[6. A. Ordinance No. 1228A, 2nd Reading, an ordinance amending Article V, "Boards, Commissions and Committees," of Chapter 2, "Administration;" and Article XII, "Building Board of Appeals," of Chapter 4.5, "Buildings and Building Regulations;" and Division 2, "Park and Recreation Board," of Article III, "Boards," of Chapter 12, "Parks and Recreation," of the Southlake Code of Ordinances. PUBLIC HEARING ]

A SECOND READING, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE FIVES, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES OF CHAPTER TWO, ADMINISTRATION AND ARTICLE 12, ETC..

DR. BAKER. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.

THIS IS THE SECOND READING ON ORDINANCE 1228 A.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDINANCE IS TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS.

PROVIDE LANGUAGE WHICH EXEMPTS THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION FROM THE TERM LIMIT REQUIREMENTS.

PROVIDE A SPECIFIC LIST OF BOARDS IN WHICH THE COUNCIL WILL APPOINT A CHAIRPERSON.

PROVIDE LANGUAGE THAT INDICATES THE COUNCIL WILL APPOINT THE VICE CHAIRPERSON ONLY FOR THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE, PROVIDE LANGUAGE THAT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, MEMBERS OF THE VARIOUS BOARDS, NOT THE CITY COUNCIL, SHALL SELECT ITS VICE CHAIRPERSON BY A MAJORITY VOTE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR, OR WHEN THAT SEAT BECOMES VACANT, AND THEN ELIMINATE ANY CONFLICTING ORDINANCE LANGUAGE IN YOUR CODE.

SO THIS QUICKLY YOU JUST SUMMARIZE PROPOSED CHANGES.

THE FIRST ONE HERE IS THE TERMS OF OFFICE.

THERE IS A EXCEPTION FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

IT IS BELIEVED DUE TO THE COMPLEX AND NATURE OF SOME OF THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATIONS, THE MANY LAWS THAT IMPACT THE FUNCTION OF THAT BOARD AND THE HIGH PROFILE NATURE OF THE COMMISSION, THAT IT'S IN CITIZENS INTEREST, THAT IN DEVELOPMENT AND CONFERENCE OF PLANNING, THAT THE COMMUNITY WOULD BE BETTER SERVED BY ALLOWING THAT BOARD TO.

[00:40:01]

EXTEND PAST THE SIX YEAR TERM LIMITS APPOINTMENTS OF THE CHAIRPERSON UNLESS THERE'S LANGUAGE IN THERE, UNLESS PREEMPTED BY CITY CHARTER OR STATE LAW.

THE CITY COUNCIL TO NAME THE CHAIR.

THEY WILL ALSO NAME THE VICE CHAIR FOR THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PER THE ZONING LANGUAGE AND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AS DISCUSSED THAT THE BOARDS THEMSELVES WILL ELECT THEIR VICE CHAIR BY MAJORITY VOTE, AND THAT WILL BE AT THE FIRST AVAILABLE MEETING FOLLOWING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE CHAIRPERSON BY THE CITY COUNCIL, OR IF A VACANCY EXISTS.

THE APPOINTMENTS BY COUNCIL WILL APPLY TO THE BOARDS ON THIS SLIDE.

I WON'T READ THEM, BUT YOU CAN SEE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SLIDE THESE ARE THE THE BOARDS THAT WERE THE APPOINTMENTS WOULD OCCUR NOT INCLUDED OF THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION BECAUSE THE CHARTER, THE COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND THE CRIME CONTROL PREVENTION DISTRICT.

BUT PER STATE LAW WOULD NOT APPOINT THE CHAIR FOR THE SOUTH LAKE YOUTH ACTION COMMISSION OR THE COURT OR PLANNING COMMITTEE.

AND THEN THERE'S WE'VE REMOVED ANY CONFLICTING CODE PROVISIONS FOR THESE BOARDS THAT HAVE BEEN WHERE THEIR BOARD CREATION HAS BEEN CODIFIED IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. AND THERE'S LANGUAGE IN THIS ORDINANCE THAT REMOVES ANY OF THE CONFLICTING CODE PROVISIONS.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, DIRECTOR BAKER. ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF GUYS? SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. SO BIG CHANGES P AND Z IS EXEMPTED FROM THE TERM LIMITS AT THIS POINT.

OKAY, EXCELLENT. WELL, THERE'S NO QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM FOR ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM SIX A.

SEEING NONE, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL.

IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? YEAH, I JUST I YES, I'M IN FAVOR OF EVERYTHING ON SIX A EXCEPT I DO HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE TERM LIMITS FOR P AND Z.

I UNDERSTAND FROM TALKING WITH THOSE OF YOU AND OTHER FOLKS THAT HAVE BEEN ON P AND Z THAT ARE ON P AND Z, HOW COMPLEX IT IS AND HOW IMPORTANT IT IS TO OUR CITY.

I'M JUST NOT SURE ABOUT LEAVING IT OPEN ENDED.

WE DON'T WE DIDN'T LEAVE IT OPEN ENDED FOR OURSELVES WHEN SOME OF YOU WHO WERE ON THE COUNCIL VOTED FOR TERM LIMITS.

SO I GUESS I'D BE INTERESTED TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT.

I JUST FEEL LIKE WE HAVE I THINK WE HAVE ONE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSIONER WHO'S COMING UP ON 20 YEARS OF SERVICE AND ONE POSITION WHICH THAT PERSON HAS SERVED.

THAT'S HUGE DEDICATION TO OUR CITY, BUT IT'S ALSO, AS AN EXAMPLE, 20 YEARS THAT SOMEONE ELSE CAN'T SERVE IN THAT SPOT.

SO I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT THIS.

I GUESS I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS.

AND MY ONLY SUGGESTION WOULD BE THAT PERHAPS WE GIVE PLANNING AND ZONING AN EXTRA TERM VERSUS LEAVING IT OPEN ENDED.

SO BUT I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT.

P AND Z COMMISSIONERS.

FORMER P AND Z COMMISSIONERS.

I'LL CHIME IN. I SERVED ON PLANNING AND ZONING AND COMING FROM A TITLE INSURANCE BACKGROUND, I WAS ABLE TO JUMP RIGHT IN.

HOWEVER, IT IS ABSOLUTELY A LEARNING CURVE AND IT TAKES THEM THREE YEARS TO ALMOST EVEN GET THEIR FEET WET.

THERE ARE SOME REALLY LONG TENURED VOLUNTEERS WHO HAVE DEDICATED A NUMBER OF YEARS, AND AS A FELLOW COMMISSIONER WHO WAS NEWER ON THE COMMISSION, THEIR INSIGHT ON THINGS THAT HAD COME THROUGH IN PRIOR YEARS, THEY REMEMBERED, YES, THIS HAS COME THROUGH THREE DIFFERENT TIMES.

HERE'S WHAT WE DID THE LAST FEW TIMES.

AND IT'S REALLY CRITICAL IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, IN MY OPINION, TO HAVE THAT HISTORY SOMETIMES.

AND IT HELPED US TREMENDOUSLY IN THE DEBATE AND THE RHETORIC AND WHAT WE DECIDED ON.

SO I WHILE I UNDERSTAND IT'S TOUGH TO JUST LEAVE IT OPEN ENDED, IT'S ALSO UP TO COUNCIL TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE PEOPLE ARE QUALITY PEOPLE THAT THEY ARE SERVING, THAT THEY'RE SHOWING UP, THAT THEY'RE CONTRIBUTING, THAT THEY'RE STILL AN ACTIVE, VIABLE MEMBER.

AND WE DON'T HAVE TO REAPPOINT ANYBODY JUST BECAUSE THERE'S THIS GRANDFATHERED.

WE ASSUME THAT THEY THEY STILL HAVE TO REAPPLY.

THEY STILL HAVE TO WANT TO REAPPLY.

AND WE STILL, AS A COUNCIL, GET TO MAKE THAT DECISION WHETHER WE FEEL THAT WE WANT THEM ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

SO THAT'S THE WAY I FEEL ABOUT IT.

I WAS NOT IN FAVOR OF TERM LIMITS FOR P AND Z WHEN THAT WAS SWITCHED A FEW YEARS AGO.

BUT SO I'M ACTUALLY HAPPY TO SEE THAT PLANNING AND ZONING AS THE RECOMMENDING BODY TO COUNCIL CAN SOMEWHAT HAVE SOME CONSISTENCY.

AND THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE SPOTS THAT OPEN UP FOR THE FOLKS THAT WANT TO GET IN.

THERE'S THE SPOT I MOVED OFF AND AUSTIN REYNOLDS CAME IN.

SO THERE'S PEOPLE WHO MOVE AWAY OR RETIRE OR DECIDE NOT TO PARTICIPATE.

[00:45:04]

BUT IT IS A LEARNING CURVE.

AND YOU REALLY DO WANT THE PEOPLE IN THERE, IN MY OPINION, THAT ARE DEDICATED AND HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND CAN HELP IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS.

AS ANOTHER FELLOW P AND Z ALUM.

I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT AMY JUST SAID.

I THINK FROM MY EXPERIENCE ON P AND Z AND THEN COMING TO COUNCIL, SO MUCH OF WHAT COUNCIL GETS, I THINK LIKE 70% OF WHAT WE SEE HAS COME THROUGH P AND Z.

SO HAVING THAT WISDOM, THAT EXPERIENCE THERE, I THINK MAKES A DIFFERENCE FOR US.

I THINK HAVING A GREAT P AND Z LIKE WE'VE HAD FOR THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS, WE'VE HAD SOME TOUGH CASES THAT P AND Z HAS REALLY WORKED OVER PRETTY GOOD.

AND BY THE TIME THEY GOT TO US, THEY'RE REALLY GOOD SHAPE.

AND I THINK THAT'S HELPED US BE MORE EFFICIENT AND MORE EFFECTIVE.

SO I'M IN FAVOR OF THE CHANGE TO EXEMPT P AND Z FROM THE TERM LIMITS.

AS AMY POINTED OUT, WE CAN ENFORCE A TERM LIMIT WHENEVER WE WANT, ESPECIALLY AT RE-APPOINTMENT TIME, AND WE TAKE THOSE ONE AT A TIME, AS WE ALWAYS DO. BUT I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE.

YEAH. ALSO FORMER P AND Z MEMBER, I'LL BE VOTING IN SUPPORT OF THIS AS WELL.

I DO UNDERSTAND WHAT KATHY IS SAYING.

I APPRECIATE THAT. THOSE COMMENTS, WHAT I WOULD JUST SIMPLY SAY IS I THINK IT'S INCUMBENT ON THIS COUNCIL AND FUTURE COUNCILS TO HOLD THE P AND Z COMMISSIONERS AND THE COMMISSION TO A VERY HIGH STANDARD.

YOU KNOW, WE HOLD ALL OF OUR GROUPS AND COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS TO HIGH STANDARDS, BUT P AND Z, I THINK WE CAN HOLD TO AN EVEN HIGHER STANDARD.

AND THAT HAS TO DO WITH ABILITY TO, YOU KNOW, TO BE AT MEETINGS AND THEN CONTRIBUTION.

AND, YOU KNOW, IF WE FEEL LIKE SOMEBODY PERHAPS IT'S NOT A GREAT FIT.

YOU HAVE TO BE WILLING TO MAKE THAT DECISION, YOU KNOW? SO I AGREE.

I THINK WE CAN MAKE THOSE DECISIONS.

WE JUST HAVE TO BE WILLING TO DO THAT.

BUT THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION IS DOING A FANTASTIC JOB AND I THINK WE'RE OKAY MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS.

I AGREE. I WAS NOT ON PLANNING AND ZONING, ALTHOUGH I SERVED ON THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR FOUR YEARS AND I THINK IT WAS COUNCILWOMAN LEPP WHO SAID SHE WAS NEVER IN FAVOR OF THE CHANGES TO THE TERM LIMITS.

I WAS NEVER IN FAVOR WITH EITHER, YOU KNOW, LOSING SOMEONE LIKE TRICLER OR KUBIAK WHO DOES A GREAT JOB.

I THINK THAT'S A TESTAMENT TO THE QUALITY OF THE CASES THAT WE GET HERE ON COUNCIL.

I WOULD I KNOW YOU HAVE TO WEIGH THE RISK OF SHUNNING, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD, PEOPLE WHO STEPPED UP TO VOLUNTEER AGAINST LOSING REALLY GOOD PEOPLE LIKE KUBIAK AND TRYCLER.

I'M JUST MENTIONING THOSE NAMES BECAUSE I KNOW KUBIAK DECENTLY WELL AND I SERVED WITH TRYCLER ON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.

I JUST DON'T WANT TO LOSE PEOPLE LIKE THAT JUST BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN AROUND A LONG TIME.

THAT TO ME IS A TESTAMENT TO THEIR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE.

AND I THINK, YES, THERE WILL ALWAYS BE OPENINGS FOR US TO BRING NEW PEOPLE ALONG.

BUT I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF LOSING PEOPLE LIKE THAT, I DON'T THINK.

I MEAN, I WASN'T ON P AND Z, OBVIOUSLY, BUT I DON'T THINK ANYONE'S QUESTIONING THE QUALITY OF P AND Z OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT AT ALL.

I PERSONALLY STRUGGLE WITH THE LACK OF TERM LIMITS ACROSS THE BOARD.

I THINK IT'S PROBABLY ONE OF THE GREATEST THINGS.

IF YOU COULD IMPLEMENT TERM LIMITS ACROSS THE COUNTRY, IT WOULD BE A GREAT THING.

