFORD DRIVE.

SO MY HOUSE IS RIGHT ON THE EAST. NO, WEST SIDE OF WHERE LOT 3 WOULD BE.

ALSO. GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. ALSO THOUGHT IT WAS VERY INFORMATIVE.

WE'RE FRIENDS WITH BETSY. THE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING OF OUR CONCERN.

SO I JUST WANTED TO READ SOMETHING QUICKLY. AGAIN, MY CONCERN IS ABOUT THE DRAINAGE AND POTENTIAL FLOODING IMPACTS FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BEHIND MY PROPERTY. CURRENTLY, OUR HOUSE ALREADY EXPERIENCES MILD FLOODING DURING HEAVY RAIN EVENTS.

THE UNDEVELOPED LOT BEHIND US OR LOTS SITS APPROXIMATELY 3FT TO 4FT HIGHER THAN MY PROPERTY.

THE WATER NATURALLY DRAINS IN OUR DIRECTION WITH THE ADDITION OF 6 NEW HOMES, INCLUDING ELEVATED PATHS, ROOFS AND DRIVEWAYS. THERE'LL BE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA.

MY CONCERN IS THAT THIS WILL INCREASE BOTH THE VOLUME AND SPEED OF STORMWATER RUNOFF TOWARD MY PROPERTY, UNLESS PROPERLY MITIGATED. I WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT SPECIFIC MEASURES ARE BEING TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF DOES NOT EXCEED PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS. IN PARTICULAR, HAS A FORMAL DRAINAGE IMPACT STUDY BEEN COMPLETED AND CAN IT BE SHARED? WHAT TYPE OF STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM IS BEING DESIGNED AND FOR WHAT STORM EVENT CAPACITY? HOW WILL RUNOFF BE INTERCEPTED OR REDIRECTED BEFORE IT REACHES MY PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS ON THE WEST SIDE? WHERE WILL THE DISCHARGE WATER ULTIMATELY FLOW? I'M REQUESTING THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT ADHERE TO A NO ADVERSE IMPACT STANDARD, ENSURING THAT DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES ARE NOT NEGATIVELY AFFECTED.

I WOULD ALSO ASK THAT APPROPRIATE MEASURES BE CONSIDERED, SUCH AS A DETENTION SYSTEM, AS WELL AS SWALES OR BERMS ALONG THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY TO MANAGE WATER FLOW. MY GOAL IS NOT TO OPPOSE THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT TO ENSURE THAT IT IS DONE RESPONSIBLY AND DOES NOT INCREASE THE FLOOD RISK TO THE EXISTING HOMES ON THE WEST SIDE. THANK YOU FOR MY FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.

OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING OUT. WE'LL TALK TO THE APPLICANT ABOUT THAT.

OKAY. GO AHEAD AND COME ON UP. YEAH. PUBLIC HEARING REMAINS OPEN.

NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. YES HI. MY NAME IS AMY WORTH, AND I AM ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS THAT BACKS UP TO THIS AS WELL.

I LIVE AT 813 LONGFORD DRIVE IN SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.

SO I JUST WANT TO REITERATE THE SAME CONCERNS THAT THE PREVIOUS TWO NEIGHBORS SAID.

I'VE LIVED IN THIS HOUSE FOR 14, 15 YEARS AND OUR HOUSE HAS FLOODED OVER THREE TIMES THE WHOLE ENTIRE HOUSE BECAUSE OF THE SETUP THAT IT IS TODAY.

SO JUST REITERATING HOW CONCERNED WE ARE WITH THE CURRENT PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE, AND THEN ALSO BEING ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT WITHIN THIS AND

[00:40:08]

CONCERNED WITH WHAT WE SHARED. I DO APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION.

I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT EITHER, BUT THERE ARE SOME CONCERNS THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS WITH THE CURRENT LAND AS IT IS TODAY AS PART OF THAT DEVELOPMENT.

NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE. LONNIE WILSON 811 LONGFORD DRIVE.

OKAY. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS AND CHAIRMAN.

AGAIN, NOT TO RESTATE THE CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED, BUT AGAIN, JUST WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE I'VE BEEN HERE FOR 28 YEARS.

I'VE SEEN ALL OF THE CONSTRUCTION THAT'S TAKEN TAKING PLACE BEHIND MY HOME IN THAT AREA.

EACH TIME PRE-CONSTRUCTION POST-CONSTRUCTION THE DAM IS BROKEN AGAIN.

JUST LIKE TO SUPPORT AND REITERATE WHAT MY NEIGHBORS HAVE SPOKEN AND CONCERNS AND JUST ASKED AGAIN.

WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO BE, YOU KNOW, ASSURED THAT ADEQUATE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO PROTECT OUR PROPERTY. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE YOU COMING OUT TONIGHT.

PUBLIC HEARING REMAINS OPEN. ANYONE ELSE WANT TO COME FORWARD COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.

AND SEEING NO ONE I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL THE APPLICANT BACK UP. AND I THINK OBVIOUSLY YOU HEARD SOME OF THIS.

SO I GUESS WHAT'S KIND OF GET INTO IT IN TERMS OF JUST, AND I KNOW AT THIS STAGE OF THE PROCESS, DRAINAGE PLANS AREN'T FULLY BAKED, BUT I MEAN, MAYBE JUST KIND OF TALK ABOUT CONCEPTUALLY KIND OF HOW.

YEAH, LET ME LET ME GO TO BUT YOU KNOW, HERE'S THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AND YOU CAN SEE A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THAT WESTERN END DOES GO TO THE WEST. BUT OUR PLAN IS TO MITIGATE THAT AND I'LL LET CLAY TALK ABOUT IT.

NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING, CHAIR CLAY CRISTY CLAY MOORE ENGINEERING 3231 HARWOOD BOULEVARD AND BEDFORD.

THANKS FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT. WE DO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A CHALLENGE HERE AND JUST TO KIND OF TALK ABOUT OUR EXISTING CONDITIONS, ABOUT ESSENTIALLY THE MIDDLE OF THE CHURCH, EVERYTHING DRAINS BACK TO THE WEST AND DRAINS TOWARDS THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND EVERYTHING.

AND SO WHEN WE WERE LOOKING AT THIS, WE WERE TRYING TO MITIGATE THAT.

AND I THINK IT'S ONE OF THE RESIDENTIAL MEMBERS HAD ASKED TO BE ABLE TO TRY TO DRAIN BACK OVER TOWARDS BREEZE WAY.

THERE IS A LIMIT TO HOW MUCH THAT WE CAN DO THAT WITH OUR GRADING PLAN.

WE'LL BE FILLING ON THAT WESTERN SIDE TO TRY TO RAISE THAT UP SO THAT IT DOES DRAIN BACK TOWARDS BREEZE WAY.

AND THEN WE'LL WORK WITH SANDY AND EVERYBODY ELSE TO FINALIZE THE QUANTITY OF DETENTION ON THAT EASTERN SIDE BEFORE IT GOES INTO BREEZE WAY IN SOUTH CARROLL.

BUT THE GOAL IS TO REDUCE BECAUSE AS WE ARE GOING TO INCREASE, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE, WE WOULD INCREASE, WE WOULD REDUCE TO WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THAT WATER GOING TO THAT WESTERN SIDE WOULD BE SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED ON THE AREA AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF IT.

WE ALSO ARE GOING TO WORK TO HAVE THAT DISCHARGE, NOT IN A POINT DISCHARGE.

YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE COLLECTED AND PUT IN A PIPE AND JUST SENT OUT. WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO WORK TO TRY TO GET THAT AS BEST WE CAN AS A SHEET FLOW AND TRY TO DRAIN IT IN THERE. THERE IS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES.