AND I THINK ALL THINGS START AT THE CITY LEVEL AND AT THE LOCAL LEVEL.

IS THERE ANY OPTION TO DO IF WE FEEL LIKE SIX YEARS IS TOO SHORT, IS THERE ANY OPTION TO GO EIGHT, TEN, 12, SOMETHING THAT STILL LIMITS US SO THAT WE DO GET ALMOST FORCE TURNOVER AND KIND OF GET THE OPTION TO STEP UP OTHER PEOPLE TO STEP UP AND LEAD WITHOUT HAVING TO HAVE THIS OPEN ENDED.

AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE PERSON THAT'S BEEN THERE 20 YEARS, I KNOW WHO IT IS.

THEY MAY DO A PHENOMENAL JOB.

BUT I DO THINK THAT NEW BLOOD I MEAN, IF WE CAN TURN OVER A COUNCIL EVERY SIX YEARS, I MEAN, I STRUGGLE WITH P AND Z BEING, YOU KNOW, IRREPARABLE IF WE DON'T TURN IT OVER.

SO THAT'S MY STRUGGLE WITH REMOVING TERM LIMITS FROM BASICALLY ANYTHING AT THIS POINT.

YEAH. I MEAN, ALL GOOD COMMENTS, I THINK ALL GOOD PERSPECTIVES.

I THINK WHERE I AM AT THIS POINT IN TIME, YOU KNOW, I'M ALWAYS TRYING TO THINK OF THE ABSTRACT, BUT ALSO IN THE SPECIFIC.

AND AT THIS POINT WE FIRST HAVE AN AMAZING P AND Z AND SECOND, YOU KNOW, HAVE A NEED FOR LONGEVITY AND CONSISTENCY IN THAT.

AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE HAD TO TURN OVER VOLUNTEERS BEFORE SINCE I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL AND WE HAD TO DO IT ON P AND Z, A COUPLE OF MEMBERS.

AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT IT'S NOT FUN.

I DO THINK THAT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE AS A COUNCIL, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE ALL THE VOLUNTEERS UNDERSTAND THAT WE ALL I MEAN, WE ALL SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE PUBLIC, OBVIOUSLY, AT THE TAXPAYERS.

THE REALITY IS NONE OF US ARE ENTITLED TO THESE SEATS, COUNCIL OR VOLUNTEER, VOLUNTEER FOLKS AT THE BOARDS OF COMMISSION.

SO AT THIS POINT IN TIME, FOR THIS MOMENT IN SOUTH LAKE, I THINK IT'S SUPER IMPORTANT THAT WE MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY ON AN EXCELLENT P AND Z.

[00:50:06]

SO I'LL BE VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS, BUT I THINK Y'ALL'S COMMENTS AND PERSPECTIVES ARE WELL CONSIDERED FOR SURE.

WELL, I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY WEIGHING IN.

TO BE CLEAR, I THINK WE HAVE A FANTASTIC P AND Z.

OF COURSE, I'M REALLY SPEAKING TO THE LONGEVITY AND OFFERING OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHERS IN OUR COMMUNITY WHO WANT TO STEP UP AND SERVE.

I DON'T THINK THERE'S I MEAN, I DON'T HAVE ANY DATA, SO BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TURNOVER IN P AND Z.

THOSE FOLKS ARE FANTASTIC.

SO, YOU KNOW, ALSO WANT THEM THERE.

SO I JUST IT'S REALLY THE OPEN ENDED TERM LIMIT PIECE THAT I STRUGGLE WITH.

OTHER THAN THAT, I MEAN, AND I HAD SAID THE SAME THING, IS THERE A WAY TO GIVE THEM LONGER BUT STILL AT SOME POINT HAVE AN ENDING? SO BUT IF YOU GUYS WOULD PREFER IT, THEN OBVIOUSLY THAT'S THE WAY TO GO.

IT'S GOING TO GO. WELL, I WILL SAY, TOO, THOUGH, I THINK IF WE LOOK BACK, I'M JUST DOING IT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD HERE.

BUT IF WE LOOK BACK, I MEAN, THERE'S BEEN REASONABLE TURNOVER ON P AND Z FOR THE LAST DECADE.

I MEAN, THERE'S GENERALLY MOVEMENT.

SO THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES.

IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S LOCKED DOWN AND THERE HASN'T BEEN A CHANGE, YOU KNOW, IN FIVE YEARS OR SIX YEARS THERE'S MOVEMENT.

SO I THINK I WOULD ALIGN IF THERE WAS NO MOVEMENT EVER.

I DO THINK THAT'S WHEN YOU NEED TO START LOOKING AT THE AD BOOK.

BUT THE NATURAL EVOLUTION OF THE PROCESS SEEMS LIKE THERE'S BEEN OPENINGS.

SO YEAH. GOOD DISCUSSION.

ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS AT THIS POINT? NO, I'LL JUST FINISH WITH I'M IT MIGHT SURPRISE YOU I'M GOING TO VOTE YES, BUT I'M FOR EVERYTHING ELSE ON THIS.

I GUESS I ALMOST WISH THOSE TWO THE OTHER ITEMS IN THIS HAVE BEEN SEPARATED, BUT EVERYTHING ELSE ON HERE EXEMPLIFIES ALL THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE TO GET ALL OF THESE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ALIGNED AND SITUATED THE WAY THEY SHOULD BE.

AND I YOU KNOW, WE ALL APPRECIATE THAT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE WORK THAT STAFFS DONE.

SO. YEAH, EXCELLENT.

OKAY. I THINK WE ALREADY HAD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM.

SO IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION, I'LL TAKE A MOTION.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM SIX A ORDINANCE NUMBER 1228.

A SECOND READING IN ORDER CEMENTING ARTICLE FIVE BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES OF CHAPTER TWO ADMINISTRATION IN ARTICLE 12 BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CHAPTER 4.5 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS AND DIVISION TWO PARK AND RECREATION BOARD OF ARTICLE THREE BOARDS OF CHAPTER 12 PARKS AND RECREATION OF THE SOUTHLAKE CODE OF ORDINANCES SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST NINE, 2022.

WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND.

SECOND. CAST YOUR VOTE.

OKAY. THE MOTION PASSES 6 TO 1.

THANK YOU. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM SIX B, ORDINANCE NUMBER 1263.

[6. B. Ordinance No. 1263, 2nd Reading, an ordinance amending Division 2, Article V, "Boards and Commissions and Committees" of Chapter 2, "Administration," of the Code of Ordinances to remove the Community Engagement Committee and create the Alliance for Community Engagement. PUBLIC HEARING ]

SECOND, READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DIVISION TWO, ARTICLE FIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES.

CHAPTER TWO ADMINISTRATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO REMOVE THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND CREATE THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.

ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER, MAJOR YOUNGBLOOD.

SIR, TAKE IT AWAY.

OK GOOD EVENING. COUNCIL AND MEMBERS.

WELL, MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL MAJOR YOUNGBLOOD HERE, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER.

SO THIS ITEM IS ON ITS SECOND READING.

AND LIKE MENTIONED, THIS IS A ORDINANCE THAT IS GOING TO REMOVE THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND REPLACE THAT WITH THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.

WHICH WILL ALSO BE KNOWN AS ACE.

SO ACE WILL REPLACE THE MAYOR'S ALLIANCE FOR UNION CULTURE AND THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE.

SO THERE ARE A FEW GOALS THAT THE NEW COMMITTEE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR.

ONE WOULD BE AROUND INFORMING.

SO ACE WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING COMMENTS ON THE ANNUAL CITY OF SOUTHLAKE COMMUNICATION PLAN AND REPORT, AS WELL AS PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND OR SPECIFIC FEEDBACK ON COMMUNICATION METHODS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF SPECIFIC, SPECIFIC POPULATIONS.

SO ACE WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSULTING WITH THE PUBLIC.

SO HOW THEY WOULD DO THIS IS THEY WOULD PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS ON IMPROVING OUR IMPLEMENTING PROGRAMS TO PROACTIVELY, PROACTIVELY SEEK PUBLIC INPUT ON KEY ISSUES AS WELL AS SERVICE FOCUS GROUP AS A FOCUS GROUP FOR PROVIDING FEEDBACK ON COMMUNICATION INITIATIVES.

ACE WOULD ALSO IDENTIFY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY LISTENING AND FOLLOW UP TECHNIQUES.

ACE WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INVOLVING THE COMMUNITY AND THE CITY'S DECISIONS.

SO THE COMMITTEE WILL PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO ENHANCE THE DIRECT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OF CITY DECISION MAKING, AS WELL AS FACILITATE THE SPIN DEVELOPMENT TOWN HALL MEETINGS AND ADVISE ON PROGRAM PROGRAM CHANGES TO THAT PARTICULAR SPIN PROGRAM AS WELL AS THE MEETINGS.

[00:55:03]

ACE WILL ALSO IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC IDEAS WITH MEASURABLE PLANNED OUTCOMES TO PROMOTE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF EVENTS AND PROGRAMS, TO PROMOTE COMMUNITY INTERACTION AND CREATE A STRONGER SENSE OF COMMUNITY.

ACE WILL ALSO ACTIVELY PROMOTE INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES.

ACE WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR COLLABORATION WITH THE PUBLIC.

ACE WILL REVIEW AND RECOMMEND IMPROVEMENTS AND OTHER IDEAS RELATED TO THE CITY'S USE OF TASK FORCES AND OTHER AD HOC GROUPS TO ASSIST WITH DECISION MAKING.

ACE WILL ALSO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPPORT AND ENHANCE GRASSROOT NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT, COMMUNITY EVENTS AND COMMUNITY SPIRIT.

LASTLY, ACE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EMPOWERING THE COMMUNITY.

SO WHEN REQUESTED, ACE WILL PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO METHODS FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND BOND AND OTHER ELECTION PROPOSITIONS.

AND SO ALSO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON COMMUNICATION RELATED TO BALLOT MEASURES.

AT THIS TIME, I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MAYOR HUFFMAN HAD TO STEP OUT JUST FOR A SECOND, SO WE'LL JUST MOVE FORWARD UNTIL HE CAN RETURN.

BUT PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS? THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU.

OKAY. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IF THERE'S ANYBODY HERE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, THAT WOULD BE THE TIME.

SEEING NO ONE.

WE WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING, ANY DISCUSSION.

OKAY. IF NOT, THEN WE WILL TAKE A MOTION.

YES, MAYOR PRO TEM AND COUNCIL.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM SIX B ORDINANCE NUMBER 1263 SECOND READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DIVISION TWO ARTICLE FIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES OF CHAPTER TWO ADMINISTRATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO REMOVE THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND CREATE THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.

AND THIS MOTION IS SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 9TH, 2022.

AND ALSO NOTING THAT WE'RE APPROVING THE ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND CREATE THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.

WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. MOTION.

SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

THAT ITEM PASSES SIX ZERO.

IF YOU'LL JUST STICK WITH ME HERE FOR A MINUTE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

[6. C. Ordinance No. 1261, 2nd Reading, an ordinance amending Chapter 18, Section 18-79 of the Southlake Code of Ordinances establishing a new speed limit on a portion of North White Chapel between Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and State Highway 114 to 35 miles per hour. PUBLIC HEARING ]

NEXT UP IS ITEM SIX C, OTHERWISE REFERRED TO AS ORDINANCE NUMBER 1261 SECOND READING.

DIRECTOR COHEN WILL BE PRESENTING.

YES, SIR. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR PRO TEM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.

SO I'LL BE PRESENTING ITEM SIX C TONIGHT, THE PURPOSE OF THIS ITEM IS BASICALLY TO REVISE OR AMEND CHAPTER 18, SECTION 1879 OF THE SOUTH LAKE CITY CODE.

IT'S INTENDED TO ESTABLISH A NEW SPEED LIMIT ON NORTH WHITE CHAPEL FROM SOUTH LAKE BOULEVARD, OR FM 1709 NORTH TO THE EASTBOUND FRONTAGE ROAD OF STATE HIGHWAY 114.

THE PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT WOULD BE 35 MILES PER HOUR.

A LITTLE BACKGROUND AS TO WHY WE'RE REQUESTING THE SPEED LIMIT TO BE REVISED.

AS YOU KNOW, WE JUST COMPLETED NORTH WIGHT CHAPEL IMPROVEMENTS.

PHASE TWO IS COMPLETED AND WE HAD THE RIBBON CUTTING LATE LAST WEEK.

THE PROJECT LIMITS WERE FROM EMERALD TO HIGHLAND.

WE WIDENED A TWO LANE RURAL ROAD TO A FOUR LANE DIVIDED ARTERIAL ROAD, AND WE ALSO REALIZED THAT THERE ARE SOME SITE DISTANT CONSTRAINTS AT SEVERAL SIDE STREETS THAT INTERSECT NORTH WHITECHAPEL.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE ON THE FAR RIGHT AS THE PROJECT LIMITS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW WITH NORTH BEING TO THE TOP OF THE SLIDE.

THE PURPOSE AGAIN IS TO REVISE THE SPEED LIMIT TO 35 MILES PER HOUR.

RIGHT NOW, IT'S ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE AT 40 MILES PER HOUR.

THE REVISED SPEED IS RECOMMENDED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.

OUR THIRD PARTY CONSULTANT HAS ALSO ENDORSED AND SUPPORTS THIS RECOMMENDATION AS WELL.

DOING SO WILL PROVIDE A SUFFICIENT SITE DISTANCE BECAUSE OF THE SPEED REDUCTION.