AND SO WE KNOW THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE A CHALLENGE WHENEVER YOU HAVE YOUR FENCES AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT GO ALONG THROUGH THERE. BUT FROM THE PRE TO POST AND EVERYTHING ELSE, WE'RE GOING TO WORK TO REDUCE THE TOTAL AREA OF THAT AND THEN WORK THAT ON THAT WESTERN SIDE.

AND JUST TO MAKE SURE WE'RE INTERPRETING THIS CORRECTLY, I GUESS IT'S THAT KIND OF DARKER DOTTED LINE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THIS.

THAT'S THE RIDGE LINES. YES, SIR. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THIS.

YES, SIR. SO ON THIS RIGHT HERE, I KNOW IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SEE ON SCREEN, BUT IT'S ABOUT 1.2 ACRES OF THE PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TOWARDS THE WEST IN HERE FROM THE RIDGE LINE WHERE YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE EXISTING CHURCH IS, ALL THAT DRAINS OVER TO THE WEST.

AND THEN AS WE WORK THROUGH AND GET OUR FINAL PLANS PUT TOGETHER WE'VE REDUCED THAT AREA DOWN ON THAT WESTERN SIDE AND EVERYTHING ELSE I THINK IT'S ABOUT.

SORRY, I CAN'T READ ON THAT SCREEN RIGHT THERE, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S ABOUT 0.65.

I CAN'T REALLY SEE SORRY. I SHOULD HAVE THAT THERE, BUT WE'RE GOING TO CUT IT DOWN IN HALF OR A LITTLE BIT MORE, AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO WORK ON THAT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NOT ANYTHING THERE OF CONCERN.

WE ARE GOING TO BE SENDING MORE WATER TO BREEZE WAY, WHICH WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO INCREASE THAT EITHER. SO THAT IS THE REASON WHY WE HAVE THE

[00:45:02]

DETENTION IN PLACE TO SEND AS MUCH AS WE CAN THROUGH THAT DETENTION POND.

OKAY. OKAY. AND THEN I, YOU KNOW, I'M ASSUMING BOTH OF YOU, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO PROBABLY TALK ABOUT IS AS A CONDITION OF, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING WE CONSIDER UP HERE THAT THAT YOU MEET WITH, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'VE KIND OF MET WITH MAYBE SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH, BUT THAT YOU MEET WITH THESE NEIGHBORS THAT I BELIEVE MOST OF THEM ARE ON THE, THE WEST.

AND JUST KIND OF TALK THROUGH THIS DRAINAGE PLAN.

ABSOLUTELY WE CAN DO THAT AFTER. AFTER THIS ITEM IS COMPLETE, MAYBE JUST OUT IN THE FOYER, JUST MEET AND TALK WITH THEM, GIVE THEM CONTACT INFO AND SET UP A TIME TO, TO DISCUSS.

SO ANY OTHER KIND OF COMMENTS FROM OTHERS.

SO HAVE YOU GUYS DONE ANYTHING? HAVE YOU LOOKED AT IT? THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES THAT ARE BEING AFFECTED BY THIS FLOODING.

HAVE YOU LOOKED AT ANYTHING THAT THEY'VE DONE TO KIND OF MITIGATE THE PROBLEM ON THEIR OWN, OR DO YOU DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY'VE DONE OVER THERE ON THAT SIDE? AND ALSO, WHERE DOES THE WATER THAT IN TIMARRON, WHERE DOES IT GO? IS IT STILL CONTINUING TO GO WEST? IT DRAINS TO THE NORTH, I BELIEVE.

WHENEVER IT GOES THROUGH, THAT'S WHERE THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT GOES. I'LL BE HONEST, I, I HAVEN'T LOOKED AT THE GLOBAL DRAINAGE OF OF WHAT THAT IS FOR THE TIMARRON AREA AND EVERYTHING ELSE, BUT JUST THROUGH THE PROPERTY RESEARCH AND WHERE THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, IT DIRECTS ME THAT I BELIEVE THAT EVERYTHING DRAINS TO THE NORTH. BUT AS DAN HAD HAPPENED TO MENTION, WE CAN TRY TO, YOU KNOW, MEET WITH EVERYBODY, GET SOME NAMES AND NUMBERS AND TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT, WHAT THE SITUATION MIGHT BE TO TRY TO HELP NAVIGATE THAT, TO ENSURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT OR HURT ANYBODY ELSE DOWNSTREAM, BECAUSE THAT'S OBVIOUSLY NOT OUR GOAL AND NOT WHAT WE WANT TO DO AT ALL THROUGH THAT DEVELOPMENT STAGE.

BUT IT'S YOUR OPINION THAT BASED ON YOUR STUDY HERE, THAT WOULD YOU CHANGE IN THE ELEVATION OF THAT BACK LOT THAT YOU ARE NOT GOING TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF WATER, YOU'RE GOING TO DECREASE IT IF YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN WHAT. MY EYES WERE A LITTLE BAD, BUT WE'RE GOING FROM 1.2 TO ABOUT 0.4 ACRES DRAINING TO THAT WESTERN SIDE.

SO WE WILL REDUCE THAT BY QUITE A BIT BY ABOUT, YOU KNOW, 60% OR SO, A LITTLE BIT MORE TO WHAT'S DRAINING THERE NOW.

GOOD ON IN TERMS OF CONTEMPLATING A DRAINAGE PLAN LIKE THIS, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT CITY STAFF'S GOING TO REVIEW AND CONFIRM ALL THE ASSUMPTIONS THAT WE'RE HEARING NOW. SO KIND OF A THIRD PARTY VERIFIED CONFIRMATION OF.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT RIGHT NOW? OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YEAH. I THINK MAYBE WE CAN YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY CITY COUNCIL IS PRETTY FOCUSED ON DRAINAGE RIGHT NOW AS WELL. SO I GUESS MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE THE APPLICANT, YOU KNOW, AFTER THIS KIND OF EXCHANGE CONTACT INFO, IF THIS GOES TO COUNCIL, THE EARLIEST IT WOULD GO WOULD BE THAT TUESDAY MAY 19TH.

SO THERE'S A COUPLE WEEKS AHEAD OF THAT TO MEET WITH NEIGHBORS AND, YOU KNOW, KIND OF BETTER EXPLAIN THIS MAYBE, MAYBE LIKE CLAY MENTIONED, DO SOME HOMEWORK BEHIND KIND OF THE BIGGER PICTURE WHERE WATER IS COMING FROM, WHERE IT'S DRAINING TO SO THAT SO THERE'S MORE UNDERSTANDING ON THAT FRONT.

IF THERE'S SOMETHING EVEN BETTER THAT CAN BE DESIGNED THAT THERE'S SOME TIME TO THINK ABOUT THAT.

ANY, ANY OTHER THOUGHTS ON THIS? MAYBE YOU CAN NOTE SOME OF THAT IN A VERY PROFESSIONALLY CRAFTED MOTION.

YEP. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. WE'RE DONE WITH PUBLIC HEARING, RIGHT? YEAH. ALL RIGHT, MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 11 ON OUR AGENDA ZA26-0022, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED APRIL 23RD, 2026, NOTING APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE AND ALSO NOTING THAT IT IS SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY #2 DATED APRIL 17TH, 2026, NOTING THE APPLICANT'S WILLINGNESS AND AGREEMENT TO MEET WITH THE HOMEOWNERS TO THE WEST OF THE DEVELOPMENT, IN PARTICULAR THE ONES THAT ARE ON LONGFORD AND MEET WITH THEM PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL, ADVISE THEM OF THEIR DRAINAGE PLANS, MORE DETAIL THERE AND GET MORE INFORMATION ON THE TIMARRON DRAINAGE.

AGAIN, ALL PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

GO AHEAD AND VOTE, PLEASE. PASSES 5-0. AND AGAIN TO THE NEIGHBORS.