AND WE'VE ALSO, AS YOU NOTICE, WE STRIPED 24 INCHES OFF OF THE CURB FACE TO KIND OF PUSH CARS FARTHER OUT TO THE MIDDLE OF THE ROADWAY ON THE OUTSIDE LANES TO IMPROVE SIGHT, DISTANCE AND VISIBILITY.

THIS CHANGE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN ON THE FAR RIGHT.

IT SHOWS FOR FOUR LANE ARTERIAL WITH DIVIDED WITH THE MEDIAN.

THE SPEED LIMIT IS RECOMMENDED TO BE 35 TO 40 MILES PER HOUR.

SO THIS RECOMMENDATION IS WITHIN THE MASTER PLAN.

THIS PROPOSAL MEETS THE STRATEGY MAP OF FOCUS AREAS OF SAFETY AND SECURITY MOBILITY, AS WELL AS THE ACHIEVING THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF SAFETY AND SECURITY AND PROVIDING TRAVEL CONVENIENCE WITHIN THE CITY AND REGION.

[01:00:02]

THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION.

I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

OKAY. THANK YOU, DIRECTOR COHEN.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. SO, ROB, ON THIS, WHEN WE CHANGE, WHAT DOES IT SAY RIGHT NOW? IS IT CURRENTLY, SAY, 40 OUT THERE OR IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE PAVEMENT? RIGHT NOW, IT'S 40 MILES PER HOUR BY ORDINANCE YESTERDAY.

ARE THERE SIGNS AT ALL RIGHT NOW OR NOT SINCE IT'S NEW CONSTRUCTION? WE HAVE. SO RIGHT NOW, BY ORDINANCE, IT IS.

BUT THE SIGNS, THE ONLY SIGNS OUT THERE RIGHT NOW ARE CAUTIONARY FOR 30 MILES PER HOUR FOR CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPEED LIMIT SIGNS, SHOULD IT BE APPROVED TONIGHT, ARE COVERED AND BAGGED.

AND TOMORROW, IF IT'S APPROVED, THEY WILL BE BAGGED WITH THE 35 MILE PER HOUR ZONE ESTABLISHED.

AND WHEN WOULD THEY BE INSTALLED? HOW QUICKLY THE SIGNS ARE INSTALLED NOW, SIR? OH, IT'S JUST SWITCHING OUT THE FACE.

YES, SIR. AND WE WILL HAVE SHOULD THE THE ACTION BE APPROVED, WE WILL HAVE MESSAGE BOARDS ANNOUNCING THE SPEED LIMIT CHANGE.

SO COMMUTERS AND TRAVELERS ARE AWARE OF IT PROBABLY FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS, UP TO A WEEK, TO NOTIFY INDIVIDUALS THAT THE SPEED LIMIT HAS INDEED CHANGED WITHIN THAT ZONE.

AND I'M GLAD CHIEF BRANDON WALKED IN.

I FIGURED HE WOULD. AND I KNOW HOW OUR POLICE HOW OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT DOES THINGS.

BUT COULD YOU JUST SPEAK VERY QUICKLY ABOUT HOW DO WE MANAGE THROUGH THAT TRANSITION TO ALLOW PEOPLE A BIT OF GRACE ON THE ADJUSTMENT AND ALL THAT? SURE, WE WON'T ENFORCE THAT FOR A WEEK ONCE IT BECOMES OFFICIAL AND COMMUNICATION AND OUR SOCIAL MEDIA CHANNELS.

AND AS DIRECTOR COHEN SAID, THE SIGNS WILL BE OUT THERE SHOWING 35 AND WE'LL HAVE OFFICERS AROUND, BUT WE WON'T WRITE ANY CITATIONS FOR THAT FOR A WEEK.

BY THE WAY, LET ME SAY JUST A SIDEBAR HERE.

SO I DROVE WHITECHAPEL TODAY AT DISMISSAL FOR CAROL.

IT WAS BEAUTIFUL.

EVERY CAR WAS ON THE INSIDE LANE.

I LITERALLY DROVE FROM SOUTH LAKE BOULEVARD TO TO 114 WITHOUT HAVING TO TAP THE BRAKE OTHER THAN DRIVING THE SPEED LIMIT.

THERE WAS NOT ONE OTHER VEHICLE IN THE WAY.

IT'S I MEAN, IT IS JUST BEAUTIFUL.

SO ANGELS SANG.

YES, THEY DID.

THANK YOU, HIS OFFICER.

AND WE'RE GOING TO DO A FUNNY VIDEO ABOUT THIS.

OR DO WE KNOW? WELL, IF I COMMIT HIM, THEN HE HAS TO.

I MAY TELL YOU, I DON'T THINK IT'S HARD TO TWIST HIS ARM TO MAKE VIDEOS.

GOT ONE IN THE CAN. THANK YOU.

SHOULD I FINISH IT UP.

FINISH IT UP. OK.

FANTASTIC. SO THIS ITEM SIX C IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

SEEING NO ONE. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? ANY CONVERSATION COUNCIL? ALL RIGHT. NO CONVERSATION.

IS IS THERE A MOTION? YES. MAYOR AND MAYOR, PRO TEM AND COUNCIL.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM SIX C ORDINANCE NUMBER 1261 SECOND READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 SECTION 18 SEVEN NINE OF THE SOUTH LAKE CITY CODE ESTABLISHING A NEW SPEED LIMIT ON A PORTION OF NORTH WHITE CHAPEL BETWEEN SOUTH LAKE BOULEVARD FM 1709 AND STATE HIGHWAY ONE, 14 TO 35 MILES PER HOUR.

AND THIS MOTION IS SUBJECT TO OUR STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 16TH, 2022.

WE HAVE A MOTION FOR A SECOND.

SECOND.

MOTION AND SECOND. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

AND THAT ITEM PASSES SEVEN ZERO.

SO I'LL PASS THE REINS BACK OVER TO THE MAYOR.

THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM WILLIAMSON.

MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER SIX DA 22-0031 SITE PLAN FOR COSTCO SOUTHLAKE DAUGHTER BAKER MAYOR MEMBERS COUNCIL.

[6. D. ZA22-0031, Site Plan for Costco Southlake on property being described as Lot 2, Block 1, Gateway Plaza Phase II, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas, Tarrant County, and located at 2601 E. SH 114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. PUBLIC HEARING ]

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO RECEIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW AN EXPANSION OF EXISTING COSTCO EXISTING COSTCO OPTICAL OFFICE.

THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL ADD 770 SQUARE FEET TO EXISTING COSTCO BUILDING AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE UNDER THE EXISTING ENTRANCE CANOPY.

THE ADDITION WILL ALLOW REARRANGEMENT OF THE OPTICAL CENTER AND ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF EXAM ROOMS FROM 1 TO 3 ROOMS. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY.

THE YELLOW CIRCLE INDICATES WHERE THE EXPANSION WILL TAKE PLACE.

IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE MAIN ENTRANCE AT THE CURRENT OPTICAL CENTER, EXPAND INTO THIS AREA HERE.

700 SQUARE FEET DOES MEET THE PARKING.

NO CHANGES. OTHER THAN THE EXPANSION, THERE ARE NO VARIANCES TO THE SITE PLAN.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND QUESTIONS.

THE STAFF. ACTUALLY, JUST ONE QUICK QUESTION.

WHAT IS GOING ON OVER THERE RIGHT NOW, OVER BY THE FUEL AREA? THAT'S THE EXPANSION THAT YOU APPROVED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO.

WHAT DID WE EXPAND? I'M JUST TRYING TO REMEMBER THE NUMBER OF PUMP MORE PUMPS.

GOTCHA. THEY'RE ALMOST DONE WITH IT.

THEY REALLY BLEW THROUGH THAT.

YEAH, THAT'S BEEN A WHILE.

YEAH. NO, I HEARD IT OPENED TODAY.

HOW ABOUT THAT? OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. IS THE APPLICANT HERE WISHING TO MAKE A PRESENTATION? IT SEEMS TO BE GOING WELL FOR YOU, SO I'M NOT SURE.

[01:05:02]

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, ANY QUESTIONS AT ALL FOR STAFF OR DISCUSSION? OKAY. WELL, ITEM 6D IS A PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL.

SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION AND WE'LL TAKE A MOTION.

YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL KNOW THAT WE APPROVE ITEM 60, OTHERWISE REFERRED TO AS DA 22-0031 SITE PLAN FOR COSTCO SOUTH LAKE ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS A LOT TWO BLOCK ONE GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE TWO IN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY, AND LOCATED AT 2601 EAST STATE HIGHWAY 114 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CURRENT ZONING SP TWO GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT IS SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 9TH, 2022 AND THE SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATE OF JULY 29, 2022.

MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

THAT ITEM PASSES 6 7-0.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. WITH THAT MOVE.

WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM SIX EASY 822 GESTURES ARE TWO EIGHT SITE PLAN FOR 300 PARKWOOD DRIVE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING DIRECTOR BAKER MAYOR MORRIS COUNCIL.

[6. E. ZA22-0028, Site Plan for 300 Parkwood Drive Medical Office Building on property described as Lot 13R, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 300 Parkwood Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 9. PUBLIC HEARING ]

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN TO DEVELOP A ONE STORY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 10,654 SQUARE FEET.

PROPOSED BUILDING IS SOUTH OF THE EXISTING CALLOWAY'S NURSERY, WEST OF THE SOUTH LAKE TRAINING CENTER, THE OLD SENIOR CENTER ALONG PARKWOOD DRIVE.

THE ADDRESS OF SURRENDER PARKWOOD DRIVE SUBJECT PROPERTIES OUTLINED IN RED ON THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.

JUST AN OBLIQUE ANGLE.

LOOKING BACK TOWARDS 1709, IT DOES HAVE A LAND USE FOR OFFICE COMMERCIAL, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSAL.

THERE IS SP2 ZONING IN PLACE.

THESE ARE THE REGULATIONS THAT WERE ADOPTED WITH THE ZONING CALLOWAY'S AND THIS LOT CAME IN TOGETHER AS PART OF THAT.

THERE WAS A CONCEPT PLAN WHICH SHOWED A TREE PRESERVATION AREA ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE LOT TO ACT AS A BUFFER BETWEEN ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THIS LOT AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE SOUTH.

THIS IS A VIEW OF THE PROPERTY LOCATION.

IF YOU'RE LOOKING SOUTH ON PARKWAY DRIVE, YOU CAN SEE THE TRAINING FACILITY, THOSE SENIOR CENTER OFF TO THE LEFT.

THIS IS A VIEW LOOKING BACK TO THE WEST AT THE END OF THE CUL DE SAC AND A COUPLE MORE PHOTOS.

THIS IS THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2007. THE PROOF OF CONCEPT PLAN DOES SHOW THE BUILDING OF A LITTLE BIT LARGER THAN WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED, A LITTLE BIT LESS PARKING.

BUT AN OFFICE BUILDING WAS SHOWN ON THE SITE.

THIS IS THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA THAT WILL BE PROTECTED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

THEY WILL BE UTILIZING THE EXISTING DRIVE THAT'S TO THE SOUTH OF CALLOWAY'S.

THE AREA BACK HERE WILL BE PRESERVED PER THE ADOPTED CONCEPT PLAN.

THE PARKING DOES MEET THE MEDICAL PARKING IN TERMS OF THE CODE REQUIREMENT.

AS MENTIONED, THE BUILDING WILL BE REDUCED FROM 12,000 SQUARE FEET TO 10,654 SQUARE FEET.

THE CONCEPT PLAN AT 12 K BUILDING PARKING WILL INCREASE TO MEET THE MEDICAL OFFICE PARKING REQUIREMENTS.

IT WILL BE 100% MEDICAL NATURE.

THERE WILL BE A SIDEWALK ALONG PARKWOOD DRIVE.

THERE WILL BE A THREE FOOT RETAINING WALL.

THE DUMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWESTERN PORTION OF THE SITE WHERE THE ARROWS INDICATED.

THIS IS A COMPARISON OF THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN BACK IN OH SEVEN AND THE SITE PLAN FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES FAIRLY CLOSE IN TERMS OF OPEN SPACE, BUILDING SIZE, ETC..

THESE ARE THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS.

THE MATERIALS INCLUDE A METAL ROOF.

IT'S A STONE BRICK COMBINATION ON THE FACADE ARCHITECTURAL CEDAR POST ALONG THE ENTRIES TO THE OFFICES.

AS MENTIONED, THE DUMPSTER SCREENING WILL MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE MASONRY ON THE BUILDING.

THIS IS A SAMPLE BOARD THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, WHICH DETAILS THE MATERIALS THAT ARE PROPOSED.

[01:10:02]

AND THIS IS THE DUMPSTER ELEVATION WHICH WILL MATCH THE MATERIALS.

IT WILL BE METAL DOORS ON THE DUMPSTER.

THIS SHOWS THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN.

THE NO DISTURBANCE OF THE PRESERVATION AREA WILL BE MAINTAINED.

THERE WILL BE A THREE FOOT RETAINING WALL ALONG THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE BUILDABLE AREA.

THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN DOES MEET THE ORDINANCE.

60% OF THE TREES MUST BE PRESERVED.

66% ARE SHOWN TO BE PRESERVED.

THIS IS THE LOCATION OF RETAINING WALL AND YOU CAN SEE THE MATERIALS AT THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF THE SLIDE.

BUT THERE'LL BE A THREE FOOT RETAINING WALL ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE BUILDABLE AREA.

THIS IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

IN ADDITION TO THE TREE, PRESERVATION WILL BE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE SITE.

WE'VE RECEIVED ONE OPPOSITION.

THE SITE IS SHOWN IN THE LIGHT BLUE COLOR AND RECEIVED ONE OPPOSITION FORM TO THE SITE PLAN.

P AND Z RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

SEVEN ZERO. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DIRECTOR BAKER WHERE AS FAR AS THE DUMPSTER LOCATION, I'M JUST LOOKING AT AN AERIAL OF THE AREA.

WILL THAT DUMPSTER BE SO FAR WEST THAT IT'S SEEN FROM THE STREET? AND I KNOW IT'S SHIELDED AND STUFF.

I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE CALLOWAY'S IS VERSUS WHERE THIS WILL BE AND IF IT IF THERE'S A CLEAR LINE OF SIGHT.

YEAH. IT KIND OF DEPENDS WHERE YOU ARE, BUT IT'S A FAIRLY, RELATIVELY FLAT SITE.

THIS IS A CUL DE SAC.

THE BUILDING WILL SCREEN AS YOU GET FURTHER SOUTH ON THE PARKWAY DRIVE.

BUT AS YOU KIND OF COME IN BETWEEN THAT DRIVE AREA, BETWEEN CALLOWAY'S, AS YOU'RE GOING SOUTH, YOU PROBABLY WILL BE ABLE TO CATCH A GLIMPSE OF IT THROUGH THIS AREA HERE.

IF YOU CAN SEE MY ARROW.

DIRECTOR BAKER, JUST TO CONFIRM, THERE'S NO REQUEST IN THIS APPLICATION TO CONNECT THE TWO PIECES OF PARKWOOD THAT WOULD PERHAPS GIVE THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH SOME SOME ISSUES.

YES, SIR, THAT IS THAT IS CORRECT.

THE PARKWOOD CURRENTLY DOES NOT CONNECT.

THERE IS RIGHT AWAY RESERVED.

THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER A CONNECTION.

BUT AT THIS TIME, GIVEN THE FINAL USE OF THAT PARKWOOD SITE PROPERTY, AT THIS TIME, THERE'S NO INTENTION. THERE'S NO STUDIES OUT THERE TO CONNECT THE TO SEGMENTS OF PARKWOOD.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THANK YOU. DIRECTOR BAKER, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? COME ON DOWN AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

AND THEN I BELIEVE YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION.

BUT GERALD WARD WITH WARD ARCHITECTURE 5004 THOMPSON TERRORISTS IN COLLIERVILLE.

WE MET, I THINK, WITH THE P AND Z SAYS TO ME, THERE WAS ONE GENTLEMAN THAT SPOKE.

WE MET WITH HIM AFTERWARD WITH HIM AND THE HOA PRESIDENT WALKED THE SITE, SHOWED THEM, TRIED TO VISUALIZE WITH THEM, SHOW THEM WHERE THE BUILDING WOULD BE, WHERE THE PARKING WAS, WHERE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT, WHAT TREES WERE GOING TO BE CUT.

AND AND SO WE HAD THAT MEETING.

I THOUGHT IT WENT WELL.

SO BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I THINK A VERY GOOD JOB OF PRESENTING OUR CASE AND JUST I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MAY HAVE.

GREAT, GREAT. THANKS. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICANT? OKAY. YOU CAN SIT DOWN FOR NOW.

WE MAY HAVE SOME QUESTIONS IN A LITTLE BIT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 6 E IF THERE'S ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK.

SEEING NONE. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL IS THERE.

OH, I APOLOGIZE. YES, OK.

WE DO HAVE. SO WE ACTUALLY HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENT CARDS HERE.

COME ON DOWN, SIR. IF YOU JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

YES. GOOD EVENING.

YEVGENY SANCHO.

500 NORTHWOOD TRAIL, SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS.

THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TONIGHT.

[01:15:04]

SO WE IN THE COMMUNITY REALLY APPRECIATE THE DEVELOPER RESPONDING TO THE ISSUES THAT WERE BROUGHT UP DURING THE SPIN MEETING HERE, PRESERVING THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA, THE NO DISTURBANCE AREA, PLANNING TO PLANT THE SHRUBBERY FOR SHELTERING THE VIEWS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND FOR NOT CONNECTING THE TWO PARKWOOD DRIVES.

AS WAS MENTIONED TODAY, THE NOT CONNECTING THE TWO PARKWOOD DRIVES IS A PRETTY IMPORTANT ISSUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

IF IT COULD BE RESOLVED, THAT WOULD BE, WE THINK, BENEFICIAL.

AND IF IT'S DONE AT THIS STAGE, IT PROBABLY WOULD BE EASIER FOR THE MEDICAL BUSINESS TO PRINT THE LETTERHEADS AND EVERYTHING ELSE WITH THE NEW ADDRESS.

AND AS I'M BEING TOLD BY SOME RESIDENTS IN THE COMMUNITY, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS PREVIOUSLY VOTED TO RENAME THE STREET AND THAT WAS DONE JANUARY 16TH, 2001, AND TO CHANGE THE MAPS TO SHOW NO CONNECTION OF ONE PARKWOOD DRIVE TO ANOTHER PARKWOOD DRIVE.

AND THAT WAS DONE ON FEBRUARY 1ST, 2000, BY THE SOUTH LAKE CITY COUNCIL.

SO FAR, I DON'T THINK ANY ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN ON THAT.

I WOULD LIKE TO REITERATE THAT WE WOULD LIKE THE DEVELOPER TO PRESERVE AS MANY TREES AS POSSIBLE ON THE SITE AND PRETTY MUCH THAT'S IT.

THESE ARE ALL THE COMMENTS.

SOUNDS GOOD. THANK YOU, SIR.

THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT.

AND WE DO HAVE ONE PERSON, MR. ERIC CARLE, FROM 604 NORTHBROOK COURT WHO DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT RECORDED HIS SUPPORT FOR THIS ITEM.

SO ANYBODY ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ONE.

SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL.

IS THERE ANY MORE DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. WE READY FOR A MOTION? YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE.

ITEM 6EZA22-0028 SITE PLAN FOR 300 PARKWOOD DRIVE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 13 R0W NIGHT NUMBER 899 ADDITION IN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND LOCATED AT 300 PARKWOOD DRIVE, SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS.

CURRENT ZONING SP TWO GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 9TH, 2022.

IN THE SITE PLAN SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED AUGUST NINE, 2022.

A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. CAST YOUR VOTE.

THAT ITEM PASSES SEVEN ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS.

WITH THAT MOVE ON TO ITEM SIX F, WHICH IS Z 22-0030.

[6. F. ZA22-0030, Site Plan for 251 Players Circle Athletic Training Facility, a 16,446 square foot one story office and training facility building on property being described as Lot 4, Players Circle Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas located at 251 Players Circle, Southlake Texas. Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District. SPIN Neighborhood #10. PUBLIC HEARING ]

SITE PLAN FOR 251 PLAYERS CIRCLE ATHLETIC TRAINING FACILITY DIRECTOR BAKER SORRY.

MAYOR MEMBERS COUNCIL.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING DEVELOPMENT OF A 16,446 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE STORY BUILDING THAT WILL CONTAIN AN INDOOR BASEBALL TRAINING FACILITY AND AN OFFICE AREA RELATED TO PRIMARY TRAINING USE.

ALL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRAINING FACILITY WILL OCCUR INDOORS.

PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 251 PLAYER CIRCLE.

IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH PLAYER'S CIRCLE, IT'S THE LOT, THE MOST SOUTHERN LOT.

WHEN YOU GO PAST THE CUL DE SAC IT'S ACROSS FROM STAMPEDE SPORTS.

THE ZONING IS C THREE GENERAL COMMERCIAL THIS IS AN AERIAL SHOWING THE PROPERTY LOCATION THIS STAMPEDE SPORTS THE NEW OFFICE DEVELOPMENT THE SACRED CHAIRS WHERE THE PROPOSED TRAINING FACILITY IS LOCATED.

IT DOES HAVE RETAIL COMMERCIAL USE AND AS MENTIONED, THE CURRENT ZONING IS C THREE WHICH ALLOWS THE USE PROPOSE.

THESE ARE COUPLE SITE PHOTOS, THE PLAYER CIRCLE, THE PUBLIC PORTION ENDS AT THE TERMINUS OF THE CUL DE SAC.

THERE'S A DRIVE AND STAMPEDES.

PARKING SPACES ARE TO THE SOUTH OF THE BUILDING.

THIS WOULD BE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT.

THIS IS LOOKING BACK TOWARDS 1709, KIND OF IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION.

THIS IS THE STAMPEDE SPORTS AND THE NEW OFFICE DEVELOPMENT.

THE ARCHITECTURE THAT'S BEING PRESENTED IS SIMILAR IN NATURE TO THESE BUILDINGS ACROSS THE STREET.

FEW MORE VIEWS.

THERE HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT STYLES TO THE PLAYER CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT.

WHEN THE CONCEPT PLAN WAS FIRST APPROVED, THERE WAS AN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE THAT WAS PRESENTED AND APPROVED.

BUT THERE HAVE BEEN SOME SOME DEVIATIONS FROM THAT AS BUILDINGS HAVE MODERNIZED IN THE IN THE AREA.

[01:20:02]

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED WHEN THE C3 THREE ZONING WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2005.

THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN SHOWS A 5100 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE WITH 51 PARKING SPACES.

THE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SHOWN ON THIS PLOT WAS 60%.

THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN THE CASE OF 16,446 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH 27 PARKING SPACES, SIGNIFICANTLY LESS PARKING SPACES, A LARGER BUILDING.

BUT THE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE IS 62%.

WHICH IS WELL WITHIN THAT C THREE ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AS MENTIONED JUST OVER 16 K AND BUILDING 27 PARKING SPACES.

THERE'LL BE A CUL DE SAC ALONG THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY ON THE NORTH PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.

BUT THE DEVELOPER DOES SHOW A SIDEWALK COMING ALONG THE FRONT TO THE ENTRANCE THAT KIND OF WRAPS AROUND THE SOUTH PART OF THE BUILDING.

THIS IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WOULD BE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSAL AND THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. THERE IS A VARIANCE BEING REQUESTED.

THERE'S CURRENTLY 15% OF THE SITE HAS TREE COVER ON IT AND THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES 70% OF THE EXISTING TREE COVER TO BE PRESERVED.

THE TREE PLAN SHOWS 45% OF THE EXISTING TREE COVER TO BE PRESERVED AND TO MAKE UP FOR THAT DIFFERENCE, WHICH IS ROUGHLY A 25% DEFICIENCY THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO PAY INTO THE REFORESTATION FUND.

THE AMOUNT WILL BE $5,980.

THAT WILL BE THREE TREES EQUALING ROUGHLY 40 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT FULL GROWTH.

AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO MAKE UP THAT DIFFERENCE BY PAYING INTO THE CITY'S REFORESTATION FUND.

AND THE CITY USES THAT FUND TO PLACE TREES ON PUBLIC PROPERTIES THROUGH THE THROUGH THE CITY.

AS I MENTIONED, WHEN THE 2005 ZONING WAS APPROVED, THERE WAS A TYPICAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WHICH YOU SEE AT FRONT OF THE PLAYER CIRCLE, WHICH THESE ARE A MIMIC.

BUT AS BUILDINGS WERE DEVELOPED FURTHER SOUTH AND OVER TIME, THEY THERE WAS SOME DEVIATION, BUT KEEPING CONSISTENT WITH THE STONE, KIND OF THE LOOK AND COLORS.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING WITH A NORTH ELEVATION.

AS MENTIONED, IT IS A TRAINING FACILITY.

THIS WON'T BE LIKE STAMPEDE WHERE IT'S OPEN FOR THE PUBLIC.

IT'S MEANT FOR A PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE AND OTHER OTHER PURPOSES.

BUT IT WON'T BE OPERATED LIKE A STAMPEDE WHERE YOU HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF KIDS AND PEOPLE COMING IN ALL HOURS.

IT'S GEARED FOR THAT VERY SPECIALIZED TRAINING, BUT YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE ELEVATIONS AS NORTH ELEVATION HAS MENTIONED, THAT SIDEWALK THAT WRAPS AROUND THE BUILDING.

AND YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE STONE THAT WAS PICKED UP IN THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE BUILDINGS.

SOUTH ELEVATION.

SO SOMEWHAT SIMILAR.

LOOK TO WHAT'S ACROSS THE STREET.

THERE ARE TWO VARIANCES.

ONE WILL BE THE TREE PRESERVATION, WHICH I MENTIONED.

THERE ALSO WILL BE A 4 TO 1 SLOPE VARIANCE BECAUSE OF THE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY TO THE SOUTH, THE LOT THAT'S DIRECTLY SOUTH.

IF YOU NOTICED ON THE AERIALS, THE SOUTHLAKE WAS HOA AMENITY CENTER.

SO DIRECTLY BEHIND IT THERE IS NO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, BUT IT DOES CLIP THAT BUILDING.

THE PREDOMINANT HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS 33 FEET.

THE C THREE, DOES THAT ALLOW UP TO 35 FEET? THESE ARE THE TWO VARIANCES, THE VARIANCE TO THE TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND THEN THAT 4 TO 1 RESIDENTIAL SETBACK OR THE TWO VARIANCES BEING CONSIDERED.

AND HERE'S JUST AN AERIAL AGAIN, SHOWING THE SITE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES.

THE P AND Z RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND GRANTED BOTH THE VARIANCES AS PRESENTED.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. GEORGE BAKER AND THE QUESTION OF STAFF.