I THINK YOU CAN KIND OF TALK TO THE APPLICANT OUT HERE IN THE FOYER AND GET SOME MORE INFORMATION FROM THEM. AND YOU CAN ALSO TALK WITH CITY STAFF AS WELL TO CONFIRM SOME OF

[00:50:04]

THE THINGS YOU'RE HEARING FROM THE APPLICANT IN TERMS OF HOW THE PROCESS WORKS AND PLANS ARE VERIFIED.

AND, YOU KNOW, TO THE EXTENT DRAINAGE SITUATION CAN BE POSITIVELY IMPACTED.

SO THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT. AND WITH THAT, WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 12 ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING,

[12. Consider: ZA26-0009, Site Plan for Pottery Barn on property described as Lot 1, Block 3R1, Southlake Town Square Addition and located at 1440 Civic Place. Current Zoning: “DT” Downtown District. SPIN Neighborhood #8. PUBLIC HEARING]

WHICH IS THE SITE PLAN FOR POTTERY BARN HERE IN TOWN SQUARE.

GOOD EVENING AGAIN. THIS IS ITEM 12. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN FOR POTTERY BARN.

AND IT'S FOR SOME SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING AN OUTDOOR PATIO AND A WOODEN TRELLIS.

LOCATED AT SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE, 1440 CIVIC PLACE.

SO AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE.

FUTURE LAND USE IS TOWN CENTER. CURRENT ZONING IS DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.

THIS IS STREET VIEW FROM GRAND AVENUE LOOKING NORTHWEST.

SO STREET VIEW FROM GRAND AVENUE LOOKING NORTH AND LOOKING WEST.

A RENDERING PROVIDED FROM THE APPLICANT. THIS IS THEIR PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND THIS IS THE ENLARGED PATIO PLAN.

NOTING THAT UP ON THE RAMP, IT'S 6FT AND 8" WIDE AND THEN COMING BACK OUT.

IT'S 11FT AND 5". AND JUST ANOTHER PART OF THE PLAN AND NOTING THE TREE WALLS.

THIS IS A PATIO ELEVATION SHOWING ALSO THEIR SIGNAGE AND THE, THE RAMP, ANOTHER PATIO ELEVATION.

AND THIS IS AN ELEVATION OF THE EAST SIDE AND ELEVATION OF THE NORTH SIDE.

THIS IS THEIR GRADING PLAN. AND AS OF NOW, THERE'S NO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE THE APPLICANT THIS EVENING.

NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. YEAH. FINALLY NOT CURTIS YOUNG.

[LAUGHTER]. HELLO. THANK YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION. THANK YOU COMMITTEE FOR YOUR TIME. MY NAME IS ALIANA RAMOS.

I AM A LICENSED ARCHITECT THAT WORKS FOR GLOBEATELIÊ.

WE ARE THE ARCHITECT FOR POTTERY BARN AT THIS LOCATION.

I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME. YEAH, MAYBE I'LL ASK IF STAFF CAN KIND OF TURN THE PRESENTATION BACK TO THE SLIDE.

YEAH. RIGHT HERE. YOU GOT IT. OKAY. CAN YOU MAYBE EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS GOING TO WORK? I GUESS, YOU KNOW, ASSUMING WHAT'S, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE JUST A PEDESTRIAN WALKING DOWN THE SIDEWALK, IS IT KIND OF FREE AND CLEAR JUST TO WALK THROUGH THERE AND THE SEATING AREAS ON THE SIDE CLOSER TO THE STREET, YOU KNOW, HOW EXACTLY IS THIS GOING TO. YES. YEAH.

FEEL FREE TO USE THE MOUSE. SO THE APPLE STORE'S UP HERE.

AND THEN AS SHE HAD MENTIONED, THE RAMP IS 6FT 8" WIDE.

THE CLEAR SPACE AT ITS NARROWEST IS 6FT WIDE.