YEAH, I'D LIKE TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT TREE VARIANCE.

YOU HAD ABOUT THREE SLIDES BACK.

YOU KIND OF HAD AN OVERHEAD VIEW.

I WAS WONDERING WHERE THOSE THREE TREES RIGHT THERE.

IT'S THERE'S THREE RIGHT THERE.

RIGHT. YEAH. OKAY.

AND SOME OF THESE ARE PHYSICALLY ON THE PROPERTY LINE.

ALSO, PERHAPS WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT AS A COUNCIL JUST A LITTLE BIT.

I MEAN, THAT'S AN EMPTY LOT.

[01:25:01]

YOU KNOW, IT'S AN EMPTY LOT FOR RETAIL.

AND I JUST WANT TO TALK THROUGH COLLECTING THOSE DOLLARS IF, YOU KNOW, IF THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE WANT TO DO IN THAT CASE.

SO. YEAH. YEAH.

GOOD QUESTION. ANYTHING ELSE FOR STAFF? OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR.

I SEE. I CAN HEAR. MR. MARCUS. YOU KNOW THE DRILL, SIR.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR COUNCIL.

ACOS MACUS 608 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND GRAPEVINE.

KEN PROBABLY DID A BETTER JOB OF PRESENTING THIS THAN I.

WE HAVE A RELATIVE THAT'S A PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL PLAYER, ACTUALLY.

TREVOR STORY PLAYS FOR THE RED SOX, BUT HE KEEPS HIS HOME HERE.

HE'S AN IRVING GUY, AND HE'S WANTED TO HAVE A PLACE.

THERE'S ACTUALLY, YOU PROBABLY KNOW, A LARGE POPULATION OF THESE GREAT PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES, AND MANY OF THE PLACES CATER TO MORE OF A RETAIL TRADE AND SO FORTH. THEY ARE LOOKING FOR A REAL SPECIALIZED PLACE, IF YOU LOOK AT THE INTERIOR.

THIS GOING TO BE VERY HIGH END REHAB THINGS.

I MEAN, IN THE PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES THAT USES ARE AT A VERY HIGH END.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE ENDEAVORED TO DO WHEN WE WERE DESIGNING THIS.

WE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY LAST YEAR.

BUT IF YOU'LL LOOK BEST WE CAN TELL, THIS IS ONE OF THE WE CAN FIND THE ONLY EXCEPT IF YOU GO TO A STADIUM, YOU CAN ACTUALLY MAKE AN INDOOR THROW FROM DEEP SHORT TO FIRST.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY INTERIOR POLES.

AND THEY WANTED A LITTLE PRIVACY.

I DIDN'T NOTICE THE ONE THING THAT WAS BROUGHT UP.

THIS IS THE ENTRANCE.

BUT THIS ENTRANCE BACK HERE, THAT'S REALLY WHERE THAT WE THINK THE ATHLETES WILL PROBABLY PARK THEIR CARS ITS OWN DOOR.

AND WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO BUILD THIS.

WE THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A REALLY COOL BUILDING.

AND TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION ABOUT THE VARIANCE, IF YOU LOOK AT THAT SITE, THOSE TREES, EVEN UNDER THE PREVIOUS PLAN, THEY'RE RIGHT UNDER RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE, ALMOST IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LOT. THEY WERE GOING TO GO ANYWAY, BUT WE DIDN'T WANT TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE ON THAT.

TREES ARE KIND OF IMPORTANT IF YOU ALL DECIDE THAT YOU WANT TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT, BUT I THINK THOSE TREES WERE GOING TO BE GONE ANYWAY.

IF YOU LOOK AT OUR LANDSCAPE PLAN, WE ENGAGED A REAL HIGH END LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THIS THING IS LANDSCAPED TO THE HILT.

IT WILL BE VERY WELL DONE.

I THINK IT'LL FIT IN WELL OVER THERE.

WITH THAT, I WOULD ASK FOR YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL TONIGHT AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM FOR YOU.

THANK YOU, SIR. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MICKY'S? WELL, HE'S REALLY GOOD.

I APPRECIATE YOU ALL BEING WILLING TO MAKE THE INVESTMENT IN SOUTH LIKE THIS.

LOOKS LIKE A COOL FACILITY, FOR SURE.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM SIX OF.

CNN. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNSEL ANY DISCUSSION.

RANDY, YOU WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE TREES? YEAH, I MEAN, MY ONLY THOUGHT IS FOR CONSIDERATION.

OBVIOUSLY, YOU CAN'T DEVELOP THAT LOT WITHOUT MOVING THOSE TREES.

CLEARLY, IT'S A RESIDENTIAL LOT.

BUT I MEAN, I LOOK AT THE NUMBERS.

I'M LIKE, YOU KNOW, 15% OF THE LOT HAS TREES AND YOU HAVE TO KEEP 70% OF THAT.

THEY'RE KEEPING 45. I MEAN, THE MATH GETS SO LOW ON THAT.

IT'S NOT TO ME, IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL.

AND I'M CERTAINLY NOT ONE TO TURN AWAY 6000.

IF MR. MARKUS WANTS TO DO THAT OUT OF THE KINDNESS OF HIS HEART.

BUT I WOULD ALSO SAY THAT THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A REASON WE HAVE A VARIANCE AND WE PASS THINGS SOMETIMES BECAUSE IT MAKES SENSE. AND WHEN FOLKS COME IN BELOW THE ORDINANCE, IT MAKES SENSE FOR THE BETTER DEVELOPMENT OF OUR COMMUNITY.

SO I WOULD BE OPEN TO NOT COLLECTING THAT THAT 6000.

BUT THAT'S UP TO COUNCIL DIRECTOR BAKER.

HOW DO WE MECHANICALLY DO THAT? WHAT'S YOUR SUGGESTION? YOU WOULD JUST GRANT THE TREE VARIANCE AND WAIVE THE CONTRIBUTION INTO THE TREE FORESTATION FUND? I MEAN, WE'VE DONE THAT BEFORE, CORRECT? WE'VE ALLOWED VARIANCES NORMALLY.

JUST WAIT. YEAH, YOU'VE GRANTED VARIANCES, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, I THINK.

WAS THIS SOMETHING, MR. MAKUS, JUST PREEMPTIVELY TO MR. MAKUS OFFERED THAT? YEAH, THAT'S FANTASTIC.

YEAH. DO YOU THINK LEAVE IT IN OR YOU GRANT THE VARIANCE AND LET THEM SPEND THAT MONEY ON LANDSCAPING? YEAH. I MEAN, MR. MAKUS, WOULD YOU FEEL LIKE UPPING YOUR LANDSCAPING? AND REALLY, I MEAN, IT LOOKS FANTASTIC, BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU DO GOOD WORK.

WOULD YOU WANT TO? YEAH.

I MEAN, WE WERE JUST TRYING TO MINIMIZE THE VARIANCES.

AND I APPRECIATE YOU YOUR YOUR KIND OF PRACTICALITY OF THE THOUGHT.

I'LL ASSURE YOU, I SEE THESE TWO YOUNG BASEBALL TEAMS HERE.

[01:30:02]

AND TREVOR IS A PRODUCT OF YOUTH BASEBALL, AND HE'S NOT SITTING HERE.

BUT I KNOW WHAT HE WOULD SAY IF HE WAS.

YOU'RE GOING TO GET MORE THAN MANY SIX THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OUT OF THIS FACILITY GOING FORWARD.

IF YOU DO IT, FINE. IF YOU DON'T.

I UNDERSTAND. NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL.

THANK YOU. THANKS.

THANK YOU, SIR. IT'S UP TO COUNCIL.

I MEAN, I'M JUST. I'M FINE.

EITHER WAY, I'M FINE GRANTING THE VARIANCE.

I REALLY DO. I MEAN, THIS IS NOT THE SITUATION THE VARIANCE IS MEANT TO PROTECT AGAINST.

EXACTLY. THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT IT'S.

YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT. IT'S NOT ABOUT.

HE'S NOT STRIPPING A LOT OF LANDSCAPE HERE.

SO WHY DON'T YOU JUST MAKE THE MOTION WITH THE VARIANCE GRANTING THE VARIANCE, YOU KNOW, THE DISCUSSION COUNCIL.

I THINK IT'S OVERKILL. I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERTSON.

ROBERTSON. WILLIAMSON WOW.

GOOD TO MEET YOU. COUNCILMEMBER SMITH.

WOW, IT'S BEEN FOUR YEARS ON MY HEAD.

HE ALSO GOES BY OTHER RANDY.

THAT'S WHAT I USE NEXT TIME.

NO, I AGREE.

I WOULDN'T FEEL RIGHT TO YOUR POINT, TAKING THIS MONEY.

I MEAN, IT'S GOING TO BE A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY.

I LOVE WHAT THAT SPOT DOWN THERE HAS BECOME.

I REMEMBER DRIVING DOWN THERE YEARS AGO AND WATCHING IT GO INTO A GAME INSIDE ONE OF THOSE FACILITIES.

AND I THINK THIS FACILITY IS ALREADY GOING TO BE OVER LANDSCAPED, NOT LITERALLY, BUT I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY.

SO I WOULDN'T FEEL RIGHT TAKING THE MONEY.

OKAY, WELL, LET'S TRY A MOTION WITH THAT VARIANCE INCLUDED.

FANTASTIC. WE DID PUBLIC HEARING OR DID THIS HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING IS COMPLETE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT MAYOR COUNCIL I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM SIX F OTHERWISE REFER TO AZ8 20 20030 SITE PLAN FOR 251 PLAYER CIRCLE ATHLETIC TRAINING FACILITY A 16,446 SQUARE FOOT ONE STORY OFFICE AND TRAINING FACILITY.

BUILDING A PROPERTY TO BEING DESCRIBED AS A LOT FOUR PLAYER CIRCLE EDITION.

IN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 251 PLAYER CIRCLE.

SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS.

CURRENT ZONING C THREE GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST NINE, 2022, AND THE SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO DATED AUGUST 9TH, 2022, NOTING THAT WE'RE APPROVING FOLLOWING VARIANCES VARIANCE TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 480, SECTION 43 PART THREE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS AND NOTING THAT A PORTION OF THIS BUILDING, AS SHOWN IN THE PROVIDED RENDERINGS CLIPS THE 4 TO 1 RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SLOPE REQUIREMENT.

BUT WE'RE GRANTING THAT VARIANCE AND THEN ALSO ARE GRANTING A VARIANCE TO THE EXISTING TREE COVER PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE, NOTING THERE'S CURRENTLY 15% EXISTING TREE COVER ON THE PROPERTY IN A MINIMUM OF 70% OF THE EXISTING TREE COVER IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESERVED.

IN THIS CASE, A MAXIMUM OF 45% OF THE EXISTING TREE COVER IS PROPOSED TO BE PRESERVED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE.

AND WE'RE GOING TO GRANT THAT VARIANCE BASED ON THAT PERCENTAGE.

WE HAVE MOTION IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

ALL RIGHT. 9670.

CONGRATULATIONS, SIR. LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING IT.

OPEN. YES, SIR. OKAY, WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM SEVEN A.

[7. A. Ordinance No. 480-763a (ZA22-0029), 1st Reading, Wheelhouse Garages, LLC, is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan with a variance to the Masonry Ordinance on property described as Tracts 6C, 6C02, 6C03, 6C01A, Jesse G. Allen Survey Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 880-950 Davis Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #10. ]

AUDIENCE NUMBER 4876380Z 20 200029 FIRST READING WHEELHOUSE GARAGES, LLC REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE IN SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE TO THE MASONRY ORDINANCE.

DR. BAKER MAYOR, AS MAYOR OF THE COUNCIL.

THIS IS A REVISION TO EXISTING APPROVED SITE PLAN AND ZONING.

WHEELHOUSE IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE IN SITE PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE A MASONRY VARIANCE.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO AMEND THE EXISTING ZONING AND SITE PLAN TO ADD LIMITED C TO LOCAL RETAIL DISTRICT USES, WHICH INCLUDE THE C ONE AND OFFICE OH ONE USES TO THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE LONG DAVIS BOULEVARD.

AND THEN TO ALLOW THE TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE.

THESE ARE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE SITE.

WHEN THE ZONING AND SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED, ORIGINALLY THE APPLICANT INDICATED THEY WERE GOING TO REMODEL, REHABBED THOSE BUILDINGS.

THEY'RE ASKING TO BUILD A NEW BUILDING AT THIS LOCATION AND THAT HAS WITH THE USES AND THE CHANGE, THE SLIGHT CHANGE OF SITE PLAN IN THIS B AND SP1 DISTRICT, WE HAD TO RUN THE REZONING BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS FOR APPROVAL.

THIS IS THE AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.

YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING BUILDING WHICH WILL NOW BE REMOVED AND A NEW BUILDING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED.

THE LAND USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED USES, THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND THE SPE ONE ZONING.

BECAUSE OF THE SITE PLAN NATURE OF THE SITE, THE CHANGE IS REQUIRED TO COME BACK THROUGH THE ZONING PROCESS VERSUS JUST A SIMPLE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. SO THIS IS THE ADOPTED SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2019 SHOWING THE OFFICE SHOWROOM USES THE BUILDING THE BROWN BUILDING WAS THE TWO BUILDINGS HERE WERE GOING

[01:35:01]

TO BE REHABBED AND REMODEL THE PROPOSED USES.

THAT WILL CHANGE.

THEY'LL BE LIMITED C-2 USES ON THE FRONT BUILDING.

SO IT'D BE THIS BUILDING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND THIS 57,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT TWO BUILDING THE C-2 USES THAT ARE WOULD ALLOW THE C-1 AND THE O1 USES IN YOUR PACKET.

A NUMBER OF USES HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED FROM THE WL ONE AND CAN REFERENCE THAT IF NEEDED.

BUT SUCH USES AN OFFICE SUCH AS CHAMBERS, COMMERCE, SAVINGS AND LOAN UTILITY OFFICES, COMMUNITY FACILITIES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE O ONE. THE C ONE WOULD ALLOW A LIMITED SIT DOWN RESTAURANT UP TO 2500 SQUARE FEET OR 2000 SQUARE FEET.

SO A SIT DOWN RESTAURANT WOULD BE ALLOWED.

AND THEN THE C TWO USES, THEY'VE ELIMINATED MOST OF THOSE USES.

BUT SOME USES THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR INCLUDE BAKERY, BICYCLE SHOP, FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, DRY CLEANERS WOULD BE INDICATIVE OF THE TYPE OF USES THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED.

IN ADDITION TO THOSE C TWO USES OFFICE SHOWROOM.

OFFICE WAREHOUSE IS BEING REQUESTED AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE SALES AND SERVICE, NOT TO INCLUDE ANY OUTDOOR SALES OR SERVICE OR STORAGE AREAS BEING REQUESTED.

SO THIS WOULD BE LIKE THE MOTORCYCLE SHOP WHERE THEY DO HAVE SOME INDOOR CELLS AND THEN A SMALL AREA THAT'S ALLOCATED FOR INDOOR TYPE OF MAINTENANCE RETAIL CELLS WITH OPERATION OF OFFICE SHOWROOM AND THE RETAIL CELLS WILL BE AUXILIARY TO THE OPERATION AND THEN LABORATORY CHEMICAL, GENERAL ANALYSIS, PHYSICAL TESTING OF THE TYPES OF USES THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED.

THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE BUILDING.

THIS RED LINE SHOWS A FENCE THAT WILL SURROUND THIS PORTION OF THE SITE.

THE USES PERMITTED WOULD BE GARAGE AND STORAGE MAINTENANCE.

PERSONAL VEHICLE HOBBY SHOPS FOR PERSONAL USE WOULD BE THE USES THAT WOULD REMAIN AND COULD BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS APPROVED IN THE 2019 ZONING AND SITE PLAN. LOT FOR THE GREEN SPACE HERE, WHICH IS A 57,000 SQUARE FEET PLUS THAT WILL REMAIN. IS PASSIVE RECREATION, OPEN SPACE.

THERE WILL BE AN EASEMENT THAT WILL BE DEDICATED FOR A FUTURE TRAIL ALONG THE CREEK AREA.

IF DEVELOPED BY THE CITY AND THEN THE CI ONE PIECE, WHICH IS ON THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, THERE WILL BE A COMMENT THAT THERE WILL BE AN ACCESS ACROSS THE DRIVE NOT TO LAND LIKE THAT, BUT THE ONE ZONING WOULD STAY IN PLACE AT THE P AND Z.

THE APPLICANT INDICATED THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO EITHER SELL TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY OWNERS OR BUT THERE'S NO PLANS TO DEVELOP THAT PIECE.

BUT THE EXISTING ZONING WOULD REMAIN ON THAT.

WHAT'S CALLED LOT FIVE, THE BUILDING AREA WHICH YOU SEE IN HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW, WILL JUST BE REDUCED SLIGHTLY, JUST A LITTLE MORE THAN 100 SQUARE FEET.

AND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED? AGAIN, WE HAVE ALL THE USES AND WE CAN GET IN THIS IF NEEDED.

THIS IS A FIRST READING, BUT THE PERMITTED USES AND THEN THE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCES THE SAME VARIANCES THAT WERE APPROVED WITH THE FIRST THE FIRST READING AND THEN THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS APPROVED DURING THE PREVIOUS ZONING.

THIS IS A LANDSCAPE PLAN.

YOU CAN SHOW THE THEY'LL HAVE A BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS, LANDSCAPING THROUGH THE SITE, AND THEN THIS AREA WILL REMAIN UNDISTURBED.

THIS IS THE ELEVATIONS.

AND PROPOSED MATERIAL COLORS OF THE NEW BUILDING ON THE NORTH SIDE.

THEN A COUPLE OF STREET VIEWS.

THERE IS ONE OPPOSED OPPOSITION FROM A NEIGHBOR IN SIENA TO THE WEST.

THE PLAINS ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL SEVEN ZERO WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE LOT FOUR MAIN THE PASSIVE OPEN SPACE.

[01:40:09]

THAT WAS ALWAYS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANT, BUT THEY DID ADD IT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AS PART OF THIS FIRST READING FOR COUNCIL, SO I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. YEAH.

DIRECTOR BAKER. SO THIS IS REALLY NOT THAT MANY CHANGES TO THE ACTUAL SITE PLAN.

THIS IS MORE ABOUT ADDING A FEW USES TO A FEW PARTICULAR BUILDINGS.

SO I TALKED A LOT JUST TO ADD USES TO THE TO THE ZONING.

YOU WERE VERY THOROUGH, THOUGH.

YOU CAN TALK AS MUCH AS YOU WANT TO DRAW IN YOUR BAKER FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS.

NO, THAT'S YEAH.

OKAY. AND JUST TO REITERATE, MAKE SURE I HEARD THIS RIGHT.

THE VARIANCE THAT THE VARIANCES THAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ARE THE SAME VARIANCES THAT WE APPROVED THREE YEARS AGO, THREE YEARS AGO, FOUR YEARS AGO, 2019, AS WELL AS THE TREE PRESERVATION.

THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE SAME, RIGHT? A SLIGHT MODIFICATION ON THE CORE LOTS, BUT YES, SAME SAME PLAN.

OKAY. AND I MEAN, I THINK P AND Z MADE A GOOD CHANGE AS FAR AS PUTTING IT IN THE DEVELOPING AGREEMENT THAT FOUR IS GOING TO REMAIN PASSIVE OPEN SPACE.

YES, SIR. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OAK? THANK YOU, SIR. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? MR. CURTIS. YOU KNOW THE DRILL, SIR.

COME ON DOWN. THANK YOU.

MAYOR. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS CURTIS YOUNG WITH THE SAGE GROUP.

1130 NORTH CARROLL HERE IN SOUTHLAKE.

AS DIRECTOR BAKER MENTIONED, THIS IS LARGELY WHAT WAS SOME OF YOU REMEMBER WAS APPROVED THREE YEARS AGO.

THE ONLY DIFFERENCE REALLY BEING THAT WE DECIDED THE BUILDINGS ALONG THE NORTH WOULD BE BETTER OFF REMOVED AND THE EXISTING BUILDING AND REPLACED WITH A BRAND NEW BUILDING THERE, BASICALLY IN THE SAME LOCATION, SAME SIZE AND A LONG DAVIS.

YOU KNOW, THREE YEARS HAVE GONE ON.

WE'RE LOOKING FOR HIGHER USES ALONG THERE.

SO WE'VE REVISED THAT BUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE THE HIGHER USES.

IT MADE IT A LITTLE BIT SMALLER, ADDED SOME PARKING.

SO THAT'S BASICALLY IT.

IF YOU HAVE ANY DETAILED QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.

COUNCIL ANY QUESTIONS? YOU KNOW, IT SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

WE'RE EXCITED TO SEE SOME MOVEMENT ON THE SITE.

THAT'S GREAT. THAT'D BE GREAT.

ABSOLUTELY. OKAY.

THANK YOU, SIR. THANKS. ITEM SEVEN IS A FIRST READING, SO IT'S NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.

BUT IF ANYBODY IS HERE TO SPEAK, I'M CERTAINLY HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A COMMENT.

WELL, IF THAT IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTION FOR STAFF FOR DISCUSSION COUNCIL HONESTLY SEEMS REALLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

OKAY. WELL, IF NO MORE DISCUSSION, I'LL TAKE A MOTION HERE IN COUNCIL.

I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM SEVEN.

AYE. OTHERWISE REFERRED TO AS ORDINANCE NUMBER 480763A ZA 220029 FIRST READING WHEELHOUSE GARAGES LLC IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE AND SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE TO THE MASONRY ORDINANCE ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 6C602 603601A JESSE G ALLEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 18 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND LOCATED AT 883 950 DAVIS BOULEVARD, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.

CURRENT ZONING SP ONE DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT REQUESTING CHANGE TO SP ONE DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT SUBJECT TO THE REVISED STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 9TH, 2022, AND THE REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY DATED JULY 29, 2022. IS THERE A NUMBER ON THAT CAN SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY WAS THERE A NUMBER WAS NUMBER TWO.

SO IT'S REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY NUMBER TWO, DATED JULY 29, 2022, AND APPROVING THE PREVIOUS VARIANCES THAT WERE APPROVED IN CASE A190033. AND THOSE VARIANCES ARE TO FIRST TO THE DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE NUMBER 634 AS AMENDED SECTION 5.2 DH REGARDING STACKING DEPTH TO A MINIMUM OF 33 FEET FOR THE ENTRANCE FROM DAVIS BOULEVARD VARIANCE TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NUMBER 483 AS AMENDED SECTION 8.01.8 REGARDING LOTS ABUTTING A STREET TO ALLOW THE LOTS AS SHOWN ON THE SIDE PLAN APPROVING A VARIANCE OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NUMBER 483 AS AMENDED SECTION 8.01.

D REGARDING SIDE LOT LINES TO ALLOW THE LOTS AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN APPROVING A VARIANCE TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NUMBER 483 AS AMENDED AND THE MASTER PATHWAYS PLANNED TO PROVIDE AN EASEMENT FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE NEEDS BUT NOT REQUIRE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EIGHT FOOT MULTI-USE TRAIL RUNNING NORTH SOUTH THROUGH THE FLOODPLAIN AND LOT SIX, AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN APPROVING VARIANCE TO THE DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE NUMBER 634 AS AMENDED SECTION 5.1, WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 500 FEET, 500 FOOT DRIVEWAY SPACING FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS ALONG FM 1938 TO ALLOW THE SPACINGS OF 154 FEET IN 423 FEET AS SHOWN AND FINALLY

[01:45:02]

APPROVING A VARIANCE TO MASONRY ORDINANCE 557A THERE'S A MOTION AS THERE.

SECOND, SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

YOU KNOW, CRAIG, I AM 74.

SO READING PAST THE SEVEN ZERO.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL SEE YOU GUYS IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NINE B, WHICH IS MSRP 20 20001 MASTERMIND PLAN FOR THE US SPY SOUTHLAKE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED 905 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD.

[9. B. MSP22-0001, Master Sign Plan for the USPI Southlake Medical Office Building located at 905 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. ]

RICHARD BAKER MAYOR COUNCIL.

THIS IS A MASTER PLAN PROPOSAL FOR THE NEW 25 K BUILDING THAT'S BEING BUILT IN FRONT OF THE EXISTING BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE BUILDING ON TOWER PLAZA 1709.

THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING.

YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN IT UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

THIS IS A EXHIBIT SHOWING THE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE BUILDING.

THE WHAT'S LABELED CL ONE B IS A BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE SIGNAGE.

THE SEAL THREE AND SEAL TWO ARE HOLDING SPACES FOR FUTURE TENANTS, WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE NORTH FACADE.

THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE SURGICAL SOUTHLAKE SIDE FACING TOWER PLAZA THAT'S SHOWING SEAL ONE A AND THEN A HOLDING SPOT FOR FUTURE TENANTS SIGN ON THAT EAST SIDE.

THE AD IS THE ADDRESS SIGN WHICH IS PERMITTED IT'S A IT'S JUST A ADDRESS ON THE BUILDING THAT'S VISIBLE FROM 1709. SO I'LL GO OVER THE.

EACH SIGN THAT'S BEING PROPOSED.

BUT THESE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHOWING THE SIGN.

THE NORTH ELEVATION IS THE ELEVATION THAT'S FACING 1709 AND THIS IS THE BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE SIGN.

AND THEN THERE'S TWO JUST AREAS THAT ARE DELINEATED ON THE BUILDING FOR FUTURE TENANT SIGNS AND LOGO.

AND THEN ON THE TOWER PLAZA SIDE OF THE EAST ELEVATION SAME BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE WITH A TEN A SIGN LOCATED JUST BELOW THAT THE AREA FACING TOWER PLAZA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING FACING THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT'S A LOT OF MECHANICAL TYPE EQUIPMENT IN THAT AREA.

SO THIS IS THE ADDRESS SIGN.

905. THIS IS BEING PROPOSED ON THE THE SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD SIDE.

IT'S ILLUMINATED.

A FIVE SQUARE FOOT ADDRESS SIGN.

SO THIS IS THE BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE SIGN.

THEY'RE ASKING ON THE NORTH ELEVATION OF 1709.

THE VARIANCES ARE WHAT DOESN'T LINE UP WITH THE SIGN ORDINANCE IS THAT, ONE, YOU NEED APPROVAL BY COUNCIL FOR ANY UPPER STORY SIGN.

THERE IS AN OFFSET FROM THE MIDDLE 75% OF THE ARTICULATED PLANE.

THE LETTER HEIGHT IS 22 INCHES IS BEING PROPOSED ON THE BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE.

THE TAGLINE IS JUST OVER EIGHT INCHES.

MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT PERMITTED.

IT IS 18 INCHES.

THE LOGO HEIGHT IS 47 INCHES.