SO IT IS PRETTY NATURAL TO CONTINUE THROUGH HERE.

WE WIDENED THAT FROM THE LAST TIME WE SPOKE. I THINK WE JUST HAD IT AT LIKE THE 5FT CLEARANCE.

YEAH, I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THAT AT CORRIDOR MEETING. YEAH.

AND THEN WE WILL HAVE THE FURNITURE TUCKED AWAY OVER HERE AS WELL AS THIS IS A PRETTY WIDE SPACE.

SO WE'RE ASSUMING POTTERY BARN WILL PROVIDE SOME FURNITURE ALONG HERE, BUT WE'LL BE KEEPING THAT WALKWAY VERY CLEAR.

OKAY. AND JUST CURIOUS, THIS MAY BE A QUESTION FOR THE GENTLEMAN BEHIND YOU, BUT I GUESS WHAT.

IN TERMS OF THE TENANT'S LEASE, I GUESS AT SOME POINT, YOU KNOW, I KNOW EVERYONE WHO COMES IN HERE THINKS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE A TENANT HERE FOREVER AND BEEN HERE 25 YEARS. TENANTS COME AND GO.

SO WHAT WILL THIS JUST BE LEFT AS IS IF THIS TENANT GOES, IS THERE ANY PUT BACK CLAUSE OR ANYTHING OR HOW DOES THAT WORK? SO I'M DAVID, I'M AT 285 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 210 [INAUDIBLE].

IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU GUYS AGAIN. THAT IS CORRECT.

THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT TO THE BUILDING AS A WHOLE.

SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD STAY FOR THE.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE ACTUALLY REQUESTED FROM POTTERY BARN TO ADD THIS INTEREST, BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF THE AREAS THAT'S THE LONGEST SPAN BETWEEN APPLE AND POTTERY BARN DOOR. IT'S OVER 100FT. THAT AVERAGES ABOUT 25FT.

SO THAT PUTS A VOID IN THE RETAIL. WE WANTED TO PUT THAT THERE SO THAT IT BREAKS THAT SPACE UP.

SO WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT A NATIONALLY RANKED LULULEMON AND LOOKING AT THAT SPACE, YOU'LL SEE THAT DOOR IS AN ENTRANCE TO A POTTERY BARN WITH A SIGN BROUGHT OUT OFF THE WALL

[00:55:04]

SO THAT IT'S NOT JUST BRICK YOU'RE STARING AT ANYMORE. SO YOU FEEL LIKE YOU KIND OF HAD A DEAD SPACE, SO TO SPEAK, TO ACTIVATE A LITTLE BIT. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON FOR 9 MONTHS TO GET THIS EXACTLY HOW THEY LIKE IT AND HOW WE LIKE IT.

SO IT'S, IT LOOKS REALLY GOOD. OKAY. SO ARE YOU ENVISIONING THIS TO BE SORT OF LIKE IT WAS OVER AT ROCKFISH IN THAT DINING AREA THEY HAD OUTSIDE? SORT OF.

IT'S FENCED IN, BUT YOU CAN STILL WALK THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF IT.

JUST WITH A LARGER OPENING. OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT.

THAT ONE IS MUCH SMALLER THAN A 6FT OPENING. THAT'S CORRECT.

6FT.

THERE WAS ONE OTHER I WAS TRYING TO THINK OF THAT HAD ANOTHER.

THERE ARE SEVERAL OF THESE THAT HAVE THAT ARE ON THE PROPERTY. THIS WOULD BE THE WIDEST.

OKAY. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT FOR ONE, I JUST WANTED TO ADD ON THAT WE ARE ADDING THIS NEW ENTRY.

THERE'S NO ENTRY AS HE HAD MENTIONED. SO THE CURRENT, THERE IS A DOOR OVER HERE TO THE SIDE, BUT IT'S NOT A REAL ENTRY TO THE POTTERY BARN.