AND A SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDATION WAS THAT THE LOGO MATCHED THE LOGO THAT WAS APPROVED ON THE LARGER BUILDING TO THE SOUTH. AND SO THE LOGO SIGN HAS BEEN REDUCED AS WELL AS THE SIGN AREA SINCE THE SIGN BOARD HAS REVIEWED THIS AND MADE A RECOMMENDATION.

AND YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT SIDE WHAT'S REQUIRED BY 704 J OR EXISTING SIGN ORDINANCE.

THESE ARE ALSO DAYTIME WILL SHOW UP AS A BLUE CHANNEL CUT LETTERS AND THEN WITH THE HALO LIGHT THEY'LL SHOW UP AS A WHITE LIGHT LETTERING AT NIGHT AS SHOWN ON THE BOTTOM PART.

THEY'RE ASKING FOR A SIMILAR SIGN ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AND YOU CAN SEE THE COMPARISON HERE AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION.

IN ADDITION, ON THE FIRST FLOOR, THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING FOR TWO HOLDING PLACES FOR FUTURE TENANT SIGNS.

THE VARIANCES ARE THE OFFSET FROM THE LOCATION WITHIN THE ARTICULATED PLANE.

THE LETTER HEIGHT IS REQUESTED 22 INCHES.

18 INCHES IS ALLOWED BY ORDINANCE MAXIMUM LOGO HEIGHT 27.5.

[01:50:06]

22.5 IS ALLOWED BY ORDINANCE AND THEN 85 SQUARE FOOT MAXIMUM TOTAL AREA, 42 SQUARE FEET. WITH THE MASTER SIGN PLAN, THEY WOULD BE LIMITED TO THE SIGNS THAT ARE SHOWN WITH THE APPROVAL AND THEN ANY ADDITIONAL SIGNS WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE MASTER SIGN PLAN PROCESS.

AND SO THEN ALSO ONE, THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION, THE TWO SIGNS AND THEN ON THE EAST ELEVATION, A SIMILAR AREA SIGN SHOWN BUT ONLY A SINGLE SIGN SHOWN ON THE TOWER PLAZA SIDE.

THESE ARE JUST SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE.

THERE ARE MONUMENT SIGNS, BUT THE APPLICANT INDICATED AT THE SIGNBOARD THAT THEY DON'T HAVE RIGHT OR ACCESS TO THE THE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGNS ALONE TOWER.

THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL MONUMENT SIGNS BEING PROPOSED WITH THIS APPLICATION.

THESE ARE THE APPROVAL ON THE LARGER BUILDING TO THE SOUTH.

AGAIN, THE SIGNBOARD RECOMMENDATION WAS THAT THE LOGO SIZE MATCH WHAT WAS APPROVED ON THE LARGER BUILDING TO THE SOUTH? IS THAT A PHOTO PICKER? YES, THAT'S EXISTING, RIGHT? YES, SIR. THAT'S THE BIGGER BUILDING FOR YOURSELF.

AND SO THESE ARE THE SIGNS THAT ARE APPROVED ON THAT BUILDING.

AGAIN THE SIGNBOARD OF PROOF SIX ZERO AND NOTING THAT THE BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE SIGNS APPROVED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF LOGO AND THE LOGO SIZE NEEDS TO BE SAME AS THE WHAT THEY SAID THE BACK BUILDING.

AND THEY APPROVED THE FUTURE TENANT SIGNS AS REQUESTED.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, SIR. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? DID THE APP AND THE APP REQUEST TO CANCEL.

ARE THEY MIRRORING WHAT THE SAME BOARD RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED AT THIS POINT? I'M SORRY. ARE THEY MIRRORING WHAT THE SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDED? YES. YES, SIR. THEY CHANGED THE LOGO SIZE TO REFLECT THE SIGN BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION.

SO THEY'RE OKAY WITH WHAT THE SIGN BOARD PUT FORTH? YES, SIR. OKAY.

OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? COME ON DOWN. SIR, IF YOU COULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

YEAH, I'M WITH UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS.

OUR CORPORATE OFFICES AT 14201 DALLAS PARKWAY IN DALLAS.

AND I DON'T HAVE A WHOLE LOT EXTRA TO OFFER JUST TO SAY THAT THE INTENT WAS TO MATCH THE SIGNAGE THAT WAS ON THE EXISTING BUILDING.

AND SO WE'RE COMPLETELY ON BOARD WITH REDUCING THE LOGO JUST A LITTLE BIT TO MATCH WHAT WAS THERE, THE SURGICAL FACILITIES IS ALL ON THE SECOND FLOOR.

AND THAT'S WHY WE'VE GOT THE TWO UPPER STORY SIGNS FOR THAT.

AND THEN THERE'S SOME ADDITIONAL TENANT SPACE THAT'S ON THE FIRST FLOOR THERE WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO PRESERVE SOME SPOTS FOR TENANTS TO HAVE SOME SIGNAGE.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR YOU? YES, SIR. GOOD QUICK QUESTION WHILE WE HAVE YOU HERE, WILL THIS SERVES A SIMILAR PURPOSE TO WHAT YOUR SURGERY CARE OVER IN GRAPEVINE DOES RIGHT NOW.

THIS IS ACTUALLY A REPLACEMENT FACILITY FOR THE BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE SURGERY CARE GRAPEVINE.

OH GOOD. YEAH, BECAUSE THAT'S A THAT'S KIND OF A DATED BUILDING OVER THERE.

SO THIS WOULD REALLY BE A NICE UPGRADE FOR IT WAS TIME TO KIND OF REMODEL OR RELOCATE AND WE CHOSE TO RELOCATE.

AND SO THESE ARE ALL DAY PROCEDURES ARTHROSCOPIC.

A LOT OF THAT TYPE OF WORK, CORRECT? YEAH. OUTPATIENT SURGERY.

THAT'S GREAT. WONDERFUL.

YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. WE'LL CALL YOU BACK IF WE NEED TO.

OKAY. SO ITEM NINE B IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, BUT IF THERE'S ANYBODY HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE SIDE, I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ONE.

OK SEEING NONE COUNCIL.

IS THERE A ANY CONVERSATION? ARE WE OKAY WITH WHAT THE SIGN BOARD RECOMMENDED? MM HMM. IT SEEMS LIKE THE APPLICANT IS, SO IT'S A LOT BETTER THAN THE EXISTING BILL.

DO YOU REMEMBER THAT ONE? WE HAD ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE.

YES. HEARINGS ON THAT SIGN PACKAGE.

SO THIS IS A WELCOME REPRIEVE FROM THAT.

IT'S TAKING SOME GUIDANCE.

THAT'S RIGHT. FACE VALUE.

MUCH BETTER. MUCH BETTER.

AGREED. NO DISCUSSION.

WE'LL TAKE A MOTION. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

I'LL MOVE THAT. WE APPROVE ITEM NINE BE OTHERWISE REFERRED TO AS MSSP 22-0001 MASTER SIGNED PLAN FOR THE USP SOUTHLAKE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 905 E SOUTH LAKE BOULEVARD, SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST NINTH, 2022, AND NOTING THAT TONIGHT WE'RE APPROVING THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SIGNED BOARD.

[01:55:01]

OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE? ALL RIGHT. ITEM NINE B PASSES SEVEN ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

AND WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NINE C, MSP 22-0002 MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR DISTRICT 114 LOCATED AT 2102 EAST STATE

[9. C. MSP22-0002, Master Sign Plan for District 114 located at 2102 E. SH 114, Southlake, Texas.]

HIGHWAY 114. DIRECTOR BAKER, MEMBERS COUNCIL.

THIS IS A MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR THE NEW DISTRICT 114 BUILDING.

THIS AERIAL VIEW SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING JUST TO THE EAST OF CHERRY LANE AND WEST OF KIMBALL.

SOME VIEWS OF THE BUILDING FROM VARIOUS DIRECTIONS.

THE A NUMBER OF SIGNS ARE ON THE SHOWN ON THE EXHIBIT.

BUT TO JUST TRY TO CONDENSE IT MAYBE QUICKLY FOR YOU, THERE ARE THREE UPPER STORY SIGNS WHICH ARE IDENTIFIED AS D FOUR.

THAT'S THE FURY ATHLETICS SIGN.

THE NEXT UPPER FLOOR SIGN IS ON THE IS D SEVEN, WHICH IS A TEXAS SECURITY AND THAT'S ON THE WESTERN FACADE FACING CHERRY AVENUE OR CHERRY LANE.

AND THEN THE D EIGHT, WHICH IS AN UPPER FLOOR OF THE TRINITY INVESTORS SIGN.

SO THERES THREE UPPER STORY SIGNS, THERE'S ONE FIRST FLOOR BUILDING SIGN, THE TEXAS SECURITY BANK, WHICH IS THE LOBBY ENTRANCE AS YOU'RE GOING INTO STARBUCKS.

AND SO THERE'S FOUR SIGNS ON THE BUILDING, THREE UPPER FLOOR, ONE FIRST FLOOR.

THE REMAINDER OF THESE SIGNS ARE DIRECTIONAL OR AN INTERIOR TYPE OF SIGN.

AND SO THESE ARE ALL IDENTIFIED AND HAVE TO BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE MASTER SIGN PLAN.

BUT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FOUR BUILDING SIGNS.

THERE ARE EXISTING SIGNS IN THE FIRST FLOOR ASSOCIATED WITH THE STARBUCKS, WHICH YOU RECENTLY APPROVED.

AND THEN BY RIGHT, THE NOW, WHICH IS A MASSAGE THERAPY TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT AND THEN ROUTES AND WATER AND WINE HAVE SIGNAGE WHICH WILL SHOW IN THE PRESENTATION.

THERE'S ONE OFF SIDE DIRECTIONAL SIGN WHICH IS IDENTIFIED IN THE ORANGE THAT'S PART OF THE DISTRICT 114 BUT WE'LL GO THROUGH EACH OF THE SIGNS QUICKLY.

K THREE IS A DIRECTIONAL SIGN WHICH PROVIDES DIRECTION TO THE CAMBRIA DELIVERIES, PARKING GARAGE AND OFFICES.

THIS IS A FOUR FIVE BY FOUR SIGN, FIVE FEET IN HEIGHT, FOUR FEET IN WIDTH THE BUILDING SIDE, THE D FOUR IS THE VERY ATHLETIC SIGN WITH THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN A HEIGHT 69.5 INCHES.

AND THEN YOU SEE THE LETTER HEIGHT FOR THE WORD FURY AND THE TAGLINE IS JUST OVER A FOOT IN HEIGHT, WIDTH, AND THAT'LL BE ON THE EASTERN FACADE THAT'LL BE ABOVE WHERE THE STARBUCKS PATIO IS LOCATED FACING 114 AND THE DRIVE ENTRANCE INTO THE THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND THIS IS A BLACK WITH A REVERSE ILLUMINATED CHANNEL TYPE SIGN D FIVE IS THE TEXAS SECURITY.

THIS IS ACTUALLY AN INTERIOR SIGN.

SO IF YOU'VE BEEN TO THE NEW STARBUCKS, YOU CAN WALK INTO THAT LOBBY.

STARBUCKS IS TO THE RIGHT.

TEXAS SECURITY WILL BE TO THE LEFT.

THE ONLY REASON THIS IS BEFORE YOU IS BECAUSE IT'S A LESS THAN TEN FEET FROM THE WINDOW.

IT'S CONSIDERED A EXTERIOR WINDOW TYPE OF SIGN AND WILL NEED APPROVAL BY COUNCIL.

THE SAME SIDE WAS FOUR FEET BACK.

IT WOULDN'T EVEN NEED APPROVAL BY COUNCIL, BUT IT'S TOTALLY INSIDE LOBBY AREA AND PROVIDES DIRECTION TO THAT RETAIL BANKING PORTION.

THE D SIX IS THE TEXAS SECURITY SIGN, WHICH STARBUCKS IS TO THE RIGHT, AND IT'LL MARK THE RETAIL FUNCTION OF THE BANK.

THEY WILL ALSO HAVE SOME OFFICES ON THE UPPER FLOOR AS WELL AS AN UPPER FLOOR SIGN.

YOU CAN SEE THE DIMENSIONS ON THAT SIGN.

D SEVEN IS THE UPPER STORY TEXAS SECURITY BANK AND THAT'LL BE ON THEIR EASTERN

[02:00:03]

FACADE. THE PARKING GARAGE IS BEHIND IT, BUT THAT WILL BE FACING CHERRY LANE.

LET'S SEE THE MENTIONS.

THE TREATY INVESTMENT SIGN IS THE THIRD UPPER STORY SIGN AND WITH DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT SIGNBOARD THAT WIDTH WAS REDUCED TO 55 FEET AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE WAS REDUCED TO 148 SQUARE FEET ON THAT PARTICULAR SIGN.

AND THE APPLICANT OFFERED THAT UP DURING DISCUSSIONS WITH THE SIGNBOARD.

AND SIGNBOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

THAT SIGNED NINE IS A MOBILE ORDER SIGN.

SO THIS WILL BE IN FRONT OF THE STARBUCKS.

THE NEW STARBUCKS WILL BE A PARKING TYPE SIGN.

THE D10 IS A WAYFINDING OR DIRECTIONAL TYPE SIGN.

IT'LL BE ON THE EXISTING WALL THAT SURROUNDS THE PARK AREA, IDENTIFYING THE PLAZA AND DELIVERY AREA. BUT THAT WILL BE MOUNTED ON THE WALL.

IT'LL BE A POWDER COATED TYPE OF STEEL WILL NOT BE INTERNALLY ELIMINATED.