LIKE THEY DON'T TREAT IT LIKE A MAIN ENTRY. SO THIS WOULD BE A SECONDARY MAIN ENTRY THAT IS NOT EXISTING RIGHT NOW.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE WHAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT BEFORE.

ALL THE FURNITURE IS KIND OF PUSHED BACK EVEN OVER HERE, WHERE IT'S NOT LIKE A NARROW SPACE.

WE'RE STILL JUST PROPOSING IT. LIKE YOU'LL STILL HAVE PLENTY OF CLEAR SPACE TO WALK THROUGH.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NOPE. THAT'S IT. NICE. NICE LEGACY WEST WELL, WE BOUGHT THAT ONE TOO, IN JUNE, SO. YEAH.

NO, I KNOW WHO YOU BOUGHT IT FROM. OH, REALLY? YEAH. OH, OKAY. YEAH. [LAUGHTER]. SO. YES NO.

REAL ESTATE. [LAUGHTER]. WISH I HAD ONE OF THOSE.

ANY. OKAY. NO, I THINK WE'RE GOOD ON THE APPLICANT SIDE.

THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 12 ON OUR AGENDA DOES REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING.

WE'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING FOR ANYBODY WHO'D LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND COMMENT ON THIS ITEM. AND SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MY ONLY RESERVATION ON THIS ONE IS I THINK IT'S GOING TO COST ME FINANCIALLY ON THE HOME FRONT.

[LAUGHTER]. THAT'S ABOUT IT. I DON'T KNOW, THIS IS A PRETTY CHALLENGING ONE.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 12 ON OUR AGENDA ZA26-0009, SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED APRIL 17TH, 2026 AND ALSO SUBJECT TO OUR SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY #3 DATED APRIL 17TH, 2026, A MOTION.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD AND VOTE, PLEASE.

PASSES 5-0. CONGRATULATIONS. GOOD LUCK. AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 19TH.

SOUNDS LIKE IT COULD BE A BUSY ONE. SO GOOD LUCK.

THANKS FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, WE ARE MOVING ON TO THE LAST ITEM ON OUR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA,

[13. Consider: ZA26-0020, Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 2056 N. Kimball Avenue on property described as Lot 67, F. Throop No. 1511 Addition. Current Zoning: “AG” Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. PUBLIC HEARING]

WHICH IS ITEM 13 ZONING CHANGE CONCEPT PLAN FOR NORTH KIMBALL AVENUE.

THIS IS ITEM 13. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON 2056 NORTH KIMBALL AVENUE. THE CURRENT ZONING IS AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND THE REQUESTED ZONING IS SF-1A.

THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY, NOTING THAT EDELLE COURT IS MAINTAINED GRAVEL 40FT WIDE DRIVE.

BUT IT'S, IT'S A PRIVATE ROAD. THE FUTURE LAND USE IS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.

THE CURRENT ZONING IS AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT.

SO STREET VIEW FROM NORTH KIMBALL AVENUE LOOKING WEST TOWARDS EDELLE COURT.

AND THAT'S THE PROPERTY LOCATION IN THE BACK.

THIS IS A STREET VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST. THESE ARE THE PREVIOUS APPROVED VARIANCES WITH THEIR PLOT SHOWING WITH THE LOTS MUST BE FRONTING A STREET AND THE MINIMUM SIDEWALK AND THEY RECEIVED A VARIANCE FOR THIS REQUIREMENT.

THIS IS THEIR PROPOSED SITE PLAN. KNOWING THAT THEY'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SF-1A REGULATIONS THIS IS OUR FRONT ELEVATIONS WITH THEIR MAXIMUM HEIGHT BEING 35FT REAR ELEVATIONS.

THIS IS THEIR TREE CONSERVATION PLAN AND SHOWING THAT THERE'S 63.3% EXISTING TREE COVER.

THE REQUIREMENT IS TO PRESERVE 40% AND THEY'RE PRESERVING 70%.

[01:00:02]