THE D 11 IS A DIRECTIONAL IDENTIFIER DISTRICT 114 PLAZA AND THEY'LL BE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GATE FROM THE STARBUCKS LOGO SIGN THAT YOU ALL PROVED A FEW MONTHS AGO.

BUT YOU CAN SEE IT IN THE RENDERING ON THE FENCE.

THIS WILL BE A JUST A VIDEO SURVEILLANCE AND KIND OF A REGULATION TYPE SIGN. THIS SIDE TYPE OF SIGN DOESN'T NEED APPROVAL BY COUNCIL.

THE APPLICANT JUST SHOWED IT, BUT IT'S EXEMPT FROM SIGN ORDERS REGULATIONS.

BUT THAT'LL BE MOUNTED TO THE RIGHT ARMED PORTION OF THE FENCE GOING INTO THE PARK.

THESE ARE PARKING GARAGE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AS WELL AS THE RESTAURANT AND OFFICE VISITOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE JUST TO BE ON THE WEST SIDE D 13.

THESE ARE LOW PROFILE MONUMENT TYPE SIGNS, THREE FOOT AND WIDTH NOT TO EXCEED FIVE FEET AND THEN D 14 AGAIN DIRECTIONAL SIDE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING LEADING INTO THE GARAGE PARKING AREAS.

AND THEN A THIRD WAYFINDING SIDE D 15.

THE SHOW. I HAVE OTHER SIGNS I CAN GO THROUGH.

MAYOR. I KNOW. I'LL BE GLAD TO SHOW HIM THE DISTRICT IF YOU'D LIKE ME TO.

BUT WE DO HAVE THOSE AVAILABLE IF YOU'D LIKE TO.

THANK YOU. QUICKLY, JUST SOME OF THE OTHER APPROVALS VARIANCES IN KIMBLE PARK.

THIS IS THE SIGN STARBUCKS SIGNAGE THAT WAS APPROVED A FEW MONTHS AGO.

AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE EXISTING FIRST FLOOR TENANTS SIGNS FROM.

114. THAT CONCLUDES PRESENTATION.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? DIRECTOR BAKER, WITH THIS SLIDE THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT WITH THE FURY ATHLETICS, BEYOND THAT FAÇADE RIGHT THERE, THE GRAY OR ON THE OTHER SIDE, IT'LL BE ON THE EAST FAÇADE.

SO IT'LL BE THIS FAÇADE.

THAT'S IF YOU CAN SEE THE ARROW.

OKAY, LET ME JUST GET THEM A LITTLE BIT BETTER.

GREAT. SO IT'LL BE ON THIS FAÇADE.

SO IT'S ABOVE KIND OF WHERE THE STARBUCKS PATIO IS LOCATED? YES, CORRECT. YOU SAID 114.

AND I'M LIKE, WELL, THAT'S KIND OF VISIBLE.

I MEAN, JUST KIMBALL 114.

IT'S KIND OF A GOOD CORNER.

THANK YOU. SO LET'S SEE SPECIFICS ON IT.

DIRECTOR BAKER, IS THIS SIMILAR IN SCOPE TO THE MASTER PACKAGE WE APPROVED FOR THE OTHER ONE ON KIMBALL PARK, THE OTHER BUILDING? YES, SIR. AGAIN, IT'S REALLY ONLY FOR BUILDING SIGNS.

YOU GOT THREE AND THEN YOU GOT ONE ON THE FIRST FLOOR, BUT YOU'LL HAVE THREE UPPER STORY SIGNS IS WHAT'S THERE'S AT LEAST THAT MANY ON THE KELLER WILLIAMS BUILDING, AREN'T THERE.

I'M SORRY. THERE ARE AT LEAST THREE ON THE KELLER WILLIAMS BUILDING, AREN'T THERE? [INAUDIBLE].

SO THERE'S THESE HAVE BEEN A PERIOD OF ROBINSON IN THE CITY AND YOU GOT THE KELLER WILLIAMS.

[02:05:03]

YEAH. SO THAT'S AT LEAST THREE.

SO IT'S A SIMILAR IN STYLE AND SCOPE.

YES, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? MR. MEDICI.

YOU KNOW THE DRILL SIR. 22120 SHY AND PARK LANE.

NORMALLY I HAVE A LONG WINDED PRESENTATION, BUT GIVEN THE LATENESS OF THE HOUR AND THE FACT THAT KEN DID A GREAT JOB EXPLAINING ALL THESE DIFFERENT NUMBERS AND LETTERS UP THERE, I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.

AND WE'RE ALL DISAPPOINTED THAT YOU DON'T HAVE.

I'M SURE YOU ARE. BUT I WAS ABOUT TO TURN ON THE THREE MINUTE LIGHT, MY FRIEND.

NO ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THIS POINT? I ACTUALLY HAVE ONE QUESTION. SO THE SIGNAGE AT I THINK IT'S YEAH.

D 12 THE RULES AND SAFETY SIGNAGE YOU KNOW, BECAUSE YOU HAVE THAT UNIQUE, SPACE THERE WITH THE DRAGON AND THE COURTYARD AND ALL THAT.

WHAT HAVE YOU IDENTIFIED AS WHAT YOU'RE MEANING NEEDING TO WARN PEOPLE OR GIVE THEM RULES ABOUT THERE.

WE JUST WANT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN THEY'RE COMING ON TO THE STATE OF TEXAS PARK, THAT THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PLAYING IN THE WATER, THAT THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE CLIMBING UP ON TOP OF THE DRAGON, THAT THE PLACE IS UNDER SURVEILLANCE.

WE HAVE 73 CAMERAS IN DISTRICT 114, AND WE HAVE NINE CAMERAS THAT ARE ON THE DRAGON ITSELF IN THAT AREA.

AND WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT.

WE I AM SHOCKED IN JUST NOW OVER ONE YEAR HOW FEW INCIDENTS WE HAVE HAD IN THAT PARK.

I WAS SCARED TO DEATH A YEAR AGO, WHICH IS WHY WE INVESTED SO HEAVILY IN, YOU KNOW, THE SECURITY AND MAKING SURE THAT IT WAS SURVEILLED APPROPRIATELY.

BUT THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE AND ITS RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN UNBELIEVABLE.

SO I'VE BEEN VERY HAPPY, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW.

SO WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE RULES ARE CLEARLY OUTLINED.

MAKE SENSE. THANK YOU.

DON'T CLIMB ON THE DRAGON.

IT'S GOOD ADVICE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NO, I WAS JUST SAYING THAT MY WIFE INFORMED ME THAT HER FRIEND, PAM'S HUSBAND, HAS A STARBUCKS IN HIS NEW BUILDING.

I'M SORRY? A WHAT? HER FRIEND PAM'S HUSBAND HAS A STARBUCKS IN HIS BUILDING? THAT'S CORRECT. I DIDN'T KNOW THAT.

YES. NO, I DIDN'T KNOW.

I MEAN, SHE WAS LITERALLY TELLING OUR OLDEST WHO IS, YOU KNOW, IS DRIVING.

YEAH. THAT HE HAS A STARBUCKS THERE.

AND I WAS LIKE, OH, I DIDN'T KNOW THAT THERE IS.

SO I'M HAPPY ABOUT THE SIGNAGE BECAUSE AS WE'VE TALKED BEFORE, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO KNOW WHAT'S THERE.

I MEAN, WE SEE THE DRAGON, WE KNOW SOME OF THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE SOME OF THE BUSINESSES THAT ARE THERE.

BUT I THINK IT'S COOL TO FOR PEOPLE TO KNOW THE DEPTH AND BREADTH OF THE BUSINESS OF THE BUSINESSES THAT YOU HAVE THERE.

SO. WELL. AND ALSO, I MEAN, I THINK WE'RE A LITTLE SORT OF LATE COMING IN FRONT OF YOU FOR OUR MASTER SIGN PLAN.

BUT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE, GIVEN THIS BUILDING AND WE DID, I THINK WE DID A REALLY GOOD JOB OF HIDING THE PARKING GARAGE IN THE BACK.

WE DID SUCH A GREAT JOB OF HIDING THE PARKING GARAGE IN THE BACK THAT NOBODY KNOWS THAT THERE'S A PARKING GARAGE BACK THERE.

SO THAT'S WHY MOST OF THOSE SIGNS THAT YOU SEE THERE ARE REALLY SORT OF DIRECTING FOLKS TO SORT OF GET WHERE THEY NEED TO GO BECAUSE THEY'RE HAVING A HARD TIME SORT OF UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE IS A BIG FOUR STORY PARKING GARAGE TUCKED IN BEHIND.

SO IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE THAT FOR SURE.

IN TO YOUR POINT, WE ONLY HAVE THREE UPPER STORY SIGNS, JUST LIKE THE OTHER BUILDING.

AND I'M PRETTY ADAMANT ABOUT ALL THE SIGNS BEING REVERSE ILLUMINATED.

I WANT THEM CLASSY AND ONLY ONE PER FACADE.

SO TO COUNCIL MEMBER LESS, YOU KNOW, CONCERN OR QUESTION THERE, YOU KNOW, THEY'LL JUST BE ONE ON 114, ONE ON CHERRY AND THEN ONE INTERNALLY FACING THE DEVELOPMENT.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO STICKER THIS LIKE A NASCAR BUILDING FOR SURE.

BUT OF COURSE, THE THING THAT MAKES IT A LITTLE DIFFERENT IS, YOU KNOW, WHERE KIMBALL PARK ONLY HAD TWO FIRST STORY SIGNS WITH INDEPENDENCE TITLE AND LIBERTY MUTUAL.

WE DO HAVE A RETAIL COMPONENT TO THIS BUILDING, AND IT'S JUST IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE RETAIL TENANTS WITHOUT HAVING SOME FIRST STORY SIGNAGE.

BUT FOR SURE.

SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO, BUT I DO WANT TO ENLIGHTEN COUNCILMEMBER SMITH AND LET HIM KNOW THAT JEFF MEDICI'S PARTIAL STARBUCKS MUG COLLECTION IS ON DISPLAY AT THE NEW STARBUCKS.

AND IT'S PRETTY COOL.

SO YOU'RE GOING TO NEED TO PAY TO VISIT.

YOU MAY NOT KNOW THIS, BUT ME AND MR. MEDICI SERVED ON THE ZBA FOR FOUR YEARS AND I SAW HIS COLLECTION YEARS AGO.

WELL COUNCIL FIELD TRIP TO STARBUCKS, I CANT WAIT.

IT'S STILL GROWING. IT'S STILL GROWING.

AND IF STARBUCKS HAD IF THEY LET ME, I WOULD HAVE PUT ALL 450 MUGS IN THERE, BUT THEY WOULD NOT.

SO IT'S ALL. ALL RIGHT.

WELL, THANK YOU, MR. MEDICI . I APPRECIATE IT.

SO THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, BUT IF ANYBODY HERE WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NINE C, I'M HAPPY TO TAKE A COMMENT.

SEEING NONE IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION COUNCIL, IS THERE MOTION? YES, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NINE C OTHERWISE REFERRED TO AS MSP22-0002 MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR DISTRICT 114 LOCATED AT 2102

[02:10:07]

EAST STATE HIGHWAY 114 SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 9TH, 2022, IN APPROVING PER THE SIGNED RECOMMENDATIONS.

WE HAVE MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

NINE C PASSES SEVEN ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS WITH THAT MOVE ON TO ITEM NINE, WHICH IS THE 20 20033 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CARILLON PARK DIRECTOR BAKER.

[9. D. ZA22-0033, Preliminary Plat for Carillon Pare on property described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd., 1700 N. Carroll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N. Carroll Ave. by Tarrant Appraisal District) and 100 through 300 E. State Hwy. 114, generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State Hwy. 114. Current Zoning: "ECZ" Employment Center Zoning District. SPIN Neighborhood #3. ]

MAYOR, COUNCIL. THIS REQUEST IS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE CAROLINE PARK.

THE PLAT COVERS 42.51 ACRES AND CONTAINS LOTS FOR MIXED USE.

DEVELOPMENT A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL RETAIL, RESTAURANT OFFICE, HOTEL, RESIDENTIAL LOFTS, LIBRARY, PARCEL FEATURE LIBRARY AND PERFORMANCE ARTS PARKS OPEN SPACE ALL WITHIN THE CARILLON DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE CHAPEL AND STATE HIGHWAY 114.

I THINK COUNCIL IS AWARE OF THE LOCATION.

THIS IS THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

STAFF HAS REVIEWED IT AND DETERMINED THAT THE PARK DEDICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT AND REFLECTS WHAT WAS APPROVED AS PART OF YOUR ZONING.

THE DOES INCLUDE AN OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE PLAN WHICH COULD BE FINALIZED OR CHANGE IN 380.

AGREEMENT DOES INDICATE THE STREETS AND BE LOCATED IN THE SINGLE FAMILY MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.

THERE IS A NOTE THAT THE WANTS THE LIBRARY AND THE PERFORMANCE ART IS LOCATED THAT THERE WILL BE ACCESS PROVIDED TO THAT FACILITY THAT WILL BE DETERMINED AS WE GO THROUGH THE PLANNING OF THOSE TWO FACILITIES.

THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL PLAT OF THE STARK LINE IS A MATCH LINE TO THE COMMERCIAL OR NON RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

AS MENTIONED, STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PARK DEDICATION REFLECTS THE ZONING DOCUMENT IS CONSISTENT.

THERE IS ONE MODIFICATION TO YOUR APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THAT'S THE ALLEY THAT'S BEHIND THE FIVE VILLA LOTS SHOWN ON THE SOUTH EASTERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.